Wear Experiences with Two Soft Contact Lenses for Astigmatism of Different Modalities.

Introduction: Patients expect to have excellent vision and comfort when wearing soft contact lenses. The purpose of this study was to compare the wear experiences of participants with astigmatism when wearing a daily disposable soft toric lens to an established, commonly used reusable toric lens. Methods: In this crossover study, habitual soft toric lens wearers were fit with a daily replacement soft toric lens (delefilcon A) and a reusable, 1-month replacement soft toric lens (comfilcon A) in a randomized order. After 30 days of wear, Visual analog scale (VAS) surveys were used to assess wear experience, including vision and comfort, for overall wear and end-of-day wear. Scores were compared statistically with mixed-effects linear models. Participants also responded to questions about convenience, ease of use, and satisfaction with both lenses and preference questions based upon comfort, vision, and overall performance. Results: Fifty-nine participants completed the multi-site crossover study. VAS scores [mean(std dev)] for overall quality of vision for the delefilcon A [80.4(16.4)] and comfilcon A [66.8(27.7)] lenses were statistically significant (P=0.002). The difference in the mean overall comfort scores for the delefilcon A lenses [71.6(26.3)] and comfilcon A lenses [63.2(28.9)] was 8.4, which exceeds the establish criteria for clinical significance, although not statistically significant (P=0.08). Overall satisfaction scores were 68.8(26.9) for the delefilcon A and 59.7(30.3) for the comfilcon A lenses (P=0.08). Both lenses provided mean binocular visual acuities better than 20/20 Snellen equivalent. Over half of the participants preferred the delefilcon A lenses based upon comfort, vision, and overall performance. Convenience, ease of use, and satisfaction all scored higher with delefilcon A lenses. Conclusion: The results of this study show that wear experience with delefilcon A lenses for astigmatism can meet or exceed that of comfilcon A toric lenses while also providing healthy, daily disposable lens wear.

Wear Experience with a daily disposable soft contact lens for astigmatism in current wearers of a reusable soft toric contact lens.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear experience of satisfied wearers of a particular reusable toric soft contact lens when refit into a water surface technology daily disposable toric soft contact lens. Methods: 30 participants completed the study over three visits. At the first visit, subjects were refit into with their habitual reusable toric soft contact lens (comfilcon A) to maximize fit and vision. Subjects returned after one week and were then refit into the study daily disposable soft contact lenses (verofilcon A) and completed surveys of their initial impressions of comfort, vision, and satisfaction. Participants wore the study lenses for two weeks, and then returned for their final visit to complete a vision and ocular health check. At the final visit, subjects also completed surveys to rate their overall and end-of-day comfort, quality of vision, stability of vision, and dryness using a visual analog scale (VAS). Participants also answered questions about their wear experience with the lenses. Overall median and interquartile range (IQR) of all data and surveys was calculated. Results: Initial impressions of the study lenses revealed a median (IQR) score of 85 (28) for vision, 91 (25) for comfort, and 87 (21) for satisfaction. Overall VAS scores after two weeks of wear found median scores of 93 (16) for quality of vision, 88 (28) for stability of vision, and 91 (20) for comfort. End-of-day median scores were 82(27) for quality of vision, 90 (35) for stability of vision, and 80 (38) for comfort. Overall dryness scores were 20(45) and end-of-day dryness was 39 (46). Median(IQR) binocular logMAR visual acuity with the study lenses was -0.16(0.1). Median rotation of the lenses was 0(4.3) degrees. Conclusion: Participants wearing the daily disposable study lenses for astigmatism gave high scores in vision and comfort both at initial fitting and after two weeks of lens wear. Results showed that satisfied wearers of comfilcon A reusable toric soft contact lenses can be successfully refit with verofilcon A daily disposable contact lenses.

Screening for hyperopia in infants using the PowerRefractor.

PURPOSE: To determine the proportion of infants in a pediatric medical practice who have high levels of hyperopia in addition to evaluating the ability of the PowerRefractor (PR) [with and without accessory +4.50 diopter (D) spectacles] compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy to detect highly hyperopic refractive errors. METHODS: The cycloplegic refractive error (2 drops tropicamide 1% given 5 min apart) of 200 normal birth weight infants was measured by retinoscopy and the Plusoptix PR. If initial readings were ≥ +2.00 D, PR measurement was repeated with accessory +4.50 D spectacles to extend its operating range. Examinations were conducted during well-baby visits at 2 months of age at the office of a local pediatrician group practice. RESULTS: Of the 200 infants, 7.5% had a spherical equivalent refractive error of +5.00 D or more in both eyes. The use of +4.50 D accessory glasses during PowerRefraction significantly improved the ability to detect higher levels of hyperopia. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves that were 0.69 to 0.51 when no glasses were worn improved to 0.87 to 0.98 when the glasses were worn (cutpoints between +3.50 and +5.00 D by retinoscopy). Significant underestimation of higher levels of hyperopia by the PR compared with retinoscopy was eliminated when +4.50 D accessory glasses were worn. CONCLUSIONS: Accessory +4.50 diopter sphere spectacles appeared to successfully extend the operating range of the PR with cycloplegia, allowing for detection of high levels of hyperopia that occurred in a large proportion of 2-month old infants with adequate sensitivity and specificity compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy.