Promoting Disposal of Left-Over Opioids After Surgery in Rural Communities: A Qualitative Description Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients rarely dispose of left-over opioids after surgery. Disposal serves as a primary prevention against misuse, overdose, and diversion. However, current interventions promoting disposal have mixed efficacy. Increasing disposal in rural communities could prevent or reduce the harms caused by prescription opioids. AIMS: Identify barriers and facilitators to disposal in the rural communities of the United States Mountain West region. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative description study with 30 participants from Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. We used a phronetic iterative approach combining inductive content and thematic analysis with deductive interpretation through the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM). RESULTS: We identified four broad themes: (a) awareness, engagement, and education; (b) low perceived risk associated with nondisposal; (c) deciding to keep left-over opioids for future use; and (d) converting decisions into action. Most participants were aware of the importance of disposal but perceived the risks of nondisposal as low. Participants kept opioids for future use due to uncertainty about their recovery and future treatments, breakdowns in the patient-provider relationship, chronic illness or pain, or potential future injury. The rural context, particularly convenience, cost, and environmental contamination, contributes to decisional burden. CONCLUSIONS: We identified PAPM stage-specific barriers to disposal of left-over opioids. Future interventions should account for where patients are along the spectrum of deciding to dispose or not dispose as well as promoting harm-reduction strategies for those who choose not to dispose.

The Influence of Rural Healthcare Systems and Communities on Surgery and Recovery: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Successful recovery after surgery is complex and highly individual. Rural patients encounter greater barriers to successful surgical recovery than urban patients due to varying healthcare and community factors. Although studies have previously examined the recovery process, rural patients' experiences with recovery have not been well-studied. The rural socioecological context can provide insights into potential barriers or facilitators to rural patient recovery after surgery. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of 30 adult general surgery patients from rural areas in the Mountain West region of the United States. We used the socioecological framework to analyze their responses. Interviews focused on rural participants' experiences accessing healthcare and the impact of family and community support during postoperative recovery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: All participants commented on the quality of their rural healthcare systems and its influence on postoperative care. Some enjoyed the trust developed through long-standing relationships with providers in their communities. However, participants described community providers' lack of money, equipment, and/or knowledge as barriers to care. Following surgery, participants recognized that there are advantages and disadvantages to receiving family and community support. Some participants worried about being stigmatized or judged by their community. CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions aimed at improving access to and recovery from surgery for rural patients should take into account the unique perspectives of rural patients. Addressing the socioecological factors surrounding rural surgery patients, such as healthcare, family, and community resources, will be key to improving postoperative recovery.

Are general surgery residents ready to practice? A survey of the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors and Young Fellows Association.

BACKGROUND: General surgery residency training has changed with adoption of the 80-hour work week, patient expectations, and the malpractice environment, resulting in decreased resident autonomy during the chief resident year. There is considerable concern that graduating residents are not prepared for independent surgical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Two online surveys were developed, one for "young surgeons" (American College of Surgeons [ACS] Fellows 45 years of age and younger) and one for "older surgeons" (ACS Fellows older than 45 years of age). The surveys were distributed by email to 2,939 young and 9,800 older surgeons. The last question was open-ended with a request to provide comments. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of all comments was performed. RESULTS: The response rate was 9.6% (282 of 2,939) of young and 10% (978 of 9,800) of older surgeons. The majority of young surgeons (94% [58.7% strongly agree, 34.9% agree]) stated they had adequate surgical training and were prepared for transition to the surgery attending role (91% [49.6% strongly agree, 41.1% agree]). In contrast, considerably fewer older surgeons believed that there was adequate surgical training (59% [18.7% strongly agree, 40.2% agree]) or adequate preparation for transition to the surgery attending role (53% [16.93% strongly agree, 36.13% agree]). The 2 groups' responses were significantly different, chi-square test of association (3) = 15.73, p = 0.0012. Older surgeons focused considerably more on residency issues (60% vs 42%, respectively), and young surgeons focused considerably more on business and practice issues (30% vs 14%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Young and older surgeons' perceptions of general surgery residents' readiness to practice independently after completion of general surgery residency differ significantly. Future work should focus on determination of specific efforts to improve the transition to independent surgery practice for the general surgery resident.

2014 fee schedule and CPT code changes will affect surgical practice.

An overview of provisions in the Medicare physician fee schedule final rule and changes in CPT coding that will affect physician reimbursement in 2014. Key elements of the final rule for the fee schedule center on the potential reduction in payment due to the conversion factor update, payment for in-office procedures, PQRS reporting options, public reporting via CMS' Physician Compare website, and the value-based payment modifier. Fundamental changes in CPT coding affect consultation codes, drainage of skin and subcutaneous structures, complex repair, skin flaps and grafts, breast biopsies and imaging, and other surgery-related codes.