Obesity and Mortality Among Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: Results From an Integrated Health Care Organization.

BACKGROUND: Obesity, race/ethnicity, and other correlated characteristics have emerged as high-profile risk factors for adverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated outcomes, yet studies have not adequately disentangled their effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the adjusted effect of body mass index (BMI), associated comorbidities, time, neighborhood-level sociodemographic factors, and other factors on risk for death due to COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large integrated health care organization. PATIENTS: Kaiser Permanente Southern California members diagnosed with COVID-19 from 13 February to 2 May 2020. MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable Poisson regression estimated the adjusted effect of BMI and other factors on risk for death at 21 days; models were also stratified by age and sex. RESULTS: Among 6916 patients with COVID-19, there was a J-shaped association between BMI and risk for death, even after adjustment for obesity-related comorbidities. Compared with patients with a BMI of 18.5 to 24 kg/m2, those with BMIs of 40 to 44 kg/m2 and greater than 45 kg/m2 had relative risks of 2.68 (95% CI, 1.43 to 5.04) and 4.18 (CI, 2.12 to 8.26), respectively. This risk was most striking among those aged 60 years or younger and men. Increased risk for death associated with Black or Latino race/ethnicity or other sociodemographic characteristics was not detected. LIMITATION: Deaths occurring outside a health care setting and not captured in membership files may have been missed. CONCLUSION: Obesity plays a profound role in risk for death from COVID-19, particularly in male patients and younger populations. Our capitated system with more equalized health care access may explain the absence of effect of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities on death. Our data highlight the leading role of severe obesity over correlated risk factors, providing a target for early intervention. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Roche-Genentech.

Dexamethasone suppressibility and adrenal and ovarian venous effluents of 5α-reduced C19 conjugates in hyperandrogenic women.

Several C19 conjugates, derived via 5α-reductase activity, are putative markers of peripheral androgen action and have been shown to correlate well with various clinical manifestations of androgen excess. While no ovarian vein gradient has been found for androsterone sulfate (ADT-S), androsterone glucuronide (ADT-G), 5α-androstane-3α,17ß-diol sulfate (3α-diol-S), and 5α-androstane-3α,17ß-diol glucuronide (3α-diol-G), the contribution of the adrenal gland to these conjugates has been unclear. Ten hirsute women were treated with 2mg/day dexamethasone (dex) for 7 days to determine the effect of adrenal androgen suppression on 5α-reduced androgen conjugate production. In addition, 11 women with mixed ovarian and adrenal androgen excess of non-neoplastic origin underwent ovarian and adrenal vein catheterization studies in order to assess gradients for the various C19 steroids. These women had significantly higher levels of both unconjugated and conjugated androgens, except for ADT-S, compared to 8 matched normal ovulatory women. After dex treatment, total testosterone (TT), unbound T (UT), androstenedione (A) and DHEAS, all decreased by 31-75%. ADT-S, ADT-G, 3α-diol-S and 3α-diol-G decreased by 48%, 71%, 46% and 68%, respectively. The suppression of the unconjugated androgens correlated highly and significantly with ADT-G. In the 11 patients undergoing adrenal venous catheterization, all patients exhibited a substantial adrenal gradient for TT and A. Of significance, in paired samples of peripheral venous and glandular effluents, no adrenal or ovarian gradient was found for any of the conjugated androgens. The data suggest that because dex suppression significantly decreases levels of the conjugated androgens, they are highly substrate dependent. However, since no adrenal or ovarian vein gradient exists, these markers of the manifestations of androgen excess largely reflect peripheral androgen metabolism.

Age-specific effects of hormone therapy use on overall mortality and ischemic heart disease mortality among women in the California Teachers Study.

OBJECTIVE: Although the Women's Health Initiative trial suggested that menopausal hormone therapy (HT) does not reduce coronary heart disease mortality overall, subsequent results have suggested that there may be a benefit in younger women. The California Teachers Study questionnaire and mortality data were used to examine whether age modified the association between HT and the relative risk of overall mortality and ischemic heart disease deaths. METHODS: Participants from the California Teachers Study were 71,237 postmenopausal women (mean age, 63 y; range, 36-94 y) followed prospectively for mortality and other outcomes from 1995-1996 through 2004. RESULTS: Age at baseline was a much more important modifier of HT effects than was age at start of therapy. Risks for all-cause mortality (n = 8,399) were lower for younger current HT users at baseline than for never users (for women ≤ 0 y: hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.62). These risk reductions greatly diminished, in a roughly linear fashion, with increasing baseline age (for women 85-94 y: hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.10 for all-cause mortality). Similar results were seen for ischemic heart disease deaths (n = 1,464). No additional significant modifying effects of age at first use, duration of use, or formulation were apparent. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that reduced risks of mortality associated with HT use are observed among younger users but not for older postmenopausal women, even those starting therapy close to their time of menopause.

Menopausal hormone therapy and subsequent risk of specific invasive breast cancer subtypes in the California Teachers Study.

BACKGROUND: Although it is well established that combined estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) increases breast cancer risk, questions remain regarding the effect of different formulations of hormones, whether certain women are at particularly high risk, and whether risk varies by tumor subtype. METHODS: We investigated hormone therapy (HT) use in relation to breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort; after a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, 2,857 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed. RESULTS: Compared with women who had never used HT, women who reported 15 or more years of estrogen therapy (ET) use had a 19% greater risk of breast cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.37), whereas women using EPT for 15 or more years had an 83% greater risk (95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.26). Breast cancer risk was highest among women using continuous combined EPT regimens. Risks associated with EPT and ET use were increased with duration of HT use for women with a body mass index (BMI) of <29.9 kg/m(2) but not for women with BMI of >or=30 kg/m(2). Elevated risks associated with EPT and ET use were confined to tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors and those that were HER2+ but were slightly diminished for HER2- tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer risks increased with longer duration of ET and EPT use, and risks were highest for continuous-combined EPT use. Furthermore, risks varied by BMI and tumor subtype. IMPACT: These findings underscore the need for personalized risk-benefit discussions with women contemplating HT use.