RESUMO
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has a benign course in several patients; however, a serious form of this disease can turn into liver failure, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Aim: This study aims to estimate the prevalence of NAFLD in Iran. Method: We searched the following databases from January 2000 to December 2022: Scopus, Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar also a number of Iranian databases, namely MagIran, SID, and Elmnet. Additionally, the quality of the included studies was evaluated through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We estimated heterogeneity between studies using the I2 statistic. Furthermore, we performed a synthesis of prevalence estimates through the random-effects DerSimonian and Laird model across the included studies with a 95% confidence interval. To assess the publication bias, we also used Egger's test. Results: Thirty-one studies were eligible for inclusion. The overall number of participants in the present study was 41,971. The overall prevalence of NAFLD in Iran was 33% [CI: 27-37%], with I2 = 99.7% (P < 0.01). The prevalence was 35% [CI: 27-43%] and 37% [CI: 27-47%] in males and females, respectively. We used Egger's test, and no significant publication bias was identified in the overall prevalence (P = 0.45). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the prevalence of NAFLD in Iran is not only high but alsoa growing trend. Effective strategies for changing lifestyles, changing eating habits, and encouraging physical activities among Iranians are recommended. Also, providing screening tests, especially among high-risk groups, has a significant effect on early diagnosis and NAFLD control.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is being studied and used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to systematically identify, critically evaluate, and summarize the findings of the studies on the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: In this systematic review, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 2019 and 2022. We included all full economic evaluations of remdesivir for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Data were summarized in a structured and narrative manner. RESULTS: Out of 616 articles obtained in this literature search, 12 studies were included in the final analysis. The mean score of the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) for the studies was 87.66 (high quality). All studies were conducted in high-income countries (eight studies in the USA and one study in England), except for three studies from middle-to-high-income countries (China, South Africa, and Turkey). Six studies conducted their economic analysis in terms of a health system perspective; five studies conducted their economic analysis from a payer perspective; three studies from the perspective of a health care provider. The results of five studies showed that remdesivir was cost-effective compared to standard treatment. Furthermore, the therapeutic strategy of combining remdesivir with baricitinib was cost-effective compared to remdesivir alone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the present study, remdesivir appears to be cost-effective in comparison with the standard of care in China, Turkey, and South Africa. Studies conducted in the United States show conflicting results, and combining remdesivir with baricitinib is cost-effective compared with remdesivir alone. However, the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir in low-income countries remains unknown. Thus, more studies in different countries are required to determine the cost-effectiveness of this drug.
