Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias , Psico-Oncologia , Mama , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , OncologiaRESUMO
Psycho-oncology addresses the psychological, social, behavioural, and ethical aspects of cancer. Identification and proper management of the patients' psychosocial needs, as well as the needs of their caregivers and family are essential for a person-centred concept of breast cancer care. The aim of this overview is to describe how psychosocial support in breast cancer is incorporated in cancer-related policy documents, such as national cancer plans and breast cancer care certification schemes.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Política de Saúde , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial , Certificação , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
The European Union Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening suggests the implementation of organised, population-based breast cancer screening programmes based on mammography every other year for women aged 50 to 69years, ensuring equal access to screening, taking into account potential needs for targeting particular socioeconomic groups. A European survey on coverage and participation, and key organisational and policy characteristics of the programmes, targeting years 2010 and 2014, was undertaken in 2014. Overall, 27 countries contributed to this survey, 26 of the 28 European Union member states (92.9%) plus Norway. In 2014, 25 countries reported an ongoing population-based programme, one country reported a pilot programme and another was planning a pilot. In eight countries, the target age range was broader than that proposed by the Council Recommendation, and in three countries the full range was not covered. Fifteen countries reported not reaching some vulnerable populations, such as immigrants, prisoners and people without health insurance, while 22 reported that participation was periodically monitored by socioeconomic variables (e.g. age and territory). Organised, population-based breast cancer screening programmes based on routine mammograms are in place in most EU member states. However, there are still differences in the way screening programmes are implemented, and participation by vulnerable populations should be encouraged.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , União Europeia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Classe Social , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence of hospitalization attributable to psychosis in Spain over the last three decades. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis (1980-2009) of age-adjusted hospital discharges rates associated with psychosis (ICD9 290-8) in all Spanish hospitals. DATA SOURCE: Spanish Hospital Morbidity Survey. RESULTS: The hospitalization rate associated with psychotic episodes had been gradually increasing since 1980 until 2004; an abrupt turnaround observed in 2004 marks the beginning of a steady decline in the rate. The turning point described is not observed for each of the psychotic diagnoses separately analyzed. However, it is clearly seen when data are grouped in diagnosis-related groups (organic-psychosis, functional psychosis and substance-induced psychosis) since the time course of the diseases within the major diagnostic groups are interrelated as evidenced by shared turning points which collectively display a common time course pattern. Main hospital indicators and antipsychotic drug prescriptions were analyzed for any possible turning point in mid-2000s. Psychiatric hospital beds and length of stays remained stable by 2004; the hospitalizations associated with non-psychotic psychiatric pathologies show no turning point in 2004. However, an abrupt change on antipsychotic drug prescriptions is precisely observed in 2004. CONCLUSIONS: After decades of linear growth, hospitalizations for psychotic patients begin to decline in 2004, coinciding with the start of last generation atypical antipsychotic drug consumption in Spain. Some of the psychotic diagnostic rates evolve in an interrelated manner which calls into question the diagnosis and nosological boundaries between some of these pathologies.
Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Transtornos Psicóticos/terapia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , EspanhaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our review analyses the studies that have specifically compared the association iDPP4/metformin with glimepiride/metformin, both in second line pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). METHODS: Systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing glimepiride with any iDPP4, both used together with metformin as a second line treatment of DM2. The effectiveness variables used were as follows: %HbA1c variation, fasting plasma glucose variation, patients achieving the therapeutic objective of HbA1c <7%, treatment dropouts due to lack of effectiveness and rescue treatments needed. The safety variables included were as follows: weight variation at the end of treatment; presentation of any type of adverse event; presentation of serious adverse events; patients who experienced any type of hypoglycaemia; patients who experienced severe hypoglycaemia; treatments suspended due to adverse effects; and deaths for any reason. RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. The group treated with glimepiride showed better results in all effectiveness variables. Regarding safety variables, the main differences observed were in the greater number of cases with hypoglycaemia in the group treated with glimepiride, and the serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to these which occurred in slightly over 2% more cases in this group compared to the iDPP4 group. The remaining adverse events, including mortality, did not show any differences between both groups. The variation in the weight difference between groups (2.1 kg) is not considered clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: A greater effectiveness is seen in the glimepiride/metformin association, which should not be diminished by slight differences in adverse effects, with absence of severe hypoglycaemia in over 98% of patients under treatment. The association of glimepiride/metformin, both due to cost as well as effectiveness and safety, may be the preferential treatment for most DM2 patients, and it offers a potential advantage in refractory hyperglycemic populations, tolerant to treatment.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Dipeptidil Peptidase 4/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: The aim of this study was to present the results from the Monitoring Use Programme (MUP) for endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using stent grafts in Spain, carried out to determine the procedure's effectiveness and safety. METHODS: This was a follow-up study carried out through a multicentric-case registry between 2001-2003. Variables were grouped into: 1) general information, 2) postoperative period and 3) follow-up period. RESULTS: The study enrolled 740 cases (97% males), from 32 hospitals. Mean age of patients was 72.7+/-7.3 years. Mean AAA diameter was 59.5+/-13.7 mm. Forty-seven percent of patients required additional intervention procedures; 19% patients presented intervention complications (53% were endoleaks). The endovascular intervention could not be completed in 6 patients, and in 2 patients the operation was changed to conventional surgery; 24% patients suffered, mostly minor, postoperative complications. Between 4-24 months, follow-up was normal in 81-85% cases with the most common complication being endoleaks (7%). After 24 months, and especially after 37, reinterventions and complications, in particular angulation and stent migration, increased, mainly associated to the Vanguard device. After 37 months, an increase in AAA size was observed. Among patients with preoperative AAA<50 mm, there was a greater proportion of individuals requiring additional procedures (60% vs 41%, P<0.01), suffering postoperative complications (26% vs 24%), and presenting more leaks (71% vs 52%), than among patients with AAA >or= 50 mm. CONCLUSIONS: ER of AAA shows favourable results in the short/medium term with regards to procedure safety and effectiveness. The appearance of some complications and increase in AAA size 2-3 years after ER raises the need for caution. Care should be taken when considering ER of small AAA.