Pulmonary infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving frontline treatment with hypomethylating agents.

Pulmonary infections (PIs) are a major complication of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA). We retrospectively evaluated 147 AML patients treated frontline with HMA in 2 Centers. Total number of HMA cycles was 1397. There were 88 episodes of PI in 64 patients (43.5%). Thirty-five/147 patients at risk (23.8%) developed at least 1 episode of early PI (during cycles 1-2). Median OS in patients who developed early PI was 3.3 months (95% CI 0.8 - 5.8) versus 10.5 months (95% CI 8.4 - 12.7) in patients without PI or with PI beyond the 2nd cycle (p < .001). Early PIs were an independent factor predicting lower survival (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.28 - 2.93; p = .002). In conclusion, early PIs are common in AML patients receiving HMA and are associated with an unfavorable outcome. The results of our study raise the issue of a tailored infection prevention strategy.

Clinical and Prognostic Features of Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparison of 2001 WHO Versus 2008/2016 WHO Criteria in a Large Single-center Cohort.

BACKGROUND: According to 2008/2016 classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), a platelet (PLT) count ≥ 450 × 109/L, reduced from the previously published WHO 2001 indicated level ≥ 600 × 109/L, was considered the new PLT threshold for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To validate this important diagnostic change in a setting of current clinical practice, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and hematologic features at diagnosis and during follow-up of 162 patients with ET, diagnosed in our center from January 2008 to December 2017. We subdivided patients according to PLT value at baseline into Group A (PLT ≥ 600 × 109/L) (124 patients; 76.5%) and Group B (PLT ≥ 450 × 109/L < 600 × 109/L) (38 patients; 23.5%). RESULTS: Among clinical features, only the median value of leukocytes (P < .001) was significantly higher in Group A. Cytostatic treatment was administered in 103 patients, with a significantly higher rate in patients of group A (P < .001). After a median follow-up of 42.4 months (interquartile range, 22.1-70.6 months), 8 thrombotic events were recorded in the entire cohort, without differences between the 2 groups (P = .336). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 96.9% (95% confidence interval, 92.6%-100%), without differences between the 2 groups (P = .255). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a substantial homogeneity among patients with ET regardless of the PLT count at diagnosis, thus confirming the usefulness of the 2008/2016 WHO diagnostic criteria.

PICC-related upper deep venous thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies. Management of anticoagulant therapy according to the platelet count.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for central venous access are frequently used in patients with hematological malignancies. Their use may be complicated by upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT). Additionally, hematological patients are frequently thrombocytopenic and the optimal management of UEDVT in patients with thrombocytopenia is challenging and poorly standardized. We retrospectively analyzed 50 adult patients affected by hematological malignancies who presented a PICC-associated UEDVT. UEDVT treatment was compared in 3 groups: patients with a platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/l (group1) who underwent a therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux 7.5 mg; patients with a platelet count < 50 × 109/l and ≥ 30 × 109/l (group 2) who were treated with a 50% reduced dose of LMWH or fondaparinux 5 mg; patients with platelets < 30 × 109/l (group 3) were observed and treated with anticoagulants when the count was > 30 × 109//l. At the onset of thrombosis, 36 patients were in group 1, 8 in group 2 and 6 in group 3. We observed no hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications related to the anticoagulant therapy; length of treatment was comparable between groups 1 and 2 (51 days group 1 vs 50 days group 2). Reduced doses of LMWH or fondaparinux may represent a safe and effective therapeutic approach in patients with moderate thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 109/l and ≥ 30 × 109/l) and a PICC-associated UEDVT.

Incidence of Clinically Significant (≤10 g/dL) Late Anemia in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) responsive to imatinib, the incidence of clinically significant (CS) late chronic anemia is still unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To highlight this issue, we revised retrospectively 81 CML patients aged >60 years treated at our Institution with front-line imatinib for at least 24 months in durable complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). CS late chronic anemia was defined as the presence of persistent (>6 months) and otherwise unexplained Hb levels ≤10 g/dL, which occurred >6 months from imatinib start. RESULTS: A condition of CS late chronic anemia occurred in 22 out of 81 patients (27.2%) at different intervals from imatinib start. Seven out of 22 patients (31.8%) needed packed red cell transfusions during the follow-up. At diagnosis, patients who developed CS late chronic anemia were significantly older and had a lower Hb median level. Six out of 22 patients with CS late chronic anemia received subcutaneous recombinant alpha-erythropoietin (EPO) at the standard dosage of 40,000 IU weekly: all 6 patients achieved an erythroid response. A significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) in patients with untreated CS late chronic anemia was observed (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: CS late chronic anemia during long-term treatment with imatinib is a common complication in responsive elderly patients, with worse EFS if untreated. Results with EPO are encouraging, but larger studies are warranted to define its role.

Prevalence of chronic pancreatitis: Results of a primary care physician-based population study.

BACKGROUND: Data on chronic pancreatitis prevalence are scanty and usually limited to hospital-based studies. AIM: Investigating chronic pancreatitis prevalence in primary care. METHODS: Participating primary care physicians reported the prevalence of chronic pancreatitis among their registered patients, environmental factors and disease characteristics. The data were centrally reviewed and chronic pancreatitis cases defined according to M-ANNHEIM criteria for diagnosis and severity and TIGAR-O classification for etiology. RESULTS: Twenty-three primary care physicians participated in the study. According to their judgment, 51 of 36.401 patients had chronic pancreatitis. After reviewing each patient data, 11 turned out to have definite, 5 probable, 19 borderline and 16 uncertain disease. Prevalence was 30.2/100.000 for definite cases and 44.0/100.000 for definite plus probable cases. Of the 16 patients with definite/probable diagnosis, 8 were male, with mean age of 55.6 (±16.7). Four patients had alcoholic etiology, 5 post-acute/recurrent pancreatitis, 6 were deemed to be idiopathic. Four had pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, 10 were receiving pancreatic enzymes, and six had pain. Most patients had initial stage and non-severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating the prevalence of chronic pancreatitis in primary care. Results suggest that the prevalence in this context is higher than in hospital-based studies, with specific features, possibly representing an earlier disease stage.