Iloprost and Organ Dysfunction in Adults With Septic Shock and Endotheliopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Soluble thrombomodulin is a marker of endotheliopathy, and iloprost may improve endothelial function. In patients with septic shock, high plasma levels of soluble thrombomodulin (>10 ng/mL) have been associated with worse organ dysfunction and mortality. Objective: To assess the effects of treatment with iloprost vs placebo on the severity of organ failure in patients with septic shock and plasma levels of soluble thrombomodulin higher than 10 ng/mL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigator-initiated, adaptive, parallel group, stratified, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted between November 1, 2019, and July 5, 2022, at 6 hospitals in Denmark. The trial had a maximum sample size of 380, with an interim analysis for futility only at 200 patients with 90 days of follow-up. In total, 279 adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock and endotheliopathy were included. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to masked intravenous infusion of iloprost, 1 ng/kg/min (n = 142), or placebo (n = 137) for 72 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the ICU adjusted for trial site and baseline SOFA score for the per-protocol population. SOFA scores for each of the 5 organ systems ranged from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction (maximum score, 20). The secondary outcomes included serious adverse reactions and serious adverse events at 7 days and mortality at 90 days. Results: Of 279 randomized patients, data from 278 were analyzed (median [IQR] age, 69 [58-77] years; 171 (62%) male), 142 in the iloprost group and 136 in the placebo group. The trial was stopped for futility at the planned interim analysis. The mean [IQR] daily SOFA score was 10.6 (6.4-14.8) in the iloprost group and 10.5 (5.9-15.5) in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference, 0.2 [95% CI, -0.8 to 1.2]; P = .70). Mortality at 90 days in the iloprost group was 57% (81 of 142) vs 51% (70 of 136) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.91-1.40]; P = .33). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 of 142 patients (18%) for the iloprost group vs 20 of 136 patients (15%) for the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.73-2.15]; P = .52). Only 1 serious adverse reaction was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adults in the ICU with septic shock and severe endotheliopathy, infusion of iloprost, 1 ng/kg/min, for 72 hours did not reduce mean daily SOFA scores compared with placebo. In a clinical context, administration of iloprost will be unlikely to improve outcome in these patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04123444.

Changes in nitric oxide inhibitors and mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal balance between macro- and microcirculation in critically ill patients is crucial for ensuring optimal organ perfusion. Nitric oxide (NO) is a regulator of vascular hemostasis and tone. The availability of NO is controlled by asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), and the availability of the NO substrates arginine and homoarginine. We investigated the changes in plasma concentrations of ADMA, SDMA, arginine, and homoarginine days 1-5 of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the association between the change in concentration days 1-3 and 30-day all-cause mortality. METHODS: Single-center cohort study of adult critically ill patients from the ICU at Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand. ADMA, SDMA, arginine, and homoarginine (NO-biomarkers) were measured on days 1-5. Initially, we determined the changes in NO-biomarkers days 1-5 with linear mixed models, and subsequently how the changes in NO-biomarkers days 1-3 were associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. Post-hoc we analyzed the association between plasma concentration at admission and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: In total 567 out of 577 patients had plasma samples from days 1-5. Plasma concentrations of ADMA and arginine increased from days 1-5. SDMA concentrations increased from days 1-2, followed by a decrease from days 2-5. Concentrations of homoarginine did not change from days 1-3 but slightly increased from days 3-5. In total 512 patients were alive 3 days after ICU admission. Among these patients, a daily twofold increase in ADMA concentration from days 1-3 was associated with decreased mortality in multivariate analysis (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.98; p = 0.046). An increase in SDMA, arginine, or homoarginine was not associated with mortality. Post-hoc we found that a twofold increase in ADMA or SDMA concentrations at admission was associated with mortality (HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.24-2.57; p = 0.0025, and HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.05-1.90; p = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing ADMA concentrations on days 1-3 are inversely associated with mortality, however not with the same strength as high ADMA or SDMA concentrations at admission. We suggest that admission concentrations are the focus of future research on ADMA and SDMA as predictors of mortality or potential therapeutical targets in ICU patients.

Fluid administration and fluid accumulation in intensive care units-Protocol for an international inception cohort study (FLUID-ICU).

INTRODUCTION: Fluid accumulation is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Fluid administration in the ICU may be a clinically relevant source of fluid accumulation in ICU patients. However, the extent is unknown, and no standard definition exists. We aim to provide epidemiological data on fluid accumulation, risk factors, use of fluid removal strategies, patient outcomes and describe current fluid administration practices in the ICU. METHODS: We will conduct an international 14-day inception cohort study including a minimum of 1000 acutely admitted adult ICU patients. Data will be collected from medical records and laboratory reports at baseline and daily from ICU admission to discharge with a maximum of 28 days. Follow-up will be performed on day 90 after inclusion. The primary outcome is the number of patients with fluid accumulation. Secondary outcomes include the number of days with fluid accumulation, use of active fluid removal, days alive without life support at day 28, days alive and out of hospital day 90, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Furthermore, we will assess risk factors for fluid accumulation and its association with 90-day mortality and report on the types of fluid administration. CONCLUSION: This international inception cohort study will provide contemporary epidemiological data on fluid administration and fluid accumulation in adult ICU patients.

LASSO regression shows histidine and sphingosine 1 phosphate are linked to both sepsis mortality and endothelial damage.

Sepsis is a major cause of death worldwide, with a mortality rate that has remained stubbornly high. The current gold standard of risk stratifying sepsis patients provides limited mechanistic insight for therapeutic targeting. An improved ability to predict sepsis mortality and to understand the risk factors would allow better treatment targeting. Sepsis causes metabolic dysregulation in patients; therefore, metabolomics offers a promising tool to study sepsis. It is also known that that in sepsis endothelial cells affecting their function regarding blood clotting and vascular permeability. We integrated metabolomics data from patients admitted to an intensive care unit for sepsis, with commonly collected clinical features of their cases and two measures of endothelial function relevant to blood vessel function, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule and soluble thrombomodulin concentrations in plasma. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized regression, and pathway enrichment analysis to identify features most able to predict 30-day survival. The features important to sepsis survival include carnitines, and amino acids. Endothelial proteins in plasma also predict 30-day mortality and the levels of these proteins also correlate with a somewhat overlapping set of metabolites. Overall metabolic dysregulation, particularly in endothelial cells, may be a contributory factor to sepsis response. By exploring sepsis metabolomics data in conjunction with clinical features and endothelial proteins we have gained a better understanding of sepsis risk factors.

Climate aspects of dose inhalers in respitatory disorders.

Hydrofluorocarbons, the propellants used in metered dose inhalers, are powerful greenhouse gases. However, this review investigates the use of metered dose inhalers which continue to be on the rise in Denmark despite evidence that most patients are treated equally well with dry powder inhalers. If the use of metered dose inhalers in Denmark were reduced to approximately the level seen in Sweden it would lead to a reduction in CO2e comparable with the emissions from the electricity used in 16,500 typical Danish households.

Sustainable research.

Research, like any other sector, has an effect on climate and is exposed for waste both societal and economic. There is evidence for possible improvements when keeping focus on study design, patient inclusion, transport, and reporting. However, there is a need for further national and international research. Sustainability is incorporated as a quality domaine in the United Kingdom and we will probably see the same development in Denmark, as argued in this review.

Novel subgroups in acute respiratory failure based on the trajectories of three endotheliopathy biomarkers: A cohort study.

Baseline levels of endotheliopathy are associated with worse respiratory outcomes and mortality in undifferentiated acute respiratory failure (ARF), but knowledge is lacking on the development of endotheliopathy over time in ARF. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of trajectories of endotheliopathy during the first days of ARF. We performed a secondary, exploratory analysis of a single-center prospective cohort including 459 patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Based on Days 1-3 Syndecan-1, soluble Thrombomodulin (sTM), and Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (PECAM-1), we divided patients into subgroups using latent class mixed modeling and correlated subgroups with clinical outcomes using Cox regression. Based on Syndecan-1 and sTM, respectively, we identified two subgroups. Based on PECAM-1, we identified three subgroups. Subgroups based on Syndecan-1 and sTM were identifiable from the baseline levels, but subgroups based on PECAM-1 were not. Patients with persistently high levels of both sTM and PECAM-1 were liberated from mechanical ventilation more slowly (Group high vs. Group low, sTM: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.88, p = .01, PECAM-1: HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.93, p = .02) and had higher 30-day mortality (sTM: HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.20-3.01, p = .01, PECAM-1: HR: 4.25, 95% CI: 1.99-9.07, p < .01). In ARF requiring mechanical ventilation, patients in subgroups with persistently high levels of sTM and PECAM-1 had lower rates of liberation from mechanical ventilation and higher 30-day mortality. However, patients with persistently high levels of sTM were identifiable based on the baseline level, and only the trajectory of PECAM-1 added information to that of the baseline level.

Goal-directed fluid removal with furosemide versus placebo in intensive care patients with fluid overload: A randomised, blinded trial (GODIF trial-First version).

BACKGROUND: Salt and water accumulation leading to fluid overload is associated with increased mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but diuretics' effects on patient outcomes are uncertain. In this first version of the GODIF trial, we aimed to assess the effects of goal-directed fluid removal with furosemide versus placebo in adult ICU patients with fluid overload. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, randomised, stratified, parallel-group, blinded, placebo-controlled trial in clinically stable, adult ICU patients with at least 5% fluid overload. Participants were randomised to furosemide versus placebo infusion aiming at achieving neutral cumulative fluid balance as soon as possible. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 90 days. RESULTS: The trial was terminated after the enrolment of 41 of 1000 participants because clinicians had difficulties using cumulative fluid balance as the only estimate of fluid status (32% of participants had their initially registered cumulative fluid balance adjusted and 29% experienced one or more protocol violations). The baseline cumulative fluid balance was 6956 ml in the furosemide group and 6036 ml in the placebo group; on day three, the cumulative fluid balances were 1927 ml and 5139 ml. The median number of days alive and out of hospital at day 90 was 50 days in the furosemide group versus 45 days in the placebo group (mean difference 1 day, 95% CI -19 to 21, p-value .94). CONCLUSIONS: The use of cumulative fluid balance as the only estimate of fluid status appeared too difficult to use in clinical practice. We were unable to provide precise estimates for any outcomes as only 4.1% of the planned sample size was randomised.

Nordic survey on assessment and treatment of fluid overload in intensive care.

Introduction: Fluid overload in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with higher mortality. There are few randomized controlled trials to guide physicians in treating patients with fluid overload in the ICU, and no guidelines exist. We aimed to elucidate how ICU physicians from Nordic countries define, assess, and treat fluid overload in the ICU. Materials and methods: We developed an online questionnaire with 18 questions. The questions were pre-tested and revised by specialists in intensive care medicine. Through a network of national coordinators. The survey was distributed to a wide range of Nordic ICU physicians. The distribution started on January 5th, 2022 and ended on May 6th, 2022. Results: We received a total of 1,066 responses from Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Iceland. When assessing fluid status, respondents applied clinical parameters such as clinical examination findings, cumulative fluid balance, body weight, and urine output more frequently than cardiac/lung ultrasound, radiological appearances, and cardiac output monitoring. A large proportion of the respondents agreed that a 5% increase or more in body weight from baseline supported the diagnosis of fluid overload. The preferred de-resuscitation strategy was diuretics (91%), followed by minimization of maintenance (76%) and resuscitation fluids (71%). The majority declared that despite mild hypotension, mild hypernatremia, and ongoing vasopressor, they would not withhold treatment of fluid overload and would continue diuretics. The respondents were divided when it came to treating fluid overload with loop diuretics in patients receiving noradrenaline. Around 1% would not administer noradrenaline and diuretics simultaneously and 35% did not have a fixed upper limit for the dosage. The remaining respondents 63% reported different upper limits of noradrenaline infusion (0.05-0.50 mcg/kg/min) when administering loop diuretics. Conclusion: Self-reported practices among Nordic ICU physicians when assessing, diagnosing, and treating fluid overload reveals variability in the practice. A 5% increase in body weight was considered a minimum to support the diagnosis of fluid overload. Clinical examination findings were preferred for assessing, diagnosing and treating fluid overload, and diuretics were the preferred treatment modality.

Haloperidol for the Treatment of Delirium in ICU Patients.

BACKGROUND: Haloperidol is frequently used to treat delirium in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), but evidence of its effect is limited. METHODS: In this multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult patients with delirium who had been admitted to the ICU for an acute condition to receive intravenous haloperidol (2.5 mg 3 times daily plus 2.5 mg as needed up to a total maximum daily dose of 20 mg) or placebo. Haloperidol or placebo was administered in the ICU for as long as delirium continued and as needed for recurrences. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 90 days after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 1000 patients underwent randomization; 510 were assigned to the haloperidol group and 490 to the placebo group. Among these patients, 987 (98.7%) were included in the final analyses (501 in the haloperidol group and 486 in the placebo group). Primary outcome data were available for 963 patients (97.6%). At 90 days, the mean number of days alive and out of the hospital was 35.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.9 to 38.6) in the haloperidol group and 32.9 (95% CI, 29.9 to 35.8) in the placebo group, with an adjusted mean difference of 2.9 days (95% CI, -1.2 to 7.0) (P = 0.22). Mortality at 90 days was 36.3% in the haloperidol group and 43.3% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference, -6.9 percentage points [95% CI, -13.0 to -0.6]). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients in the haloperidol group and in 9 patients in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in the ICU with delirium, treatment with haloperidol did not lead to a significantly greater number of days alive and out of the hospital at 90 days than placebo. (Funded by Innovation Fund Denmark and others; AID-ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03392376; EudraCT number, 2017-003829-15.).

Restriction of Intravenous Fluid in ICU Patients with Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluids are recommended for the treatment of patients who are in septic shock, but higher fluid volumes have been associated with harm in patients who are in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: In this international, randomized trial, we assigned patients with septic shock in the ICU who had received at least 1 liter of intravenous fluid to receive restricted intravenous fluid or standard intravenous fluid therapy; patients were included if the onset of shock had been within 12 hours before screening. The primary outcome was death from any cause within 90 days after randomization. RESULTS: We enrolled 1554 patients; 770 were assigned to the restrictive-fluid group and 784 to the standard-fluid group. Primary outcome data were available for 1545 patients (99.4%). In the ICU, the restrictive-fluid group received a median of 1798 ml of intravenous fluid (interquartile range, 500 to 4366); the standard-fluid group received a median of 3811 ml (interquartile range, 1861 to 6762). At 90 days, death had occurred in 323 of 764 patients (42.3%) in the restrictive-fluid group, as compared with 329 of 781 patients (42.1%) in the standard-fluid group (adjusted absolute difference, 0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.7 to 4.9; P = 0.96). In the ICU, serious adverse events occurred at least once in 221 of 751 patients (29.4%) in the restrictive-fluid group and in 238 of 772 patients (30.8%) in the standard-fluid group (adjusted absolute difference, -1.7 percentage points; 99% CI, -7.7 to 4.3). At 90 days after randomization, the numbers of days alive without life support and days alive and out of the hospital were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among adult patients with septic shock in the ICU, intravenous fluid restriction did not result in fewer deaths at 90 days than standard intravenous fluid therapy. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and others; CLASSIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03668236.).

Endotheliopathy is associated with slower liberation from mechanical ventilation: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endotheliopathy is suggested as pivotal pathophysiology of sepsis and trauma-associated organ failure, but its role in acute respiratory failure is not yet determined. We investigated if endotheliopathy biomarkers at ICU admission are associated with illness severity and clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study including 459 mechanically ventilated adults at ICU admission. Plasma levels of three endotheliopathy biomarkers were measured at ICU admission: Syndecan-1, soluble Thrombomodulin (sTM), and Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (PECAM-1). The primary outcome was the rate of liberation from mechanical ventilation, which is presented together with the rate of the competing risk of death while still on mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were PaO2/FiO2-ratios on admission and on last measurement in patients dying within five days, and 30-day all-cause mortality. The primary outcome and 30-day all-cause mortality were analyzed using Cox regression, controlled for gender, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, septic shock, heart failure, PaO2/FiO2-ratio at admission, respiratory infection, acute kidney injury, and bilirubin. PaO2/FiO2-ratios were analyzed using linear regression, controlled for age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory infection, and shock. RESULTS: Patients with high sTM were liberated from mechanical ventilation at a lower rate (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, for an increase from the 25th to the 75th percentile, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.93, p = 0.01). Patients with high PECAM-1 were liberated from mechanical ventilation at a lower rate, but only during the first 5 days (adjusted HR 0.72, for an increase from the 25th to the 75th percentile, 95% CI 0.58-0.9, p < 0.01). High levels of Syndecan-1 and PECAM-1 were associated with a higher rate of death while still on mechanical ventilation. sTM and PECAM-1 were negatively associated with PaO2/FiO2-ratio at ICU admission and no biomarker was associated with last measured PaO2/FiO2-ratio. High levels of all biomarkers were associated with higher 30-day all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: In acute respiratory failure, endotheliopathy biomarkers are associated with lower rates of liberation from mechanical ventilation, hypoxemia at ICU admission, and 30-day all-cause mortality.

Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) are treated with supplemental oxygen, but the benefits and harms of different oxygenation targets are unclear. We hypothesized that using a lower target for partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao2) would result in lower mortality than using a higher target. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 2928 adult patients who had recently been admitted to the ICU (≤12 hours before randomization) and who were receiving at least 10 liters of oxygen per minute in an open system or had a fraction of inspired oxygen of at least 0.50 in a closed system to receive oxygen therapy targeting a Pao2 of either 60 mm Hg (lower-oxygenation group) or 90 mm Hg (higher-oxygenation group) for a maximum of 90 days. The primary outcome was death within 90 days. RESULTS: At 90 days, 618 of 1441 patients (42.9%) in the lower-oxygenation group and 613 of 1447 patients (42.4%) in the higher-oxygenation group had died (adjusted risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.11; P = 0.64). At 90 days, there was no significant between-group difference in the percentage of days that patients were alive without life support or in the percentage of days they were alive after hospital discharge. The percentages of patients who had new episodes of shock, myocardial ischemia, ischemic stroke, or intestinal ischemia were similar in the two groups (P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Among adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the ICU, a lower oxygenation target did not result in lower mortality than a higher target at 90 days. (Funded by the Innovation Fund Denmark and others; HOT-ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03174002.).

Retrospective Evaluation of Two Fast-track Strategies to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Real-life Chest Pain Population.

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline on non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (N-STE ACS) proposed a new ACS rule-out protocol. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate this new tool, which uses diagnostic levels of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT; > 14 ng/L) in a slightly modified version and compare this to a recently proposed approach using undetectable levels of hs-TnT to rule out patients. METHODS: There were 534 consecutive patients with suspected ACS included. Protocol 1: symptom duration, hs-TnT at 0 and 6-9 h, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and symptom status at 6-9 h. Protocol 2: a single blood sample of hs-TnT. The primary endpoint was a discharge diagnosis of ACS by blinded adjudication. Secondary endpoints were ACS re-admission < 30 days and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Protocol 1 classified 434/534 (81%) patients, with 27.9% being ruled out. All myocardial infarctions were correctly ruled in, but 15 cases of unstable angina were missed, resulting in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 87.3% (79.6-92.5%) and 87.6% (80.4-92.9%), respectively. Protocol 2 ruled out 17.5% of the population, yielding a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 94.1% (88.2-97.6%) and 90.8% (81.9-96.2%), respectively. Both protocols correctly ruled in 2/3 patients with ACS re-admission < 30 days and 55/56 1-year fatalities. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the diagnostic value of a modified version of the ESC rule-out protocol (Protocol 1) in N-STE ACS patients, but also suggests that a simpler protocol using undetectable levels of hs-TnT (Protocol 2) could provide a similar or even superior sensitivity.