Aß-related Angiitis (ABRA)-A Rare Paraneoplastic Cause of Cerebral Vasculitis in a Young Patient: A Pathway From Unspecific Neurological Symptoms to Final Diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Aß-related angiitis (ABRA) is a very rare disease entity with combined features of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and primary angiitis of the CNS. However, the pathogenesis has not been conclusively described yet. Interestingly though, a possible paraneoplastic origin has been reported in the past. ABRA leads to severe encephalopathy with a broad spectrum of unspecific neurological symptoms and usually occurs in older patients. Because of the response to immunological treatment, it is important to confirm the diagnosis as fast as possible. Unfortunately, the pathway to a definite diagnosis is often complicated and prolonged. CASE REPORT: Here, we describe a 48-year-old-female patient presenting headache, behavioral changes as well as subacute fatigue and epileptic seizures in the recent past. The initial neuroradiological examination demonstrated extended lesions in the left hemisphere compatible with an inflammatory or neoplastic disease. After extensive investigations, initially without a definite result, we finally validated the diagnosis of ABRA by brain biopsy. Shortly afterwards a routine check-up revealed an invasive mammary carcinoma. Owing to a mandatory mastectomy and chemotherapy, an immunosuppressive therapy was not implemented. CONCLUSIONS: The reported case demonstrates our diagnostic approach and the clinical difficulties in validating a rare cause of encephalopathy in a young patient with nonspecific clinical and neuroradiological findings. Because of the possibility of an effective treatment, it is important to consider ABRA in the differential diagnosis especially when blood tests, analysis of cerebrospinal fluid, and angiography show normal results. Since a paraneoplastic genesis is presumed, a search for an underlying tumor disease should be considered.

Microbial Load in Septic and Aseptic Procedure Rooms.

BACKGROUND: Highly effective measures to prevent surgical wound infections have been established over the last two decades. We studied whether the strict separation of septic and aseptic procedure rooms is still necessary. METHODS: In an exploratory, prospective observational study, the microbial concentration in an operating room without a room ventilating system (RVS) was analyzed during 16 septic and 14 aseptic operations with the aid of an air sampler (50 cm and 1 m from the operative field) and sedimentation plates (1 m from the operative field, and contact culture on the walls). The means and standard deviations of the microbial loads were compared with the aid of GEE models (generalized estimation equations). RESULTS: In the comparison of septic and aseptic operations, no relevant differences were found with respect to the overall microbial concentration in the room air (401.7 ± 176.3 versus 388.2 ± 178.3 CFU/m3; p = 0.692 [CFU, colony-forming units]) or sedimentation 1 m from the operative field (45.3 ± 22.0 versus 48.7 ± 18.5 CFU/m2/min; p = 0.603) and on the walls (35.7 ± 43.7 versus 29.0 ± 49.4 CFU/m2/min; p = 0.685). The only relevant differences between the microbial spectra associated with the two types of procedure were a small amount of sedimentation of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis in septic operations, and of staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas stutzeri in aseptic operations, up to 30 minutes after the end of the procedure. CONCLUSION: These data do not suggest that septic and aseptic procedure rooms need to be separated. In interpreting the findings, one should recall that the study was not planned as an equivalence or non-inferiority study. Wherever patient safety is concerned, high-level safety concepts should only be demoted to lower levels if new and convincing evidence becomes available.