Evaluation of Parameters and Nozzle Tip Damage after Clinical Use of Three Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens Injector Models.

Purpose: To assess the nozzle tip damage and the parameters of three different hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) injector models. Methods: After routine cataract surgeries at the University Eye Hospital Heidelberg, all the used IOL injectors were collected from the operating room and sent to our laboratory. Nozzle tip damage was assessed under a microscope and graded as follows: no damage (grade 0), slight scratches (1), deep scratches (2), extensions (3), cracks (4), and bursts (5). Each damage grade was assigned a score from 0 to 5, and the total damage score for each injector system was calculated and compared. Nozzle tip parameters (diameters and areas), plunger tip parameters, and tip angles were also measured in each model. Results: The damage scores were (median, Q3-Q1): 1 (1-1) for Accuject, 1 (1-1) for Bluemixs, and 1 (1-1) for RayOne. There was no statistically significant difference in the damage scores between the study groups (P > 0.05). The outer cross-sectional vertical and horizontal diameters were 1.69 and 1.69 mm for Accuject, 1.69 and 1.69 mm for Bluemixs, and 1.70 and 1.71 mm for RayOne. Plunger tip areas were 0.78 mm2 for Accjuect, 0.74 mm2 for Bluemixs, and 0.43 mm2 for RayOne. Plunger tip area/inner cross-sectional area of the nozzle tip (%) was 31.2% for RayOne, 66.7% for Accuject, and 63.8% for Bluemixs. The tip angles for three injector models were 56° (Accuject), 56° (Bluemixs), and 44° (RayOne). Conclusions: All the injector models showed mild to moderate damage to the nozzle tip after IOL implantation, even with smaller diameter tips. RayOne resulted in the lowest ratio between plunger tip area and inner cross-sectional area of the nozzle tip and a better distribution of damage categories than the other two groups. All three injector models had relatively small tip parameters. If smaller incisions are required in certain patients, smaller tip parameters should be considered.

Forward Light Scattering of the Vitreous Gel After Enzymatic Aging: An In Vitro Model to Study Vitreous Opacification.

Purpose: Symptomatic vitreous opacifications, so-called floaters, are difficult to objectively assess majorly limiting the possibility of in vitro studies. Forward light scattering was found previously to be increased in eyes with symptomatic floaters. Using an objective setup to measure forward light scattering, we studied the effects of enzymatically digesting the components of the vitreous body on straylight to develop an in vitro model of vitreous opacifications. Methods: Fifty-seven porcine vitreous bodies were digested using hyaluronidase, collagenase, trypsin, and bromelain, as well as using a combination of hyaluronidase + collagenase and hyaluronidase + bromelain. A modified C-Quant setup was used to objectively assess forward light scattering. Results: Depletion of hyaluronic acid majorly increased vitreous straylight (mean increase 34.4 deg2/sr; P = 0.01), whereas primarily digesting the vitreous gel with collagenase or trypsin did not significantly affect straylight. When collagenase or bromelain is applied in hyaluronic acid depleted vitreous gels, the increase in forward light scattering is reversed partially. Conclusions: The age-related loss of hyaluronic acid primarily drives the increase in vitreous gel straylight induced by conglomerates of collagen. This process can be reversed partially by digesting collagen. This in vitro model allows the objective quantification and statistical comparison of straylight burden caused by vitreous opacities and, thus, can serve as a first testing ground for pharmacological therapies, as demonstrated with bromelain.

In-vitro assessment of a novel intraocular lens made of crosslinked polyisobutylene.

PURPOSE: To describe and analyse the particularities of the material and the optical quality of the first intraocular lens (IOL) (Eyedeal® lens) made of crosslinked polyisobutylene (xPIB). METHODS: We assessed the material quality using an accelerated ageing process (to provoke glistenings) and compared values with a control, AcrySof® lens. Using the sessile drop method, the contact angle of the new IOL was measured. Images of the lens surface were recorded by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Optical quality was assessed by measuring the labeled power and modulation transfer function (MTF) using standard metrology equipment (OptiSpheric IOL PRO2). RESULTS: The Eyedeal® lens had an average glistening density result of 7.46 ± 3.78 MV/mm2 compared to the control AcrySof® whose glistenings number was 142.42 ± 72.47 MV/mm2. The contact angle was 97.2° whereas the angle of AcrySof material is between 73.3 ± 2.4° and 84.4 ± 0.1°. Using SEM, Eyedeal® lenses were examined and all appeared to be comparable to modern IOLs made of acrylic materials. The power and MTF values were normal and conformed to ISO standards. CONCLUSIONS: In the laboratory, the new Eyedeal® lens showed equivalence to current hydrophobic- or hydrophilic-acrylic lens models. It showed superiority in its glistening density result compared to the control lens.

Material Analysis of Explanted Calcified Silicone Intraocular Lenses in Association with Asteroid Hyalosis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze posterior surface opacification in explanted silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs) with clinicopathologic correlation to asteroid hyalosis. METHODS: In a laboratory setup, 12 explanted silicone IOLs underwent laboratory analyses, including light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy for elemental composition (EDX). Relevant clinical data were obtained for each case, including gender, age at IOL implantation, dates of implantation and explantation, as well as history of neodymium-dopped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser treatments or other opacification removal attempts. High-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were obtained in vitro with an anterior segment OCT device (Anterion, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). RESULTS: Calcification located at the posterior optic surface of each lens was identified through SEM and EDX analyses, revealing deposits composed of hydroxyapatite. In all cases, IOL polishing using Nd:YAG laser had been attempted prior to IOL exchange. The clinical functional data showed that this type of IOL opacity led to increase in straylight and subjective symptoms of glare. CONCLUSIONS: Silicone IOLs can develop posterior surface calcification in eyes with asteroid hyalosis. There are mechanical techniques of cleaning the IOL surface but in many cases, IOL explantation is the only sustainable way to reduce the patients' straylight levels and glare symptoms. Due to the risk of posterior surface calcification, silicone IOL implantation should be avoided in eyes with asteroid hyalosis.