Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 374(20): 1942-53, 2016 05 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27192672

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Small lifestyle-intervention studies suggest that modest weight loss increases the chance of conception and may improve perinatal outcomes, but large randomized, controlled trials are lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned infertile women with a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 29 or higher to a 6-month lifestyle intervention preceding treatment for infertility or to prompt treatment for infertility. The primary outcome was the vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term within 24 months after randomization. RESULTS: We assigned women who did not conceive naturally to one of two treatment strategies: 290 women were assigned to a 6-month lifestyle-intervention program preceding 18 months of infertility treatment (intervention group) and 287 were assigned to prompt infertility treatment for 24 months (control group). A total of 3 women withdrew consent, so 289 women in the intervention group and 285 women in the control group were included in the analysis. The discontinuation rate in the intervention group was 21.8%. In intention-to-treat analyses, the mean weight loss was 4.4 kg in the intervention group and 1.1 kg in the control group (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 27.1% of the women in the intervention group and 35.2% of those in the control group (rate ratio in the intervention group, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In obese infertile women, a lifestyle intervention preceding infertility treatment, as compared with prompt infertility treatment, did not result in higher rates of a vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term within 24 months after randomization. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR1530.).


Assuntos
Dieta Redutora , Exercício Físico , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Estilo de Vida , Obesidade/terapia , Adulto , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Obesidade/complicações , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Redução de Peso , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 212(3): 348.e1-7, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25447962

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the management of imminent preterm delivery with respect to prescription of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) and referral to a tertiary center. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study existing of 1 perinatal center and 9 referring hospitals. All women who received their first dose of ACS in 1 of the 10 hospitals between 24+0 and 32+0 weeks of gestation and/or delivered before 32 weeks of gestation from 2005 until 2010. Patients were identified using the electronic database of hospital pharmacies. Main outcome measures were time interval from administration to delivery for different indications and number of women who were not referred in time to a tertiary center. RESULTS: In total, 1375 women received ACS. Main indications were suspected preterm labor (44.7%), preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (15.9%), maternal indication (12.8%), fetal indication (9.2%) and vaginal blood loss (8.4%). Overall, 467 (34.0%) women delivered ≤7 days after ACS administration; 8.7% of women with vaginal blood loss and 54.5% of women with maternal indication. Among the 931 women who received ACS in the secondary hospitals, 452 (48.5%) women were referred to a tertiary hospital and 89 (6.5%) women delivered in a secondary hospital with a gestational age of less than 32 weeks. CONCLUSION: One-third of all women receiving ACS delivered within 7 days and half of the women who received ACS in a secondary hospital were referred to a tertiary center. There seems to be room for improvement regarding the timing of ACS administration and subsequently referral to a tertiary center.


Assuntos
Betametasona/uso terapêutico , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Países Baixos , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Cuidados de Saúde Secundários , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo
3.
BMC Womens Health ; 10: 22, 2010 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20579357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, 30% of subfertile women are overweight or obese, and at present there is no agreement on fertility care for them. Data from observational and small intervention studies suggest that reduction of weight will increase the chances of conception, decrease pregnancy complications and improve perinatal outcome, but this has not been confirmed in randomised controlled trials. This study will assess the cost and effects of a six-months structured lifestyle program aiming at weight reduction followed by conventional fertility care (intervention group) as compared to conventional fertility care only (control group) in overweight and obese subfertile women. We hypothesize that the intervention will decrease the need for fertility treatment, diminish overweight-related pregnancy complications, and will improve perinatal outcome. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicenter randomised controlled trial in subfertile women (age 18-39 year) with a body mass index between 29 and 40 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria are azoospermia, use of donor semen, severe endometriosis, premature ovarian failure, endocrinopathies or pre-existent hypertensive disorders.In the intervention group the aim is a weight loss of at least 5% to10% in a six-month period, to be achieved by the combination of a diet, increase of physical activity and behavioural modification. After six months, in case no conception has been achieved, these patients will start fertility treatment according to the Dutch fertility guidelines. In the control group treatment will be started according to Dutch fertility guidelines, independently of the patient's weight. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measure is a healthy singleton born after at least 37 weeks of gestation after vaginal delivery. Secondary outcome parameters including pregnancy outcome and complications, percentage of women needing fertility treatment, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, body weight, quality of life and costs.Data will be analysed according to the intention to treat principle, and cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to compare the costs and health effects in the intervention and control group. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide evidence for costs and effects of a lifestyle intervention aiming at weight reduction in overweight and obese subfertile women and will offer guidance to clinicians for the treatment of these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR1530.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Estilo de Vida , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/prevenção & controle , Atividade Motora , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/prevenção & controle , Sobrepeso/terapia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Resultado da Gravidez , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA