First-time application of droplet digital PCR for methylation testing of the 11p15.5 imprinting regions.

BACKGROUND: Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and Silver-Russel syndrome are two imprinting disorders caused by opposite molecular alterations in 11p15.5. With the current diagnostic tests, their molecular diagnosis is challenging due to molecular heterogeneity and mosaic occurrence of the most frequent alterations. As the determination of precise (epi)genotype of patients is relevant as the basis for a personalized treatment, different approaches are needed to increase the sensitivity of diagnostic testing of imprinting disorders. METHODS: We established methylation-specific droplet digital PCR approaches (MS-ddPCR) for the two imprinting centers in 11p15.5, and analyzed patients with paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 11p15.5 (upd(11)pat) and other imprinting defects in the region. The results were compared to those from MS-MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) and MS-pyrosequencing. RESULTS: MS-ddPCR confirmed the molecular alterations in all patients and the results matched well with MS-MLPA. The results of MS-pyrosequencing varied between different runs, whereas MS-ddPCR results were reproducible. CONCLUSION: We show for the first time that MS-ddPCR is a reliable and easy applicable method for determination of MS-associated changes in imprinting disorders. It is therefore an additional tool for multimethod diagnostics of imprinting disorders suitable to improve the diagnostic yield.

Prenatal testing for imprinting disorders: A laboratory perspective.

Imprinting Disorders (ImpDis) are a group of congenital syndromes associated with up to four different types of molecular disturbances affecting the monoallelic and parent-of-origin specific expression of genomically imprinted genes. Though each ImpDis is characterized by aberrations at a distinct genetic site and a specific set of postnatal clinical signs, there is a broad overlap between several of them. In particular, the prenatal features of ImpDis are non-specific. Therefore, the decision on the appropriate molecular testing strategy is difficult. A further molecular characteristic of ImpDis is (epi)genetic mosaicism, which makes prenatal testing for ImpDis challenging. Accordingly, sampling and diagnostic workup has to consider the methodological limitations. Furthermore, the prediction of the clinical outcome of a pregnancy can be difficult. False-negative results can occur, and therefore fetal imaging should be the diagnostic tool on which decisions on the management of the pregnancy should be based. In summary, the decision for molecular prenatal testing for ImpDis should be based on close exchanges between clinicians, geneticists, and the families before the initiation of the test. These discussions should weigh the chances and challenges of the prenatal test, with focus on the need of the family.