Sternal fixation for isolated traumatic sternal fractures improves pain and upper extremity range of motion.

INTRODUCTION: Sternal fractures are debilitating due to intractable pain, constant fracture movement and limited range of motion (ROM) of the upper extremities (UE). Traditional treatment comprises mainly of pain control, delaying return to daily activities. Recently, sternal fixation has gained popularity. There is, however, a lack of literature demonstrating efficacy. We report our experience of traumatically fractured sternal fixation. METHODS: Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was completed for all patients undergoing sternal fixation by a single trauma surgeon at our Level I trauma center. Basic demographics were obtained. Primary outcomes included average cumulative pain scores, total cumulative narcotic amounts and total number of pain medication agents utilized prior to and after sternal fixation. Secondary outcome included physical therapy UE ROM before and after surgery. Paired t tests were used for comparison; significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent sternal fixation from 8/2016 to 2/2018. Average age was 54.4 ± 20.8 years; 54% were female. All patients experienced blunt trauma; average injury severity score was 15.8 ± 10.9 and abbreviated chest injury score was 2.5 ± 0.51. Average intensive care unit/hospital length of stay was 2.3/10.2 days. Average pain scores significantly improved by a score of 3.5 postoperatively (preoperative = 7.08 ± 2.3, postoperative = 3.54 ± 2.5; p = 0.001). Total pain medications required by sternal fixation patients significantly decreased by 1 medication postoperatively (preoperative = 4.2 medications, postoperative = 3.2 medications; p = 0.002). Average narcotic requirements significantly decreased by 7.59 morphine milligram milliequivalents (MME) after sternal fixation (preoperative amount = 71.78 MME, postoperative amount = 64.19 MME; p = 0.041). Every patient had limited UE ROM preoperatively; however, all but one patient resumed full UE ROM postoperatively (p < 0.001). There were no postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal fixation is a safe and effective procedure resulting in improved pain, decreased narcotic requirements, and faster recovery.

Emergent General Surgery Operations in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The left ventricle assist device (LVAD) patient population is rapidly expanding. Unique characteristics of these patients complicate the management of noncardiac surgical problems. Emergent general surgery (EGS) intervention is often warranted but remains poorly described. We reviewed EGS consultations in LVAD patients to better understand these patients. METHODS: During a 12-year period, 301 LVAD patients were reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, reason for EGS consultation, operative intervention, transplantation, and mortality were analyzed. Wilcoxon, Fisher's exact, and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Statistical significance was P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 139 (46.2%) patients required EGS consultation. EGS consultations were older (63 vs 57 years; P = .002), primarily Caucasian (86%), and male (83%) with average preimplant cardiac index of 1.84. Comorbidities were similar between those with and without EGS consultation. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was the most common reason for consultation (53%), followed by abdominal pain (22%) and bowel ischemia/obstruction (19%). Of EGS consultations, 77% were on warfarin and 60% on aspirin. Procedures were not withheld: 46% required esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and 30% required colonoscopy. Surgical intervention was performed in 28% of EGS consults-49% emergent (within 24 hours) and 44% urgent (during hospitalization). Mean time to surgery was 48 days after LVAD placement. EGS intervention precluded 7 (18%) patients from heart transplantation and 10 (26%) patients suffered perioperative mortality. Elevated lactic acid was associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: EGS consultation is necessary in almost half of all LVAD patients, most commonly for GI bleed. EGD/colonoscopy can be safely used to manage the majority of these consultations; one-third will require surgery. High lactic acid is associated with higher mortality. Additional analysis of this population is required for improving surgical management.

Practical Bioethics for the Humanitarian Surgeon: The Development, Implementation and Assessment of an Ethics Curriculum for Residents Participating in Humanitarian Missions.

BACKGROUND: Humanitarian surgeons face many ethical challenges. Despite increasing resident participation during humanitarian activities, minimal literature exists describing premission ethics training. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify publications on humanitarian surgery. A 3-tiered review was performed assessing for ethical conflicts and guidelines. A Humanitarian Ethics Curriculum (HEC) was developed based on these findings and administered to residents prior to a humanitarian mission. Postmission essays were assigned to describe an ethical dilemma they encountered. The HEC's value was evaluated by identifying the ACGME core competencies represented in the essays. RESULTS: 49 eligible publications were identified. Several areas of consensus were found. Controversies identified included: trainee involvement, surgical innovation, and operating on patients with dismal prognosis. All residents stated that the HEC was vital. 61% of ethical dilemmas involved surgical patients. Core competencies emphasized included systems-based practice, patient care, professionalism, interpersonal/communication skills, and medical knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: There is consensus regarding ethical principles that surgeons should follow during humanitarian activities. However, areas of controversy persist. Premission HEC should be administered to residents participating in humanitarian missions.

Rural Trauma Team Development Course Instills Confidence in Critical Access Hospitals.

PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons' Rural Trauma Team Development Course (RTTDC) was designed to help rural hospitals optimize a team approach to trauma management recognizing the need for early transfer. Little literature exists on the success of RTTDC achieving its objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of RTTDC on rural trauma team members. METHODS: RTTDC was hosted at seven rural hospitals. A pre-course 30-question Likert survey gauging confidence managing trauma patients was administered to participants. Four weeks following, participants received a post-course survey with corresponding Likert questions and 11 trauma knowledge-based questions. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests and general linear models were utilized. Statistical significance is set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: 111 participants completed the pre-course survey; 53 (48%) completed the post-course survey. Results presented on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 = "not at all comfortable" to 5 = "extremely comfortable." Participants knowing their role in the trauma team improved by 16% (p = 0.02). Familiarity with the roles of other trauma team members was significantly improved (3.4 vs. 4.15; p < 0.01). Participants comfort with resuscitating trauma patients and managing traumatic brain injury significantly improved (3.29 vs. 3.69; p = 0.01 and 2.62 vs. 3.14; p = 0.004, respectively). Comfortability communicating with the regional trauma center improved significantly (3.64 vs. 4.19; p = 0.004). Participant decision to transfer trauma patients within 15 min of arrival improved by 3.2%. Participants answered 82% of the knowledge-based questions correctly. CONCLUSION: RTTDC instills confidence in providers at rural hospitals. The information taught is well retained, allowing for quality care and timely patient transfer to the nearest trauma center.

Taking the bull by the horns: Patient trampled by bull requiring surgical fixation of multiple rib fractures including rib 11.

Rib fractures are a serious problem in thoracic trauma resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Surgical stabilization in the management of rib fractures is gaining more popularity and recognition as outcomes continue to show positive results, however, there is still hesitancy among the trauma community to recommend this intervention. Although there still remains questions as to which patients to provide surgical stabilization to in the non-flail rib fracture patient population, surgical stabilization of rib fractures have been shown to be extremely beneficial in those patients with flail chest and should be strongly considered in this patient population, especially if they require ventilatory support. Here we present a 62-year-old female with severe chest wall deformity from 21 rib fractures after being trampled by a bull. This included a flail segment and a severely angulated 11th rib fracture piercing through the lung into the retroperitoneum. Furthermore, we also introduce a new technique for stabilization of rib fractures that are more posterior. Given the fact we surgically intervened early in our patient with severe chest wall trauma, she had a very favorable outcome, allowing her to be discharged from the hospital in a timely fashion with minimal overall morbidity.

Rapid Reversal of Novel Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Medications in General Surgery Emergencies.

The reversal of the new class of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is challenging in the emergent perioperative setting. This summary focuses on the reversal of NOACs, determining the emergent nature (risk analysis), and other considerations in reversal.

We Wear Suits and Lie to Each Other.

OBJECTIVE: The residency match process is stressful and costly for fourth-year medical students with significant personal and professional implications. We hypothesize that students use impression management (IM) tactics such as conforming to the perceived expectations of program directors and interviewers and to improve their chances of matching. DESIGN: After institutional review board approval, a piloted survey tool was administered to fourth-year medical students at 17 schools. Questions were divided into interviewing behavior categories-slight image creation (embellishing and tailoring), extensive image creation (constructing, inventing, and borrowing), image protection (omitting), and ingratiation (opinion conforming). Descriptive statistics are presented as percentages. Data were analyzed using chi-square test, Fischer exact test, and Bonferroni-adjusted p values where appropriate with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. SETTING: Allopathic medical schools in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Fourth-year medical students in the United States. RESULTS: The response rate was 21.3%. Respondents were equally male (49.7%)/female (50.3%), primarily 25 to 27-year old (65.9%) and located in the midwest (78.8%). Most attended public medical schools (73.1%). Statistically significant findings are presented in the Tables. CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-year medical students feel the need, and in some instances, actually engage in IM tactics. This study demonstrates that IM tactics are used, and vary by interviewee characteristics. Program directors' awareness of IM tactics may help improving the quality of residency interviews and therefore select more suitable candidates.

Perioperative management of elderly patients.

The older population only represents 13.7% of the US population but has grown by 21% since 2002. The centenarian population is growing at a faster rate than the total US population. This unprecedented growth has significantly increased surgical demand. The establishment of quality and performance improvement data has allowed researchers to focus attention on the older patient population, resulting in an exponential increase in studies. Although there is still much work to be done in this field, overlying themes regarding the perioperative management of elderly patients are presented in this article based on a thorough literature review.

Workplace bullying of general surgery residents by nurses.

OBJECTIVE: Workplace bullying is at the forefront of social behavior research, garnering significant media attention. Most of the medical research has addressed bullying of nurses by physicians and demonstrates that patient care and outcomes may suffer. The intent of this study was to determine if general surgery residents are bullied by nurses. DESIGN: A survey instrument previously validated (Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised) to evaluate for workplace bullying was modified to reflect the resident-nurse relationship. After institutional review board approval, the piloted online survey was sent to general surgery program directors to forward to general surgery residents. Demographic data are presented as percentages, and for negative acts, percentages of daily, weekly, and monthly frequencies are combined. SETTING: Allopathic general surgery residencies in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents. RESULTS: The response rate was 22.1% (n = 452). Most respondents were men (55%) and had a mean age of 29 years (standard deviation = 7). Although 27.0% of the respondents were interns, the remaining classes were equally represented (12%-18% of responses/class). The respondents were primarily from medium-sized residency programs (45%), in the Midwest (28%), training in university programs (72%), and rotating primarily in a combined private and county hospital that serves both insured and indigent patients (59%). The residents had experienced each of the 22 negative acts (11.5%-82.5%). Work-related bullying occurs more than person-related bullying and physical intimidation. Ignoring of recommendations or orders by nurses occurs on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis for 30.2% of residents (work-related bullying). The most frequent person-related bullying act is ignoring the resident when they approach or reacting in a hostile manner (18.0%), followed by ignoring or excluding the resident (17.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Workplace bullying of general surgery residents by nurses is prominent. Future research is needed to determine the toll on the resident's well-being and patient outcomes.

It was the night before the interview: perceptions of resident applicants about the preinterview reception.

OBJECTIVE: Hosting a reception for prospective interns the evening before the interview has become a well-established expectation. It is thought that these initial impressions significantly influence the ranking process. Despite these well-held beliefs, there has been a paucity of studies exploring the preinterview reception. DESIGN: A survey tool was created and piloted to ensure validity. The survey was then administered to a fourth-year class of allopathic medical students immediately after interviews but before Match Day. SETTING: A university, teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fourth-year allopathic medical students. RESULTS: The response rate was 100% (n = 69). Ninety-six percent of programs hosted an event. Although these events were minimally stressful (86%), the same percent felt that not attending would limit their knowledge of the program, and 66% felt that it would negatively affect their application. Forty percent believe this event to be extremely important to residency programs in selecting interns. Ninety-five percent are attended by residents only, and approximately half were at a casual restaurant. Most applicants (97%) never paid for their own meal, and 69% felt that if they did, it would leave a negative impression of the program. CONCLUSIONS: Candidates believe the preinterview reception is important in the selection process, that failing to attend would negatively affect their application, and provides insight about the program. Alcohol is often provided but rarely has a negative effect. Applicants prefer an informal setting with unfettered interactions with the residents.

A six year head-to-head comparison of osteopathic and allopathic applicants to a university-based, allopathic general surgery residency.

OBJECTIVE: The number of osteopathic physicians is increasing as is the number applying to allopathic general surgery residency programs. A lack of knowledge of osteopathic schooling leads to a potential applicant bias in favor of allopathic applicants, but the 2 groups have not been compared head to head. DESIGN: Applications over a 6-year period to an allopathic general surgery residency program were reviewed. Demographics, examination scores, employment, education, and research experience were catalogued into a database. Allopathic applicants were compared with osteopathic applicants utilizing statistical analysis. SETTING: A university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Allopathic and osteopathic applicants to an allopathic general surgery residency program. RESULTS: A total of 1290 applications were reviewed; 1155 allopathic and 135 osteopathic applications. Other than race, the 2 cohorts are similar in age, gender, and citizenship. The groups are not significantly different with regard to the number of letter of recommendations, volunteer activities, scholarly works, and advanced degrees. Graduates of both proceed directly to residency. A significantly higher percentage of allopathic graduates reported their United States medical licensing examination (USMLE) scores, yet when osteopaths released their USMLE transcript, they scored significantly higher on the USMLE Step 1 examination and required fewer attempts to pass. These differences do not apply to the USMLE Step 2 examination. CONCLUSIONS: No single screening tool exists for selecting a successful general surgery resident. We are seeing increased numbers of osteopathic applicants. Many criteria used to evaluate applicants do not apply to osteopathic applicants, but our comparison of common selection variables on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application did not demonstrate an overall difference. While our analysis demonstrated a statistically higher USMLE Step 1 score by osteopathic applicants, they may only self-report favorable data.

Open fractures: it doesn't come out in the wash.

BACKGROUND: Six hours from injury to washout is considered the gold standard in the treatment of open traumatic fractures. Despite this being our hospital policy, the rural nature of our Level I trauma center causes delays in discovery and transport, creating a unique randomization of time to washout. We hypothesized that orthopedic complications after open fractures are related to the severity of the fractures, not the timing of the washout. METHODS: Patients and fractures were reviewed retrospectively over 6.3 years, evaluating for demographics, injury severity, location of fracture, mechanism of injury, Gustilo fracture grade, and time from injury to initial washout. Orthopedic wound complication rates were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,487 open fractures in 1,278 patients were reviewed. Time from injury to washout was 26 to 4,749 min (mean, 510 min), with 48 patients having no washout. Overall, 8.2% of fractures (n=122) had an orthopedic complication, rates of which increased with severity (Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS], and Gustilo class) and blunt injuries but were not related to time to washout. Penetrating injuries showed no difference in complication rates according to time to washout. Lower extremity fractures had a higher rate of complications than those of the upper extremity (odds ratio 2.2), likely because of differences in fracture grade. By multivariable logistic regression, only fracture grade, Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and male gender were independent predictors of wound complications; penetrating trauma was predictive of low risk. Time to washout was not an independent predictor of wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although grossly contaminated fractures should not be left unattended, the degree of initial injury, as judged by fracture grade and physiology (RTS), was predictive of orthopedic wound complications, whereas time to washout was not. Hence, there is little benefit of washout in Gustilo grade 1/AIS 1 fractures or penetrating injuries, regardless of grade, and adherence to a specific time to washout is not beneficial.

Surgical resident education: what is the department's price for commitment?

OBJECTIVE: The current recession has impacted all aspects of our economy. Some residency programs have experienced faculty salary cuts, furlough days, and cessation of funding for travel to academic meetings. This milieu forced many residency programs to reevaluate their commitment to resident education, particularly for those expenses not provided for by Direct Medical Education (DME) and Indirect Medical Education (IME) funds. The purpose of this study was to determine what price a Department of Surgery pays to fulfill its commitment to resident education. DESIGN: A financial analysis of 1 academic year was performed for all expenses not covered by DME or IME funds and is paid for by the faculty practice plan. These expenses were categorized and further analyzed to determine the funds required for resident-related scholarly activity. SETTING: A university-based general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight surgical residents and a program coordinator. RESULTS: The departmental faculty provided $153,141 during 1 academic year to support the educational mission of the residency. This amount is in addition to the $1.6 million in faculty time, $850,000 provided by the federal government in terms of DME funds, and $14 million of IME funds, which are distributed on an institutional basis. Resident presentations at scientific meetings accounted for $49,672, and program coordinator costs of $44,190 accounted for nearly two-thirds of this funding. The departmental faculty committed $6400 per categorical resident. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to DME and IME funds, a department of surgery must commit significant additional monies to meet the educational goals of surgical residency.

"Damage control" in the elderly: futile endeavor or fruitful enterprise?

BACKGROUND: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) provides effective management in carefully selected, exsanguinating trauma patients. However, the effectiveness of this approach has not been examined in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to characterize elderly DCL patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons was queried for patients admitted to our Level I trauma center between January 2003 and June 2008. Patients who underwent a DCL were included in the study. Elderly (55 years or older) and young (16-54 years) patients were compared for demographics, injury severity, intraoperative transfusion volume, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 62 patients met inclusion criteria. Elderly and young cohorts were similar in gender (male, 78.6% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.78), Injury Severity Score (25.1 ± 2.1 vs. 23.8 ± 1.7, p = 0.49), packed red blood cell transfusion volume (3036 mL ± 2760 mL vs. 2654 mL ± 2194 mL, p = 0.51), and number of complications (3.21 ± 0.48 vs. 3.33 ± 0.38, p = 0.96). Mortality was greater in the elderly cohort (42.9% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.02). The mean time to death for the elderly was 9.8 days ± 10.2 days and 26 days ± 21.5 days in the young (p = 0.485). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the severity of injury, the outcome of elderly DCL patients is better than what might be predicted. They succumb to their injuries more frequently and earlier in the hospital course compared with the young, but the majority of these patients survive. DCL in the elderly is not a futile endeavor.

Is your residency program ready for Generation Y?

Current residency applicants are members of Generation Y and are significantly different from previous generations of trainees as well as the faculty who attract, recruit, and manage them. Generation Y has been affected by globalization, diversification, terrorism, and international crisis. They are products of the self-esteem movement in child rearing, education, and extracurricular activities where they were all declared winners. Children's activities no longer had winners and losers or first, second, and third place; every child received a participation trophy. Even though they were raised to be a team player, their parents always told them they are special. Technology is ingrained into their daily lives, and they expect its use to be effective and efficient. Generation Y-ers desire to impact the world and give back to their communities and demand immediate access to leadership. This generation poses a challenge to residency programs that will need to attract, recruit, and manage them effectively. This article will provide an overview of Generation Y, contrast Generation Y with Generation X, and discuss how to use generation-specific strategies to attract, recruit, and manage a Generation Y resident.

Running out of gas but not trauma patients: the effect of the price of gas on trauma admissions.

As fuel costs steadily rise and motor vehicle collisions continue to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, we examined the relationship between the price of gasoline and the rate of trauma admissions related to gasoline consumption (GRT). The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons data of a rural Level I trauma center were queried over 27 consecutive months to identify the rate of trauma admissions/month related to gas utilization compared with the number of nongasoline related trauma admissions, based on season and day of the week. The average price/gallon of regular gas in our region was obtained from the NorthCarolinaGasPrices. com database. A log linear model with a Poisson distribution was created. No significant association exists between the average price/gallon of gasoline and the GRT rate across the months, seasons, and weekday and weekend periods. As the price of gas continues to rise, the rate of rural GRT does not decrease. Over a longer period of time and with skyrocketing prices, this relationship may not hold true. These findings may also be explained by the rural area where limited alternative transportation opportunities exist and a trauma patient population participating in high risk behavior regardless of cost.

Impact of hypothermia in the rural, pediatric trauma patient.

OBJECTIVE: Hypothermia is an independent predictor of mortality in adult trauma studies. However, the impact of hypothermia on the pediatric trauma population has not been described. The purpose of this study is to evaluate hypothermia as a cofactor to mortality, complications, and among survivors, hospital length of stay parameters in the pediatric trauma population. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database (National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons) over a 5-yr period (July 2002 to June 2007). SETTING: A rural, level I trauma center. PATIENTS: One thousand six hundred twenty-nine pediatric patients admitted with a traumatic injury. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association of hypothermia with mortality, infectious complications, organ dysfunction, and among survivors, hospital length of stay parameters. Of 1,629 pediatric trauma patients admitted, 182 (11.1%) patients were hypothermic (temperature below 36 degrees C) on admission. Hypothermia had an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 2.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-5.22, p = .025) for mortality. After controlling for covariates, hypothermia had associations with developing pneumonia (AOR, 0.185, 95% CI, 0.040-0.853; p = .031) and a bleeding diathesis (AOR, 3.14, 95% CI, 1.04-9.44; p = .042). The median days in the hospital, intensive care unit (ICU), and ventilator were longer in the hypothermic cohort; however, after controlling for covariates, hypothermia was not associated with differences in hospital days, ICU days, or ventilator days. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermia is a common problem at admission among pediatric trauma patients. Hypothermia is associated with an increase in the odds of death and the development of a bleeding diathesis, while having decreased odds for developing pneumonia. While the length of stay indicators were longer in the hypothermic cohort among survivors, no significant association was noted with hypothermia for hospital, ICU, or ventilator days after controlling for confounders.

Impact of hypothermia (below 36 degrees C) in the rural trauma patient.

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is an independent predictor of mortality based on urban studies. But this association has not been described in the rural setting. This study's purpose was to evaluate hypothermia as a cofactor to mortality, complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) parameters in the rural trauma setting. STUDY DESIGN: The National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons database for our rural, Level I trauma center was queried for a 5-year period (July 2002 to June 2007) to identify adult trauma patients. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association of hypothermia with mortality; infectious complications; organ dysfunction; and, among survivors, hospital LOS parameters. RESULTS: Of 9,482 adult patients admitted, 1,490 (15.7%) patients were hypothermic. Hypothermia had an adjusted odds ratio of 1.70 for mortality (95% CI, 1.35 to 2.12; p < 0.001). After controlling for covariates, hypothermia was not significantly associated with infectious complications or organ dysfunction, except for arrhythmia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.40; CI, 1.03 to 1.90; p = 0.031). Hypothermia was not associated with a difference in ICU (p = 0.310) or ventilator (p = 0.144) LOS. But a slight increase in hospital days was noted in the hypothermic patient (hazards ratio, 0.890 for discharge; 95% CI, 0.838 to 0.946; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermia is a common problem at admission in a rural trauma center. It is associated with an increase in hospitalized days but not with increased ICU or ventilator days among survivors. Other than arrhythmias, it was not significantly associated with other National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons infectious or organ dysfunction complications. Hypothermia is an independent risk factor for mortality in the rural trauma patient.

What do surgical nurses know about surgical residents?

OBJECTIVE: A fundamental premise of establishing collaborative relationships between residents and nurses is a basic understanding of the attributes of each group. The intent of this study was to determine what surgical nurses know about surgical residents. DESIGN: A piloted survey tool was administered to a cross-section of nurses working in 3 surgical intensive care units, a surgical intermediate unit, and 2 general surgical floors. Surgical residents completed the same survey tool. The percentage of residents giving the most frequent response was compared with the percentage of nurses giving the same response. SETTING: A university, teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-four of 129 surgical nurses and 24 of 25 surgical residents who completed the survey tool. RESULTS: The response rate for nurses on the 2 survey days was 94%, or 54% of all surgical nurses employed by the hospital, and 96% for residents. The nurses surveyed were equally distributed between the units. Ninety-nine percent of nurses did not have a surgical resident as a significant other, 55% of nurses had greater than 5 years experience, and 95% were licensed registered nurses. Seventy-eight percent of nurses correctly indicated that a medical doctorate is the highest degree required to start residency (p = 0.01), but only 57% accurately identified the length of surgical residency (p = 0.02). Nurses perceived residents devoted less time to patient care (p < 0.01) and more time to studying (p < 0.01). Forty percent of nurses do not think interns are legally physicians (p < 0.01) or hold a medical license (p < 0.01). Forty percent of nurses are aware of the 80-hour work week restriction (p < 0.01). Eighteen percent of nurses have the perception that residents are not allowed to perform bedside procedures without an attending physician present (p = 0.03), while 56% have the perception that residents are not allowed to perform any part of an operation without an attending physician (p < 0.01). There is a misperception among 32% of nurses that residents pay tuition for residency (p < 0.01), while only 52% accurately identified the range of a resident's salary (p = 0.01) and 11% the amount of resident debt (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of the collaborative relationship in surgical patient care, surgical nurses have a limited understanding of surgical residents. Educating nurses about the education, roles, and responsibilities of surgical residents might improve collaborative relationships and ultimately patient care.