Short-term complication rates of open reduction and plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a propensity score matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This is a retrospective cohort study designed to compare short-term postoperative complication rates between closed humeral shaft fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus intramedullary nailing (IMN), as well as secondary independent risk factors for adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using CPT codes to identify patients that underwent an open reduction and plate fixation or intramedullary nailing procedure for a closed humeral shaft fracture from 2010 to 2021. Cohorts were matched using propensity scores to account for demographic differences and rates of complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: From the database, a total of 4,222 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, with 3,326 and 896 undergoing ORIF and IMN respectively. After propensity score matching, 866 of the nearest-neighbor matches were included in each cohort for a total of 1,732 patients in the final analysis. The rate of any adverse event (AAE) was significantly higher in the ORIF cohort (16.3%) than the IMN cohort (12.1%, p = 0.01). The ORIF group had higher rates of postoperative transfusion (p = 0.002), return to OR (p = 0.005), and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis, ASA class 4, increasing age, increasing operative time, and history of bleeding disorder were found to increase the risk of AAE in both ORIF and IMN patients. CONCLUSIONS: While prior studies have claimed higher complication rates in IMN patients, this study found a significantly higher short-term risk of AAE in ORIF patients when compared in matched cohorts. However, individual 30-day complication rates do not differ significantly between procedures, and both have been shown to be safe and effective tools in the management of humeral shaft fractures.

Improved outcomes with perioperative dietitian-led interventions in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Background: Nutritional assessment is important for optimization of patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Preoperative nutritional intervention is a potentially modifiable optimization target, but the outcomes of such intervention are not well-studied. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of nutritional interventions on elective TJA outcomes. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to perform a systematic review of the Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library systems. Included studies were comprised of patients greater than 18 years of age undergoing a primary unilateral TJA who received a perioperative dietitian-led intervention. Data analyzed included nutritional intervention protocol, patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), postoperative labs and complications, among others. Results: Our initial search identified a total of 1766 articles. Four studies representing 5006 patients met inclusion criteria. The studies utilized a protein-dominant diet, with or without a carbohydrate solution accompanied by dietitian assessment or education. The 4 studies found that the intervention group had significantly decreased LOS, fewer albumin infusions, less wound drainage, lower rates of hypocalcemia and hypokalemia, reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) values, improved time out of bed, and decreased overall costs. Conclusion: The findings support the potential benefits of perioperative dietitian-led intervention on key outcomes for patients undergoing primary TJA. Surgeons should consider nutritional intervention in their preoperative optimization protocols. Future studies could help elucidate the optimum nutritional regimens and monitoring for idealized intervention and surgical timing. Prospero registration number: CRD4202338494.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear After Radial to Axillary End-to-Side Transfer: A Case Report.

CASE: A 60-year-old man sustained a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and axillary nerve palsy with deltoid dysfunction after an anterior shoulder dislocation. He underwent staged reverse end-to-side radial-to-axillary nerve transfer with return of deltoid function allowing for subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty. At 1 year postoperatively, he returned to full activity. CONCLUSION: Irreparable rotator cuff tears complicated by axillary nerve palsy can be effectively treated with a staged approach of nerve transfer followed by reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Significant Increase in Early Reoperation After Latarjet-Bristow Procedure Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the 30-day outcomes, including length of stay, short-term complications, hospital readmission, all-cause reoperation, and death after arthroscopic Bankart (AB) and Latarjet. METHODS: Patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had undergone either AB or Latarjet-Bristow (LB) procedures for anterior shoulder instability from 2012 to 2018 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nearest neighbor propensity score matching was used to address any potential demographic differences. The 30-day incidence of postoperative complications were compared, and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify risk factors associated with the incidence of post-operative complications. RESULTS: A total of 7,519 patients were identified, with 6,990 (93.0%) undergoing AB and 529 (7.0%) LB. After propensity score matching, the baseline demographics were not significantly different (P > .05). There was no significant difference in rate of total adverse events between the AB and LB cohorts (P = .06). There was a significant difference in the rate of return to the operating room between LB (1.9%) when compared to AB (0%) (P < .001). Of reoperations, 40% were due to need for revision stabilization (0.8% of all LB cases) and 40% were for irrigation and debridement. There was also a significant difference in operative time (AB = 87 minutes, LB = 131 minutes; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall 30-day complication rates were low for both groups, with similar rates among AB and LB patients. However, there was a statistically significant increased rate of short-term reoperation or revision stabilization in the LB cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Female Sex, Older Age, Earlier Surgery, Anticoagulant Use, and Meniscal Repair Are Associated With Increased Risk of Manipulation Under Anesthesia or Lysis of Adhesions for Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To determine what patient or surgical factors are associated with an increased risk of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) or lysis of adhesions (LOA) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: A systematic review was performed in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases were searched for studies published through February 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies that identified risk factors for MUA and/or LOA after ACLR. Studies investigating arthrofibrosis after multiligamentous knee injuries or ACL repair were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven studies including a total of 333,876 ACLRs with 4,842 subsequent MUA or LOA (1.45%) were analyzed. Increasing age was associated with an increased risk in 3 studies (P < .001, P < .05, P < .01) but was found to have no association another two. Other factors that were identified by multiple studies as risk factors for MUA/LOA were female sex (4 studies), earlier surgery (5 studies), use of anticoagulants other than aspirin (2 studies), and concomitant meniscal repair (4 studies). CONCLUSIONS: In total, 1.45% of the patients who underwent ACLR and were included in this systematic review had to undergo a subsequent MUA/LOA to treat arthrofibrosis. Female sex, older age, earlier surgery, use of anticoagulants other than aspirin, and concomitant meniscal repair were associated with increased risk of MUA/LOA. The modifiable risks, including use of anticoagulants and time between injury and surgery, can be considered when making treatment decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III/IV evidence.

Wound Infiltration With Extended-Release Versus Short-Acting Bupivacaine Before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if preincision infiltration with extended-release liposomal bupivacaine provides improved overall pain relief compared with 0.25% bupivacaine after laparoscopic or robotic-assisted hysterectomy. DESIGN: A single-center double-masked randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force Classification I). SETTING: A tertiary-care community hospital. PATIENTS: Patients recruited from July 2015 through January 2016. Sixty-four patients were randomized, and 59 were analyzed for the primary outcome. INTERVENTIONS: Women scheduled to undergo multiport laparoscopic or robotic-assisted total hysterectomy for benign indications were randomized to receive preincision infiltration with undiluted liposomal bupivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was overall average pain intensity by numeric rating scale (0-10) using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) via telephone survey on postoperative day (POD) 3. A sample size of 28 per group (N = 56) was planned to detect a 30% change in pain scores. Secondary outcomes were overall average and worst numeric pain scores on PODs 1, 2, and 14; pain scores in hospital; BPI pain interference scores; and total opioid use. There were no demographic differences between the 2 groups. For the primary outcome, we found a decrease in the average (p = .02) pain scores on POD 3 in the liposomal bupivacaine group. We also found a decrease in worst pain scores on POD 2 (p = .03) and POD 3 (p = .01). There were no differences in pain scores while in the hospital or on POD 1 or POD 14. There were no differences in BPI pain interference scores, opioid use, or reported adverse effects. CONCLUSION: For laparoscopic and robotic-assisted multiport hysterectomies, there is evidence of decreased average postoperative pain with liposomal bupivacaine compared with 0.25% bupivacaine for port-site analgesia on POD 3, but no difference in opioid use or measures of functioning.