Retrospective 3D analysis of bone regeneration after cystectomy of odontogenic cysts.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate a new 3D evaluation method for evaluating bone regeneration after cystectomy of odontogenic cysts. METHODS: The study included 26 patients who underwent cystectomies between 2012 and 2017 and had received either fillings or non-fillings with autologous iliac crest. Bony regeneration was analyzed using 3D imaging software and comparing identical regions of interest (ROIs) that were determined by exact overlays of the postoperative cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) or computer tomography (CT) images. Outcome measures, including volume changes according to the defect size and configuration, patient age, the entity and distribution of the cysts, were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (5 women and 21 men) had 30 defects, including nine keratocysts, seven radicular cysts and 14 dentigerous cysts. A total of 73% of the defects were in the mandible. The mean 3D follow-up time was 12 months. According to the 3D evaluation of bony regeneration, the defect size and configuration showed no significant differences between the groups (filled or non-filled with 15 defects per group). CONCLUSIONS: By establishing a standardized 3D method for evaluating bone regeneration, healing can be better monitored and evaluated.

Correction to: Osseous ingrowth in allogeneic bone blocks applied for vertical bone augmentation: a preclinical randomized controlled study.

In the article by Möst et al., entitled "Osseous ingrowth in allogeneic bone blocks applied for vertical bone augmentation: a preclinical randomized controlled study.

Osseous ingrowth in allogeneic bone blocks applied for vertical bone augmentation: a preclinical randomised controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of osseous graft consolidation using allogeneic bone blocks for vertical bone augmentation in an animal model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardised allogeneic and autologous bone blocks were fixed on the frontal skull of 20 adult female pigs and covered with a resorbable collagen membrane. Animals were sacrificed after 2 and 6 months. Specimens were histologically and histomorphometrically analysed focusing on the amount of vital bone, residual bone substitute material and connective tissue. Furthermore, the amount of expression of bone matrix proteins (collagen type I and osteocalcin) and de novo vessel formation (von Willebrand factor) were quantified by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Significantly more allogeneic bone blocks failed for both evaluation time points (p < 0.05). Allogeneic blocks showed significantly less vital bone with more connective tissue formation compared to autologous bone blocks. Increased vessel formation could be detected for both evaluation time points in the contact area of autologous bone with local bone. The expression of collagen type I and osteocalcin was significantly lower in the allogeneic bone graft. CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic cancellous bone blocks showed a significantly higher failure rate compared to autologous bone blocks. Allogeneic bone blocks seemed to negatively affect bone formation or negatively influence the host in the long term, and increased connective tissue formation and block loss should be anticipated. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In order to maintain patient safety and treatment success clinicians should be persuaded to make a conscious choice of the applied biomaterials with regard to their components and structure.

Evaluation of Staff Satisfaction After Implementation of a Surgical Safety Checklist in the Ambulatory of an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department and its Impact on Patient Safety.

PURPOSE: Safety checklists in medicine have been shown to be effective in the prevention of complications and adverse events in patients undergoing surgery. Such checklists are not as common in dentistry. The aims of this study were to propose a safety checklist for the ambulatory treatment of patients undergoing oral and implant surgery and to assess its impact on patient safety and staff satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After implementation of a surgical safety checklist in the ambulatory treatment of patients undergoing oral and implant surgeries, a questionnaire regarding staff satisfaction and safety-related parameters was randomly administered. Incidents, complications, and adverse events were documented. Outcomes with (n = 40 surgeries) and without (n = 40 surgeries) use of the checklist were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Staff reported high satisfaction with the use of the checklist, which demonstrably improved team communication and lowered stress levels during surgery. There was a statistically significantly higher frequency of reported incidents without the use of the checklist (n = 43) than with the use of the checklist (n = 10; P = .000). Most incidents were reported in the context of pre- and post-procedural processes. CONCLUSIONS: Safety checklists help to improve work processes, optimize communication, and lower stress levels. Their use in clinical dental practice is recommended.

The influence of different abutment materials on tissue regeneration after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis - a randomized controlled preclinical study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of different abutment materials on peri-implant tissue regeneration after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in a large animal model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Titanium implants (n = 51) were inserted in the upper and lower jaw of eight beagle dogs and a peri-implant infection was induced. After two months the peri-implant infection was surgically treated and abutments with different surfaces (Ti-2: n = 14; CoCrMb: n = 13; Ag-modified Ti-4: n = 14; Ti-4 control: n = 10) were applied. Clinical attachment level (CAL), modified sulcus bleeding index (mBI), bleeding on probing (BoP), and the sulcus fluid flow rate (SFFR) were determined 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgical treatment to document the peri-implant tissue reaction. RESULTS: Superior levels for CAL and mBI were found with the Ti-4 control and the Ag-modified abutments, with the Ag-modified abutments showing the best values after 12 weeks. Lowest SFFR values compared with the other treatment groups underlined the superior soft tissue reaction adjacent to Ag-modified abutments. After 12 weeks inferior CAL, SFFR, BOP and mBI values were documented for the Ti-2 surface. CONCLUSION: Within limitations of the study, Ag-modified abutments lead to superior tissue reactions. Further studies are needed to investigate the properties of abutment materials.

Establishment of a new pull-out strength testing method to quantify early osseointegration-An experimental pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The animal study aims to evaluate a new experimental model for measuring sole the influence of the surface characteristics independent from implant macro-design on the level of osseointegration by registering the pull-out strength needed for removal of experimental devices with different surfaces from artificial defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two test bodies (36 with the FRIADENT(®) plus surface, 36 with the P15/HAp biofunctionalized surface) were inserted in six adult domestic pigs with artificial calvarial defects. The experimental devices were designed to fit in the defects leaving a gap between the test body and the local bone. After 21 days of healing, the animals were sacrificed and the test bodies were pulled out with a standardised reproducible pull-out device measuring the pull-out strength. The pull-out strength for both groups was compared. RESULTS: Twenty-one days after insertion a mean force of 412 ± 142 N for the P15/HAp group and 183 ± 105 N for the FRIADENT(®) plus group was measured for the removal of the specimens from the calvarial bone. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The experimental set-up seems to be a suitable method when measuring the impact of implant surfaces on the early stage of osseointegration.

Extra-oral defect augmentation using autologous, bovine and equine bone blocks: A preclinical histomorphometrical comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare autologous bone (AB), bovine bone (BB), and equine bone (EB) blocks with regard to de novo bone formation, connective tissue, and residual bone substitute material portions in a standardized defect animal model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the frontal skull of 20 pigs, 106 standardized cylindrical "critical size defects" were prepared. Defects were randomly filled with AB, BB, and EB blocks. After a healing period of 30 and 60 days, de novo bone formation, residual bone substitute material, and connective tissue portion was assessed by means of histomorphometry (Toluidine blue O staining). Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to evaluate differences between the groups. RESULTS: The de novo bone formation was significantly higher in the AB group in comparison to the xenogeneic groups (p < 0.05). After 30 days, EB showed significantly (p < 0.05) more newly formed bone compared to the BB group. The soft tissue formation was significantly higher in the BB and EB group. Defects augmented with BB showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher portions of bone substitute materials compared to sides augmented with EB after 30 days. CONCLUSION: In the extra-oral model, AB blocks were superior concerning de novo bone formation. No clinical advantages of EB blocks could be observed.

Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This investigation focused on a comparison of clinical and histological characteristics after sinus floor augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP, Straumann BoneCeramic(®) ), anorganic bovine bone (ABB, Geistlich Bio-Oss(®) ), mineralized cancellous bone allograft (MCBA, Zimmer Puros(®) ), or autologous bone (AB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with a posterior edentulous maxillary situation and a vertical bone height less than or equal to 4 mm were included in this study. A two-stage procedure was carried out. After augmentation of the maxillary sinus with ABB, BCP, MCBA, or AB followed by a healing period of 5 months, biopsies were taken with simultaneous implant placement. The samples were analyzed using microradiography and histology. RESULTS: Ninety-four implants were placed in the augmented positions and 53 bone biopsies were taken and evaluated. The bone volume fraction of newly formed bone was measured as 30.28 ± 2.16% for BCP, 24.9 ± 5.67% for ABB, 41.74 ± 2.1% for AB, and 35.41 ± 2.78% for MCBA with significant increases in bone volume of AB vs. BCP and ABB, and MCBA vs. ABB samples. Significantly different residual bone substitute material was measured as 15.8 ± 2.1% in the BCP group and 21.36 ± 4.83% in the ABB group. CONCLUSION: As it provides the highest rate of de novo bone formation, AB can be considered to remain the gold standard in sinus floor augmentation. All tested control materials showed comparable results and are suitable for maxillary sinus augmentation.