Rapid detection of Bacillus ionophore cereulide in food products.

Cereulide is a toxic cyclic depsipeptide produced by certain strains of Bacillus cereus found in soil and food products. While some harmless strains of Bacillus are used as probiotic, others can cause nausea and vomiting, and represent an important food safety concern. Current detection methods are time consuming and do not necessarily detect toxic cereulide. Here, we developed a rapid protocol using Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry that detects the toxin originating from a colony smear of B. cereus. The distinct molecular feature of the toxin peak at m/z 1,191 was clearly identified from bacterial extracts with a limit of detection (LOD) of 30 ng/mL. Final optimisation of the sample preparation was based on cereulide chelating cations to produce the alkali adduct [M + K]+ without the use of a MALDI matrix, and provided a 1,000-fold improvement of LOD with 30 pg/mL of cereulide. We evaluated the application of this method for the detection of cereulide in rice, milk, and different ready-to-eat meals. The proposed protocol is quick, easy and provides an improvement over conventional methods for the detection of B. cereus toxin.

Drug allergy passport and other documentation for patients with drug hypersensitivity - An ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group Position Paper.

The strongest and best-documented risk factor for drug hypersensitivity (DH) is the history of a previous reaction. Accidental exposures to drugs may lead to severe or even fatal reactions in sensitized patients. Preventable prescription errors are common. They are often due to inadequate medical history or poor risk assessment of recurrence of drug reaction. Proper documentation is essential information for the doctor to make sound therapeutic decision. The European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology have formed a task force and developed a drug allergy passport as well as general guidelines of drug allergy documentation. A drug allergy passport, a drug allergy alert card, a certificate, and a discharge letter after medical evaluation are adequate means to document DH in a patient. They are to be handed to the patient who is advised to carry the documentation at all times especially when away from home. A drug allergy passport should at least contain information on the culprit drug(s) including international nonproprietary name, clinical manifestations including severity, diagnostic measures, potential cross-reactivity, alternative drugs to prescribe, and where more detailed information can be obtained from the issuer. It should be given to patients only after full allergy workup. In the future, electronic prescription systems with alert functions will become more common and should include the same information as in paper-based documentation.

Pathogenesis of drug allergy--current concepts and recent insights.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) may be caused by immunologic and non-immunologic mechanisms. According to the World Allergy Organization, drug allergy (DA) encompasses the subgroup of immunologic DHRs which are mediated either by specific antibodies or specific T lymphocytes. Due to the immunologic memory, DA reactions bear an increased risk for dramatically enhanced reactions on re-exposure. Some current concepts of DA were described decades ago. Drug allergies to soluble macromolecular protein drugs such as biopharmaceuticals are predominantly T cell-dependent drug-specific antibody responses leading to IgE-or IgG-mediated allergy. However, most drugs are too small to be directly recognized by specific B and T cells. Immune reactions to low-molecular drugs have been explained by the hapten model: a hapten drug can bind covalently to soluble autologous proteins (e.g. serum albumin). Resulting compounds may then be recognized by matching B cell receptors (BCRs) and induce a specific T cell-dependent IgE-or IgG-antibody production. Drug haptens may bind to extra- or intracellular proteins, which are processed and presented by various professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Depending on the APC, they may induce not only specific antibody production, but also non-immediate T cell-mediated DA. More recently, a supplementary effector mechanism for non-immediate DA to low-molecular drugs has been described, namely the pharmacological interaction of native low-molecular drugs with immune receptors (p-i-concept). Low-molecular drugs may directly and reversibly attach to immune receptors. These non-covalent interactions may modify the affinity between autologous major histocompatibility complex (MHC), presented peptides and specifically primed T cell receptors (TCRs) and thereby stimulate T cells. A special type of p-i-reaction has been recently described between the antiviral drug abacavir and the F pocket of HLA-B*57:01. This interaction causes an alteration of the MHC-presented self-peptide repertoire and may consecutively lead to a kind of auto-reactivity. Such types of reactions can explain the strong MHC-HLA associations which have been found for some T cell-mediated DHRs.

Desensitization in delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions -- an EAACI position paper of the Drug Allergy Interest Group.

Drug hypersensitivity may deprive patients of drug therapy, and occasionally no effective alternative treatment is available. Successful desensitization has been well documented in delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. In certain situations, such as sulfonamide hypersensitivity in HIV-positive patients or hypersensitivity to antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis, published success rates reach 80%, and this procedure appears helpful for the patient management. A state of clinical tolerance may be achieved by the administration of increasing doses of the previously offending drug. However, in most cases, a pre-existent sensitization has not been proven by positive skin tests. Successful re-administration may have occurred in nonsensitized patients. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of desensitization is needed. Currently, desensitization in delayed hypersensitivity reactions is restricted to mild, uncomplicated exanthems and fixed drug eruptions. The published success rates vary depending on clinical manifestations, drugs, and applied protocols. Slower protocols tend to be more effective than rush protocols; however, underreporting of unsuccessful procedures is very probable. The decision to desensitize a patient must always be made on an individual basis, balancing risks and benefits. This paper reviews the literature and presents the expert experience of the Drug Hypersensitivity Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs -- an ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group position paper.

Skin tests are of paramount importance for the evaluation of drug hypersensitivity reactions. Drug skin tests are often not carried out because of lack of concise information on specific test concentrations. The diagnosis of drug allergy is often based on history alone, which is an unreliable indicator of true hypersensitivity.To promote and standardize reproducible skin testing with safe and nonirritant drug concentrations in the clinical practice, the European Network and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Interest Group on Drug Allergy has performed a literature search on skin test drug concentration in MEDLINE and EMBASE, reviewed and evaluated the literature in five languages using the GRADE system for quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. Where the literature is poor, we have taken into consideration the collective experience of the group.We recommend drug concentration for skin testing aiming to achieve a specificity of at least 95%. It has been possible to recommend specific drug concentration for betalactam antibiotics, perioperative drugs, heparins, platinum salts and radiocontrast media. For many other drugs, there is insufficient evidence to recommend appropriate drug concentration. There is urgent need for multicentre studies designed to establish and validate drug skin test concentration using standard protocols. For most drugs, sensitivity of skin testing is higher in immediate hypersensitivity compared to nonimmediate hypersensitivity.

Etiology and pathogenesis of adverse drug reactions.

In clinical routine, adverse drug reactions (ADR) are common, and they should be included in the differential diagnosis in all patients undergoing drug treatment. Only part of those ADR are immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions and thus true drug allergies. Far more common are non-immune-mediated ADR, e.g. due to the pharmacological properties of the drug or to the individual predisposition of the patient (enzymopathies, cytokine dysbalance, mast cell hyperreactivity). In true drug allergiesT cell- and immunoglobulin E (lgE)-mediated reactions dominate the clinical presentation. T cell-mediated ADR usually have a delayed appearance and include skin eruptions in most cases. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that they may involve systemic T cell activation and thus take a severe, sometimes lethal turn. Clinical danger signs are involvement of mucosal surfaces, blistering within the exanthematous skin areas and systemic symptoms, e.g. fever or malaise. Drug presentation via antigen-presenting cells to T cells can either involve the classical pathway of haptenization of endogenous proteins or be directly mediated via noncovalent binding to immune receptors (MHC molecules or T cell receptors), the so-called p-i concept. Flare-up reactions during the acute phase of T cell-mediated ADR should not be mistaken for true drug allergies, as they only occur in the setting of a highly activated T cell pool. IgE-mediated ADR are less frequent and involve mast cells and/or basophils as peripheral effector cells. Recent data suggest that certain patients with drug allergy have a preexistent sensitization although they have never been exposed to the culprit drug, probably due to cross-reactivity. Thus, allergic drug reactions on first encounter are possible. In general, the extent of cross-reactivity is higher in IgE-compared to T cell-mediated ADR. Based on a specific ethnic background and only for severe T cell-mediated ADR to certain drugs, a strong HLA association has been established recently.

Continuous apple consumption induces oral tolerance in birch-pollen-associated apple allergy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with birch pollen allergy (major allergen: Bet v 1) have often an associated oral allergy syndrome (OAS) to apple, which contains the cross-reactive allergen Mal d 1. As successful birch pollen immunotherapy does not consistently improve apple related OAS symptoms, we evaluated whether regular apple consumption has an effect on OAS and immune parameters of Mal d 1 or Bet v 1 allergy. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with a clear history of birch pollen rhinoconjunctivitis and associated OAS to apple were included in an open, randomized, controlled clinical trial: 27 patients consumed daily defined amount of apple (1-128 g), doubling the amount every two to three weeks, while 13 patients remained untreated. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that achieved tolerance to at least 128 g of apple at the end of the study after 8 months. Exploratory endpoints were questionnaire about cross-reactive food and pollen allergy symptoms, conjunctival provocation test with birch pollen and Bet v 1, and in vitro tests (tIgE, sIgE, and IgG4 to Mal d 1 and Bet v 1; basophil activation test with both allergens). RESULTS: Seventeen of 27 patients in active group and none of 13 patients in control group (P = 0.0001) could tolerate a whole apple after the intervention. However, differences in endpoints reflecting systemic immune reactivity did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In patients with OAS to apple, tolerance can be safely induced with slowly, gradually increasing consumption of apple. However, the observation of a relapse after discounting of apple consumption and absence of immunologic changes suggest that induced tolerance is only transient.

Petasites extract Ze 339 (PET) inhibits allergen-induced Th2 responses, airway inflammation and airway hyperreactivity in mice.

BACKGROUND: The herbal Petasites hybridus (butterbur) extract (Ze 339, PET) is known to have leukotriene inhibiting properties, and therefore might inhibit allergic diseases. METHODS: The effect of PET was investigated in ovalbumin (OVA) immunized BALB/c mice given intranasally together with antigen challenge in the murine model of allergic airway disease (asthma) with the analysis of the inflammatory and immune parameters in the lung. RESULTS: PET given with the antigen challenge inhibited the allergic response. PET inhibited airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and eosinophil recruitment into the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid upon allergen challenge, but had no effect in the saline control mice. Eosinophil recruitment was further assessed in the lung by eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) activity at a concentration of 100 microg PET. Microscopic investigations revealed less inflammation, eosinophil recruitment and mucus hyperproduction in the lung with 100 microg PET. Diminution of AHR and inflammation was associated with reduced IL-4, IL-5 and RANTES production in the BAL fluid with 30 microg PET, while OVA specific IgE and eotaxin serum levels remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: PET, which has been reported to inhibit leukotriene activity, reduced allergic airway inflammation and AHR by inhibiting the production of the Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5, and RANTES.

Eczematous skin reaction to atopy patch testing with cockroach in patients with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Aeroallergens from house dust mite (HDM) may be an important trigger in a subgroup of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). HDM and cockroach (CR) contain cross-reactive allergens, such as tropomyosin. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of patch testing with an aeroallergen and the role of CR allergen and HDM allergen in persons with AD. METHODS: We performed skin prick tests (SPT) with a panel of common aeroallergens and total serum immunoglobulin (Ig)E and specific IgE tests for CR and HDM on 23 patients with AD and 9 nonatopic control participants. Atopy patch tests (APT) were performed with CR and HDM extracts on clinically uninvolved skin on the back, and evaluated after 48 and 72 hours. RESULTS: A positive APT reaction to CR was found in 10/23 (43%) patients with AD. No positive reactions were observed in the nonatopic control participants. Positive APT reactions for CR showed no significant correlation with SPT or specific IgE levels for this allergen. Twelve of the 23 (52%) patients with AD were also sensitized to HDM. There was no significant correlation between positive results for SPT, APT, and specific IgE to CR and HDM. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that CR allergens can induce positive patch test reactions in patients with AD. The absence of a significant correlation to SPT and specific IgE antibodies suggests that T-cell- and IgE-sensitization may be mediated by different allergens. There was no significant relationship between CR and HDM sensitivity, thus indicating no major cross-reactivity.

Effect of natural seasonal pollen exposure and repeated nasal allergen provocations on elevation of exhaled nitric oxide.

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a marker for allergic airway inflammation. We wondered whether in patients with intermittent allergic rhinitis only (i) natural pollen exposure and (ii) artificial pollen exposure by repeated nasal allergen provocations may lead to an elevation of FENO. METHODS: In two prospective studies, we compared the FENO of nonatopic controls with the FENO of nonasthmatic individuals with mild intermittent rhinitis to tree and/or grass pollen. Study I: 13 atopic individuals and seven controls had measurements of FENO, blood eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) before, during and after pollen season. Study II: 16 atopic individuals and 12 controls had nasal allergen provocations on four following days out of pollen season, with daily measurements of FENO before, 2 and 6 h after provocation, and determination of blood eosinophils, ECP and FEV1 at baseline, on days 5 and 10-12. RESULTS: Natural pollen exposure (study I) caused a significant elevation of FENO in allergic individuals. Nasal allergen provocations (study II) did not elicit a statistically significant rise neither of FENO nor of blood eosinophils between baseline and day 5. However, a subgroup of four individuals with a rise of blood eosinophils during nasal allergen provocations showed also a rise of FENO. CONCLUSIONS: We suppose that in allergic rhinitis a concomitant reaction of the bronchial system is dependent on a strong local inflammation leading to a generalized immune stimulation.

Toll-like receptor 4 agonists adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide adjuvant attenuate ovalbumin-specific allergic airway disease: role of MyD88 adaptor molecule and interleukin-12/interferon-gamma axis.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological and experimental data suggest that bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) can either protect from or exacerbate allergic asthma. Lipopolysaccharides trigger immune responses through toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) that in turn activates two major signalling pathways via either MyD88 or TRIF adaptor proteins. The LPS is a pro-Type 1 T helper cells (Th1) adjuvant while aluminium hydroxide (alum) is a strong Type 2 T helper cells (Th2) adjuvant, but the effect of the mixing of both adjuvants on the development of lung allergy has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: We determined whether natural (LPS) or synthetic (ER-803022) TLR4 agonists adsorbed onto alum adjuvant affect allergen sensitization and development of airway allergic disease. To dissect LPS-induced molecular pathways, we used TLR4-, MyD88-, TRIF-, or IL-12/IFN-gamma-deficient mice. METHODS: Mice were sensitized with subcutaneous injections of ovalbumin (OVA) with or without TLR4 agonists co-adsorbed onto alum and challenged with intranasally with OVA. The development of allergic lung disease was evaluated 24 h after last OVA challenge. RESULTS: Sensitization with OVA plus LPS co-adsorbed onto alum impaired in dose-dependent manner OVA-induced Th2-mediated allergic responses such as airway eosinophilia, type-2 cytokines secretion, airway hyper-reactivity, mucus hyper production and serum levels of IgE or IgG1 anaphylactic antibodies. Although the levels of IgG2a, Th1-affiliated isotype increased, investigation into the lung-specific effects revealed that LPS did not induce a Th1 pattern of inflammation. Lipopolysaccharides impaired the development of Th2 immunity, signaling via TLR4 and MyD88 molecules and via the IL-12/IFN-gamma axis, but not through TRIF pathway. Moreover, the synthetic TLR4 agonists that proved to have a less systemic inflammatory response than LPS also protected against allergic asthma development. CONCLUSION: Toll-like receptor 4 agonists co-adsorbed with allergen onto alum down-modulate allergic lung disease and prevent the development of polarized T cell-mediated airway inflammation.

[Elevated concentrations of fecal calprotectin in patients with liver cirrhosis]. / Erhöhte Konzentrationen von fäkalem Calprotectin bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTION: Bacterial translocation from the gut lumen is considered to play an important role in the development of infectious complications in patients with liver cirrhosis. This translocation might be increased by inflammation of the gut mucosa. Calprotectin is a cytoplasmatic protein of neutrophilic granulocytes and is an established marker for the assessment of localized intestinal inflammation. It was the aim of the current study to systematically evaluate a localized intestinal inflammation in patients with liver cirrhosis by means of fecal calprotectin concentrations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fecal calprotectin concentrations were determined in 53 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and in 18 subjects without intestinal or liver diseases, who were comparable with respect to age and gender. Patients with diarrhoea, inflammatory bowel disease and a positive stool test for occult blood were excluded from the study. Fecal calprotectin concentrations were measured by a sandwich ELISA. The systemic inflammatory reaction of the patients was assessed by C-reactive protein, white blood cells counts and the serum concentrations of the cytokines IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10. RESULTS: Fecal calprotectin concentrations were significantly increased in patients with liver cirrhosis (median 37.0 mg/kg) compared to controls patients (median 2.2, P < 0.0001). There were no significant correlations of calprotectin concentrations with systemic inflammatory parameters, like CRP, white blood cell count or serum cytokines. However, fecal calprotectin concentrations were significantly associated with the stage of liver cirrhosis as expressed by the Child-Pugh score ( P < 0.001). A trend towards higher concentrations of calprotectin was found in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis ( P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with liver cirrhosis display elevated fecal calprotectin concentrations as a potential sign of intestinal inflammation. Further studies are warranted to establish a role of calprotectin for the risk assessment of infectious complications secondary to bacterial translocation in patients with liver cirrhosis.

T cell involvement in cutaneous drug eruptions.

BACKGROUND: The most frequent side-effects of drug therapy are skin eruptions. Their pathomechanism is rather unclear. OBJECTIVE: In this prospective study we investigated the T cell activation and drug specificity in different forms of drug-induced exanthemas from 22 patients. METHODS: During acute drug allergy, liver parameters and T cell subset activation in the circulation (up-regulation of CD25 and HLA-DR) were evaluated and skin biopsies of the acute lesion performed. After recovery, the causative drug was identified by lymphocyte transformation (LTT) and scratch-patch tests. RESULTS: Seventeen of 22 (17/22) patients had maculo-papular exanthema, 4/22 bullous exanthema and 1/22 urticaria. The causative drugs were mainly antibiotics, anti-epileptics and anti-hypertensives. Up-regulation of HLA-DR on circulating CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T cells was detected in 17 patients, being most marked in patients with bullous reactions or hepatic involvement. The LTT was positive in 14/21 analysed and the patch test in 7/15. All patients showed lymphocytic infiltration in the skin biopsy of the acute lesion. Generally CD4(+) T cells dominated; a higher percentage of circulating CD8(+) T cells was found in patients with bullous skin reactions or hepatic involvement. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate activation and drug specificity of T cells in drug-induced skin eruptions. A predominant CD8(+) T cell activation leads to more severe (bullous) skin symptoms or liver involvement, while predominant activation of CD4(+) cells elicits mainly maculo-papular reactions.

Recognition of sulfamethoxazole and its reactive metabolites by drug-specific CD4+ T cells from allergic individuals.

The recognition of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole (SMX) by T cells is usually explained with the hapten-carrier model. However, recent investigations have revealed a MHC-restricted but processing- and metabolism-independent pathway of drug presentation. This suggested a labile, low-affinity binding of SMX to MHC-peptide complexes on APC. To study the role of covalent vs noncovalent drug presentation in SMX allergy, we analyzed the proliferative response of PBMC and T cell clones from patients with SMX allergy to SMX and its reactive oxidative metabolites SMX-hydroxylamine and nitroso-SMX. Although the great majority of T cell clones were specific for noncovalently bound SMX, PBMC and a small fraction of clones responded to nitroso-SMX-modified cells or were cross-reactive. Rapid down-regulation of TCR expression in T cell clones upon stimulation indicated a processing-independent activation irrespective of specificity for covalently or noncovalently presented Ag. In conclusion, our data show that recognition of SMX presented in covalent and noncovalent bound form is possible by the same TCR but that the former is the exception rather than the rule. The scarcity of cross-reactivity between covalently and noncovalently bound SMX suggests that the primary stimulation may be directed to the noncovalently bound SMX.

[Allergy to house dust mites]. / Hausstaubmilbenallergie.

The prevalence of atopic disease in Switzerland is 15-20%. About 30% of these patients have perennial symptoms and a substantial proportion are allergic to house-dust mite proteins. If absolute air humidity is lower than 7.0 g water per kg air, house-dust mites will not proliferate. This is why the occurrence of house-dust mites varies between different regions. About half of the patients with allergy to house-dust mites complain of rhinitis, a quarter of asthma and a quarter of asthma and rhinitis. The diagnosis is usually by history, skin prick tests and if necessary provocation. Therapy includes allergen avoidance (reduction of air humidity in dwellings by ventilation, encasing of mattresses and bedding), medication (mainly topical corticosteroids) and specific immunotherapy.

[Urticaria]. / Urtikaria.

Urticaria may affect as many as 25% of all people at some time during their lives. The hallmark of urticaria are transitory and completely reversible wheals (intracutaneous oedema). There are multiple causes of urticaria. It has various clinical expressions. Corresponding to the time course it is possible to differentiate between acute, acute relapsing and chronic urticaria. Acute and acute relapsing urticaria is often caused by an allergy or "pseudoallergy". Causal factors of chronic urticaria are usually elusive and therefore only a symptomatic treatment is possible. H1 antihistamines with a low potential for sedation are the most important first-line treatment.

Skin and laboratory tests in amoxicillin- and penicillin-induced morbilliform skin eruption.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous amoxicillin- and penicillin-mediated reactions can be classified as immediate and delayed-type reactions. Immediate reactions are thought to involve IgE antibodies and have been studied extensively. In contrast only few data exist about delayed reactions such as morbilliform or maculopapular rash. OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of immediate skin tests, skin-patch tests, specific IgE and lymphocyte transformation tests with regard to the diagnosis of delayed skin eruptions. METHODS: Skin and in vitro tests were performed in 18 subjects. Twelve subjects had penicillin- or amoxicillin-induced morbilliform exanthema and six were controls without hypersensitivity reaction, tested before and after exposure. RESULTS: Specific IgE to penicillin and immediate penicillin skin tests were negative in amoxicillin- or penicillin-induced delayed skin eruptions. In contrast, skin-patch testing and LTT were positive in 9/12 or 10/12, respectively, but negative in all six controls. CONCLUSION: These findings substantiate a T-cell-mediated immune pathomechanism in the majority of penicillin-induced delayed skin reaction. Moreover, they underline the necessity to adapt the test procedures to underlying pathomechanisms and support the diagnostic value of skin-patch testing and LTT in delayed cutaneous reactions to penicillins.