Daratumumab in first-line treatment of patients with light chain amyloidosis and Mayo stage IIIb improves treatment response and overall survival.

Treatment of patients with Mayo stage IIIb light chain (AL) amyloidosis is still challenging, and the prognosis remains very poor. Mayo stage IIIb patients were excluded from the pivotal trial leading to the approval of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone. This retrospective, multicenter study evaluates the addition of daratumumab to first-line therapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIb AL amyloidosis. In total, data from 119 consecutive patients were analyzed, 27 patients received an upfront treatment including daratumumab, 63 a bortezomibbased regimen without daratumumab, eight received therapies other than daratumumab or bortezomib and 21 pretreated patients or deceased prior to treatment were excluded. In the daratumumab group, median overall survival was not reached after a median follow-up time of 14.5 months, while it was significantly worse in the bortezomib- and the otherwise treated group (6.6 and 2.2 months, respectively) (P=0.002). Overall hematologic response rate at 2 and 6 months was better in the daratumumab group compared to the bortezomib group (59% vs. 37%, P=0.12, 67% vs. 41%, P=0.04, respectively). Landmark survival analyses revealed a significantly improved overall survival in patients with partial hematologic response or better, compared to non-responders. Cardiac response at 6 months was 46%, 21%, 0% in the daratumumab-, bortezomib- and otherwise treated groups, respectively (P=0.04). A landmark survival analysis revealed markedly improved overall survival in patients with cardiac very good partial response vs. cardiac non-responders (P=0.002). This study demonstrates for the first time the superiority of an upfront treatment with daratumumab over standard-of-care in stage IIIb AL amyloidosis.

Elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone is a very well tolerated regimen associated with durable remission even in very advanced myeloma: a retrospective study from two academic centers.

BACKGROUND: The anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, elotuzumab (elo), plus lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) is approved for relapsed/refractory MM in the U.S. and Europe. Recently, a small phase 2 study demonstrated an advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) for elo plus pomalidomide (pom)/dex compared to pom/dex alone and resulted in licensing of this novel triplet combination, but clinical experience is still limited. PURPOSE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of elo/pom/dex in a "real world" cohort of patients with advanced MM, we queried the databases of the university hospitals of Würzburg and Vienna. FINDINGS: We identified 22 patients with a median number of five prior lines of therapy who received elo/pom/dex prior to licensing within an early access program. Patients received a median number of 5 four-week treatment cycles. Median PFS was 6.4 months with 12-month and 18-month PFS rates of 35% and 28%, respectively. The overall response rate was 50% and 64% of responding patients who achieved a longer PFS with elo/pom/dex compared to their most recent line of therapy. Objective responses were also seen in five patients who had been pretreated with pomalidomide. Low tumor burden was associated with improved PFS (13.5 months for patients with ISS stage I/II at study entry v 6.4 months for ISS III), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. No infusion-related reactions were reported. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Elo/pom/dex is an active and well-tolerated regimen in highly advanced MM even after pretreatment with pomalidomide.