[Recommendations of the Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the AFU concerning the management of Vasectomy]. / Recommandations du Comité d'Andrologie et de Médecine Sexuelle de l'AFU concernant la prise en charge de la vasectomie.

OBJECTIVES: To answer the main clinical questions asked by practitioners and men consulting for a vasectomy request. METHOD: The CPR method was used. The clinical questions were formulated according to the PICO methodology. A Pubmed literature search for the period 1984-2021 identified 508 references, of which 79 were selected and analyzed with the GRADE grid. RECOMMENDATIONS: Vasectomy is a permanent, potentially reversible contraception. It is a safe procedure. A second vasectomy is necessary in only 1 % of cases. Surgical complications (hematoma, infection, pain, etc.) are rare. The frequency of prolonged scrotal pain after vasectomy is about 5 %, and less than 2 % describe a negative impact of this pain on their quality of life. Vasectomy does not have negative consequences on sexuality. The only contraindication to vasectomy is the minor patient. Patients at increased risk of remorse are single, divorced or separated men under the age of 30. Sperm storage may be particularly appropriate for them. Whatever the reason, the law allows the surgeon to refuse to perform the vasectomy. He must inform the patient of this at the first consultation. The choice of the type of anesthesia is left to the discretion of the surgeon and the patient. It must be decided during the preoperative consultation. Local anesthesia should be considered first. General anesthesia should be particularly considered in cases of anxiety or intense sensitivity of the patient to palpation of the vas deferens, difficulty palpating the vas deferens, or a history of scrotal surgery that would make the procedure more complex. Concerning the vasectomy technique, 2 points seem to improve the efficiency of the vasectomy: coagulation of the deferential mucosa and interposition of fascia. Leaving the proximal end of the vas deferens free seems to reduce the risk of post-vasectomy syndrome without increasing the risk of failure or complications. No-scalpel vasectomy is associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications than conventional vasectomy. Regarding follow-up, it is recommended to perform a spermogram at 3 months post-vasectomy and after 30 ejaculations. If there are still a few non-motile spermatozoa at 3 months, it is recommended that a check-up be performed at 6 months post-vasectomy. In case of motile spermatozoa or more than 100,000 immobile spermatozoa/mL at 6 months (defining failure), a new vasectomy should be considered. Contraception must be maintained until the effectiveness of the vasectomy is confirmed.

[Morbidity of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for localized cancer prostate]. / Morbidité du curage ganglionnaire pelvien étendu au cours de la prostatectomie totale laparoscopique robot assistée.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the morbidity specific of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a 8 year retrospective study. MATERIAL: We carried out a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective study on 342 consecutive patients who underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, from July 2010 to March 2018. Postoperative complications were recorded up to 3 months after the operation. RESULTS: Thirty (8.8%) patients had at least one complication related to lymphadenectomy including 1 vascular injury (0.3%), 7 injuries of the obturator nerve (2%), 5 venous thromboembolic complications (1.5%) including 4 pulmonary embolisms, 10 symptomatic lymphoceles (2.9%) and 8 lymphoedemas (2.3%). Of these complications, 13 were classified Clavien 1 (43.3%), 8 Clavien 2 (26.7%), 7 Clavien 3a (23.3%) and 2 Clavien 3b (6.7%). In univariate analysis a high age (P=0.04), high BMI (P<0.01) and pT stage (P=0.02) were significantly associated with complication whereas in multivariate analysis, only age (P=0.02) and BMI (P<0.01) lived were. In univariate analysis high BMI (P=0.04) and lymph node involvement (P=0.04) were associated with lymphatic complication. We did not find any other specific risk factor for the other complications. CONCLUSION: With 8.8% of overall complications related to lymphadenectomy and 5% of complication classified Clavien grade 2 or higher, extended pelvic lymphadenectomy was not very morbid. Age and BMI were risk factors for a overall complication. BMI and lymph node involvement were risk factors for lymphatic complications. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[Trends in the use of midurethral slings after the new legislation: A nationwide survey]. / Évolution des pratiques après l'arrêté encadrant les bandelettes sous-urétrales : résultats d'une enquête nationale.

INTRODUCTION: The French Department of Health published on October 23, 2020 a decree governing acts associated with mid-urethral sling (MUS) operations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in practice following this new legislation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out among French urologists and gynecologists using an online survey to collect changes in practices since the publication of the decree. RESULTS: From January to February 2021, 436 surgeons participated in the survey. Among these surgeons, 87% were aware of the new legislation and 56% of them considered the decree as useless. The order resulted in an increase in working time in 81% of cases. Among these surgeons, 66% of the surgeons worked in tertiary referral centers for the management of incontinence, of which 55% had a multidisciplinary meeting in urogynecology. Among the surgeons, 31% considered this meeting to be useful but 80% considered that it did not lead to any change in surgical indications, even though 33% of complications of BSU were discussed there. In conclusion, 61% of surgeons felt more reluctant to schedule a BSU placement with this new legislation. CONCLUSION: The majority of questioned surgeons considered the decree as useless. It generated few changes in practices which already respected the law on information, consultation, consent, experience and training. Most urologists and gynecologists are more reluctant to offer MUS after this new legislation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Results of active surveillance for sporadic renal angiomyolipomas greater than 4cm: A pledge for active surveillance]. / Résultats de la surveillance active des angiomyolipomes sporadiques du rein de plus de 4cm : un plaidoyer en faveur de la surveillance active.

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) of sporadic renal angiomyolipomas (AML) is under-utilised because of an old dogma fearing a life-threatening retroperitoneal hemorrhage when tumour size exceeds 4cm. The objective of this study was to report the outcome of AS in patients with sporadic AML greater than 4cm. METHODS: The results of AS in 35 patients managed for sporadic renal AML greater than 4cm were analysed. During AS, tumour growth, occurrence of new symptoms and/or complications, discontinuation of AS protocol, reason for discontinuation as well as subsequent treatment options were reported. RESULTS: Within a median follow-up of 36 months, 16 (46 %) patients discontinued AS at the end of the study period (mean follow-up 55±66, median 36 months). Patients who discontinued AS were more symptomatic at diagnosis but had similar age, mean tumour size and sex ratio. Active treatment-free survival was 66 % at 5 years. Retroperitoneal hemorrhage was reported in 3 (8.5 %) patients. None of these bleedings required transfusion or monitoring in an intensive care unit. Other reasons for discontinuation were pain (37 %), patient preference (19), changes in the radiological appearance of the tumour (19 %), and hematuria (6 %). CONCLUSION: This study showed that AS in AML bearing patients was feasible even in the setting of tumours larger than 4cm. More than 50% of the patients were still on AS at 5 years. Discontinuation of AS was not related to bleeding complications in most cases. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

Prognostic factors after adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Very few studies have sought prognostic factors after adrenalectomy for metastasis. The aim of this study was to assess prognostic factors for oncological outcomes after adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis. METHODS: All adrenalectomies for metastases performed in seven centers between 2006 and 2016 were included in a retrospective study. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for CSS and RFS were sought by Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: 106 patients were included. The primary tumors were mostly renal (47.7%) and pulmonary (32.3%). RFS and CSS estimated rates at 5 years were 20.7% and 63.7%, respectively. In univariate analysis, tumor size (HR 3.83; p = 0.04) and the metastasis timing (synchronous vs. metachronous; HR 0.47; p = 0.02) were associated with RFS. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (HR 8.28; p = 0.01) and metastasis timing (HR 18.60; p = 0.002) were significant factors for RFS. In univariate analysis, the renal origin of the primary tumor (HR 0.1; p < 0.001) and the disease-free interval (DFI; HR 0.12; p = 0.02) were associated with better CSS, positive surgical margins with poorer CSS (HR 3.4; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the renal origin of the primary tumor vs. pulmonary (HR 0.13; p = 0.03) and vs. other origins (HR 0.10; p = 00.4) and the DFI (HR 0.01; p = 0.009) were prognostic factors for CSS. CONCLUSION: In this study, tumor size and synchronous occurrence of the adrenal metastasis were associated with poorer RFS. Renal origin of the primary tumor and longer DFI were associated with better CSS. These prognostic factors might help for treatment decision in the management of adrenal metastasis.

[Surgical management of suburethral sling complications and functional outcomes]. / Prise en charge chirurgicale des complications de bandelette sous-urétrale et résultats fonctionnels.

OBJECTIVES: To identify various clinical presentation leading to the diagnosis of mid-urethral sling (MUS) complications and to analyze the functional outcomes after surgical management of these complications. METHOD: Retrospective observational monocentric study of all patients treated by MUS section or removal, between December 2005 and October 2019, in a pelviperineology centre. RESULTS: During this study, 96 patients were included. MUS complications surgically managed were vaginal mesh exposure (48 %), urethral mesh exposure (17 %), bladder mesh exposure (10 %); dysuria (30 %), pain (6 %), and infection (3 %). The mean time to diagnosis was 2 years. This diagnosis delay was caused by a non-specific and heterogeneous symptomatology. Surgical management consisted in MUS partial removal (79 %) and MUS simple section (21 %) with low perioperative morbidity. At three months follow-up, 36 patients (53 %) had stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including 13 (19 %) de novo (meaning no SUI before MUS section/removal) and 19 (28 %) had overactive bladder, including 9 (13 %) de novo. Half of the patients with SUI after MUS section/removal were able to be treated by a second MUS with a success rate of 83 % at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Clinical presentation of MUS complications is heterogeneous. Surgical treatment was associated with low morbidity in our study. Post-operatively, half of the patients had SUI and a second MUS was a relevant treatment option after proper evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Overexpression of certain transient receptor potential and Orai channels in prostate cancer is associated with decreased risk of systemic recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies had suggested the potential role of calcium signaling in prostate cancer (PCa) prognosis and agressiveness. We aimed to investigate selected proteins contributing to calcium (Ca2+ ) signaling, (Orai, stromal interaction molecule (STIM), and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels) and involved in cancer hallmarks, as independent predictors of systemic recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: A case-control study including 112 patients with clinically localized PCa treated by RP between 2002 and 2009 and with at least 6-years' follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to the absence or presence of systemic recurrence. Expression levels of 10 proteins involved in Ca2+ signaling (TRPC1, TRPC4, TRPV5, TRPV6, TRPM8, STIM1, STIM2, Orai1, Orai2, and Orai3), were assessed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays (TMAs) constructed from paraffin-embedded PCa specimens. The level of expression of the various transcripts in PCa was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis. RNA samples for qPCR were obtained from fresh frozen tissue samples of PCa after laser capture microdissection on RP specimens. Relative gene expression was analyzed using the 2-▵▵Ct method. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that increased expression of TRPC1, TRPC4, TRPV5, TRPV6, TRPM8, and Orai2 was significantly associated with a lower risk of systemic recurrence after RP, independently of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, percentage of positive biopsies, and surgical margin (SM) status (P = .007, P = .01, P < .001, P = .0065, P = .007, and P = .01, respectively). For TRPC4, TRPV5, and TRPV6, this association was also independent of Gleason score and pT stage. Moreover, overexpression of TRPV6 and Orai2 was significantly associated with longer time to recurrence after RP (P = .048 and .023, respectively). Overexpression of TRPC4, TRPV5, TRPV6, and Orai2 transcripts was observed in group R- (3.71-, 5.7-, 1.14-, and 2.65-fold increase, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to suggest the independent prognostic value of certain proteins involved in Ca2+ influx in systemic recurrence after RP: overexpression of TRPC1, TRPC4, TRPV5, TRPV6, TRPM8, and Orai2 is associated with a lower risk of systemic recurrence. TRPC4, TRPV5, and TRPV6 appear to be particularly interesting, as they are independent of the five commonly used predictive factors, that is, PSA, percentage of positive biopsies, SM status, Gleason score, and pT stage.