mTOR and mTOR phosphorylation status in primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma tissue: differential expression and clinical relevance.

PURPOSE: Impaired regulation of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway has been implicated in mechanisms related to neoplastic transformation in renal cell cancer (RCC) through enhancement of cell proliferation and survival and mTOR activation has been reported to occur due to phosphorylation of mTOR. To further determine the relevance of mTOR expression and activation and to analyze their putative role as a biomarker for systemic treatment in metastatic RCC, we investigated the expression of mTOR and phospho(p)-mTOR in primary RCC and metastases and correlated levels with pathological variables and clinical outcome. METHODS: Tissue microarrays (TMA) from paraffin-embedded tissue from 342 patients with primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma and 90 patients undergoing surgical resection for metastases were immunohistochemically stained for mTOR and p-mTOR and expression was quantified with immunoreactivity scores. Clinical patient characteristics and follow-up were recorded. Comparative evaluation of protein expression levels and association of expression with clinical variables and survival was performed. RESULTS: mTOR staining revealed differential expression in benign, primary and RCC metastasis (average staining score: 1.64, 0.78, and 1.44, respectively). Average staining of p-mTOR was 0.99 in benign kidney tissue, 0.73 in primary RCC and 1.14 in RCC metastasis tissue. Elevated mTOR expression in primary RCC tissue was associated with the presence of tumor necrosis, while a high level of p-mTOR was significantly correlated with advanced T-stage, high Fuhrman grade, the presence of tumor necrosis and sarcomatoid features. An elevated ratio of p-mTOR/mTOR was significantly correlated with advanced stage and sarcomatoid histology. mTOR expression was not predictive of overall survival (OS), while high p-mTOR levels were associated with impaired OS (p = 0.0046) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.0067). In univariate analysis, advanced stage (HR 3.78), high Fuhrman grade (HR 4.0), the presence of tumor necrosis (HR 1.99), and sarcomatoid features (HR 5.12) were significant predictors of OS. Moreover, elevated levels of p-mTOR (HR 1.67) and an elevated ratio of p-mTOR/mTOR ratio (HR 1.73) were significantly predictive of OS. In the multivariate regression model only the presence of locally advanced tumors (HR 2.44) was of independent prognostic value for OS, while there was a trend for impaired OS for patients with a high p-mTOR (HR 1.27, p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorylated mTOR is differentially expressed in localized RCC and metastasis. Elevated phosphorylation of mTOR is associated with aggressive pathologic features and unfavorable outcome. Whether these findings portend to relevance for mTOR inhibition treatment for metastatic RCC should be objective of further investigations.

Differential expression and clinical relevance of MUC1 in renal cell carcinoma metastasis.

PURPOSE: To determine the differential expression patterns and prognostic relevance of Mucin-1 (MUC1) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastasis. METHODS: Tissue microarrays (TMA) from samples of 151 RCC metastases, 61 primary RCCs and corresponding benign renal tissues were immunohistochemically stained for MUC1 and semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunoreactivity scores (IRS). MUC1 differential expression in metastasis, primary RCC and normal tissue were comparatively analyzed. Patient characteristics and clinical follow-up for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) were recorded. Correlations of MUC1 expression with mRCC survival were determined. RESULTS: Median cytoplasmic expression was highest in benign tissue (IRS = 1.04). Primary RCC (0.50) and metastasis (0.12) showed significantly lower cytoplasmic staining intensity. Membranous expression in benign tissue was, however, significantly lower (0.21) compared with primary RCC (0.59) and metastasis (0.57). Notable differences of MUC1 cytoplasmic and membranous expression were observed between different metastasis sites. Significantly higher (P = 0.014) membranous expression was observed in pulmonary versus non-pulmonary lesions, while no significant differences of cytoplasmic MUC1 expression were observed. The prognostic relevance of MUC1 expression in metastatic RCC was limited. CONCLUSIONS: MUC1 is differentially expressed in benign renal tissue, primary RCC and RCC metastasis. Membranous MUC1 expression was significantly elevated in pulmonary metastases compared to non-pulmonary lesions, which may reflect individual biology and putative response to MUC1-based anti-cancer therapy.