Eloquent Lower Grade Gliomas, a Highly Vulnerable Cohort: Assessment of Patients' Functional Outcome After Surgery Based on the LoG-Glio Registry.

Majority of lower grade glioma (LGG) are located eloquently rendering surgical resection challenging. Aim of our study was to assess rate of permanent deficits and its predisposing risk factors. We retrieved 83 patients harboring an eloquently located LGGs from the prospective LoG-Glio Database. Patients without surgery or incomplete postoperative data were excluded. Sign rank test, explorative correlations by Spearman ρ and multivariable regression for new postoperative deficits were calculated. Eloquent region involved predominantly motor (45%) and language (40%). At first follow up after 3 months permanent neuro-logical deficits (NDs) were noted in 39%. Mild deficits remained in 29% and severe deficits in 10%. Complete tumor removal (CTR) was successfully in 62% of intended cases. Postoperative and 3-month follow up National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) showed significantly lower values than preoperatively (p<0.001). 38% cases showed a decreased NIHSS at 3-month, while occurrence was only 14% at 9-12-month follow up. 6/7 patients with mild aphasia recovered after 9-12 months, while motor deficits present at 3-month follow up were persistent in majority of patients. Eastern oncology group functional status (ECOG) significantly decreased by surgery (p < 0.001) in 31% of cases. Between 3-month and 9-12-months follow up no significant improvement was seen. In the multivariable model CTR (p=0.019, OR 31.9), and ECOG>0 (p=0.021, OR 8.5) were independent predictors for permanent postoperative deficit according to NIHSS at 3-month according to multivariable regression model. Patients harboring eloquently located LGG are highly vulnerable for permanent deficits. Almost one third of patients have a permanent reduction of their functional status based on ECOG. Risk of an extended resection has to be balanced with the respective oncological benefit. Especially, patients with impaired pre-operative status are at risk for new permanent deficits. There is a relevant improvement of neurological symptoms in the first year after surgery, especially for patients with slight aphasia.

Multicentric Registry Study on Epidemiological and Biological Disease Profile as Well as Clinical Outcome in Patients with Low-Grade Gliomas: The LoG-Glio Project.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organization (WHO) grade II low-grade gliomas (LGGs) in adults are rare, and patients' mean overall survival (OS) is relatively long. Epidemiological data on factors influencing tumor genesis and progression are scarce, and prospective data on surgical management are still lacking. Because of the molecular heterogeneity of LGG, a comprehensive molecular characterization is required for any clinical and epidemiological research. Further, a detailed radiologic assessment is needed as the only established objective criterion for progressive disease. Both radiologic and molecular assessments have to be standardized to produce comparable data. The aim of the registry is to improve the evidence for surgical management of LGG patients by establishing a multicenter registry with a strong surgical and clinical focus including mandatory biobanking. METHODS: The LoG-Glio project is a prospective national observational multicenter registry that began on November 1, 2015. Inclusion criteria encompass all patients > 18 years of age with a radiologic suspicion of LGG. Patients with severe neurologic or psychiatric disorders that may interfere with their informed consent or if there is no possibility for further follow-up are excluded. Diagnosis of glioblastoma WHO grade IV isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type leads to a secondary exclusion of patients. In addition to demographic data, results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, add-on for patients with brain tumors, and National Health Institute Stroke Scale before and after surgery and during regular follow-ups are collected. At each time point a detailed recording of surgical and adjuvant treatment is performed. Radiologic assessment involves three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of T1, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2 sequences. For the final evaluation, a central detailed neuropathologic and molecular assessment of tumor samples and a radiologic evaluation of imaging sets are part of the study protocol. RESULTS: We report the first 100 consecutively registered patients for LoG-Glio. Three patients dropped out due to loss of follow-up. Of the remaining recruited patients, 8 were classified as wait and scan; 89 had surgery. Using the inclusion criteria described previously, 70 patients had an IDH-mutated glioma, 10 had miscellaneous rare LGGs, and 8 patients had an IDH wild-type WHO grade II or III glioma. CONCLUSION: The LoG-Glio registry has been successfully implemented. Applied selection criteria result in an appropriately balanced patient cohort. Short-term outcome data on epidemiology as well as the influence of current surgical techniques and adjuvant treatment on patient outcomes are expected. In the long run, the aim of the registry is to validate the new molecular-based WHO classification and the influence of the extent of resection on progression-free survival and OS. The registry provides an open platform for future research projects benefiting patients with LGG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02686229 Clinical trials.