Overall Medication Adherence as an Indicator for Health Outcomes Among Elderly Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to assess overall medication adherence as an indicator for emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and mortality among elderly patients. METHODS: The study included individuals aged 75-90 years, diagnosed with diabetes or hypertension, who were treated with at least 1 antihypertensive, or antidiabetic medication in 2017. We determined personal adherence rates by calculating the mean adherence rates of the medications prescribed to each individual. We retrieved information on all ER visits and hospitalizations in internal medicine and surgical wards from 2017 to 2019 and mortality in 2019. RESULTS: Of the 171,097 individuals included in the study, 60% were women. The mean age was 81.2 years. 93% had hypertension, 46% had diabetes, and 39% had both diabetes and hypertension. In 2017, 61,668 (36.0%) patients visited the ER, 44,910 (26.2%) were hospitalized in internal medicine wards, and 13,305 (7.8%) were hospitalized in surgical wards. Comparing the highest adherence quintile to the lowest, ORs were 0.69 (0.63, 0.76) for ER visits, 0.40 (0.36, 0.45) for hospitalization in internal medicine wards, and 0.61 (0.52, 0.72) for hospitalization in surgery wards. ORs were similar for the 3 consecutive years 2017, 2018, and 2019. The adjusted OR for all-cause mortality in 2019 comparing the highest adherence quintile to the lowest was 0.60 (0.54, 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Better medication adherence was associated with fewer ER visits and hospitalizations among elderly patients with diabetes and hypertension and lower mortality rates. Overall medication adherence is an indicator for health outcomes unrelated to the patient's underlying health status.

Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injection and risk of acute coronary syndrome: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injection (CSI) is a frequently used treatment, considered safe with a low incidence of minor side effects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is increased following corticosteroid injection for musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS: Data were reviewed from 41,276 patients aged over 40 years and hospitalised with ACS between January 2015 and December 2019. Each ACS case was allocated up to 10 control patients from their primary care clinic, matched for age and sex. The cases and controls were reviewed for orthopaedic or rheumatological consultation including a CSI procedure and occurring prior to the hospital admission date. The incidence of CSI was compared between the case and control groups. RESULTS: Data from a total of 413,063 patients were reviewed, 41,276 ACS cases and 371,787 controls. The mean age was 68.1, standard deviation (SD) = 13.1, 69.4% male. In the week prior to their hospital admission, 118 ACS patients were treated with CSI compared with 495 patients in the control group; odds ratio (OR) = 1.95 (1.56-2.43). In total, 98% of CSI procedures were carried out by orthopaedic specialists. An association between ACS and prior CSI was strongest in the days immediately prior to hospitalisation: OR = 3.11 (2.10-4.61) for patients who were injected 1 day before ACS. The association between ACS and CSI declined with increasing time between injection and hospital admission: at 90 days OR = 1.08 (0.98-1.18). The association remained robust when cardiovascular risk factors, history of rheumatological disease, and other co-morbidity were taken into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injection appears to substantially increase the risk of acute coronary syndrome.

Factors associated with depression, anxiety and severe mental illness among adults with atopic eczema or psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests an association between atopic eczema (AE) or psoriasis and mental illness; however, the factors associated with mental illness are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize and evaluate all available evidence on factors associated with depression, anxiety and severe mental illness (SMI) among adults with AE or psoriasis. METHODS: We searched electronic databases, grey literature databases and clinical trial registries from inception to February 2022 for studies of adults with AE or psoriasis. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, cross-sectional or case-control studies where effect estimates of factors associated with depression, anxiety or SMI were reported. We did not apply language or geographical restrictions. We assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. We synthesized results narratively, and if at least two studies were sufficiently homogeneous, we pooled effect estimates in a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 21 studies (11 observational, 10 RCTs). No observational studies in AE fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Observational studies in people with psoriasis mostly investigated factors associated with depression or anxiety - one cross-sectional study investigated factors associated with schizophrenia. Pooled effect estimates suggest that female sex and psoriatic arthritis were associated with depression [female sex: odds ratio (OR) 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.40, 95% prediction intervals (PIs) 0.62-4.23, I2 = 24.90%, τ2 = 0.05; psoriatic arthritis: OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.56-3.25, 95% PI 0.21-24.23, I2 = 0.00%, τ2 = 0.00] and anxiety (female sex: OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.32-5.07, 95% PI 0.00-3956.27, I2 = 61.90%, τ2 = 0.22; psoriatic arthritis: OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.33-2.94, I2 = 0.00%, τ2 = 0.00). Moderate/severe psoriasis was associated with anxiety (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.25, I2 0.00%, τ2 = 0.00), but not depression. Evidence from RCTs suggested that adults with AE or psoriasis given placebo had higher depression and anxiety scores compared with comparators given targeted treatment (e.g. biologic agents). CONCLUSIONS: Our review highlights limited existing research on factors associated with depression, anxiety and SMI in adults with AE or psoriasis. Observational evidence on factors associated with depression or anxiety in people with psoriasis was conflicting or from single studies, but some identified factors were consistent with those in the general population. Evidence on factors associated with SMIs in people with AE or psoriasis was particularly limited. Evidence from RCTs suggested that AE and psoriasis treated with placebo was associated with higher depression and anxiety scores compared with skin disease treated with targeted therapy; however, follow-up was limited. Therefore, long-term effects on mental health are unclear.

Implementing a screening algorithm for early recognition of sepsis in hospitalized children: a quality improvement project.

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in children. Utilizing a screening tool for early recognition of sepsis is recommended. Our centre had no screening tool for sepsis nor a standardized protocol for sepsis management. In December 2020, a screening algorithm for sepsis was implemented. The algorithm consisted of vital signs measurements in children with an abnormal body temperature, a pop-up alert, nurse's and physician's evaluation, and activation of a workup protocol. The project's primary aim was to increase vital signs measurement rates in hospitalized children with abnormal body temperature from 40% to >90% within 6 months, by 1 June 2021, and sustain until 31 December 2021. Adherence to the algorithm and performance were monitored during 2021, and the outcomes were compared to the preceding 5 years and a control ward. The alert identified 324 children and 596 febrile episodes. Vital signs measurement adherence increased from 42.7% to >90% in 2 months. A nurse evaluated 86.4% of episodes, and a physician evaluated 83.0% of these. Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission rates were lower in the intervention period vs. the pre-intervention period vs. the control ward (4.6% vs. 5.6% vs. 6.0%, respectively); the median PICU length of stay was shorter in the intervention vs. the control ward [2.0 (IQR 1, 4) vs. 5.5 (IQR 2, 7), respectively]. These differences were not statistically significant. During the intervention period, the adherence to vital signs measurements reached the goal of >90%. The alert system prompted an evaluation by caregivers and management according to the protocol. Further monitoring is needed to improve outcomes.

Effect of same-arm versus cross-arm administration of sequential doses of BNT162b2 on short-term vaccine effectiveness-a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to test whether administering the second BNT162B2 vaccine dose on the cross-arm or the same arm as the first dose creates a more robust local and systemic immune response leading to favourable clinical results. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all Clalit Health Services members who received the BNT162b2 vaccine between December 2020 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was a positive RT-PCR test result for SARS-CoV-2 38 days after administration of the second dose. RESULTS: During the study, 2 678 226 Clalit Health Services members received both doses of the BNT162b vaccine and were eligible for analysis. Of these, 2 367 694 (88.41%) received the first two doses of the vaccine on the same arm. The primary endpoint was observed in 2061 (0.077%) participants. The primary endpoint was observed less frequently in the same-arm versus the cross-arm group (1760/2 365 934 and 301/310 231 respectively), with an adjusted OR of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94; p 0.004). DISCUSSION: Administration of the first and second BNT162b2 vaccine doses in the same arm might increase vaccine effectiveness in the short term possibly because of more robust local lymph node activation. This easy intervention could have a public health impact on the implementation of future mRNA vaccines. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of our findings.

Psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa: A large-scale population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has been described, but the association between these conditions is yet to be firmly established. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between psoriasis and HS by using a large-scale real-life computerized database. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the prevalence of HS among patients with psoriasis with that among age-, sex- and ethnicity-matched control subjects. RESULTS: A total of 68,836 patients with psoriasis and 68,836 controls were included in the study. The prevalence of HS was increased in patients with psoriasis versus in those in the control group (0.3% vs 0.2%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.3; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis adjusting for smoking, obesity, and other comorbidities, psoriasis was still associated with HS (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.2; P < .001). Patients with coexistent psoriasis and HS were significantly younger (39.0 ± 15.7 vs 42.6 ± 21.2 years [P = .015]) and had a higher prevalence of obesity (35.1% vs 25.3% [P = .001]) and smoking (58.5% vs 37.3% [P < .001]) compared with patients with psoriasis alone. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective data collection. CONCLUSIONS: A positive association was observed between HS and psoriasis. Further longitudinal observational studies are necessary to establish these findings in other study populations.

Effectiveness and persistence of anti-obesity medications (liraglutide 3 mg, lorcaserin, and orlistat) in a real-world primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic disease with rising prevalence. Guidelines suggest medications for obesity management if lifestyle interventions do not lead to substantial weight loss. Randomized control trials have shown the efficacy of anti-obesity medications in inducing weight loss, but real-world data are lacking. Therefore, our study aims to evaluate anti-obesity medications' effectiveness in reducing weight and improving cardiometabolic parameters and to assess their persistence in a real-world setting. METHODS: A historical cohort study using routinely collected data from Clalit Health Services (CHS). We retrieved data on all CHS members aged ≥20 years who initiated anti-obesity medication (orlistat, liraglutide 3 mg, and lorcaserin) between 2018 and 2020. We assessed average weight loss and the percentage of patients that had lost ≥5% and ≥10% of their body weight at 3, 6, and 9 months and compared the effectiveness of these 3 medications. RESULTS: We included 5,306 CHS members in our study; most (77.8%) were female, aged 40-59 years (52.4%). Treatment with liraglutide 3 mg and lorcaserin was associated with subsequent weight reduction. The average weight loss at 6 months was 5.6 kg (4.95-6.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]) with liraglutide 3 mg and 1.7 kg (1.2-2.2, 95% CI) with lorcaserin. There was no evidence that treatment with orlistat was associated with subsequent weight loss (-0.18 kg [-0.8 to 0.4, 95% CI]). At 6 months, 38% of the patients with orlistat, 43% with lorcaserin, and 51% with liraglutide 3 mg persisted with their treatments (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Liraglutide 3 mg was the primary medication associated with clinically significant weight loss and had the highest persistence rate in our real-world study.

Obesity is a prevalent chronic disease connected to many other chronic medical conditions linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, treating obesity is of utmost importance. Guidelines suggest medications for obesity management if lifestyle interventions do not lead to substantial weight loss. This study evaluated the efficacy of anti-obesity medications liraglutide 3 mg, lorcaserin, and orlistat in a real-world clinical setting, which is different from a clinical trial setting. The study included 5,306 patients, most of whom were middle-aged females. Liraglutide 3 mg was the medication with the highest efficacy in weight loss. The average weight loss with liraglutide 3 mg was 5.6 kg at 6 months. In addition, 54.8% of the patients had lost ≥5% of their body weight, and 30.4% had lost ≥10% of their body weight after 9 months of treatment. Lorcaserin had only a modest effect on weight loss, with an average weight loss of 1.7 kg at 6 months. Orlistat had almost no impact on weight reduction. Persistence with the medications was also the highest in the liraglutide group.

Nineteen months into the pandemic, what have we learned about COVID-19-related outcomes in patients with psoriasis?

BACKGROUND: The impact of psoriasis on the outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is yet to be precisely delineated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of COVID-19, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality among patients with psoriasis as compared with age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects. In addition, we aim to delineate determinants of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed to longitudinally follow patients with psoriasis and their matched controls with regard to COVID-19-related outcomes. The risk of COVID-19 infection, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality were assessed using uni- and multi-variable Cox regression analyses. Determinants of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study population included 144 304 patients with psoriasis and 144 304 age- and sex-matched control individuals. Patients with psoriasis displayed a slightly elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (fully-adjusted HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; p < 0.001). Relative to controls, patients with psoriasis had comparable multivariate risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalization (fully-adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.99-1.18; p = 0.065) and COVID-19-associated mortality (fully-adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.05; p = 0.162). When evaluating individuals hospitalized due to COVID-19, patients with psoriasis were more likely to have type-2 diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50; p = 0.027) and obesity (adjusted OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.65; p = 0.001) relative to controls. CONCLUSIONS: While patients with psoriasis are at a higher risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection, they are not more susceptible to the complications of COVID-19.

Determinants and Effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is yet to be delineated. It remains largely unknown how AD-related immunosuppressive medications affect the development of vaccine-induced immunity. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine among patients with AD and to assess its effectiveness in protecting against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality. A specific analysis additionally examined whether AD-related immunosuppressive drugs influenced the effectiveness of the vaccine. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was performed using the database of Clalit Heath Services, Israel, to follow adult patients with AD. Multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were utilized to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) of the incident outcomes. RESULTS: As of 26 June, 2021, 58,582 (75.4%) out of 77,682 adult patients with AD completed two BNT162b2 vaccine doses in Israel. Adulthood-onset AD (adjusted OR, 1.34; 95% CI 1.28-1.40; p < 0.001) and moderate-to-severe AD (adjusted OR, 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.21; p = 0.001) predicted an increased vaccination rate. Vaccinated patients with AD demonstrated a significantly decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (adjusted HR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.16-0.26; p < 0.001), COVID-19-associated hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.08; 95% CI 0.04-0.18; p < 0.001), and COVID-19-associated mortality (adjusted HR, 0.04; 95% CI 0.01-0.20; p < 0.001). Exposure to immunosuppressive drugs (n = 597; 0.8% of patients) did not impair the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination (adjusted HR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.13-6.81; p = 0.958). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AD, COVID-19 vaccination is highly effective for a wide range of COVID-19-related outcomes. Immunosuppressive drugs did not impair the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in this retrospective analysis.

Risk of COVID-19 and its complications in patients with atopic dermatitis undergoing dupilumab treatment-a population-based cohort study.

The risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection and its complications among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated by dupilumab is yet to be determined. We aimed to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality among patients with AD treated by dupilumab. A population-based cohort study was conducted to compare AD patients treated by dupilumab (n = 238) with those treated by prolonged systemic corticosteroids (≥ 3 months; n = 1,023), phototherapy (n = 461), and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 194) regarding the incidence of COVID-19 and its complications. The incidence rate of COVID-19, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality among patients treated by dupilumab was 70.1 (95% CI, 40.5-116.4), 5.0 (95% CI, 0.3-24.7), and 0.0 per 1,000 person-year, respectively. The use of dupilumab was not associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection [adjusted HR for dupilumab vs. prolonged systemic corticosteroids: 1.13 (95% CI, 0.61-2.09); dupilumab vs. phototherapy: 0.80 (95% CI, 0.42-1.53); dupilumab vs. azathioprine/MMF: 1.10 (95% CI, 0.45-2.65)]. Dupilumab was associated with a comparable risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalization [adjusted HR for dupilumab vs. prolonged systemic corticosteroids: 0.35 (95% CI, 0.05-2.71); dupilumab vs. phototherapy: 0.43 (95% CI, 0.05-3.98); dupilumab vs. azathioprine/MMF: 0.25 (95% CI, 0.02-2.74)]. When applicable, the risk of mortality was not elevated in patients with AD treated by dupilumab [HR for dupilumab vs. prolonged systemic corticosteroids: 0.04 (95% CI, 0.00-225.20)]. To conclude, dupilumab does not impose an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 complications in patients with AD. Dupilumab should be continued and considered as a safe drug for moderate-to-severe AD during the pandemic.

The Association of Bullous Pemphigoid With Atopic Dermatitis and Allergic Rhinitis-A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Although bullous pemphigoid (BP), atopic dermatitis (AD), and allergic rhinitis (AR) are associated with shared pathogenic mechanisms the epidemiological relationship between these conditions remains to be investigated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bidirectional association of BP with AD and AR. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed comparing BP patients (n = 3924) with age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects (n = 19,280), with respect to incident cases of AD and AR. A case-control design was additionally adopted to assess the odds of BP in individuals with a preexisting diagnosis of AD and AR. RESULTS: The odds of BP was increased after a preexisting diagnosis of AD (fully adjusted odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.15; P < 0.001) and AR (fully adjusted odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; P = 0.047). Patients with BP were at an increased risk of subsequent AD (fully adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.60-2.51; P < 0.001) but not AR (fully adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20; P = 0.997). Compared with other patients with BP, those with BP and comorbid AD and AR were more frequently managed by adjuvant drugs and long-term systemic and topical corticosteroids and had decreased all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A history of AD and AR confers susceptibility to the development of BP. Awareness of this association may be of help for physicians managing patients with these diseases.

Primary care physicians' attitudes and knowledge regarding medical cannabis and willingness to prescribe it: the Israeli experience.

BACKGROUND: Use of medical cannabis (MC) in Israel has increased since its regulatory approval in 2016. Currently, more than 1% of Israeli adults are treated with MC; this requires primary care physicians (PCPs) to be familiar with this treatment option. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the attitudes and knowledge of Israeli PCPs toward MC and evaluated their willingness to prescribe it for different medical conditions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey which was distributed to PCPs in Israel. Physicians were asked about their opinions, knowledge, and willingness to prescribe MC. RESULTS: Two hundred and one PCPs answered the questionnaire. Their average age was 47 years (±11.2), 71% were specialists. 51% of the respondents thought that MC is an effective treatment. 63% replied that they had little knowledge and 75% indicated that they would like to deepen it. 61% of the respondents were willing to initiate an MC treatment for a dying patient, while less than 50% were willing to initiate MC treatment for various other conditions. Most respondents indicated that they were willing to renew a prescription for any approved medical condition. Willingness to prescribe MC increased for physicians who agreed that MC was effective (odds ratio [OR] 21.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.40-200.85), for physicians who strongly agreed with the statement that they had sufficient knowledge (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.58-15.83) and for residents compared with specialists (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.52-10.73). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey revealed PCPs' differing opinions and insufficient knowledge regarding treatment with MC. These findings suggest that continuing medical education regarding MC is needed.

Use of medical cannabis (MC) in Israel has increased substantially since its regulatory approval in 2016. Currently, more than 1% of Israeli adult population receive MC; this requires primary care physicians (PCPs) to be familiar with this treatment option. We assessed the attitudes and knowledge of Israeli PCPs toward MC and evaluated their willingness to prescribe it for different medical indications. Two hundred and one PCPs answered our questionnaire. 51% of the respondents thought that MC was an effective treatment. 63% of physicians stated that they had little knowledge regarding MC and 75% indicated that they would like to deepen it. 61% of the respondents were willing to initiate MC treatment for a dying patient, while less than 50% were willing to initiate MC treatment for other conditions. Willingness to initiate treatment with MC was low for most indications, while renewal was more acceptable. Our survey revealed PCPs' different opinions and insufficient knowledge regarding the utilization of MC in primary care. These findings emphasize the necessity for continuous medical education regarding MC.

Associations of Chronic Medication Adherence with Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations.

INTRODUCTION: Good medication adherence is associated with decreased healthcare expenditure; however, adherence is usually assessed for single medication. We aim to explore the associations of adherence levels to 23 chronic medications with emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations. The primary endpoints are ER visits and hospitalizations in internal medicine and surgical wards. METHODS: Individuals aged 50-74 years, with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, treated with at least one antihypertensive or antidiabetic medication during 2017 were included. We determined personal adherence rates by calculating the mean adherence rates of the medications prescribed to each individual. Adherence rates were stratified into categories. We retrieved information about all the ER visits, and hospitalizations in internal medicine and surgical wards during 2016-2018. RESULTS: Of 268,792 persons included in the study, 50.6% were men. The mean age was 63.7 years. Hypertension was recorded for 217,953 (81.1%), diabetes for 160,082 (59.5%), and both diabetes and hypertension for 109,225 (40.6%). The mean number of antihypertensive and antidiabetic medications used was 2.2 ± 1.1. In total, 51,301 (19.1%) of the cohort visited the ER at least once during 2017, 21,740 (8.1%) were hospitalized in internal medicine wards, and 10,167 (3.8%) in surgical wards during 2017. Comparing the highest adherence category to the lowest, adjusted odds ratios were 0.64 (0.61, 0.67) for ER visits, 0.56 (0.52, 0.60) for hospitalization in internal wards, and 0.63 (0.57, 0.70) for hospitalization in surgical wards. Odds ratios were similar for the three consecutive years 2016-2018. CONCLUSION: Better medication adherence was associated with fewer ER visits and hospitalizations among persons with diabetes and hypertension. Investing in improving medication adherence may reduce health costs and improve patients' health.

Risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality in patients with psoriasis treated by interleukin-17 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The risk of the infection and its complications under this drug class remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of COVID-19, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality among patients with psoriasis treated by IL-17I. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was performed to compare psoriasis patients treated by IL-17I (n = 680) with those treated by methotrexate (n = 2153) and non-systemic/non-immunomodulatory treatments (n = 138,750) regarding the incidence of COVID-19 and its complications. RESULTS: The use of IL-17I was not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection [adjusted HR for IL-17I vs. methotrexate: 0.91 (95% CI, 0.48-1.72); IL-17I vs. non-systemic/non-immunomodulatory treatments: 0.92 (95% CI, 0.54-1.59)]. IL-17I was associated with comparable risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalization [adjusted HR for IL-17I vs. methotrexate: 0.42 (95% CI, 0.05-3.39); IL-17I vs. non-systemic/non-immunomodulatory treatments: 0.65 (95% CI, 0.09-4.59)] and COVID-19-associated mortality [adjusted HR for IL-17I vs. methotrexate: 7.57 (95% CI, 0.36-157.36); IL-17I vs. non-systemic/non-immunomodulatory treatments: 7.05 (95% CI, 0.96-51.98)]. In a sensitivity analysis, neither secukinumab nor ixekizumab imposed an elevated risk of any of the outcomes of interests. CONCLUSIONS: IL-17I treatment does not confer an increased risk of COVID-19 infection or its complications in patients with psoriasis. Our findings support the continuation of IL-17I treatment during the pandemic.

The Relationship Between Patient Medication Adherence and Following Preventive Medicine Recommendation.

BACKGROUND: To study the relationship between adherence to chronic medications and adherence to preventive medicine recommendations among persons with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. METHODS: Data were collected from the Clalit database included all members of Clalit aged 50 to 74 years, diagnosed with diabetes mellitus or hypertension before 2016 and treated with at least 1 medication (statins hypotensive or antidiabetic drugs) during 2017. We analyzed all the monthly prescriptions that were filled during 2017. We determined personal adherence rates by calculating each individual's average adherence rate to all the prescribed medications. Adherence rates were stratified by quintiles. We checked whether each person included followed the Israeli recommendations for influenza vaccine, colon cancer screening, and mammography. RESULTS: Of 268,792 persons, 81.1% had hypertension, and 59.5% had diabetes; 40.6% had diabetes and hypertension. The mean age was 63.7 years; 50.6% were men. The mean number of medications used was 2.2 ± 1.1. An adherence rate of ≤20% was found in 4.2%, and >80% in 42.5%. Overall, 59.6% had received an influenza vaccine, 68.0% had undergone colon cancer screening, and 75.2% of the women had undergone mammography. Increased adherence to medications was associated with increased adherence to preventive recommendations. For persons in the study cohort, adjusted odds ratios comparing the highest to the lowest quintile of medication adherence were 1.52 (1.46-1.59) for influenza vaccine, 1.59 (1.53-1.66) for colon cancer screen, and 1.35 (1.27-1.44) for mammography. DISCUSSION: A positive association was observed between adherence to chronic medications and adherence to preventive medicine among persons with hypertension and diabetes.

The Burden of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Its Complications in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis-A Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to characterize a large cohort of COVID-19-positive adult patients with AD and to identify predictors of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality. METHODS: A population-based nested case-control study was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of predictors for COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS: Of 78,073 adult patients with AD, 3618 (4.6%) tested positive for COVID-19. Subclinical COVID-19 infection occurred in 3368 (93.1%) of COVID-19-positive patients, whereas 123 (3.4%), 46 (1.3%), 55 (1.5%), and 26 (0.7%) patients developed a mild, moderate, severe, and critical disease, respectively. Altogether, 250 patients (6.0%) were hospitalized, and 40 patients (1.1%) died because of COVID-19 complications. Coronavirus disease 2019-associated hospitalization was independently associated with the intake of extended courses of systemic corticosteroids (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.14; P = 0.005). None of AD-related variables independently predicted COVID-19-associated mortality. The presence of comorbid metabolic syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, and depression projected both COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged systemic corticosteroids during the pandemic are associated with increased odds of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and should be avoided in patients with AD.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients with Psoriasis: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of immune-related conditions on the outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is poorly understood. Determinants of COVID-19 outcomes among patients with psoriasis are yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: Th objective of this study was to characterize a large cohort of patients with psoriasis with COVID-19 and to identify predictors of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality. METHODS: A population-based nested case-control study was performed using the computerized database of Clalit Health Services, Israel. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence (CIs) of predictors for COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality. RESULTS: The study population included 3151 patients with psoriasis who tested positive for COVID-19. Subclinical COVID-19 infection occurred in 2818 (89.4%) of the patients while 122 (3.9%), 71 (2.3%), 123 (3.9%), and 16 (0.5%) of the patients experienced a mild, moderate, severe, and critical disease, respectively. Overall, 332 (10.5%) patients were hospitalized and 50 (1.6%) patients died because of COVID-19 complications. Intake of methotrexate independently predicted COVID-19-associated hospitalization (adjusted OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.11-4.78; p = 0.025). Use of biologic agents was not associated with COVID-19-associated hospitalization (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.32-1.73; p = 0.491) or mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.12-6.21; p = 0.870). Older age, the presence of comorbid cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic renal failure independently predicted both COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of oral methotrexate was associated with an increased odds of COVID-associated hospitalization, whereas the use of biologic drugs was not associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19 among patients with psoriasis.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are associated with a decreased risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalization in patients with psoriasis-A population-based cohort study.

The risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its complications among patients with psoriasis treated by tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) remains to be decisively delineated. We aimed to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality among Israeli patients with psoriasis treated by TNFi relative to other systemic agents. A population-based cohort study was conducted to compare psoriasis patients treated by TNFi (n = 1943), with those treated by methotrexate (n = 1929), ustekinumab (n = 348), and acitretin (n = 1892) regarding COVID-19 outcomes. Risk of investigated outcomes was assessed using uni- and multi-variate Cox regression analyses. The incidence rate of COVID-19, COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and mortality in the TNFi group was 35.8 (95% CI, 26.1-47.9), 0.8 (95% CI, 0.0-4.2), and 0.0 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Exposure to TNFi was associated with a comparable risk of COVID-19 infection [adjusted hazard ration (HR) for TNFi vs methotrexate: 1.07 (95% CI, 0.67-1.71); TNFi vs ustekinumab: 1.07 (95% CI, 0.48-2.40); TNFi vs acitretin: 0.98 (95% CI, 0.61-1.57)]. TNFi was associated with a decreased risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalization relative to methotrexate (adjusted HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.82) and ustekinumab (adjusted HR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.64), but not to acitretin (adjusted HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.16-6.16). No significant difference in COVID-19-associated mortality was found between the four different groups. TNFi was associated with a decreased risk of admissions due to COVID-19. Our findings substantiate the continuation of TNFi treatment during the pandemic. TNFi may be positively considered in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis warranting systemic treatment during the pandemic.

The risk of COVID-19 in patients with bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The burden of COVID-19 in patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP) and pemphigus is yet to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risks of COVID-19 and COVID-19-associated hospitalization and mortality in patients with BP and pemphigus and to delineate determinants of severe COVID-19 illness among these patients. METHODS: A population-based cohort study compared COVID-19 and its complications in patients with BP (n = 1845) and pemphigus (n = 1236) with age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects. RESULTS: The risks of COVID-19 (hazard rate [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.73; P = .691) and COVID-19-associated hospitalization (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.84-2.98; P = .160) was comparable between patients with BP and controls. The risk of COVID-19-associated mortality was higher among patients with BP (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.15-6.92; P = .023). The risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44-1.49; P = .496), COVID-19-associated hospitalization (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.53-3.76; P = .499), and COVID-19-associated mortality (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.15-11.92; P = .789) was similar in patients with pemphigus and their controls. Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants did not predispose COVID-19-positive BP and pemphigus patients to a more severe illness. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BP experience increased COVID-19-associated mortality and should be monitored closely. Maintaining systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive adjuvant agents during the pandemic is not associated with worse outcomes.