Effects of carvedilol on human prostate tissue contractility and stromal cell growth pointing to potential clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Apart from antagonizing ß-adrenoceptors, carvedilol antagonizes vascular α1-adrenoceptors and activates G protein-independent signaling. Even though it is a commonly used antihypertensive and α1-adrenoceptors are essential for the treatment of voiding symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia, its actions in the human prostate are still unknown. Here, we examined carvedilol effects on contractions of human prostate tissues, and on stromal cell growth. METHODS: Contractions of prostate tissues from radical prostatectomy were induced by electric field stimulation (EFS) or α1-agonists. Growth-related functions were examined in cultured stromal cells. RESULTS: Concentration-response curves for phenylephrine, methoxamine and noradrenaline were right shifted by carvedilol (0.1-10 µM), around half a magnitude with 100 nM, half to one magnitude with 1 µM, and two magnitudes with 10 µM. Right shifts were reflected by increased EC50 values for agonists, with unchanged Emax values. EFS-induced contractions were reduced by 21-54% with 0.01-1 µM carvedilol, and by 94% by 10 µM. Colony numbers of stromal cells were increased by 500 nM, but reduced by 1-10 µM carvedilol, while all concentrations reduced colony size. Decreases in viability were time-dependent with 0.1-0.3 µM, but complete with 10 µM. Proliferation was slightly increased by 0.1-0.5 µM, but reduced with 1-10 µM. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol antagonizes α1-adrenoceptors in the human prostate, starting with concentrations in ranges of known plasma levels. In vitro, effect sizes resemble those of α1-blockers used for the treatment of voiding symptoms, which requires concentrations beyond plasma levels. Bidirectional and dynamic effects on the growth of stromal cells may be attributed to "biased agonism".

The Vanishing Clinical Value of PD-L1 Status as a Predictive Biomarker in the First-Line Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

BACKGROUND: Our study endeavors to elucidate the clinical implications of PD-L1 positivity in individuals afflicted with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). METHODS: Patients with advanced UCB were prospectively enrolled following a radical cystectomy (RC) performed within January 2017 to December 2022 at our tertiary referral center. The clinical outcome, defined as the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on systemic treatment, was analyzed using an χ2-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, the Kaplan-Meier method, and a log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 648 patients were included following an RC performed within January 2017 to December 2022. Their PD-L1 status was analyzed with the primary PD-L1-specific antibody (clone SP263, Ventana) and defined both by the CPS and IC-score in 282 patients (43.5%) with a high risk (pT3-pT4 and/or lymph node involvement) or metastatic UCB. While the median PFS was significantly prolonged 5-fold in PD-L1+ patients, we found no difference in OS, regardless of PD-L1 status, or treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS: While PD-L1 positivity indicates prolonged PFS, the presence of PD-L1 does not influence OS rates, suggesting its limited usefulness as a prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer. However, the positive correlation between an PD-L1 status and a sustained response to ICI treatments indicates its potential role as a predictive biomarker. Further research is required to understand how the predictive value of PD-L1 positivity may extend to the use of ICIs in combination with antibody-drug conjugates.

Propensity score-matched evaluation of palliative transurethral resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard-of-care, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is widely accepted as a size-independent method for surgical treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). However, in an ageing society an increasing number of patients presents with BOO due to locally advanced prostate cancer. There is currently no guidelines recommendation as to the enucleation or resection technique. Therefore, we compared intraoperative performance, postoperative outcomes, and safety for palliative (p)TURP and (p)HoLEP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of 1373 and 2705 men who underwent TURP or HoLEP for LUTS/BOO between 2014 and 2021, respectively. Patients were matched for age, prostate size and preoperative international prostate symptom score (IPSS). Patients were stratified by technique and groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: While postoperative symptoms and urodynamic parameters improved irrespective of technique, we report significantly increased resection and enucleation times for palliative indication. For corresponding efficiency parameters, we observed a two-fold higher surgical performance (g/min) for both techniques in patients without prostate cancer. While adverse events were comparable between groups, we found a two-fold higher hemoglobin drop in palliative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no standard-of-care for patients with BOO and locally advanced prostate cancer. Our data show that both TURP and HoLEP offer adequate symptom improvement and comparable safety profiles. While HoLEP is feasible even in larger prostates, both procedures become more difficult in patients with prostate cancer. Taken together, this study covers an important gap in current literature, helping urological surgeons to make evidence-based decisions for the benefit of their patients.

[Laser Techniques in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Syndrome]. / Lasertechniken in der Behandlung des benignen Prostatasyndroms.

Laser Techniques in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Syndrome Abstract: Lasers have a wide range of applications in endourological therapy. Not only in the treatment of stones, but also in the treatment of benign prostatic syndrome (BPS), their importance continues to grow. The endourological treatment of BPH with different laser techniques will be discussed in more detail in the following. The physical differences between the individual lasers will be explained first, followed by the treatment options that can be performed with a laser. The main focus will be on the concrete comparison of the treatment methods, especially in clinical contexts. In particular, the duration of surgery, length of hospitalisation, risk of post-operative bleeding, catheterisation duration, risk of urinary retention and risk of post-operative complications such as retrograde ejaculation, bladder neck sclerosis, urethra stricture and adenoma recurrence will be listed and compared for the most important methods. Nevertheless, the distribution of TURP to laser is still 30:1 in favour for TURP [1].

[Benign Prostate Hyperplasia - Current Medical Therapy, New Developments, and Side Effects]. / Benigne Prostatahyperplasie.

Benign Prostate Hyperplasia - Current Medical Therapy, New Developments, and Side Effects Abstract: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) consist of both voiding and storage symptoms. Urethral obstruction leading to voiding symptoms is most commonly attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), where hyperplastic growth and increased smooth muscle tone in the hyperplastic prostate may lead to benign prostate obstruction (BPO). Spontaneous contractions of the detrusor muscle may cause storage symptoms, which are referred to as overactive bladder (OAB). With a considerable proportion of patients suffering from "mixed LUTS", a combination of voiding and storage symptoms, LUTS affect a large portion of the population worldwide, with major impact on quality of life (QoL). A demographic shift in society, will lead to higher incidence and prevalence of LUTS, with a growing economic burden. Standard-of-care medical treatment for LUTS/BPO includes α1-adrenoceptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, for reduction of prostate smooth muscle tone, and 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) to slow down disease progression. Medical therapy for LUTS/OAB includes muscarinic receptor antagonists, and ß3-agonists for relief of spontaneous bladder contractions. When left untreated, LUTS may cause considerable adverse events, ranging from acute urinary retention with kidney failure, and recurring infections, to social withdrawal, and depression.

Efficacy, Efficiency, and Safety of En-bloc vs Three-lobe Enucleation of the Prostate: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy, efficiency, and safety in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), we directly compared intraoperative performance, postoperative outcomes, and safety in the original 3-lobe enucleation technique with the more recent en-bloc method. As HoLEP is widely accepted as a size-independent method for surgical treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), detailed understanding of its benefits is mandatory. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of 1,396 men who underwent HoLEP for LUTS/BPO between 2017 and 2020. We included 606 patients in the final analysis (en-bloc n = 303; 3-lobe n = 303), who were matched for prostate size (50 cc), age, body mass index, and preoperative international prostate symptom score. Patients were then stratified by technique, and groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety, and short-term functional outcomes. RESULTS: While postoperative symptoms and urodynamic parameters improved irrespective of technique, we report significantly less adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥II vs

Strategies to successfully prevent COVID-19 outbreak in vulnerable uro-oncology patient population.

PURPOSE: As COVID-19 pandemic persists with variants, and despite effective vaccination campaigns, breakthrough infections surge. We implemented strategies to protect vulnerable patients of the uro-oncologic outpatient clinic. We adopted proactive non-symptomatic risk reduction measures, which include non-symptomatic testing requirements for both patients and health care professionals (HCP), intensified patient tracing and contact reduction by implementation of digital health options. Here, we present our best practice example to safely guide oncology professionals and patients with metastasized genitourinary cancers through the current and future pandemics. METHODS: Solely for this purpose, we created a registry of collected data (current telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, vaccination status). We collected a nasopharyngeal swab from every patient upon presentation for treatment. We implemented bi-weekly RNA-PCR assay tests for HCP with patient contact, and limited personal contact at our facility through digital patient consultations. RESULTS: We started implementing our COVID prevention model at the beginning of the second wave in September 2020 and included 128 patients with urologic malignancies requiring systemic treatment. After COVID vaccination became available in December 2020, all of our HCP were fully vaccinated within 6 weeks and 97% of our patients (125/128) within 9 months. We performed 1410 nasopharyngeal swabs during in-house visits, thereby detecting two COVID-19 infections among our patients, who both survived and successfully continued treatment. To further reduce personal contact, half of our consultations were fully operated digitally, with 76% (97/128) of our patients participating in our digital health offers. CONCLUSION: The willingness of patients and HCPs to participate in the study allowed us to implement strict standards to prepare for the ongoing and future pandemics in outpatient cancer units. Next to general preventive measures such as frequent hand disinfection, wearing facial masks, and keeping distance, an important measure to protect vulnerable uro-oncology patients is the capability to perform virus genome sequencing to trace transmission chains.

How does symptom severity impact clinical outcomes of men with lower urinary tract symptoms after holmium laser enucleation or transurethral resection of the prostate?

Introduction: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated outcome measure for the evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). When treating patients with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), patient selection is key to achieve the best clinical outcome. Therefore, we analyzed how the severity of LUTS as determined by IPSS influenced postoperative functional outcomes. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective, matched-pair analysis of 2,011 men who underwent HoLEP or TURP for LUTS/BPO between 2013-2017. We included 195 patients in the final analysis (HoLEP n = 97; TURP n = 98), who were matched for prostate size (50 cc), age, and body mass index. Patients were then stratified by IPSS. Groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety and short-term functional outcomes. Results: While preoperative symptom severity was a significant predictor of postoperative clinical improvement, patients who received HoLEP showed superior postoperative functional results with higher peak flow rates and 2-fold greater improvement in IPSS. In patients presenting with severe symptoms, we observed 3- to 4-fold less Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II and overall complications after receiving HoLEP compared to TURP. Conclusions: Patients with severe LUTS were more likely to experience clinically significant improvement after surgery than patients with moderate LUTS, and HoLEP showed superior functional outcomes than TURP. However, patients with moderate LUTS should not be denied surgery, but may warrant a more comprehensive clinical work-up.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A truly size-independent method?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of prostate size on functional outcomes and perioperative morbidity, we analyzed patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). As LUTS secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are a chronic progressive disease, prevalence and prostate size increase with age. HoLEP is a size-independent method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO and can be offered in medication-refractory patients with durable long-term results and reduced perioperative morbidity. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 852 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS secondary to BPO between 2014-2018. Patients were divided into group 1 (≤60 cc), group 2 (>60 < 120 cc), group 3 (≥120 cc). Perioperative parameters, safety and short-term functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in group 3 were significantly older and showed a significantly higher median prostate-specific antigen level. Perioperative parameters, such as enucleation time and morcellation time significantly differed in favor of smaller prostate sizes, while enucleation and morcellation speed showed favorable results for larger prostate sizes. Larger prostates ≥120 cc showed a significantly higher postoperative drop in hemoglobin. However, patients did not differ in postoperative functional outcomes or Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complications (4.8% of all patients [41/852]). There was no difference in perioperative complications between all groups (P = 0.760). CONCLUSION: While larger prostates take significantly longer to operate on, postoperative functional outcomes show no difference between all sizes. In conclusion, HoLEP is a size-independent and effective method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO in prostates ≥30 cc.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate of High-risk Patients - A Propensity-score-matched-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative management and functional outcome of spinal anesthesia (SpA) to general anesthesia (GA) in high-risk patients treated for lower urinary tract symptoms with Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). METHODS: In the current retrospective analysis, a propensity-score-matching of patients treated for lower urinary tract symptom with HoLEP (n = 300) in SpA with ASA>2 (n = 100), GA with ASA>2 (GA-high-risk) (n = 100) or GA with ASA≤2 (GA-low-risk) (n = 100) was performed. The impact of anesthesiologic mode on perioperative anesthesiologic outcome, early functional outcome and treatment related adverse events (according to Clavien Dindo), was evaluated. RESULTS: Hypotensive episodes were significantly less frequent in the SpA-cohort (9%) compared to the GA-high-risk cohort (32%) and the GA low-risk cohort (22%) (each P <.05 respectively). SpA-patients showed a significantly shorter median time in post anesthesia care unit (PACU-time: 135 minutes; 120-166.5) compared to GA-high-risk patients (186 minutes; 154-189.5), with significant less referrals to Intermediate care unit (1% vs 9 %); (each P <.05). PACU-time (99 minutes) and Intermediate care unit referrals (0%) for GA-low-risk were lower than for both other cohorts. Postoperative requirement for analgesics was significantly lower in the SpA-cohort (2%), compared to both GA-cohorts (74% and 61% respectively; P <.05). No significant difference was found regarding early functional outcome or treatment related adverse events (p-range: 0.201-1.000). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing HoLEP, SpA provides greater hemodynamic stability and allows faster overall postoperative recovery with preferable pain management. Yielding a comparable functional outcome, it is a safe and efficient alternative to GA in high-risk patients.

68Ga-EMP-100 PET/CT-a novel ligand for visualizing c-MET expression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma-first in-human biodistribution and imaging results.

BACKGROUND: 68Ga-EMP-100 is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) ligand that directly targets tumoral c-MET expression. Upregulation of the receptor tyrosin kinase c-MET in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is correlated with overall survival in metastatic disease (mRCC). Clinicopathological staging of c-MET expression could improve patient management prior to systemic therapy with for instance inhibitors targeting c-MET such as cabozantinib. We present the first in-human data of 68Ga-EMP-100 in mRCC patients evaluating uptake characteristics in metastases and primary RCC. METHODS: Twelve patients with mRCC prior to anticipated cabozantinib therapy underwent 68Ga-EMP-100 PET/CT imaging. We compared the biodistribution in normal organs and tumor uptake of mRCC lesions by standard uptake value (SUVmean) and SUVmax measurements. Additionally, metastatic sites on PET were compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and the respective, quantitative PET parameters were assessed and then compared inter- and intra-individually. RESULTS: Overall, 87 tumor lesions were analyzed. Of these, 68/87 (79.3%) were visually rated c-MET-positive comprising a median SUVmax of 4.35 and SUVmean of 2.52. Comparing different tumor sites, the highest uptake intensity was found in tumor burden at the primary site (SUVmax 9.05 (4.86-29.16)), followed by bone metastases (SUVmax 5.56 (0.97-15.85)), and lymph node metastases (SUVmax 3.90 (2.13-6.28)) and visceral metastases (SUVmax 3.82 (0.11-16.18)). The occurrence of visually PET-negative lesions (20.7%) was distributed heterogeneously on an intra- and inter-individual level; the largest proportion of PET-negative metastatic lesions were lung and liver metastases. The highest physiological 68Ga-EMP-100 accumulation besides the urinary bladder content was seen in the kidneys, followed by moderate uptake in the liver and the spleen, whereas significantly lower uptake intensity was observed in the pancreas and the intestines. CONCLUSION: Targeting c-MET expression, 68Ga-EMP-100 shows distinctly elevated uptake in mRCC patients with partially high inter- and intra-individual differences comprising both c-MET-positive and c-MET-negative lesions. Our first clinical results warrant further systemic studies investigating the clinical use of 68Ga-EMP-100 as a biomarker in mRCC patients.

The impact of preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms medication on the functional performance of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION: Medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) targets prostate size, to prevent disease progression, and prostate smooth muscle tone for rapid relieve of LUTS. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a size-independent method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO in medication-refractory patients and offers durable long-term results with reduced perioperative morbidity. As up to 50% of patients receive medical treatment for LUTS/BPO prior to surgery, we analyzed the impact of alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) on outcomes and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing HoLEP for LUTS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively gathered data of 1,057 patients, who underwent HoLEP for LUTS/BPO from 2013-2018, and divided patients into group 1 (no medication), group 2 (α-blockers), and group 3 (5-ARI and α-blockers). Perioperative parameters, short-term functional outcomes and safety were assessed and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V26.0 software. RESULTS: Even though preoperative LUTS profile was significantly different between groups, all patients improved significantly after HoLEP, irrespective of preoperative LUTS medication. Median improvement of IPSS was 9, 8 and 7 points, of Qmax was 10, 12 and 9.5 ml/s, with significant improvement of quality of life (QoL) and reduction of post-void residual volume (PVR) for groups 1-3, respectively, 30 days after surgery. With only 4.0% (42/1,057) of patients experiencing a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complication, there was no difference in prevalence of perioperative complications between groups (p = 0.943). CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative LUTS medication does not impair efficacy of HoLEP with acceptable perioperative morbidity, the time gap between medical therapy and surgical treatment may favor an earlier response.

[The role of the microbiome in urological diseases]. / Die Rolle des Mikrobioms bei urologischen Erkrankungen.

The use of modern molecular technologies in the last decade has given us new insights into the complex interactions of the human microbiome in health and in the pathogenesis of diseases. Among other things, the sterility concept of the urinary tract has been discarded and the goal is now to identify the different microbial signatures associated with various diseases. Dysbalances of the microbiome are increasingly suspected of causing negative effects on various malignant and benign diseases. Recently, such associations have also been shown for prostate carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma and urinary bladder carcinoma. This may lead to the discovery of new potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and as a therapeutic target of the diseases mentioned. For the diagnosis of some benign diseases such as interstitial cystitis, urge incontinence and chronic prostatitis or chronic pelvic pain syndrome, microbial involvement was previously considered an exclusion criterion. However, current studies show that the individual patient's microbiome can have an influence on the development and severity of the respective disease.

Immature Plasma Cell Myeloma Mimics Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Due to Endothelial PSMA-Expression.

We present a 71-year-old female patient who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for suspected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as RCC also shows high PSMA-expression in tumor neovascularization. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed a high PSMA-avidity in the renal tumor, enlarged intra-abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes. Moreover, PSMA-positive pleural, pulmonal and osseous lesions were found. However, histopathology revealed an immature plasma cell myeloma with an endothelial PSMA-expression of the neovasculature. This case illustrates the increased PSMA-avidity in multiple myeloma and highlights PSMA as a potential theragnostic target in multiple myeloma. For clinical routine, lymphatic diseases such as extramedullary myeloma should be considered as differential diagnosis in PSMA-avid renal masses on PET/CT.

Enucleation vs. Resection: A Matched-pair Analysis of TURP, HoLEP and Bipolar TUEP in Medium-sized Prostates.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), bipolar enucleation of the prostate (bTUEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in medium-sized prostates (50cc). METHODS: We present a retrospective analysis of 2230 patients treated for lower urinary tract symptoms. We analysed perioperative parameters, short-term clinical outcomes and adverse events in matched-pair cohorts. RESULTS: Both HoLEP and bTUEP were superior in terms of efficacy compared to TURP (surgery time: 51min and 50min vs. 60min; P < 0.001; tissue retrieval percentage: 71.4% and 70% vs. 50%; P < 0.001) and showed stronger improvement of LUTS (change IPSS: -15 and -14 vs. -10; P = 0.008). Furthermore, urodynamic parameters (Qmax: +15 ml/s and +19 ml/s vs. +12 ml/s; P < 0.001; PVR: -100 ml and -95 ml vs. - 80ml; P < 0.008) were significantly more improved after enucleation than after TURP. All techniques showed an equally low complication rate (6.9% and 6.9% vs. 10.3%; P = 0.743). No relevant difference of clinical outcomes was identified between HoLEP and bTUEP. CONCLUSION: Both resection and enucleation are efficient and safe procedures in patients with medium-sized prostates (50cc), but irrespective of the technical approach, transurethral enucleation is superior to TURP in terms of perioperative and functional outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Radiosurgery for Visceral and Lymph Node Metastases of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Single Center Analysis.

Despite rapid advances of systemic therapy options in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), local tumor or metastases treatment remains important in selected patients. Here, we assess the safety and efficacy of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) as an ablative therapy for visceral and lymph node metastases of RCC. Patients with histologically confirmed RCC and radiologically confirmed progression of visceral or lymph node metastases underwent RRS and were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival and progression free survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Sixty patients underwent RRS and were included in the analysis. Patients presented for RRS treatment with a median age at RRS treatment of 64 years (range 42-83), clear cell histology (88.3%) and favorable international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database (IMDC) risk score (58.3%). Treatment parameters differed for the number of fractions (median visceral metastases: 1, range 1-5; median lymph node metastases: 1, range 0-5; p = 0.003) and prescription dose (median visceral metastases 24 Gy, range 8-26; median lymph node metastases 18 Gy, range 7-26, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 65.7 months (range: 2.9-108.6), the median progression free survival was 17.4 months (range: 2.7-70.0) and local tumor control was achieved in 96.7% of patients. Adverse events were limited to 8.3% of patients, with one grade 4 toxicity within 6 weeks after RRS therapy. RRS is a safe and effective treatment option in selected patients with metastatic RCC in a multimodal approach. Further research is warranted to confirm our findings prospectively.

Superiority of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate over Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in a Matched-Pair Analysis of Bleeding Complications Under Various Antithrombotic Regimens.

Introduction: To compare holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients under continuous antithrombotic therapy with regard to bleeding complications. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis of 221 patients with continuous antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulative medication, who were treated with HoLEP (n = 111) or TURP (n = 110). Matching criteria were prostate size (50 cc) and total surgical time (60 minutes). Patients were further stratified by their antithrombotic medication. We evaluated functional outcomes, perioperative morbidity, and bleeding complications according to Clavien-Dindo (CD). Results: Our perioperative assessment showed a significantly higher percentage of resected tissue for HoLEP (median 71.43%; interquartile range [IQR]: 61.82-78.57) than for TURP (median 45.45% IQR: 39.02-56.20) (p < 0.001). Total perioperative hemoglobin drop was significantly lower for the HoLEP cohort (median 0.7 g/dL; IQR: 0.3-1.1 g/dL) than for the TURP cohort (median 2.20 g/dL; IQR: 1.18-2.80 g/dL) (p < 0.001). For all subgroups, perioperative blood loss was always significantly lower for HoLEP than for TURP. The median hemoglobin drop was 0.5 g/dL vs 1.1 g/dL for the acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg (ASS) subgroup, 0.70 g/dL vs 2.95 g/dL for the ASS+ADP-receptor inhibitor subgroup, 0.65 g/dL vs 2.4 g/dL for the vitamin K antagonist subgroup, and 0.90 g/dL vs 2.70 g/dL for the direct oral anticoagulant subgroup (all, p < 0.001). Perioperative adverse events were significantly less frequent after HoLEP (5.4%) than after TURP (16.4%) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: HoLEP is an efficient and safe procedure for patients under diverse continuous antithrombotic regimens. It provides a superior perioperative hemostatic control and causes less bleeding complications in this high-risk population.

The clinical value of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in octogenarians.

OBJECTIVES: With holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) a size-independent method for surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been introduced. HoLEP offers durable long-term results with reduced perioperative morbidity. As the risk of disease progression increases with age, the main goals, when offering surgery to an elderly population, are reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving quality of life (QoL). We therefore analyzed the impact of age on outcomes and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing HoLEP for LUTS at our tertiary referral center. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS secondary to BPO between 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into group 1 (<70 years), group 2 (70-79 years), and group 3 (≥80 years). Perioperative parameters, safety, and short-term functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Perioperative Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complications were seen in 4.1% of patients (20/487). There was no difference in perioperative complications between all age groups (P = .176). Functional outcome was assessed 30 days post surgery. There was significant improvement in median International Prostate Symptom Score of 14, 10, and 8 points for groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < .001), respectively, with constant improvement of median QoL of 3 points for all groups. Median maximum flow rate (Qmax ) showed significant improvement of 14.5, 10.5, and 13 mL/s for groups 1 to 3 (P = .467), respectively. CONCLUSION: HoLEP offers acceptable perioperative complication rates even in the oldest patient cohort (≥80 years). Therefore, HoLEP is a safe and efficient option even in oldest patients.

The significance of a high preoperative PSA level for the detection of incidental prostate cancer in LUTS patients with large prostates.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of a high preoperative PSA level for the detection of incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) in LUTS patients with very large prostates (> 100 cc). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1125 men treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Patients were stratified according to a preoperative PSA level higher (high PSA; n = 365) or lower than 10 ng/ml (low PSA; n = 760). Preoperative and histopathological parameters were compared between both cohorts. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of iPCa. RESULTS: Demographic parameters were similar between both cohorts. The median PSA levels were 14.2 ng/ml (11.5-19.9) and 4 ng/ml (2.4-6.0). The prostate volume was significantly higher in the high PSA group (105 cc vs. 75 cc; p < 0.001). Correspondingly, the PSA density was significantly increased in the high PSA cohort compared to the low PSA cohort (0.14 vs. 0.05; p < 0.001). The overall detection rate of iPCa showed no difference between groups (9.5% vs. 9.9%). More preoperative prostate biopsies were performed in the high PSA group compared to the low PSA group (46.8% vs. 17.6%; p < 0.001). However, the rate of false negative results was comparable between groups (12.7% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.726). In logistic regression models all PSA-related parameters failed to predict iPCa. CONCLUSIONS: PSA-guided approaches to predict iPCa in LUTS patients with very large prostates are not accurate. This finding is useful in clinical practice for counselling our patients and to prevent unwarranted diagnostic procedures.