RESUMO
PURPOSE: We assessed the long-term results of surgery for urethral stricture by statistical methods using guidelines for survival analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 267 patients who underwent surgery for urethral strictures between March 1993 and December 1999, 238 (89%) were followed prospectively. The primary end point was success rate of urethroplasty. Secondary end points were variables that might influence success rates. Survival data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression using guidelines for survival analysis. RESULTS: The success rate of all urethroplasties was 82% (95% CI 66 to 89) at 7.5 years. A 6.5-year success rate of 86% (95% CI 70 to 95) was achieved by flap, of 86% (95% CI 66 to 100) by anastomotic, of 79% (95% CI 64 to 94) by mesh graft and of 56% (95% CI 20 to 100) by graft urethroplasty. No significant difference was found among the surgical procedures using the log rank (p = 0.269) or Gehan-Wilcoxon (p = 0.259) test. Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of failed urethroplasty in patients previously treated with urethral stents (HR 3.69, 95% CI 1.27 to 10.8) and by 2 or more urethrotomies (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Using standardized success criteria and statistical methods that applied guidelines for survival analysis conclusions were drawn. Excellent results are achievable by all forms of urethroplasty, justifying a more liberal indication for urethral reconstruction.
Assuntos
Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Recidiva , Reoperação , Telas Cirúrgicas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: We assessed patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery for urethral strictures and compared it with objective clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 267 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for urethral stricture between March 1993 and December 1999 were questioned regarding satisfaction. Mailed questionnaires or a telephone interview, if questionnaires were not returned, provided information on the urinary tract, voiding, sexual function, overall satisfaction and miscellaneous impairments after surgery for urethral strictures. The response rate was 87% (233 of 267 patients). Subjective data were compared with objective clinical findings. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients who underwent successful urethroplasty 159 (78%) and 24 of the 30 (80%) in whom urethroplasty was considered a failure from the physician viewpoint were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome of urethral surgery. Patients who underwent re-intervention for complications other than re-stricture and those who complained of a weak or very weak urinary stream were considerably less satisfied. Factors influencing sexual function also had an important impact on patient satisfaction. Patients with marked or severe penile curvature, penile shortening, erection deterioration and a markedly or severely impaired sexual life were especially dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Patients consider the outcome of surgery for urethral strictures differently than physicians. The outcome of urethroplasty should be assessed not only by objective, but also by subjective criteria. Patients need appropriate preoperative counseling. With realistic expectations most men are satisfied with surgery for urethral stricture.