The Influence of COVID on Emergency Medicine Career Choice: A Survey of Medical Students.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to substantial changes in the delivery of healthcare and medical education. Little is known about how the pandemic has altered medical students' perceptions in regard to career choice. Methods The authors developed and implemented a multi-center survey that evaluated medical students' preferred career choice before and during the coronavirus pandemic, as well as the influence of pandemic-related factors on that choice. The survey was distributed to all levels of medical students (MS) at nine medical schools across the country from November 2020 to January 2021 and represented a convenience sample. Preferred career choice was assessed through the use of a Likert scale and additional factors affecting career choice were solicited. The degree of interest before and during the pandemic, as well as factors influencing the shift, were treated as ordinal variables and compared using chi-squared testing. Cohen's Kappa statistic was calculated to assess the degree of shifts of interest in Emergency Medicine among students. The study was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board at the host institution, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, and all participating sites. Results A total of 1431 of 6710 (21.3%) eligible students completed the survey. The COVID pandemic was cited as a reason for a changed interest in specialty by 193 (13.5%) students. The most common reason for specialty change was the students' clinical experience, followed by a desire to be on the front lines, and personal/family health concerns. There was a significant association between career change and degree of interest among students interested in emergency medicine (EM) as their future specialty before the COVID pandemic as well as during the COVID pandemic. Living with an immunocompromised individual had a significant association with a reduced interest in EM. There was a significant association between EM rotation completion and how interested students were in EM as their future specialty before the COVID pandemic and during the COVID pandemic. Among EM-interested students whose specialty interest was changed by the COVID pandemic, 34 (41.5%) became less favorable to EM, 28 (34.2%) stayed the same, and 20 (24.4%) students became more favorable to EM. Conclusions The impact of COVID-19 on medical students' career choice is a complicated matter that involves both personal and professional factors. It appears that there is a trend towards less interest in the field of EM with multifactorial influences, some of which are related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Measuring and Predicting Faculty Consensus Rankings of Standardized Letters of Evaluation.

Background Standardized letters of evaluation (SLOE) are becoming more widely incorporated into the residency application process to make the letter of recommendation, an already critical component in a residency application packet, more objective. However, it is not currently known if the reviewers of these letters share consensus regarding the strength of an applicant determined by their SLOE. Objective We measured the level of faculty agreement regarding applicant competitiveness as determined by SLOEs and the ability of 2 algorithms to predict faculty consensus rankings. Methods Using data from the 2021-2022 Match cycle from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine SLOE Database as a blueprint, authors created 50 fictional SLOEs representative of the national data. Seven faculty then rated these SLOEs in order of applicant competitiveness, defined as suggested rank position. Consensus was evaluated using cutoffs established a priori, and 2 prediction models, a point-based system and a linear regression model, were tested to determine their ability to predict consensus rankings. Results There was strong faculty consensus regarding the interpretation of SLOEs. Within narrow windows of agreement, faculty demonstrated similar ranking patterns with 83% and 93% agreement for "close" and "loose" agreement, respectively. Predictive models yielded a strong correlation with the consensus ranking (point-based system r=0.97, linear regression r=0.97). Conclusions Faculty displayed strong consensus regarding the competitiveness of applicants via SLOEs, adding further support to the use of SLOEs for selection and advising. Two models predicted consensus competitiveness rankings with a high degree of accuracy.

Capstone Simulation: A Multipatient Simulation for Senior Emergency Medicine Residents.

Introduction: Emergency medicine (EM) trainees must learn to manage multiple patients simultaneously using task-switching. While prior work has demonstrated that multipatient scenarios can be an effective teaching tool for task-switching, few studies have shown how simulation can be used to assess residents' ability to manage multiple patients effectively. The goal of this curriculum was to provide a formative assessment of core EM skills by employing a series of simulations designed to require frequent task-switching. Methods: This exercise consisted of three simulation scenarios running in sequence. The first scenario involved medical resuscitation and advanced cardiac life support, the second required learners to manage two patients involved in a trauma using advanced trauma life support, and the final scenario tested learners' ability to communicate bad news. Faculty observers used scenario-specific checklists to identify gaps in content knowledge, communication skills, and task-switching abilities during reflective debriefs. These checklists were analyzed to identify trends. All participants were sent a postsession evaluation. Items omitted by >50% of participants were flagged for review. Results: Flagged items included asking for finger-stick glucose, verbalizing a backup intubation plan, specifying type of blood products, and asking for team input. Nine of 12 participants completed the postsession evaluation, noting that they agreed or strongly agreed the simulation was relevant and promoted reflection on task-switching skills. Discussion: This simulation provides educators with a tool to facilitate reflective feedback with senior EM learners regarding their core resuscitation, leadership, and task-switching skills and could be further adapted to promote deliberate practice.

From Battles to Burnout: Investigating the Role of Interphysician Conflict in Physician Burnout.

PURPOSE: Despite the recognized importance of collaborative communication among physicians, conflict at transitions of care remains a pervasive issue. Recent work has underscored how poor communication can undermine patient safety and organizational efficiency, yet little is known about how interphysician conflict (I-PC) impacts the physicians forced to navigate these tensions. The goal of this study was to explore the social processes and interpersonal interactions surrounding I-PC and their impact, using conversations regarding admission between internal medicine (IM) and emergency medicine (EM) as a lens to explore I-PC in clinical practice. METHOD: The authors used constructivist grounded theory to explore the interpersonal and social dynamics of I-PC. They used purposive sampling to recruit participants, including EM resident and attending physicians and IM attending physicians. The authors conducted hour-long, semistructured interviews between June and October 2020 using the Zoom video conferencing platform. Interviews were coded in 3 phases: initial line-by-line coding, focused coding, and recording. Constant comparative analysis was used to refine emerging codes, and the interview guide was iteratively updated. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 18 residents and attending physicians about how engaging in I-PC led to both personal and professional harm. Specifically, physicians described how I-PC resulted in emotional distress, demoralization, diminished sense of professional attributes, and job dissatisfaction. Participants also described how emotional residue attached to past I-PC events primed the workplace for future conflict. CONCLUSIONS: I-PC may represent a serious yet underrecognized source of harm, not only to patient safety but also to physician well-being. Participants described both the personal and professional consequences of I-PC, which align with the core tenets of burnout. Burnout is a well-established threat to the physician workforce, but unlike many other contributors to burnout, I-PC may be modifiable through improved education that equips physicians with the skills to navigate I-PC throughout their careers.

Who's on your team? Specialty identity and inter-physician conflict during admissions.

PURPOSE: Despite the implementation of professionalism curricula and standardised communication tools, inter-physician conflict persists. In particular, the interface between emergency medicine (EM) and internal medicine (IM) has long been recognised as a source of conflict. The social nuances of this conflict remain underexplored, limiting educators' ability to comprehensively address these issues in the clinical learning environment. Thus, the authors explored EM and IM physicians' experiences with negotiating hospital admissions to better understand the social dynamics that contribute to inter-physician conflict and provide foundational guidance for communication best practices. METHODS: Using a constructivist grounded theory (CGT) approach, the authors conducted 18 semi-structured interviews between June and October 2020 with EM and IM physicians involved in conversations regarding admissions (CRAs). They asked participants to describe the social exchanges that influenced these conversations and to reflect on their experiences with inter-physician conflict. Data collection and analysis occurred iteratively. The relationships between the codes were discussed by the research team with the goal of developing conceptual connections between the emergent themes. RESULTS: Participants described how their approaches to CRAs were shaped by their specialty identity, and how allegiance to members of their group contributed to interpersonal conflict. This conflict was further promoted by a mutual sense of disempowerment within the organisation, misaligned expectations, and a desire to promote their group's prerogatives. Conflict was mitigated when patient care experiences fostered cross-specialty team formation and collaboration that dissolved traditional group boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: Conflict between EM and IM physicians during CRAs was primed by participants' specialty identities, their power struggles within the broader organisation, and their sense of duty to their own specialty. However, formation of collaborative inter-specialty physician teams and expansion of identity to include colleagues from other specialties can mitigate inter-physician conflict.

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks for Painful Hand Injuries: A Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVES:  Traumatic hand injuries present to emergency departments frequently. Pain secondary to these injuries is typically managed with opioids, which may be inadequate and have side effects. Ultrasound (US)-guided forearm nerve blocks have emerged as an alternative modality for patients with acute pain from isolated extremity injuries. METHODS:  We performed a non-blinded, consecutive, randomized pragmatic trial of US-guided forearm nerve blocks using medium and long-acting anesthetic versus usual care for a six-day period around July 4th, 2017. Adults who sustained a traumatic or blast injury of their hands were considered. Consecutive emergency department patients were consented, enrolled and randomized into a study group (block) or control (standard care). The study group received a US-guided forearm block using a 50/50 mix of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was median pain scores via a 100-point visual analog scale at 15, 60, and 120 minutes after the nerve block compared to the baseline pain score. The secondary outcome was mean morphine equivalents administered. RESULTS:  Sixteen patients were screened and 12 were randomized: six to the treatment group and six to the control group. Median pain reduction from baseline at 15, 60, and 120 minutes in the forearm block group was -35 (IQR=10), -30 (IQR=50), and -20 (IQR=70, versus -5 (IQR=10), -20.5 (IQR=20), -20 (IQR=70) in the control group. At all time points, patient-reported pain scores decreased significantly over baseline in the forearm block group, whereas non-significant reductions in pain scores occurred in the control group. CONCLUSION: US-guided forearm blocks for acute traumatic hand injuries resulted in greater pain relief when compared to usual care.

Ischemic ECG Pattern Recognition to Facilitate Interpretation While Task Switching: A Parallel Curriculum.

Introduction: Interruptions are an inevitable part of working as an emergency physician, yet these can increase cognitive load and precipitate medical error. Emergency physicians learn to balance these responsibilities using a process called task switching. Yet residents have little exposure to exercises that purposefully integrate task switching during their training. We addressed this gap by exposing emergency medicine (EM) trainees to task-switching events in the form of critical ECG interpretation while they were engaged in concurrent, parallel activities. Methods: The curriculum was carried out in three phases. First, 12 PGY 2 residents engaged in a small-group session testing their baseline confidence and ECG interpretation skills. The second phase was longitudinal: During concurrent educational activities, investigators interrupted tasks and asked trainees to interpret ECGs in 10 seconds or less. The curriculum's final phase was used to review the ECGs and answer any questions. Results: Confidence and percentage of correct interpretations were compared from phase 1 to phase 2. Participants showed improved confidence (M = 2.5, SD = 0.6, to M = 2.9, SD = 0.6; p = .02; 5-point Likert scale) and increased mean percent correct (M = 0.7, SD = 0.1, to M = 0.8, SD = 0.1; p = .01) following the curriculum. Discussion: Our curriculum provides a pragmatic, reproducible approach to enhancing critical ECG interpretation with task switching in a way that mirrors the EM practice environment, promoting a reduction of cognitive load and highlighting the skills learners will need as they develop expertise.

Working with Senior Residents: How to get past "You're doing great!"

Audience: This content is intended for emergency medicine faculty. Introduction: Faculty at our institution noted that it can be easy to identify and address the knowledge gaps of junior learners. However, they often find different skills are needed when precepting senior residents, a sentiment shared by faculty at other institutions.1 To foster the skills needed for lifelong learning and deliberate practice, it is crucial that educators find methods to effectively assess the skills of senior residents and provide them with continued feedback.2 The goal of this faculty development session is to outline methods educators can use with senior residents to support their autonomy and independence while exploring their clinical reasoning, pushing them outside of their comfort zone, and promoting reflective and deliberate practice.2-9. Educational Objectives: By the end of the lecture, all faculty will be able to 1) describe how to use the Aunt Minnie method of precepting for senior residents, 2) list examples of ways in which they can probe the clinical reasoning of senior residents, 3) explain how to use reflective feedback techniques with senior residents, and 4) report use of the techniques discussed during this session when precepting senior residents in the emergency department. Educational Methods: This content is presented as a PowerPoint lecture with subsequent discussion. Research Methods: A post-session survey was distributed to allow participants to evaluate the session. This survey was sent four months after the session to gauge how often participants were using the covered techniques on their clinical shifts in the interim. Results: The majority of survey respondents reported that they initially felt that precepting senior learners was "somewhat difficult" and that they found this session "valuable" in helping them address this challenge. Faculty reported using all of the techniques discussed in this session during their clinical shifts, but were more likely to use methods to promote clinical reasoning or reflective feedback than the Aunt Minnie method of precepting. Overall, respondents reported learning new skills during this exercise and appreciated the format which allowed them to share their own experiences of working with the senior residents and brainstorm techniques that might be useful beyond those discussed by the instructors. Discussion: This faculty development session successfully introduced emergency medicine faculty to techniques that can be used to improve feedback and assessment of senior residents. The lecture format allowed for efficient transmission of material, while several group discussions and a role-play activity allowed for integration of material and sharing of experiences. Overall this exercise was a success with faculty reporting use of several of the techniques discussed. In future iterations, it may be beneficial to integrate more role-play activities to allow participants to practice more of the skills learned in a simulated environment prior to implementing on shifts with learners. Topics: Feedback, deliberate practice, clinical reasoning, precepting.

Advising special population emergency medicine residency applicants: a survey of emergency medicine advisors and residency program leadership.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the advising and emergency medicine (EM) residency selection practices for special population applicant groups for whom traditional advice may not apply. METHODS: A survey was distributed on the Council of Residency Directors in EM and Clerkship Directors in EM Academy listservs. Multiple choice, Likert-type scale, and fill-in-the-blank questions addressed the average EM applicant and special population groups (osteopathic; international medical graduate (IMG); couples; at-risk; re-applicant; dual-accreditation applicant; and military). Percentages and 95% confidence intervals [CI] were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred four surveys were completed. Of respondents involved in the interview process, 2 or more standardized letters of evaluation (SLOEs) were recommended for osteopathic (90.1% [95% CI 84-96]), IMG (82.5% [73-92]), dual-accreditation (46% [19-73]), and average applicants (48.5% [39-58]). Recommendations for numbers of residency applications to submit were 21-30 (50.5% [40.7-60.3]) for the average applicant, 31-40 (41.6% [31.3-51.8]) for osteopathic, and > 50 (50.9% [37.5-64.4]) for IMG. For below-average Step 1 performance, 56.0% [46.3-65.7] were more likely to interview with an average Step 2 score. 88.1% [81.8-94.4] will consider matching an EM-EM couple. The majority were more likely to interview a military applicant with similar competitiveness to a traditional applicant. Respondents felt the best option for re-applicants was to pursue the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP) for a preliminary residency position. CONCLUSION: Advising and residency selection practices for special population applicants differ from those of traditional EM applicants. These data serve as an important foundation for advising these distinct applicant groups in ways that were previously only speculative. While respondents agree on many advising recommendations, outliers exist.

Navigating Cognitive Dissonance: A Qualitative Content Analysis Exploring Medical Students' Experiences of Moral Distress in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: As undergraduate medical students are acculturated into clinical practice, they develop a set of refined professional values that impact their decision making. We aimed to use students' reflective narratives on ethical dilemmas to identify how students experience moral distress while working in the emergency department (ED) to better understand how to support them in the development of their own agency to act ethically. METHODS: Students rotating in our emergency medicine clerkship are required to submit an essay describing an ethical dilemma they encountered. We selected a random sample of these reflective pieces from the 2015 and 2016 academic years and used an exploratory qualitative thematic analytic approach to identify frequently recurring themes. This process was continued until thematic sufficiency was reached. RESULTS: Two-hundred essays were coded, and seven unique themes were identified. The moral distress students described in reflective writing narratives stemmed from patient-provider discord, uncertainty, and social injustices. In each case, students were expressing the cognitive dissonance they experienced as they began to reconcile the difference between their perceptions of optimal patient care and the actual care delivered to the patient. CONCLUSION: Understanding medical students' cognitive dissonance in the ED will help educators support their students as they negotiate the differences between preferences and principles while being acculturated into clinical practice. Future work should develop specific interventions to promote educator understanding of learners' moral distress and to develop novel models of support for learners.