Improving an existing proxy-based approach for floodplain denitrification assessment to facilitate decision making on restoration.

Excess nitrogen (N) from agricultural sources is a major contributor to the water pollution of rivers in Europe. Floodplains are of tremendous importance as they can permanently remove nitrate (NO3) from the environment by releasing reactive N to the atmosphere in its gaseous forms (N2O, N2) during denitrification. However, the quantitative assessment of this ecosystem function is still challenging, particularly on the national level. In this study, we modeled the potential of NO3-N removal through microbial denitrification in soils of the active floodplains of the river Elbe and river Rhine in Germany. We combined laboratory measurements of soil denitrification potentials with straightforward modelling data, covering the average inundation duration from six study areas, to improve an existing Germany-wide proxy-based approach (PBAe) on NO3-N retention potential. The PBAe estimates this potential to be 30-150 kg NO3-N ha-1 yr-1. However, with soil pH and Floodplain Status Category identified as essential parameters for the proxies, the improved PBA (PBAi) yields a removal potential of 5-480 kg N ha-1 yr-1. To account for these parameters, we applied scaling factors using a bonus-malus system with a base value of 10-120 N ha-1 yr-1. Upscaling the determined proxies of the PBAi to the entire active floodplains of the river Elbe and river Rhine results in similarly high NO3-N retention sums of ~7000 t yr-1 in spite of very different retention area sizes, strengthening the argument for area availability as the primary objective of restoration efforts. Although PBAs are always subject to uncertainty, the PBAi enables a more differentiated spatial quantification of denitrification because local key controlling parameters are included. Hence, the PBAi is an innovative and robust approach to quantify denitrification in floodplain soils, supporting a better assessment of ecosystem services for decision-making on floodplain restoration.

Vegetation characteristics control local sediment and nutrient retention on but not underneath vegetation in floodplain meadows.

Sediment and nutrient retention are essential ecosystem functions that floodplains provide and that improve river water quality. During floods, the floodplain vegetation retains sediment, which settles on plant surfaces and the soil underneath plants. Both sedimentation processes require that flow velocity is reduced, which may be caused by the topographic features and the vegetation structure of the floodplain. However, the relative importance of these two drivers and their key components have rarely been both quantified. In addition to topographic factors, we expect vegetation height and density, mean leaf size and pubescence, as well as species diversity of the floodplain vegetation to increase the floodplain's capacity for sedimentation. To test this, we measured sediment and nutrients (carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus) both on the vegetation itself and on sediment traps underneath the vegetation after a flood at 24 sites along the River Mulde (Germany). Additionally, we measured biotic and topographic predictor variables. Sedimentation on the vegetation surface was positively driven by plant biomass and the height variation of the vegetation, and decreased with the hydrological distance (total R2 = 0.56). Sedimentation underneath the vegetation was not driven by any vegetation characteristics but decreased with hydrological distance (total R2 = 0.42). Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content in the sediment on the traps increased with the total amount of sediment (total R2 = 0.64, 0.62 and 0.84, respectively), while C, N and P on the vegetation additionally increased with hydrological distance (total R2 = 0.80, 0.79 and 0.92, respectively). This offers the potential to promote sediment and especially nutrient retention via vegetation management, such as adapted mowing. The pronounced signal of the hydrological distance to the river emphasises the importance of a laterally connected floodplain with abandoned meanders and morphological depressions. Our study improves our understanding of the locations where floodplain management has its most significant impact on sediment and nutrient retention to increase water purification processes.

Trace metal dynamics in floodplain soils of the river Elbe: a review.

This paper reviews trace metal dynamics in floodplain soils using the Elbe floodplains in Germany as an example of extraordinary importance because of the pollution level of its sediments and soils. Trace metal dynamics are determined by processes of retention and release, which are influenced by a number of soil properties including pH value, redox potential, organic matter, type and amount of clay minerals, iron-, manganese- and aluminum-oxides. Today floodplains act as important sinks for contaminants but under changing hydraulic and geochemical conditions they may also act as sources for pollutants. In floodplains such changes may be extremes in flooding or dry periods that particularly lead to altered redox potentials and that in turn influence the pH value, the mineralization of organic matter as well as the charge of the pedogenic oxides. Such reactions may affect the bioavailability of trace metals in soils and it can be clearly seen that the bioavailability of metals is an important factor for estimating trace metal remobilization in floodplain soils. However as bioavailability is not a constant factor, there is still a lack of quantification of metal mobilization particularly on the basis of changing geochemical conditions. Moreover, mobile amounts of metals in the soil solution do not indicate to which extent remobilized metals will be transported to water bodies or plants and therefore potentially have toxicological effects. Consequently, floodplain areas still need to be taken into consideration when studying the role and behavior of sediments and soils for transporting pollutants within river systems, particularly concerning the Water Framework Directive.