Trap-Door Thoracotomy and Clamshell Thoracotomy as Surgical Approaches for Neuroblastoma and Other Thoracic Tumors in Children.

Solid tumors of the cervicothoracic junction, the posterior mediastinum, or bilateral dorsal thoracic tumors represent a challenge in pediatric surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to evaluate trap-door thoracotomy and clamshell thoracotomy as surgical approaches. A single-center retrospective study of children with solid tumors in these specific localizations was performed. From 2015 to 2023, 26 children (17 girls; 9 boys) were treated at a median age of 54 months (range 8-229). Tumor resection was performed for neuroblastoma (n = 11); metastatic disease (n = 7); malignant rhabdoid tumor (n = 4); Ewing sarcoma (n = 1); inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (n = 1); rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1); and neurofibroma (n = 1). The surgical goal of macroscopic complete excision was achieved in all of the 14 children who underwent trap-door thoracotomy and in 11 of the 12 children who underwent clamshell thoracotomy. There were no major complications. At a median follow-up of 8 months (range 0-60), the disease was under local control or in complete remission in 66.7% of the children. In conclusion, surgical resection of solid tumors of the cervicothoracic junction in children can be performed safely and successfully with trap-door thoracotomy and with clamshell thoracotomy for posterior mediastinal or bilateral dorsal thoracic tumors.

Redo nephron-sparing surgery in stage V pediatric renal tumors - A report from the SIOP/GPOH study group for renal tumors.

PURPOSE: Nephron-sparing Surgery (NSS) is the surgical treatment of choice in children with bilateral renal tumors or in syndromatic patients. With an increasing role of this surgical approach, there is also an increased number of tumor relapses after NSS. Aim of this study was to evaluate a second ("Redo-") NSS in children with relapsed renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing Redo-NSS for relapsed kidney tumors between 2009 and 2021 at our institution, which represents a national reference center of the SIOP/GPOH renal tumor study group. RESULTS: Nine patients (5 girls, 4 boys) underwent Redo-NSS with resection of 15 lesions. Mean age at surgery was 58 months (12-137), mean operative time for Redo-NSS was 195 min (137-260). R0 resection status was achieved in all children. Two patients had second relapses, one of them was resected via NSS, the other child underwent tumor nephrectomy. Two patients with anaplastic relapses died from combined second relapses. Thus, 7/9 patients are alive without evidence of disease, an impaired renal function was observed in one child. Mean follow-up after Redo-NSS was 35 months (6-49). CONCLUSIONS: In renal tumor relapses, Redo-NSS can be performed with satisfactory oncological and functional results. Occurrence of diffuse anaplasia should possibly refrain from this approach. Further evaluation in international multicenter analyses are necessary for a definitive determination of Redo-NSS.

Gastric Transposition for Repair of Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia: Indications, Complications, and Outcome of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastric transposition (GT) is a possible option for esophageal replacement in long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). The present study aims to report and compare indications and outcome of laparoscopic-assisted GT (LAGT) versus open (OGT) GT for LGEA repair. METHODS: Retrospective single-center analysis of all LGEA patients undergoing GT between 2002 and 2021. RESULTS: Thirty-one children with LGEA underwent GT. Of these, 19 underwent LAGT (mean weight at surgery 5.6 kg; mean age 167 days) and 12 underwent OGT (6.1 kg; 233 days). Indications for OGT were previous surgery (n = 7), associated severe cardiac malformations (n = 4), and a simultaneous resection of a choledochal cyst (n = 1). The conversion rate was 1. The two procedures (LAGT/OGT) differed in anesthetic time (308/350 min), duration of ventilation (5.1/5.3 days), hospital stay (34/32 days), and complications (22/15). None of the differences reached statistical significance. Outcome was also comparable: completely oral nutrition uptake in 66%/73%, slow weight gain in the low centiles in both groups, no patient developed dumping syndrome, symptomatic reflux was seen in 1 patient after OGT. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, LAGT for repair of LGEA provided similar outcomes as open surgery. The minimally invasive approach preserves thoracal structures, prevents additional thoracotomy or laparotomy, and is faster. To realize LAGT, a postpartal treatment concept including gastrostomy placement via a microincision to minimize adhesions is essential. The open surgical approach should be considered in cases of previous extensive surgical attempts of EA correction causing severe adhesions as well as associated anomalies or genetic syndromes causing hemodynamic instability.