Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors. RESULTS: In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed. CONCLUSION: These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available test kit for noninvasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status (NIPT-RhD) with a focus on early gestation and multiple pregnancies. METHODS: The FetoGnost RhD assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) is routinely applied for clinical decision making either in woman with anti-D alloimmunization or to target the application of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to women with a RhD positive fetus. Based on existing data in the laboratory information system the newborn's serological RhD status was compared with NIPT RhD results. RESULTS: Since 2009 NIPT RhD was performed in 2968 pregnant women between weeks 5 + 6 and 40 + 0 of gestation (median 12 + 6) and conclusive results were obtained in 2888 (97.30%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from those 2244 (77.70%) cases with the newborn's serological RhD status reported. The sensitivity of the FetoGnost RhD assay was 99.93% (95% CI 99.61-99.99%) and the specificity was 99.61% (95% CI 98.86-99.87%). No false-positive or false-negative NIPT RhD result was observed in 203 multiple pregnancies. CONCLUSION: NIPT RhD results are reliable when obtained with FetoGnost RhD assay. Targeted routine anti-D-prophylaxis can start as early as 11 + 0 weeks of gestation in singleton and multiple pregnancies.

Association of ABO blood group with bleeding severity in patients with bleeding of unknown cause.

Blood group O has been associated with an increased bleeding tendency due to lower von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) levels. We explored whether blood group O is independently associated with bleeding severity in patients with mild-to-moderate bleeding of unknown cause (BUC) in the Vienna Bleeding Biobank cohort. Bleeding severity was recorded with the Vicenza bleeding score (BS). Blood group O was overrepresented in 422 patients with BUC compared with its presence in 23 145 healthy blood donors (47.2% vs 37.6%; odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.79). The BS and the number of bleeding symptoms were significantly higher in patients with blood group O than in patients with non-O after adjustment for VWF and FVIII levels and sex (least-square [LS] means of BSs: 6.2; 95% CI, 5.8-6.6 vs 5.3; 4.9-5.7; and of number of symptoms: LS, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.2-3.7 vs 3.0; 2.8-3.2, respectively). Oral mucosal bleeding was more frequent in those with blood group O than in those with other blood types (group non-O; 26.1% vs 14.3%), independent of sex and VWF and FVIII levels, whereas other bleeding symptoms did not differ. Patients with blood group O had increased clot density in comparison with those with blood group non-O, as determined by rotational thromboelastometry and turbidimetric measurement of plasma clot formation. There were no differences in thrombin generation, clot lysis, or platelet function. Our data indicate that blood group O is a risk factor for increased bleeding and bleeding severity in patients with BUC, independent of VWF and FVIII levels.

Frequency and prognostic value of D alloantibodies after D-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning.

BACKGROUND: Due to the fact that the ABO and D system is inherited independently from the HLA system, approximately 40% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are performed across the blood group barrier. Reports on the development of de novo anti-D in patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by D-mismatched allogeneic HSCT are rare. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of anti-D alloimmunization after D-mismatched HSCT following RIC and its prognostic impact on transplant outcome. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with hematologic diseases who underwent D-mismatched HSCT were retrospectively analyzed: 19 D- patients with a D+ donor and 21 D+ patients with a D- donor. Routine serologic testing for blood group typing and antibody screening was performed by a column agglutination method every time when transfusion of red blood cell units was requested and in the posttransplantation course to demonstrate establishment of donor ABO type and to detect alloimmunization. RESULTS: After a median serologic follow-up of 21 (range, 0 to 73) months after HSCT, anti-D was identified in 2 of 21 (10%) D+ patients receiving a D- transplant, 23 and 34 months after HSCT. None of the 19 D- patients with a D+ donor developed an anti-D. CONCLUSION: We observed an infrequent de novo anti-D formation that is more likely in D+ recipients of D- grafts. However, the development of anti-D does not normally impair the transplant outcome and is not of clinical relevance in the posttransplant course.

Vienna experience of ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is a promising strategy for enlargement of living-donor pools. In recent years, recipient desensitization by blood group antigen-specific immunoadsorption, together with rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin, has allowed excellent graft performance after ABO-incompatible transplantation. Adopting this protocol, originally described by Tydén and coworkers, we performed four living-donor renal transplants across the ABO barrier (A1-->0, A1-->B, B-->A1, A2-->0) between July 2007 and August 2008. Recipients were aged 25-66 years, donors 49-69 years. A protocol of on-demand immunoadsorption was followed, based on serial post-transplant antibody monitoring. Substantial and sustained decrease of blood group antibody levels was achieved in all four recipients, therefore post-transplant immunoadsorption was not needed. Graft and patient survival after 4-18 months' follow-up was 100%. Current serum creatinine was 1.3-2.0 mg/dl. Two grafts showed C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries in the complete absence of typical morphological features of antibody-mediated rejection. One recipient experienced early graft dysfunction, diagnosed as Banff borderline lesion, which responded well to steroid pulse therapy. The same recipient developed de novo interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and arteriolar hyalinosis, presumably the result of suboptimal control of blood pressure and/or calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Two of the four recipients developed lymphoceles necessitating surgical revision. Apart from urinary tract infection in three patients and subclinical CMV in one, no major infectious complications were reported. Notably, two stable recipients developed polyoma BK viremia without clinical or morphological manifestations of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. The results obtained in our small series support the earlier reported high efficiency of desensitization based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption. Nevertheless, the lack of long-term data will necessitate continuous and prudent consideration of the benefits and risks of this strategy.