RESUMO
More than 20years have passed since the NIH 1993 Act was initiated, and while progress has been made toward better representation of minorities and women in clinical research studies, as this review will show, there is still tremendous room for improvement. The purpose of this review was to identify the current state of literature on recruitment and retention strategies in clinical studies of low-income and minority populations. We identified 165 studies published in English between 2004 and 2014. Data extracted included information on the study type (descriptive or analytical), study design, study focus (recruitment, retention, both recruitment and retention), health outcome, specific minority group, special population or age group, if specific recruitment/retention techniques were tested, and key research findings. Particular attention was given to articles that statistically analyzed the effectiveness of recruitment and retention strategies on enrollment/retention rates. Effective recruitment and retention strategies for low-income and minority groups, differential effectiveness across groups, and implications for future research are discussed.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Etnicidade , Grupos Minoritários , Seleção de Pacientes , Pobreza , Envelhecimento , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Participação da Comunidade , Competência Cultural , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Idioma , Projetos de Pesquisa , Confiança , Saúde da MulherAssuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/normas , Informática em Enfermagem/educação , Informática em Enfermagem/normas , Terminologia como Assunto , Coleta de Dados , Educação em Enfermagem/normas , Humanos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 2 anticipatory guidance styles (maternal focused [MOMS] and infant focused [Ounce of Prevention]) directed at mothers of infants aged newborn to 6 months on their infant feeding behaviors at 1 year compared with routine advice as outlined in Bright Futures (BF). METHODS: This is a cluster randomized trial. A total of 292 mother/infant dyads were enrolled at their first well-child visit to 3 urban pediatric clinics in Columbus, Ohio. Intervention-specific brief advice and 1-page handouts were given at each well visit. In addition to infant weights and lengths, surveys about eating habits and infant feeding practices were completed at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline data revealed a group with high rates of maternal overweight (62%) and obesogenic habits. At 12 months, the maternal-focused group gave their infants less juice (8.97 oz vs 14.37 oz, P < .05), and more daily servings of fruit (1.40 vs 0.94, P < .05) and vegetables (1.41 vs 1.03, P < .05) compared with BF mothers. Ounce of Prevention mothers also gave less juice (9.3 oz, P < .05) and more fruit servings (1.26 P < .05) than BF. CONCLUSIONS: Brief specific interventions added to well-child care may affect obesogenic infant feeding behaviors of mothers and deserves further study as an inexpensive approach to preventing childhood obesity.
Assuntos
Comportamento Alimentar , Mães/educação , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Comportamento Alimentar/etnologia , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Alimentos Infantis , Recém-Nascido , Obesidade/etnologia , Folhetos , Pobreza , População UrbanaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conducting longitudinal research studies with low-income and/or minority participants present a unique set of challenges and opportunities. PURPOSE: To outline the specific strategies employed to successfully recruit and retain participants in a longitudinal study of nutritional anticipatory guidance during early childhood, conducted with a low-income, ethnically diverse, urban population of mothers. METHODS: We describe recruitment and retention efforts made by the research team for the 'MOMS' Study (Making Our Mealtimes Special). The 'multilayered' approach for recruitment and retention included commitment of research leadership, piloting procedures, frequent team reporting, emphasis on participant convenience, incentives, frequent contact with participants, expanded budget, clinical staff buy-in, a dedicated phone line, and the use of research project branding and logos. RESULTS: Barriers to enrollment were not encountered in this project, despite recruiting from a low-income population with a large proportion of African-American families. Process evaluation with clinic staff demonstrated the perception of the MOMS staff was very positive. Participant retention rate was 75% and 64% at 6 months and 12 months post-recruitment, respectively. We attribute retention success largely to a coordinated effort between the research team and the infrastructure support at the clinical sites, as well as project branding and a dedicated phone line. CONCLUSIONS: Successful participant recruitment and retention approaches need to be specific and consistent with clinical staff buy in throughout the project.
Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Pesquisadores/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comunicação , Dieta , Etnicidade , Feminino , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Longitudinais/métodos , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde , Mães/educação , Ohio , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Pobreza , Pesquisadores/educação , Pesquisadores/psicologia , Relações Pesquisador-Sujeito , População Urbana , Adulto JovemRESUMO
This paper discusses the lessons learned by our collaborative, transdisciplinary team while developing a pilot/demonstration educational health campaign geared toward underserved communities in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. The objective of the current study was to determine the feasibility of a campaign to raise awareness of the association between family history and cancer risk and to inform individuals of the availability of Jameslink, an online familial cancer risk assessment tool. The research team included members of The Ohio State University Primary Care Research Institute, which includes a unique combination of expertise in Genetics, Behavioral Science, Social and Health Psychology, Communication, Medicine, and Methodology. The experience of the team in developing university and community partnerships, identifying stakeholders and formulating campaign messages is described. Groups who aided in this process as well as the perspectives they brought to the project are discussed. The lessons learned may be helpful to those developing similar community health projects.