Short- and long-term reproducibility of body surface gastric mapping using the Gastric Alimetry® system.

BACKGROUND: Many diagnostic tests for gastroduodenal symptoms, such as gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), gastric emptying breath tests (GEBT), and electrogastrography (EGG) show variable intra-individual reproducibility over time. This study investigated the short- and long-term reproducibility of body surface gastric mapping (BSGM), a non-invasive test for assessing gastric function, in controls and patients with chronic gastroduodenal disorders. METHODS: Participants completed three standardized BSGM tests using Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand). The test encompassed a fasting baseline (30 min), a 482 kCal standard meal, and a 4 h postprandial recording. The first two tests were >6 months apart and the last occurred ~1 week after the second test, to evaluate long and short-term reproducibility. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and 14 healthy controls were recruited. There were no significant differences in any BSGM metrics between the tests at short and long term (all p > 0.180). Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) for the primary metrics were high, ranging from 0.58 to 0.96, with intra-individual coefficients of variance (CVintra) ranging from 0.2% to 1.9%. Reproducibility was higher, and intra-individual variation lower, than in previous studies of GES (CCC = 0.54-0.83, CVintra = 3%-77%), GEBT (CVintra = 8%-11%), and EGG (CVintra = 3%-78%). CONCLUSIONS: BSGM spectral metrics demonstrate high reproducibility and low intra-individual variation at both short and long term, with superior results to comparable tests. The high reproducibility of Gastric Alimetry supports its role as a diagnostic aid for gastric dysfunction and a reliable tool for evaluating treatment outcomes and disease progression over time.

Effect of Menstrual Cycle and Menopause on Human Gastric Electrophysiology.

Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms disproportionately affect females of childbearing age; however, the effect of menstrual cycling on gastric electrophysiology is poorly defined. To establish the effect of the menstrual cycle on gastric electrophysiology, healthy subjects underwent non-invasive Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM; 8x8 array), with validated symptom logging App (Gastric AlimetryⓇ, New Zealand). Participants were premenopausal females in follicular (n=26) and luteal phases (n=18). Postmenopausal females (n=30) and males (n=51) were controls. Principal gastric frequency (PGF), BMI-adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA-RI), fasted-fed amplitude ratio (ff-AR), meal response curves, and symptom burden were analysed. Menstrual cycle-related electrophysiological changes were then transferred to an established anatomically-accurate computational gastric fluid dynamics model (meal viscosity 0.1 Pas), to predict the impact on gastric mixing and emptying. PGF was significantly higher in the luteal vs. follicular phase (mean 3.21 cpm, SD (0.17) vs. 2.94 cpm, SD (0.17), p<0.001) and vs. males (3.01 cpm, SD (0.2), p<0.001). In the computational model, this translated to 8.1% higher gastric mixing strength and 5.3% faster gastric emptying for luteal versus follicular phases. Postmenopausal females also exhibited higher PGF than females in the follicular phase (3.10 cpm, SD (0.24) vs. 2.94 cpm, SD (0.17), p=0.01), and higher BMI-adjusted amplitude (40.7 µV (33.02-52.58) vs. 29.6 µV (26.15-39.65), p<0.001), GA-RI (0.60 (0.48-0.73) vs. 0.43 (0.30-0.60), p=0.005), and ff-AR (2.51 (1.79-3.47) vs. 1.48 (1.21-2.17), p=0.001) than males. There were no differences in symptoms. These results define variations in gastric electrophysiology with regard to human menstrual cycling and menopause.

Gastric Alimetry® Testing and Healthcare Economic Analysis in Nausea and Vomiting Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes (CNVS), gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia (FD) are complex disorders. Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM), a new test of gastric function, using Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand) may be useful for de-escalating healthcare utilisation. This study aimed to define healthcare costs and estimate health economic impacts of implementing this test in patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. METHODS: Consecutive patients at a tertiary referral centre evaluated with Gastric Alimetry were included. Frequency and cost data relating to medical investigations, hospital and outpatient presentations were evaluated. Costs of healthcare utilisation were calculated, and the potential cost savings of implementing Gastric Alimetry within a diagnostic decision-tree model were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 31 consecutive patients (mean age 36.1 years; 83.9% female; predominant symptoms: nausea [83.9%], pain [61.3%], vomiting [67.7%] and bloating [35.5%]) completed Gastric Alimetry testing. Repeat gastroscopy and abdominal CT rates were 29% (8/28) and 85% (11/13), respectively. Gastric Alimetry testing identified spectral abnormalities in 45.2% of patients, and symptom profiling classified a further 29.1% of patients. Median annualised cost difference after test introduction was NZ$-12,032. Estimated reductions in investigation-related costs when incorporating Gastric Alimetry into the diagnostic workflow model were approximately NZ$1,300 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilisation and confirmatory testing rates remain high in nausea and vomiting syndromes. This study presents real-world data, together with a decision-tree analysis, showing Gastric Alimetry can streamline clinical care pathways, resulting in reduced healthcare utilisation and cost.

Cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for gastroduodenal disorders of gut-brain interaction: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is increasingly used to manage Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBIs). This systematic review aimed to review the evidence for the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for patients with gastroduodenal DGBIs. METHODS: Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Scopus were searched in July 2022. Studies were included if they investigated the effects of a CBT-based intervention on gastrointestinal symptoms and/or psychological outcomes pre- and post-intervention in patients with gastroduodenal DGBIs. Case studies, studies not in English, and studies with patients under 18 years were excluded. Results were synthesised narratively, and standardised effect sizes were calculated where possible. RESULTS: Nine studies (seven RCTs and two pre/post studies) were identified, with data reported in 10 articles (total N = 602). The studies investigated patients with functional dyspepsia (n = 7), rumination syndrome (n = 1), and supragastric belching (n = 1). The studies had heterogeneous interventions, methodologies, and outcomes, precluding meta-analysis, as well as a moderate-high risk of bias and high drop-outs rates. Findings demonstrated decreased gastrointestinal symptoms and improved anxiety, depression, and quality of life, from pre- to post-intervention, with medium to large effect sizes for symptoms and small to large effect sizes for psychological outcomes. Efficacy was maintained at follow-up, up to one year later. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests promising evidence that CBT effectively improves gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological outcomes in patients with gastroduodenal DGBIs. However, heterogeneity, risk of bias, and lack of statistical reporting were noted, indicating the need for more robust research and standardisation.

It's a helluva journey: a qualitative study of patient and clinician experiences of nausea and vomiting syndromes.

Background: Chronic gastroduodenal disorders including, chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome, gastroparesis, and functional dyspepsia, are challenging to diagnose and manage. The diagnostic and treatment pathways for these disorders are complex, costly and overlap substantially; however, experiences of this pathway have not been thoroughly investigated. This study therefore aimed to explore clinician and patient perspectives on the current clinical pathway. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between June 2020 and June 2022 with 11 patients with chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome alone (based on Rome IV criteria) and nine gastroenterologists who treat these conditions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using a reflexive, iterative, inductive approach. Five key patient themes were identified: (1) the impacts of their chronic gastroduodenal symptoms, (2) the complexity of the clinical journey, (3) their interactions with healthcare providers, (4) the need for advocacy, and (5) their experience of treatments. Five key clinician themes were also identified: (1) these conditions were seen as clinically complex, (2) there is an uncertain and variable clinical pathway, (3) the nuance of investigations, (4) these conditions were difficult to therapeutically manage, and (5) there are barriers to developing a therapeutic relationship. Conclusion: Findings indicate that both patients and clinicians are dissatisfied with the current clinical care pathways for nausea and vomiting syndromes. Recommendations included the development of more clinically relevant and discriminant tests, standardization of the diagnostic journey, and the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Gastric Alimetry in the Management of Chronic Gastroduodenal Disorders: Impact to Diagnosis and Health Care Utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms are frequently overlapping within existing diagnostic paradigms, and current diagnostic tests are insensitive to underlying pathophysiologies. Gastric Alimetry has emerged as a new diagnostic test of gastric neuromuscular function with time-of-test symptom profiling. This study aimed to assess the impact to diagnosis and health care utilization after the introduction of Gastric Alimetry into clinical care. METHODS: Consecutive data of patients from 2 tertiary centers with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms (Rome-IV defined or motility disorder) having integrated care and Gastric Alimetry testing were evaluated. Changes in diagnoses, interventions, and management were quantified. Pretest and posttest health care utilization was reported. A preliminary management framework was established through experiential learning. RESULTS: Fifty participants (45 women; median age 30 years; 18 with gastroparesis, 24 with chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome, and 6 with functional dyspepsia) underwent Gastric Alimetry testing. One-third of patients had a spectral abnormality (18% dysrhythmic/low amplitude). Of the remaining patients, 9 had symptoms correlating to gastric amplitude, while 19 had symptoms unrelated to gastric activity. Gastric Alimetry aided management decisions in 84%, including changes in invasive nutritional support in 9/50 cases (18%; predominantly de-escalation). Health care utilization was significantly lower post-Gastric Alimetry testing when compared with the average utilization cost in the year before Gastric Alimetry testing (mean ± SD $39,724 ± 63,566 vs $19,937 ± 35,895, P = 0.037). DISCUSSION: Gastric Alimetry aided diagnosis and management of patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms by enabling phenotype-informed care. The high majority of results aided management decisions, which was associated with reduced health care utilization.

An automated artifact detection and rejection system for body surface gastric mapping.

BACKGROUND: Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) is a new clinical tool for gastric motility diagnostics, providing high-resolution data on gastric myoelectrical activity. Artifact contamination was a key challenge to reliable test interpretation in traditional electrogastrography. This study aimed to introduce and validate an automated artifact detection and rejection system for clinical BSGM applications. METHODS: Ten patients with chronic gastric symptoms generated a variety of artifacts according to a standardized protocol (176 recordings) using a commercial BSGM system (Alimetry, New Zealand). An automated artifact detection and rejection algorithm was developed, and its performance was compared with a reference standard comprising consensus labeling by 3 analysis experts, followed by comparison with 6 clinicians (3 untrained and 3 trained in artifact detection). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa. KEY RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was 0.84 (95% CI:0.77-0.90) among experts, 0.76 (95% CI:0.68-0.83) among untrained clinicians, and 0.71 (95% CI:0.62-0.79) among trained clinicians. The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm against experts was 96% (95% CI:91%-100%) and 95% (95% CI:90%-99%), respectively, vs 77% (95% CI:68%-85%) and 99% (95% CI:96%-100%) against untrained clinicians, and 97% (95% CI:92%-100%) and 88% (95% CI:82%-94%) against trained clinicians. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: An automated artifact detection and rejection algorithm was developed showing >95% sensitivity and specificity vs expert markers. This algorithm overcomes an important challenge in the clinical translation of BSGM and is now being routinely implemented in patient test interpretations.

Standardized system and App for continuous patient symptom logging in gastroduodenal disorders: Design, implementation, and validation.

BACKGROUND: Functional gastroduodenal disorders include functional dyspepsia, chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes, and gastroparesis. These disorders are common, but their overlapping symptomatology poses challenges to diagnosis, research, and therapy. This study aimed to introduce and validate a standardized patient symptom-logging system and App to aid in the accurate reporting of gastroduodenal symptoms for clinical and research applications. METHODS: The system was implemented in an iOS App including pictographic symptom illustrations, and two validation studies were conducted. To assess convergent and concurrent validity, a diverse cohort with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms undertook App-based symptom logging for 4 h after a test meal. Individual and total post-prandial symptom scores were averaged and correlated against two previously validated instruments: PAGI-SYM (for convergent validity) and PAGI-QOL (for concurrent validity). To assess face and content validity, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with patients. KEY RESULTS: App-based symptom reporting demonstrated robust convergent validity with PAGI-SYM measures of nausea (rS  =0.68), early satiation (rS  =0.55), bloating (rS  =0.48), heartburn (rS  =0.47), upper gut pain (rS  =0.40), and excessive fullness (rS  =0.40); all p < 0.001 (n = 79). The total App-reported Gastric Symptom Burden Score correlated positively with PAGI-SYM (rS  =0.56; convergent validity; p < 0.001), and negatively with PAGI-QOL (rS  = -0.34; concurrent validity; p = 0.002). Interviews demonstrated that the pictograms had adequate face and content validity. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The continuous patient symptom-logging App demonstrated robust convergent, concurrent, face, and content validity when used within a 4-h post-prandial test protocol. The App will enable standardized symptom reporting and is anticipated to provide utility in both research and clinical practice.