Radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a prospective multicenter evaluation.

PURPOSE: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may require extensive X-ray usage. We evaluated the impact of preoperative surgeon briefing regarding the inclusion and evaluation of fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP) in a multicenter study on the applied X-ray usage. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study of 6 tertiary centers was performed. Each center recruited up to 25 prospective patients with renal stones of any size for RIRS. Prior to study´s onset, all surgeons were briefed about hazards of radiation and on strategies to avoid high doses in RIRS. Prospective procedures were compared to past procedures, as baseline data. FT was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary parameters were stone-free rate (SFR), complications according to the Clavien, SATAVA and postureteroscopic lesion scale. Results were analyzed using T test, chi-squared test, univariate analysis and confirmed in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: 303 patients were included (145 retro- and 158 prospective). Mean FT and DAP were reduced from 130.8 s/565.8 to 77.4 s/357.8 (p < 0.05). SFR was improved from 85.5% to 93% (p < 0.05). Complications did not vary significantly. Neither stone position (p = 0.569), prestenting (p = 0.419), nor surgeons' experience (> 100 RIRS) had a significant impact on FT. Significant univariate parameters were confirmed in a multivariate model, revealing X-ray training to be radiation protective (OR - 44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased surgeon awareness of X-ray exposure risks has a significant impact on FT and DAP. This "awareness effect" is a simple method to reduce radiation exposure for the patient and OR staff without the procedures´ outcome and safety being affected.

Future perspectives of flexible ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the recent past, there were numerous and promising technological developments in the field of endourology leading to tremendous changes in the management of urolithiasis. This review will try to weave ancient stone therapy with the very modern advent of flexible ureteroscopy and recent developments in robotic systems. RECENT FINDINGS: In the broad field of flexible ureteroscopy for stone surgery, new disposable scopes have been developed and established. The use of robotic instruments is also a new and interesting concept. Additionally, clinical research on the understanding of laser features leads to a specific and appropriate use of lasers for lithotripsy, both holmium, and nowadays also interestingly thulium. SUMMARY: Disposable, digital flexible ureteroscopes for the treatment of both ureteric and kidney stones are taking an essential role in the medical field. Until recently, the clinically relevant laser systems for stone surgery during ureteroscopy are mainly based on Holmium laser YAG (Ho:YAG) devices, but a new thulium variant with promising features is giving interesting results. Additional research in laser features will guide to a better, more effective and safer treatment algorithm. Robotic technologies are promising but their definitive role still needs to be determined.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Arterioureteral Fistula: The Urologist's Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Arterioureteral fistula (AUF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease that primarily arises as a long-term complication in oncological patients who have permanent ureteral stenting. The incidence is rising. The objective of this study was to outline the risk factors for management and outcome of AUF in a large individual case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six AUF cases in 24 patients from six German tertiary referral centers occurring between 2008 and 2016 were identified retrospectively and entered into a dedicated database by using patient notes and out-patient visits. RESULTS: Of 24 patients, 23 had a history of abdominopelvic surgery for oncological disease, 21/24 had undergone radiotherapy, and 23/24 had long-term ureteral stenting. All cases presented with visible hematuria, 11/26 at the time of a stent exchange. Blood transfusions were required in 92.3%, and intravenous inotropes were needed in 46.2%. Of 26 patients, 11 had flank pain. CT angiogram was positive in 35.7%. Angiography and endovascular fistula repair was performed in 88.5%, and the rest received open surgical repair. Mortality was 7.7%. Endovascular treatment was technically successful in 91.3%, and open surgery was successful in 3/4 cases. Recurrent AUF developed in 3/24 patients. Stent-related complications occurred in 15%. Vascular complications were common. Long-term survival was limited due to progression of the underlying malignant disease. CONCLUSION: AUF results in major hemorrhage and warrants time-efficient diagnosis and treatment. Awareness is key. When AUF is considered, interventional angiography should promptly be performed. Fistula detection can be improved by guidewire manipulation. Pre-interventional CT angiogram may be omitted due to low sensitivity. Endovascular repair with stenting and/or coiling is effective and safe.