Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 38(10): 2501-2511, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31797075

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic role of expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system members, such as urokinase-type activator (uPA), uPA-receptor (uPAR), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining for uPA system was performed on a tissue microarray of specimens from 3121 patients who underwent RP. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of overexpression of these markers alone or in combination with biochemical recurrence (BCR). Decision curve analysis was used to assess the clinical impact of these markers. RESULTS: uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 were overexpressed in 1012 (32.4%), 1271 (40.7%), and 1311 (42%) patients, respectively. uPA overexpression was associated with all clinicopathologic characteristics of biologically aggressive PCa. On multivariable analysis, uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 overexpression were all three associated with BCR (HR: 1.75, p < 0.01, HR: 1.22, p = 0.01 and HR: 1.20, p = 0.03, respectively). Moreover, the probability of BCR increased incrementally with increasing cumulative number of overexpressed markers. Decision curve analysis showed that addition of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 resulted in a net benefit compared to a base model comparing standard clinicopathologic features across the entire threshold probability range. In subgroup analyses, overexpression of all three markers remained associated with BCR in patients with favorable pathologic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Overexpression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in PCa tissue were each associated with worse BCR. Additionally, overexpression of all three markers is informative even in patients with favorable pathologic characteristics potentially helping clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy and/or intensified follow-up.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/fisiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Inibidor 1 de Ativador de Plasminogênio/fisiologia , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Receptores de Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/fisiologia , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/fisiologia , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/biossíntese , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Inibidor 1 de Ativador de Plasminogênio/biossíntese , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Receptores de Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/biossíntese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/biossíntese
2.
Urol Oncol ; 37(10): 774-783, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255543

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system as a prognostic biomarker in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) with or without adjuvant intravesical therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We stained TURB tissue from 827 NMIBC patients with uPA, its receptor (uPAR) and its inhibitor (PAI-1). The status of these markers was categorized as normal vs. overexpressed using the cutoffs of 30% for uPA, 50% for uPAR, and 30% for PAI-1. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of these markers. RESULTS: uPA was overexpressed in 37.7% of patients, uPAR in 44.7% and PAI-1 in 44.6%. Overexpression of these markers was associated with high tumor grade. Within a median follow-up was 60 months (interquartile range: 22-109), uPA (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; P = 0.006), uPAR (HR: 1.70; P < 0.001), PAI-1 (HR: 1.35; P = 0.014), and the combination of all 3 markers (HR: 3.38; P < 0.001) were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS); uPA (HR: 1.68; P = 0.035) and the combination of all 3 markers (HR: 8.79; P = 0.005) were associated with progression-free survival (PFS). The addition of the uPA system to a base model improved the discrimination by 1.3% for RFS and 2.1% for PFS. In subgroup analyses, uPA (HR: 2.19; P = 0.018) was associated with PFS in T1G3 patients and its addition to a base model improved the discrimination by 2.5%. uPA (HR: 1.44; P = 0.019), uPAR (HR: 1.54; P = 0.006), PAI-1 (HR: 1.46; P = 0.013) and the combination of all 3 markers (HR: 3.48; P < 0.001) were associated with RFS in TaG1-2 patients and their addition to a base model improved the discrimination by 2.1%. CONCLUSION: uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 are overexpressed in one-third to half of patients with NMIBC. Their overexpression is an independent prognosticator of RFS and PFS which improved the predictive accuracy of current clinicopathological characteristics. Biomarkers that capture the biological and clinical behavior of individual tumors may help personalize clinical decision-making in patients with NMIBC.


Assuntos
Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/genética , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/metabolismo , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA