Phase II trial of brentuximab vedotin in relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors.

Background CD-30 is highly expressed in some patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors. Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate directed to CD-30. We report a phase 2 trial of brentuximab vedotin in patients with chemo-refractory GCT. Patients and methods This is a single arm, two cohort phase 2 trial investigating brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicities in patients with relapsed GCT who have no curative options. Patients with mGCT who progressed after first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy and after at least 1 salvage regimen (high-dose or standard-dose chemotherapy) were eligible. CD30 expression was assessed and two cohorts defined: CD30 positive and CD30 negative/unknown. Results 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 34.7 (range, 23-56). All patients had non-seminoma. Median AFP 4.9 (range, 1-219,345) and hCG 282 (range, 0.6-172,064). Five patients had late relapse (> 2 years). Median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range, 2-7). Ten patients received prior high-dose chemotherapy. Seven patients had positive CD30 staining. There were two grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. No partial or complete responses were observed. 6 patients achieved radiographic stable disease (range, 9-14.9 weeks), 5 had elevated AFP or hCG at trial entry and all 5 had transient > 50% decline in baseline AFP/hCG: 4 had CD30 -ve and 2 had CD30 + ve staining; 10 patients had progression of disease as their best response; 2 were not evaluable for response. Conclusion Brentuximab vedotin does not appear to have clinically meaningful single-agent activity in patients with refractory GCT.

Vector production in an academic environment: a tool to assess production costs.

Generating gene and cell therapy products under good manufacturing practices is a complex process. When determining the cost of these products, researchers must consider the large number of supplies used for manufacturing and the personnel and facility costs to generate vector and maintain a cleanroom facility. To facilitate cost estimates, the Indiana University Vector Production Facility teamed with the Indiana University Kelley School of Business to develop a costing tool that, in turn, provides pricing. The tool is designed in Microsoft Excel and is customizable to meet the needs of other core facilities. It is available from the National Gene Vector Biorepository. The tool allows cost determinations using three different costing methods and was developed in an effort to meet the A21 circular requirements for U.S. core facilities performing work for federally funded projects. The costing tool analysis reveals that the cost of vector production does not have a linear relationship with batch size. For example, increasing the production from 9 to18 liters of a retroviral vector product increases total costs a modest 1.2-fold rather than doubling in total cost. The analysis discussed in this article will help core facilities and investigators plan a cost-effective strategy for gene and cell therapy production.