II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion. RESULTS: All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Neuromodulation with aerobic exercise reduces fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVES: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with aerobic exercise (tDCS-AE) effectively reduces fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. However, no study has assessed this method in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with significant fatigue. Therefore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of tDCS-AE for significant fatigue symptoms in adult female SLE patients. METHODS: This randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind study included 25 patients with SLE in remission or low disease activity (SLEDAI-2K £4) and with significant fatigue [≥36 points on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) or ≥38 points on the Modified Fatigue Scale (MFIS)]. The patients received sham or tDCS for five consecutive days. The anode and cathode were positioned at M1 and Fp2, respectively (international 10-20 EEG system). tDCS was applied at an intensity of 2mA, and density of 0.057mA/cm2 in the tDCS-AE group. Both groups underwent combined low-intensity treadmill exercise. FSS, MFIS, pain visual analogue scale, physical activity, and sleep quality were evaluated at baseline and on days 7, 30, and 60. Adherence and safety were assessed using a standardised questionnaire. RESULTS: Improvement in fatigue levels was observed in both groups. However, a sustained reduction in fatigue levels on days 30 and 60 occurred only with tDCS-AEs (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in pain level, sleep quality, or physical activity. No disease flares occurred and the adverse effects were mild and transient. Finally, the patient's adherence to the treatment was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Despite isolated AEs, there was an improvement in fatigue, however, only tDCS-AE maintained significant and sustained improvement.

Pandemic non-adjuvanted influenza A H1N1 vaccine in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis

Abstract Objective To assess the possible effect of therapy, disease subtype and severity on H1N1 immunogenicity in patients with SSc. Methods Ninety-two patients and 92 age- and gender-matched healthy controls received adjuvant-free influenza A/California/7/2009 (pH1N1) vaccine. Blood samples were collected immediately before and 3 weeks after vaccination to evaluate antibody responses to the H1N1 virus. Efficacy was assessed by seroprotection (SP) and seroconversion (SC) rates and the factor increase in geometric mean antibody titre. Participants received a 21-day symptom diary card and were instructed to report local and systemic adverse events. Results SSc patients were predominantly females (91%) and 61% had limited SSc, 12% had severe skin involvement and 57.6% were on immunosuppressive (IS) therapy. SSc patients and controls presented comparable overall SP (P = 0.20) and SC (P = 0.61) rates. Further evaluation of the possible effect of disease and therapy revealed similar rates of SP and SC in patients with dcSSc vs lcSSc (SP P = 0.62 and SC P = 0.66), severe vs mild/moderate skin involvement (SP P = 1 and SC P = 0.45) and with vs without IS (SP P = 0.26 and SC P = 0.10). The frequency of mild local and minor systemic reactions was similar in patients with dcSSC vs lcSSc (P = 0.70 vs 0.32) and in those with and without severe skin involvement (P = 0.59 vs 0.28). Conclusion The non-adjuvanted influenza H1N1 virus vaccine proved to be safe and effective, independent of SSc clinical subtype, disease severity or therapy. These latter factors do not seem to contribute to mild adverse events observed in SSc. Our data support the annual influenza vaccination recommendation for these patients.

Pandemic non-adjuvanted influenza A H1N1 vaccine in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis

Abstract Objective To assess the possible effect of therapy, disease subtype and severity on H1N1 immunogenicity in patients with SSc. Methods Ninety-two patients and 92 age- and gender-matched healthy controls received adjuvant-free influenza A/California/7/2009 (pH1N1) vaccine. Blood samples were collected immediately before and 3 weeks after vaccination to evaluate antibody responses to the H1N1 virus. Efficacy was assessed by seroprotection (SP) and seroconversion (SC) rates and the factor increase in geometric mean antibody titre. Participants received a 21-day symptom diary card and were instructed to report local and systemic adverse events. Results SSc patients were predominantly females (91%) and 61% had limited SSc, 12% had severe skin involvement and 57.6% were on immunosuppressive (IS) therapy. SSc patients and controls presented comparable overall SP (P = 0.20) and SC (P = 0.61) rates. Further evaluation of the possible effect of disease and therapy revealed similar rates of SP and SC in patients with dcSSc vs lcSSc (SP P = 0.62 and SC P = 0.66), severe vs mild/moderate skin involvement (SP P = 1 and SC P = 0.45) and with vs without IS (SP P = 0.26 and SC P = 0.10). The frequency of mild local and minor systemic reactions was similar in patients with dcSSC vs lcSSc (P = 0.70 vs 0.32) and in those with and without severe skin involvement (P = 0.59 vs 0.28). Conclusion The non-adjuvanted influenza H1N1 virus vaccine proved to be safe and effective, independent of SSc clinical subtype, disease severity or therapy. These latter factors do not seem to contribute to mild adverse events observed in SSc. Our data support the annual influenza vaccination recommendation for these patients.

Espondiloptose em atleta / Spondyloptosis in athlete

Os atletas adolescentes estão sob maior risco de lombalgia e lesões estruturais da coluna. A espondilólise é responsável pela maioria das lombalgias em jovens esportistas e raramente ocorre em adultos. Relatamos o caso de uma paciente de 13 anos, atleta de judô, que chegou a nosso serviço com quadro de cinco meses de lombalgia progressiva durante os treinos, sendo inicialmente atribuída a causas mecânicas, sem que houvesse uma investigação mais detalhada por métodos de imagem. Na admissão já apresentava deformidade lombar, postura antálgica e manobra de hiperextensão lombar em unipodálico positiva bilateralmente. Realizou-se investigação, que evidenciou espondiloptose, sendo, então, submetida a tratamento cirúrgico. Com base neste relato de caso, discutimos a abordagem diagnóstica de lombalgia em atletas jovens, uma vez que a queixa de lombalgia crônica pode ser marcador de uma lesão estrutural, a qual pode ser definitiva e trazer perda funcional irreversível.

The adolescent athletes are at greater risk of low back pain and structural spine injuries. Spondylolysis is responsible for the majority of back pain cases in young athletes, rarely occurring in adults. We report a case of a 13-year-old judo female athlete, who came to our service with 5 months of progressive low back pain during training which was initially attributed to mechanical causes, without any further investigation by imaging methods. At admission, the patient had lumbar deformity, antalgic posture and bilaterally positive unipodalic lumbar hyperextension maneuver. After a research which showed spondyloptosis, the patient underwent surgery. In this article, we discuss, based on this case report, the diagnostic approach to low back pain in young athletes, since the complaint of chronic back pain can be a marker of a structural lesion that may be permanent and bring irreversible functional loss.

Baixo valor sérico de P1NP: preditor de perda de massa óssea em mulheres na pré-menopausa com Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico / Lower P1NP serum levels: a predictive marker of bone loss in premenopausal SLE patients

Objetivos: Determinar a incidência de perda de massa óssea em um ano em pacientes com lúpus na pré-menopausa e o valor preditor dos marcadores do metabolismo ósseo para essa complicação. Métodos: Sessenta e três pacientes foram avaliadas à entrada no estudo e após um ano de seguimento. Variações na densidade mineral óssea (DXA) acima da mínima variação significativa (MVS) foram consideradas significativas, como recomendado pela Sociedade Internacional de Densitometria Clínica (International Society for Clinical Densitometry). Os níveis séricos dos marcadores do metabolismo ósseo foram determinados no início do estudo: propeptídeo N-terminal do pro-colágeno tipo 1 (P1NP) e telopeptídeo C-terminal do colágeno tipo 1 (CTX) por eletroquimioluminescência; osteoprotegerina (OPG) e ligante do receptor ativador do fator nuclear kB (RANKL) por ELISA. Resultados: 36,5% dos pacientes apresentaram perda de massa óssea e 17,5% ganho de massa óssea na coluna lombar e/ou fêmur. Os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos: perda de massa óssea (P), massa óssea estável (E) e ganho de massa óssea (G). Pacientes com P e E tomaram doses cumulativa, média e máxima de glicocorticoide semelhantes durante o estudo, mas pacientes com G receberam doses menores (G vs. P e G vs. E, p < 0,05). Os níveis séricos basais de P1NP foram diferentes nos três grupos (P: 36,95 ± 23,37 vs. E: 54,63 ± 30,82 vs. G: 84,09 ± 43,85 ng/ml, p=0,001). Análises de múltiplas comparações demonstraram diferenças significativas nos níveis de P1NP entre P vs. E, p=0,031; P vs. G, p < 0,001 e E vs. G, p=0,039. Não houve diferença entre os grupos com relação aos níveis de CTX, OPG/RANKL, fatores de risco para osteoporose ou parâmetros relacionados à doença. Após análise multivariada, apenas níveis baixos de P1NP permaneceram como fator de risco independente para perda de massa óssea (p < 0,013)...

Objective: To determine the one-year incidence of bone loss in premenopausal lupus patients and the value of bone markers as predictors of this complication. Methods: Sixty-three premenopausal SLE patients were evaluated at baseline and after one-year of follow-up. Bone mineral density changes (DXA) above the least significant change (LSC) were considered significant, as recommended by International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Serum levels of bone markers were determined at baseline: N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (P1NP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) by electrochemiluminescence; osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL) by ELISA. Results: 36.5% of patients presented bone loss and 17.5% bone gain at lumbar spine and/or femur. Patients were divided in three groups: bone mass loss (BL), no bone mass change (NC) and bone mass gain (BG). Patients with BL e NC took similar cumulative, mean and maximum GC doses during the study, but patients with BG took lower doses (BG vs. BL and BG vs. NC, p < 0.05). Baseline P1NP levels were different in the three groups (BL: 36.95 ± 23.37 vs. NC: 54.63 ± 30.82 vs. BG: 84.09 ± 43.85 ng/ml, p=0.001). Further multiple comparison analysis demonstrated significant differences in P1NP between BL vs. NC, p=0.031; BL vs. BG, p < 0.001 and NC vs. BG, p=0.039. No difference was observed concerning the levels of CTX, OPG/RANKL, risk factors for osteoporosis or disease related parameters. After multivariate analysis only lower P1NP levels remained as an independent risk factor for bone loss (p < 0.013). Conclusion: This study provides original evidence that lower levels of P1NP, the most specific bone formation marker, are predictive of bone loss in the next year in premenopausal SLE patients...