Platelet count abnormalities and peri-operative outcomes in adults undergoing elective, non-cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anemia and transfusion of blood in the peri-operative period have been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality across a wide variety of non-cardiac surgeries. While tests of coagulation, including the platelet count, have frequently been used to identify patients with an increased risk of peri-operative bleeding, results have been equivocal. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of platelet level on outcomes in patients undergoing elective surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) between 2006-2016. RESULTS: We identified 3,884,400 adult patients who underwent elective, non-cardiac surgery from 2006-2016 at hospitals participating in NSQIP, a prospectively-collected, national clinical database with established reproducibility and validity. After controlling for all peri- and intraoperative factors by matching on propensity scores, patients with all levels of thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis had higher odds for perioperative transfusion. All levels of thrombocytopenia were associated with higher mortality, but there was no association with complications or other morbidity after matching. On the other hand, thrombocytosis was not associated with mortality; but odds for postoperative complications and 30-day return to the operating room remained slightly increased after matching. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may guide surgeons in the appropriate use and appreciation of the utility of pre-operative screening of the platelet count prior to an elective, non-cardiac surgery.

Surgeon specialty and patient outcomes in carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of carotid endarterectomy performed by neurological, general, and vascular surgeons. METHODS: The authors identified 80,475 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy between 2006 and 2015 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a prospectively collected, national clinical database with established reproducibility and validity. Nine hundred forty-three patients were operated on by a neurosurgeon; 75,649 by a vascular surgeon; and 3734 by a general surgeon. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes were stratified by the surgeon's primary specialty. Using propensity scores, comprising pre- and intraoperative characteristics as well as procedure and diagnostic codes, the authors matched 203 neurosurgery (NS) patients to 203 vascular surgery (VS) patients and 203 NS patients to 203 general surgery (GS) patients. No pre- or intraoperative factors were significantly different between specialties in the matched sample. Regular logistic regression and conditional logistic regression were used to predict postoperative complications in the full sample and in the matched sample. RESULTS: In the complete population sample, NS patients, when compared to patients of general and vascular surgeons, were less likely to be admitted from home and more likely to have carotid artery occlusion or stenosis with cerebral infarction, to be a current smoker, to have had recent chemo- or radiotherapy, to have surgery under general anesthesia, to undergo multiple procedures, and to have longer surgery times. In unadjusted analyses, NS patients were more likely to experience major complications (NS vs VS: odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6; NS vs GS: odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.7); minor complications (NS vs VS: odds ratio 2.9, 95% CI 2.0-4.1; NS vs GS: odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.7-4.2); intra- or postoperative transfusions (NS vs VS: odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.9; NS vs GS: odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3); prolonged hospitalization (NS vs VS: odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI 2.6-3.5; NS vs GS: odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 2.2-3.0); and discharge to skilled care facilities (NS vs VS: odds ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.3-3.4; NS vs GS: odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 2.4-4.1). In adjusted, propensity-matched analyses, however, patients' outcome with carotid endarterectomy performed by NS was comparable with those completed by GS and VS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy performed by a neurosurgeon tend to have a greater preoperative disease burden than do those treated by a general or vascular surgeon, which contributes significantly to more morbid postoperative courses. In patients matched carefully on the basis of health status at the time of surgery and intraoperative variables that affect results, patients' outcomes after carotid endarterectomy do not appear to depend on the attending surgeon's primary specialty.

Impact of Resident Involvement in Neurosurgery: An American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis of 33,977 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting and limited literature on the effect of intraoperative resident involvement on surgical outcomes. Our study assessed effects of resident involvement on outcomes in patients undergoing neurosurgery. METHODS: We identified 33,977 adult neurosurgical cases from 374 hospitals in the 2006-2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a prospectively collected national database with established reproducibility and validity. Outcomes were compared according to resident involvement before and after 1:1 matching on procedure and perioperative risk factors. RESULTS: Resident involvement was documented in 13,654 cases. We matched 10,170 resident-involved cases with 10,170 attending-alone. In the matched sample, resident involvement was associated with increased surgery duration (average, 34 minutes) and slight increases in odds for prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.3) and complications (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3) including infections (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7). Increased risk for infections persisted after controlling for surgery duration (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). The majority of cases were spine surgeries, and resident involvement was not associated with morbidity or mortality for malignant tumor and aneurysm patients. Training level of residents was not associated with differences in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Resident involvement was more common in sicker patients undergoing complex procedures, consistent with academic centers undertaking more complex cases. After controlling for patient and intraoperative characteristics, resident involvement in neurosurgical cases continued to be associated with longer surgical duration and slightly higher infection rates. Longer surgery duration did not account for differences in infection rates.

The Influence of Race on Short-term Outcomes After Laminectomy and/or Fusion Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of race on outcomes in patients undergoing elective laminectomy and/or fusion spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies that have looked at the effect of race on spine surgery outcomes have failed to take into account baseline risk factors that may influence peri-operative outcomes. METHODS: We identified 48,493 adult patients who underwent elective spine surgery consisting of elective laminectomy and/or fusion, from 2006 to 2012, at hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), a prospectively collected, national clinical database with established reproducibility and validity. Pre- and intraoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes were stratified by race. We used propensity scores to match African-American and Caucasian patients on all pre- and intraoperative factors, including by principal diagnosis leading to surgery as well as surgery performed. We used regular and conditional logistic regression to predict the effect of race on adverse postoperative outcomes in the full sample and matched sample. RESULTS: Caucasians comprised 82% of our sample. We found no differences in the incidence of pre- and intraoperative factors when comparing Caucasian patients with all minority patients, and only minimal increased odds for prolonged length of length of hospitalization (LOS) and discharge with continued care. However, African-American patients, who comprised 39% of our minority sample, had more preoperative comorbidities than Caucasian patients. Even after eliminating all differences between pre- and intraoperative factors between Caucasian and African-American patients, African-American patients continued to have LOS that was, on average, one day longer than Caucasian patients. African-American patients also had higher odds for major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 1.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1-1.6], and to be discharged requiring continued care (OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.8-2.8). CONCLUSION: African-American race is independently associated with prolonged LOS, major complications, and a need to be discharged with continued care in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Relation of Echocardiographic Characteristics of the Right-Sided Heart With Incident Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients With Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) has been associated with right-sided heart dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Longitudinal data are sparse in terms of understanding the prognostic implications of right ventricular remodeling in SDB on cardiovascular risk. We therefore investigated the predictive value of right-sided cardiac functional alterations on incident heart failure (HF) or death in SDB. Patients with SDB who underwent echocardiography within 1 month of index polysomnogram from January 2002 to July 2011 with normal left ventricular ejection fraction were included. Cox proportional prognostic hazard models predicting HF or death were used. Of a potential 375 subjects, 202 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (58 ± 14 years; 50% men). Subjects were followed for 3.1 ± 2.4 years with a total of 34 (16.8%) developing HF or death. Right ventricular end-systolic area (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.6, p = 0.038), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7, p = 0.005) and also left atrial volume index (HR 1.7, 95%, CI 1.3 to 2.3, p <0.001) and E/A ratio (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7, p <0.001), were predictive of HF or death. Patients with increased PVR had significantly shorter event-free survival than without increased PVR (p = 0.04). In sequential Cox models, a model based on clinical data and left ventricular ejection fraction (χ2, 5.4) was improved by left atrial volume index (χ2, 12.7; p = 0.011) and further increased by PVR (χ2, 19.7; p = 0.015). In conclusion, right-sided heart dysfunction provides important prognostic information in SDB and may aid in identifying those at highest risk to target for closer follow-up.

Incidence of Thromboembolic Complications Within 30 Days of Electrical Cardioversion Performed Within 48 Hours of Atrial Fibrillation Onset.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the risk of thromboembolism after cardioversion within 48 h of atrial fibrillation (AF) onset in patients therapeutically versus not therapeutically anticoagulated. BACKGROUND: Although guidelines do not mandate anticoagulation for cardioversion within 48 h of AF onset, risk of thromboembolism in this group has been understudied. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardioversion within 48 h after AF onset were identified from a prospectively collected database and retrospectively reviewed to determine anticoagulation status and major thromboembolic events within 30 days of cardioversion. RESULTS: Among 567 cardioversions in 484 patients without therapeutic anticoagulation (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.3 ± 1.7), 6 had neurological events (1.06%), all in patients on aspirin alone. Among 898 cardioversions in 709 patients on therapeutic anticoagulation (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.6 ± 1.7; p = 0.017), 2 neurological events occurred (0.22%; OR: 4.8; p = 0.03), both off anticoagulation at the time of stroke. No thromboembolic events occurred in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score <2 (p = 0.06) or in patients with postoperative AF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute-onset AF, odds of thromboembolic complications were almost 5 times higher in patients without therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of cardioversion. However, no events occurred in post-operative patients and in those with CHA2DS2-VASc scores of <2, supporting the utility of accurate assessment of AF onset and risk stratification in determining the need for anticoagulation for cardioversion of AF <48 h in duration.

Use and Utility of Hemostatic Screening in Adults Undergoing Elective, Non-Cardiac Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: One view of value in medicine is outcome relative to cost of care provided. With respect to operative care, increased attention has been placed on evaluation and optimization of patients prior to undergoing an elective surgery. We examined more than 2 million patients having elective, non-cardiac surgery to assess the incidence and utility of pre-operative hemostatic screening, compared with a composite of history variables that may indicate a propensity for bleeding, to assess several important outcomes of surgery. MATERIALS & METHODS: We queried the NSQIP database to identify 2,020,533 patients and compared hemostatic tests (PT, aPTT, platelet count) and history covariables indicative of potential for abnormal hemostasis. We compared outcomes across predictor values; used Person's chi-square tests to compare differences, and logistic regression to model outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 36% of patients had all three tests pre-operatively while 16% had none of them; 11.2% had a history predictive of potential abnormal bleeding. Outcomes of interest across the cohort included death in 0.7%, unplanned return to the operating room or re-admission within 30 days in 3.8% and 6.2% of patients; 5.3% received a transfusion during or after surgery. Sub-analyses in each of the nine surgical specialties' most common procedures yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: The limited predictive value of each hemostatic screening test, as well as excess costs associated with them, across a broad spectrum of elective surgeries, suggests that limiting pre-operative testing to a more select group of patients may be reasonable, equally efficacious, efficient, and cost-effective.

Preoperative steroid use and the incidence of perioperative complications in patients undergoing craniotomy for definitive resection of a malignant brain tumor.

We studied the impact of preoperative steroids on 30 day morbidity and mortality of craniotomy for definitive resection of malignant brain tumors. Glucocorticoids are used to treat peritumoral edema in patients with malignant brain tumors, however, prolonged (⩾ 10 days) use of preoperative steroids as a risk factor for perioperative complications following resection of brain tumors has not been studied comprehensively. Therefore, we identified 4407 patients who underwent craniotomy to resect a malignant brain tumor between 2007 and 2012, who were reported in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a prospectively collected clinical database. Metastatic brain tumors constituted 37.5% (n=1611) and primary malignant gliomas 62.5% (n=2796) of the study population. We used logistic regression to assess the association between preoperative steroid use and perioperative complications before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. Patients who received steroids constituted 22.8% of the population (n=1009). In the unmatched cohort, steroid use was associated with decreased length of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.8), however, the risk for readmission (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.8) was increased. In the propensity score matched cohort (n=465), steroid use was not statistically associated with any adverse outcomes. Patients who received steroids were less likely to stay hospitalized for a protracted period of time, but were more likely to be readmitted after discharge following craniotomy. As an independent risk factor, preoperative steroid use was not associated with any observed perioperative complications. The findings of this study suggest that preoperative steroids do not independently compromise the short term outcome of craniotomy for resection of malignant brain tumors.

Risks associated with preoperative anemia and perioperative blood transfusion in open surgery for intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECT: Preoperative anemia may be treated with a blood transfusion. Both are associated with adverse outcomes in various surgical procedures, but this has not been clearly elucidated in surgery for cerebral aneurysms. In this study the authors assessed the association of preoperative anemia and perioperative blood transfusion, separately, on 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing open surgery for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: The authors identified 668 cases (including 400 unruptured and 268 unruptured intracranial aneurysms) of open surgery for treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the 2006-2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a validated and reproducible prospective clinical database. Anemia was defined as a hematocrit level less than 39% in males and less than 36% in females. Perioperative transfusion was defined as at least 1 unit of packed or whole red blood cells given at any point between the start of surgery to 72 hours postoperatively. The authors separately compared surgical outcome between patients with (n = 198) versus without (n = 470) anemia, and those who underwent (n = 78) versus those who did not receive (n = 521) a transfusion, using a 1:1 match on propensity score. RESULTS: In the matched cohorts, all observed covariates were comparable between anemic (n = 147) versus nonanemic (n = 147) and between transfused (n = 67) versus nontransfused patients (n = 67). Anemia was independently associated with prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS; odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.5), perioperative complications (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1), and return to the operating room (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.5). Transfusion was also independently associated with perioperative complications (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia and transfusion are each independent risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for cerebral aneurysms. Perioperative anemia is also associated with prolonged hospital LOS and 30-day return to the operating room.

Impact of age on 30-day postoperative outcome of surgery for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To assess in a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, the impact of increased age on 30-day postoperative outcomes of surgery for intracranial aneurysms (ICAs). METHODS: 721 adult patients who underwent surgery for ICA were identified in the 2006-2012 American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were stratified by age: <50 years (n=221), 50-60 years (n=221), and >60 years (n=266). Patients <50 and 50-60 years old were propensity score-matched to those aged >60 years. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between increased age and surgical outcome. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, age <50 years was associated with fewer postoperative complications (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7) and lower mortality (OR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9) compared with those aged >60 years. Patients aged between 50 and 60 years were less likely to have complications (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.8) in unadjusted analyses. Upon propensity score matching, covariate balance was achieved for all age strata. In adjusted analyses, patients <50 years (OR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.7) and 50-60 years (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8) of age continued to have fewer complications than those aged >60. CONCLUSIONS: Age >60 is independently associated with 30-day postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for ICA. The results of this study suggest age >60 should be considered an a priori risk factor in surgical management of ICA, regardless of associated comorbidities often associated with increased age.

Obstructive sleep apnea and sickle cell anemia.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the prevalence of and risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA). METHODS: Cross-sectional baseline data were analyzed from the Sleep and Asthma Cohort Study, a multicenter prospective study designed to evaluate the contribution of sleep and breathing abnormalities to SCA-related morbidity in children ages 4 to 18 years, unselected for OSAS symptoms or asthma. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the relationships between OSAS status on the basis of overnight in-laboratory polysomnography and putative risk factors obtained from questionnaires and direct measurements. RESULTS: Participants included 243 children with a median age of 10 years; 50% were boys, 99% were of African heritage, and 95% were homozygous for ß(S) hemoglobin. OSAS, defined by obstructive apnea hypopnea indices, was present in 100 (41%) or 25 (10%) children at cutpoints of ≥1 or ≥5, respectively. In univariate analyses, OSAS was associated with higher levels of habitual snoring, lower waking pulse oxygen saturation (Spo2), reduced lung function, less caretaker education, and non-preterm birth. Lower sleep-related Spo2 metrics were also associated with higher obstructive apnea hypopnea indices. In multivariable analyses, habitual snoring and lower waking Spo2 remained risk factors for OSAS in children with SCA. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of OSAS in children with SCA is higher than in the general pediatric population. Habitual snoring and lower waking Spo2 values, data easily obtained in routine care, were the strongest OSAS risk factors. Because OSAS is a treatable condition with adverse health outcomes, greater efforts are needed to screen, diagnose, and treat OSAS in this high-risk, vulnerable population.

Surgeon specialty and outcomes after elective spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of elective spine fusion and laminectomy when performed by neurological and orthopedic surgeons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between primary specialty training and outcome of spinal surgery is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed the 2006 to 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database of 50,361 patients, 33,235 (66%) of which were operated on by a neurosurgeon. We eliminated all differences in preoperative and intraoperative risk factors between surgical specialties by matching 17,126 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery (OS) to 17,126 patients who underwent neurosurgery (NS) on propensity scores. Regular and conditional logistic regressions were used to predict adverse postoperative outcomes in the full sample and matched sample, respectively. The effect of perioperative transfusion on outcomes was further assessed in the matched sample. RESULTS: Diagnosis and procedure were the only factors that were found to be significantly different between surgical subspecialties in the full sample. We found that compared with patients who underwent NS, patients who underwent OS were more than twice as likely to experience prolonged length of stay (LOS) (odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.4-2.8), and significantly more likely to receive a transfusion perioperatively, have complications, and to require discharge with continued care. After matching, patients who underwent OS continued to have slightly higher odds for prolonged LOS, and twice the odds for receiving perioperative transfusion compared with patients who underwent NS. Taking into account perioperative transfusion did not eliminate the difference in LOS between patients who underwent OS and those who underwent NS. CONCLUSION: Patients operated on by OS have twice the odds for undergoing perioperative transfusion and slightly increased odds for prolonged LOS. Other differences between surgical specialties in 30-day postoperative outcomes were minimal. Analysis of a large, multi-institutional sample of prospectively collected clinical data suggests that surgeon specialty has limited influence on short-term outcomes after elective spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Impact of increased body mass index on outcomes of elective spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected database. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether overweight body mass index (BMI) influences 30-day outcomes of elective spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity is prevalent in the United States, but its impact on the outcome of elective spine surgery remains controversial. METHODS: We used National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a prospective clinical database with proven validity and reproducibility consisting of 256 perioperative standardized variables from surgical patients at nearly 400 academic and nonacademic hospitals nationwide. We identified 49,314 patients who underwent elective fusion, laminectomy or both between 2006 and 2012. We divided patients according to BMI (kg/m2) as normal (18.5-24.9), preobese (25.0-29.9), obese I (30.0-34.9), obese II (35.0-39.9), and obese III (≥40). Relationship between increased BMI and outcome of surgery measured as prolonged hospitalization, complications, return to the operating room, discharged with continued care requirement, readmission, and death was determined using logistic regression before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: All overweight patients (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) showed increased odds of an adverse outcome compared with normal patients in unmatched analyses, with maximal effect seen in obese III group. In the propensity-matched sample, obese III patients continued to show increased odds for complications (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.3), readmission (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.9), and return to the operating room (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.1). CONCLUSION: Impact of obesity on elective spine surgery outcome is mediated, at least in part, by comorbidities in patients with BMI between 25.0 and 39.9 kg/m2. However, BMI itself is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in morbidly obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The effect of blood transfusion on short-term, perioperative outcomes in elective spine surgery.

Studies in various surgical procedures have shown that transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Impact of blood transfusion in patients undergoing spine surgery is not well-described. We assessed the impact of intra and postoperative transfusion on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. We used the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify a retrospective cohort of 36,901 adult patients who underwent elective spine surgery between 2006 and 2011. Patients who received intra or postoperative transfusion (n=3262) were matched to those who did not using propensity scores. Logistic regression predicted adverse postoperative outcomes. We conducted sensitivity analysis in a subset of patients in whom the number of intraoperatively transfused units of RBC or whole blood was known. Upon matching, preoperative hematocrit, length of surgery, and percentage of spinal fusion surgery were not significantly different between transfused and non-transfused patients. After matching, transfusion remained adversely associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) in hospital (odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-2.9), postoperative complications (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.9), and an increased 30 day return to operation room (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2). Transfusion of even one unit of blood intraoperatively was associated with prolonged LOS (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6) and minor complications (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.3). Therefore, transfusion of RBC or whole blood, even a single unit, increased LOS and postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing elective spine surgery, independent of preoperative hematocrit level and patient comorbidities.

Smoking and postoperative outcomes in elective cranial surgery.

OBJECT: The goal in this study was to assess whether a current or prior history of smoking and the number of smoking pack years affect the risk for adverse outcomes in the 30-day postoperative period in patients who undergo elective cranial surgery. METHODS: Data from the 2006-2011 American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project were used in this study. The authors identified 8296 patients who underwent elective cranial surgery, of whom 1718 were current smokers, 854 were prior smokers, and 5724 were never smokers. Using propensity scores and age, the authors matched current and prior smokers to never smokers. Odds ratios for adverse postoperative outcomes were predicted with logistic regression. The relationship between number of pack years and poor outcomes was also examined. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, prior and current smokers did not differ from never smokers for having poor outcomes postoperatively. Similarly, in matched analyses, no association was found between smoking and adverse outcomes. Number of pack years in propensity-matched analyses did not predict worse outcomes in prior or current smokers versus never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The authors did not find smoking to be associated with 30-day postoperative morbidity or mortality. Although smoking cessation is beneficial for overall health, it may not improve the short-term (≤ 30 days) outcome of elective cranial surgery. Thus postponement of elective cranial cases only for smoking cessation may not be necessary.

Impact of preoperative anemia on outcomes in patients undergoing elective cranial surgery.

OBJECT: The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative anemia in patients undergoing elective cranial surgery influences outcomes in the immediate perioperative period (≤ 30 days). METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was used to identify 6576 patients undergoing elective cranial surgery between 2006 and 2011. Propensity scores were used to match patients with moderate to severe anemia (moderate-severe) or mild anemia with patients without anemia. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the outcomes of interest. Sensitivity analyses were used to limit the sample to patients without perioperative transfusion as well as those who underwent craniotomy for definitive resection of a malignant brain tumor. RESULTS: A total of 6576 patients underwent elective cranial surgery, of whom 175 had moderate-severe anemia and 1868 had mild anemia. Patients with moderate-severe (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8) and mild (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.7) anemia were more likely to have prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the hospital compared to those with no anemia. Similarly, in patients who underwent craniotomy for a malignant tumor resection (n = 2537), anemia of any severity was associated with prolonged LOS, but not postoperative complications nor death. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia is not associated with an overall increased risk for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing elective cranial surgery. However, patients with anemia are more likely to experience prolonged hospitalization postoperatively, resulting in increased resource utilization.

Prediction of 30-day heart failure-specific readmission risk by echocardiographic parameters.

It is unknown whether echocardiographic morphologic and hemodynamic parameters have incremental value in predicting 30-day heart failure (HF)-specific readmission risk among patients admitted with HF. We performed a prospective cohort study of adult patients entering a transitional care program after HF hospitalization to assess the role of echocardiographic parameters in predicting 30-day HF-specific readmission risk. Patients were followed for at least 30 days postdischarge, and readmission outcomes were ascertained prospectively. A previously validated 30-day HF readmission score (Yale Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation [CORE]) was calculated using 20 clinical and pathology parameters. Atrial and ventricular morphologic and hemodynamic variables were obtained from the index hospitalization echocardiogram. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify variables associated with 30-day HF specific readmission risk. Among 283 patients (mean age 72 ± 14 years, 57% men, 54% ischemic HF, ejection fraction 35% ± 17%) who underwent echocardiography during index admission there were 46 HF specific readmissions. After risk adjustment, elevated echocardiographic right atrial pressure (RAP; hazard ratio [HR] 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82 to 7.52, p <0.001), left ventricular filling pressures (HR 7.46, 95% CI 2.31 to 24.14, p = 0.001), and weight change during admission (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99, p = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-day HF-specific readmission risk. However, only elevated RAP and left ventricular filling pressure added incremental prognostic value to the Yale-CORE HF readmission score. An E/e' threshold of 23 identified a subgroup at highest risk of readmission and provided a net 29% reclassification improvement over the Yale-CORE HF readmission score (p = 0.005).

Appropriate test selection for single-photon emission computed tomography imaging: association with clinical risk, posttest management, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are only one step in appropriate use of imaging. Other steps include pretest clinical risk evaluation and optimal management responses. We sought to understand the link between AUC, risk evaluation, management, and outcome. METHODS: We used AUC to classify 1,199 consecutive patients (63.8 ± 12.5 years, 56% male) undergoing SPECT as inappropriate, uncertain, and appropriate. Framingham score for asymptomatic patients and Bethesda angina score for symptomatic patients were used to classify patients into high (≥5%/y), intermediate, and low (≤1%/y) risk. Subsequent patient management was defined as appropriate or inappropriate based on the concordance between management decisions and the SPECT result. Patients were followed up for a median of 4.8 years, and cause of death was obtained from the social security death registry. RESULTS: Overall, 62% of SPECTs were appropriate, 18% inappropriate, and 20% uncertain (only 5 were unclassified). Of 324 low-risk studies, 108 (33%) were inappropriate, compared with 94 (15%) of 621 intermediate-risk and 1 (1%) of 160 high-risk studies (P < .001). There were 79 events, with outcomes of inappropriate patients better than uncertain and appropriate patients. Management was appropriate in 986 (89%), and appropriateness of patient management was unrelated to AUC (P = .65). CONCLUSION: Pretest clinical risk evaluation may be helpful in appropriateness assessment because very few high-risk patients are inappropriate, but almost half of low-risk patients are inappropriate or uncertain. Appropriate patient management is independent of appropriateness of testing.

Effect of smoking on the perioperative outcomes of patients who undergo elective spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database. OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether preoperative cigarette smoking and smoking duration predicted adverse, early, perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have assessed the association of smoking and long-term outcomes for a number of spine surgery procedures, with conflicting findings. The association between smoking and 30-day outcomes for spine surgery is unknown. METHODS: A total 14,500 adults, classified as current (N = 3914), prior (N = 2057), and never smokers. Using propensity scores, current and prior smokers were matched to never smokers. Logistic regression was used to predict adverse postoperative outcomes. The relationship between pack-years and adverse outcomes was tested. Sensitivity analyses were conducted limiting the study sample to patients who underwent spine fusion (N = 4663), and using patient subgroups by procedure. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, prior smokers were significantly more likely to have prolonged hospitalization (1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-1.3) and major complications (1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6) compared with never smokers. No association was found between smoking status and adverse outcomes in adjusted, matched patient models. Current smokers with more than 60 pack-years were more likely to die within 30 days of surgery (3.0, 95% CI, 1.1-7.8), compared with never smokers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: The large National Surgical Quality Improvement population was carefully matched for a wide range of baseline comorbidities, including 29 variables previously suggested to influence perioperative outcomes. Although previous studies conducted in subgroups of spine surgery patients have suggested a deleterious effect for smoking on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery, our analysis did not find smoking to be associated with early (30 d) perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Preoperative anemia and perioperative outcomes in patients who undergo elective spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether preoperative anemia predicted adverse, early, perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior studies have assessed the association of anemia with outcomes in various noncardiac surgical procedures. The association between preoperative anemia and 30-day outcomes for spine surgery is unknown. METHODS: A total of 24,473 adults, classified as having severe (N = 88), moderate (N = 314), mild (N = 5477), and no anemia. Using propensity scores, patients with severe, mild, and moderate anemia were matched with patients with no anemia. Logistic regression was used to predict adverse postoperative outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted limiting the study sample to patients who did not receive intra- or postoperative transfusion and to patients with and without preoperative cardiovascular comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients with all levels of anemia had significantly higher risk of nearly all adverse outcomes than nonanemic patients in unadjusted and propensity-matched models. Patients with moderate and mild anemia were more likely to have prolonged length of hospitalization, experience 1 or more complications, and expire within 30 days of surgery compared with nonanemic patients. The association between anemia and adverse outcomes was found independently of intra- and postoperative transfusions, and was not more pronounced in patients with preoperative cardiovascular comorbidities. CONCLUSION: All levels of anemia were significantly associated with prolonged length of hospitalization and poorer operative or 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Our findings, using a large multi-institutional sample of prospectively collected data, suggests that anemia should be regarded as an independent risk factor for perioperative and postoperative complications that deserves attention prior to elective spine surgery.