Clinicopathological and imaging features of ductal carcinoma in situ in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1/2-associated invasive breast cancer has been extensively studied. However, there are few reports of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological and imaging findings of DCIS in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study. We identified patients diagnosed with DCIS with BRCA mutations between September 2003 and December 2020. Clinicopathological data and mammography (MG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US) findings were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 30 cancers in 28 patients; 7 (25.0%) patients had BRCA1 mutations, and 21 (75.0%) had BRCA2 mutations. The median patient age was 42 years. Screening was the most common reason for the detection of DCIS (50.0%), followed by occult cancer diagnosed by pathological examination after risk-reducing mastectomy (26.7%). The nuclear grade was most often 1 (46.7%), and 93.3% were estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive. The detection rates of MG, MRI, and US were 64.3%, 72.0%, and 64.0%, respectively. The most common imaging findings were calcification (100%) on MG, non-mass enhancement (88.9%) on MRI, and hypoechoic area (75.0%) on US. CONCLUSION: BRCA-associated DCIS was more strongly associated with BRCA2, and imaging features were similar to those of sporadic DCIS. Our results are helpful in informing surveillance strategies based on genotypes in women with BRCA mutations.

Effects of a structured group intervention on obesity among breast cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with an increased risk for developing breast cancer and poor cancer-related outcomes. Endocrine therapy is a key part of treatment for breast cancer, but can result in weight gain. This study examined the efficacy of a structured group intervention during adjuvant endocrine therapy for obese patients with breast cancer. The intervention involved a combination of proper nutrition, exercise, and group coaching. METHODS: Participants were patients with breast cancer who were undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy and exhibited apparent weight gain while undergoing therapy, or had a diagnosis of abnormal lipid metabolism. We conducted a single-arm prospective study with a combined intervention. The intervention comprised 15 min of nutrition education, a 30-min group health coaching program, and three 45-min group aerobic exercise sessions. We evaluated participants' parameters (e.g., body weight, body mass index [BMI], cholesterol, psychological distress) at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: At 1 month after the intervention, there were significant reductions in body weight (p < 0.01), BMI (p < 0.01), triglyceride levels (p < 0.05), total cholesterol levels (p < 0.01), psychological distress (p < 0.05), and cancer-related fatigue (p < 0.01). At 3 and 6 months after the intervention, we observed further reductions in body weight, BMI, and triceps skinfold thickness. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that a short-term structured intervention helped modify dietary and exercise behaviors and promote health among breast cancer survivors, and resulted in favorable changes in participants' body weight.

[The Role of Preoperative Chemotherapy Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype].

Following the discovery that the prognostic impact of preoperative chemotherapy depends on the primary breast cancer subtype, the treatment strategy for primary breast cancer changed. Pathologic complete response(pCR)with preoperative chemotherapy is predictive of a favorable prognosis in patients with HER2 type or triple-negative type breast cancer, but not in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative, the so-called Luminal type, breast cancer. However, the role of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with Luminal-B type breast cancer who may need chemotherapy should be further assessed. Recent studies have reported severalsubtypes of triple-negative breast cancer, distinguishable by gene expression analysis, which may respond differently to treatment. Furthermore, novel agents, including pertuzumab or T-DM1 for HER2 type breast cancer, bevacizumab or PARP inhibitors for triple negative-breast cancer, or combination regimens with these novelagents, are expected to achieve higher pCR rates and improve patient prognosis. The tumor microenvironment may also play an important role in predicting treatment response or prognosis. It is important that tailor-made treatment strategies for patients with primary breast cancer, especially for patients who will not respond favorably to current standard therapies, consider both the treatment effects and the medicaleconomic effects.