Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Agric Food Chem ; 69(44): 13200-13216, 2021 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34709825

RESUMO

Nontarget data acquisition for target analysis (nDATA) workflows using liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate mass (LC-HRAM) spectrometry, spectral screening software, and a compound database have generated interest because of their potential for screening of pesticides in foods. However, these procedures and particularly the instrument processing software need to be thoroughly evaluated before implementation in routine analysis. In this work, 25 laboratories participated in a collaborative study to evaluate an nDATA workflow on high moisture produce (apple, banana, broccoli, carrot, grape, lettuce, orange, potato, strawberry, and tomato). Samples were extracted in each laboratory by quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS), and data were acquired by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled to a high-resolution quadrupole Orbitrap (QOrbitrap) or quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer operating in full-scan mass spectrometry (MS) data-independent tandem mass spectrometry (LC-FS MS/DIA MS/MS) acquisition mode. The nDATA workflow was evaluated using a restricted compound database with 51 pesticides and vendor processing software. Pesticide identifications were determined by retention time (tR, ±0.5 min relative to the reference retention times used in the compound database) and mass errors (δM) of the precursor (RTP, δM ≤ ±5 ppm) and product ions (RTPI, δM ≤ ±10 ppm). The elution profiles of all 51 pesticides were within ±0.5 min among 24 of the participating laboratories. Successful screening was determined by false positive and false negative rates of <5% in unfortified (pesticide-free) and fortified (10 and 100 µg/kg) produce matrices. Pesticide responses were dependent on the pesticide, matrix, and instrument. The false negative rates were 0.7 and 0.1% at 10 and 100 µg/kg, respectively, and the false positive rate was 1.1% from results of the participating LC-HRAM platforms. Further evaluation was achieved by providing produce samples spiked with pesticides at concentrations blinded to the laboratories. Twenty-two of the 25 laboratories were successful in identifying all fortified pesticides (0-7 pesticides ranging from 5 to 50 µg/kg) for each produce sample (99.7% detection rate). These studies provide convincing evidence that the nDATA comprehensive approach broadens the screening capabilities of pesticide analyses and provide a platform with the potential to be easily extended to a larger number of other chemical residues and contaminants in foods.


Assuntos
Resíduos de Praguicidas , Praguicidas , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Cromatografia Líquida , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Frutas/química , Resíduos de Praguicidas/análise , Praguicidas/análise , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Verduras , Fluxo de Trabalho
2.
Food Sci Nutr ; 9(5): 2658-2667, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34026079

RESUMO

Samples of 23 seafood products were obtained internationally in processing plants and subjected to controlled decomposition to produce seven discrete quality increments. A sensory expert evaluated each sample for decomposition, using a scale of 1-100. Samples were then extracted and analyzed by liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Untargeted data processing was performed, and a sensory-driven Random Forest model in the R programming language for each product was created. Five samples of each quality increment were analyzed in duplicate on separate days. Scores analogous to those obtained through sensory analysis were calculated by this approach, and these were compared to the original sensory findings. Correlation values (r) were calculated from these plots and ranged from 0.971 to 0.999. The finding of decomposition state of each sample was consistent with sensory for 548 of 550 test samples (99.6%). Of the two misidentified samples, one was a false negative, and one false positive (0.2% each). One additional sample from each of the 1st, 4th, and 7th increments of each product was extracted and analyzed on a third separate day to evaluate reproducibility. The range of these triplicate calculated scores was 15 or less for all samples tested, 10 or less for 63 of the 69 triplicate tests (91%), and five or less for 41 (59%). From the models, the most predictive compounds of interest were selected, and many of these were identified using MS2 data with standard or database comparison, allowing identification of compounds indicative of decomposition in these products which have not previously been explored for this purpose.

3.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 80: 155-8, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23584076

RESUMO

In 2007, the United States Food and Drug Administration released guidance recommending testing of glycerin used in regulated consumer products, such as cough syrup preparations, toothpaste, and other pharmaceutical and food products, for the toxic compounds ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol. Regulatory laboratories routinely test glycerin, and products containing glycerin or related compounds for these toxic glycols, using an official gas chromatographic method, to ensure the safety of these products. The current work describes a companion technique to compliment this GC-FID method utilizing Orbitrap mass spectrometry with direct analysis in real time ionization to rapidly screen these samples qualitatively, with results in as little as five seconds, with no sample preparation required. This allows the more time and resource intensive method to be reserved for those rare cases when these compounds are detected, potentially greatly improving laboratory efficiency. The technique was evaluated for qualitative sensitivity and repeatability, and compared against the GC-FID method. The method appears to perform well against these metrics.


Assuntos
Etilenoglicol/análise , Etilenoglicóis/análise , Glicerol/análise , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Cromatografia Gasosa/métodos , Etilenoglicol/isolamento & purificação , Etilenoglicóis/isolamento & purificação , Ionização de Chama/métodos , Glicerol/química , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
J Agric Food Chem ; 59(11): 5906-13, 2011 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21534596

RESUMO

A method for the extraction of agmatine, cadaverine, histamine, phenyethylamine, putrescine, tryptamine, tyramine, and urocanic acid from canned tuna and frozen tuna loin matrices by matrix solid-phase dispersion, followed by separation and quantification of these compounds by ultrahigh-performance hydrophilic interaction chromatography (UHPLC-HILIC) with orbitrap mass spectrometric detection, is described. Tuna samples are dispersed in a CN-silica sorbent and eluted with a mixture of aqueous ammonium formate buffer and acetonitrile. Separation and detection are carried out on an Agilent 1200 high-performance liquid chromatograph coupled to a Thermo Exactive orbitrap mass spectrometer, and metformin is used as the internal standard. Spike recoveries are determined across a range of 20-100 ppm for each compound, and the method is validated with respect to linearity, reproducibility, accuracy, and limits of quantitation and detection. The method is demonstrated to be suitable for use in quantifying these target compounds in the studied matrices.


Assuntos
Aminas Biogênicas/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Alimentos Marinhos/análise , Extração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Atum , Animais , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA