Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am ; 31(1): 131-142, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396284

RESUMO

Brazil has always been a fertile place for plastic surgery techniques, especially cosmetic, and it was not different in rhinoplasty. In Brazil surgeons started using the dorsal preservation rhinoplasty in the 1970s. Techniques have changed, the problems and contraindications were challenged, and solutions proposed. As a result, indications were expanded to almost every kind of nose. Surface working executed with power tools, such as the piezoelectric device and the power drill, complemented the techniques and allowed for refinement in execution. Today the Brazilian preservation techniques are adopted and improved by many surgeons around the world.


Assuntos
Rinoplastia , Humanos , Brasil , Rinoplastia/métodos , Nariz/cirurgia
2.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 26(4): 738-743, Oct.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1421675

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction The sinus fungus ball is an agglomeration of debris and hyphae, mainly caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, within the paranasal sinus, commonly affecting a single sinus, and it only rarely affects the frontal sinus. Objective To identify the state of the art of fungus ball in paranasal sinuses, especially related to the epidemiology of the disease in the frontal sinus. Additionally, this article reports a rare case of fungus ball in the frontal sinus in an adult male, and discusses the variables of this condition related to the patient. Data Synthesis All of the 8 cases of fungus ball in the frontal sinus reported in this study affected male patients: 40% had unilateral disease, and 60%, bilateral disease, contrary to the incidence data of fungus ball in the other paranasal sinuses, which reports unilateral prevalence. However, in the present study, this index changes, with 50% of unilateral and 50% of bilateral incidence regarding frontal sinus involvement. The average age of the patients was 65.36 years (range: 60-74 years). The etiologic agent was Aspergillus spp., and the endonasal endoscopic therapeutic approach corresponded to 80% of cases, while frontal osteoplasty accounted for 20% of cases, reaffirming the prevalence data from other studies. Conclusion Despite being a low-incidence entity, frontal sinus fungus ball should be considered in patients with pain in the frontal region refractory to the usual clinical treatments.

3.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 26(4): e738-e743, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36405460

RESUMO

Introduction The sinus fungus ball is an agglomeration of debris and hyphae, mainly caused by Aspergillus fumigatus , within the paranasal sinus, commonly affecting a single sinus, and it only rarely affects the frontal sinus. Objective To identify the state of the art of fungus ball in paranasal sinuses, especially related to the epidemiology of the disease in the frontal sinus. Additionally, this article reports a rare case of fungus ball in the frontal sinus in an adult male, and discusses the variables of this condition related to the patient. Data Synthesis All of the 8 cases of fungus ball in the frontal sinus reported in this study affected male patients: 40% had unilateral disease, and 60%, bilateral disease, contrary to the incidence data of fungus ball in the other paranasal sinuses, which reports unilateral prevalence. However, in the present study, this index changes, with 50% of unilateral and 50% of bilateral incidence regarding frontal sinus involvement. The average age of the patients was 65.36 years (range: 60-74 years). The etiologic agent was Aspergillus spp., and the endonasal endoscopic therapeutic approach corresponded to 80% of cases, while frontal osteoplasty accounted for 20% of cases, reaffirming the prevalence data from other studies. Conclusion Despite being a low-incidence entity, frontal sinus fungus ball should be considered in patients with pain in the frontal region refractory to the usual clinical treatments.

4.
Facial Plast Surg ; 37(1): 45-52, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715148

RESUMO

Nasal dorsal preservation surgery was described more than 100 years ago, but recently has gained prominence. Our objective is to show the surgical technique, the main indications and counterindications, and the complications. It is a technique that does not cause the detachment of the upper lateral cartilage (ULC) from the nasal septum, and has the main following sequence: preparation of the septum and its resection can be at different levels (high or low, i.e., SPAR [septum pyramidal adjustment and repositioning] A or B); preparation of the pyramid; transversal osteotomy; lateral osteotomy(s); and septopyramidal adjustment. The result is a nose with a lower radix than the original, a deprojection of the nasal dorsum tending to maintain its original shape; an increase in the interalar distance (IAD) and enlargement of the nasal middle ⅓; and loss of projection of the nasal tip and roundness of the nostrils. Thus, the ideal candidate is the one who benefits from such side effects, that is: tension nose, that is, high radix with projected dorsum, projected anterior nasal septal angle (ANSA), narrow middle ⅓, narrow IAD, thin nostrils and straight perpendicular plate of the ethmoid (PPE), and, depending on the characteristics, the deviated nose. The counterindications are low radix, irregularities in the nasal dorsum, ANSA lower than rhinion, and a wide middle ⅓. And the main stigmas are: a nose with a very low radix, middle ⅓ enlarged, residual hump, and saddling of the supratip area. Other issues of this technique are: the shape of the radix; the need or not to remove PPE; wide dorsum; irregular dorsum; ANSA lower than rhinion; weak cartilages; long nasal bone; deviated PPE; and obsessive patient. We conclude that this is a great technique for noses with characteristics suitable to it; care must be taken with the stigmas it can cause.


Assuntos
Rinoplastia , Humanos , Osso Nasal , Cavidade Nasal , Septo Nasal/cirurgia , Nariz/cirurgia , Osteotomia , Rinoplastia/efeitos adversos
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 8(1): 302-309, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425833

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are still poorly recognized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which risk factors could influence the risk of recurrence among patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery in long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients with CRS who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were followed for an average period of 12 years in a nonconcurrent cohort. After surgery, patients were considered to an additional endoscopic sinus surgery if appropriate medical therapy failed during this period. The presence of nasal polyps, asthma, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, smoking habits, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and atopy were assessed. The recurrence-free interval between groups (with or without these risk factors) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meyer curves, and the indication for a revisional surgery was considered to be the unfavorable event. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) were more likely than patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) to need revisional surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.02). Asthma was the only factor that was significantly related to recurrence both in patients with CRSsNP (hazard ratio, 5.54) and in patients with CRSwNP (hazard ratio, 3.27). Although eosinophilia itself was not related to a higher chance of recurrence, its presence influenced the outcome of CRSwNP compared with CRSsNP and the impact of asthma among patients with CRSwNP. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis in patients with CRSwNP was inferior to that in patients with CRSsNP. Asthma was the only factor that increased the chance of recurrence in patients with either CRSsNP or CRSwNP.


Assuntos
Asma , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Asma/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/epidemiologia , Pólipos Nasais/cirurgia , Rinite/epidemiologia , Rinite/cirurgia , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/cirurgia
6.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 83(3): 356-363, May-June 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-889259

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is still a controversial issue in literature. Objective: A systematic review of the association between these two diseases in adult patients. Methods: Systematic review in PubMed and Cochrane Database with articles published between 1951 and 2015. We included all articles that specifically studied the relationship between CRS and GERD. Results: Of the 436 articles found, only 12 met the inclusion criteria. Eight cross-sectional articles suggest a relation between CRS and GERD, especially on CRS that is refractory to clinical or surgical treatment. However, the groups are small and methodologies are different. Four other longitudinal studies have assessed the effect of treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the improvement of symptoms of CRS, but the results were conflicting. Conclusions: There seems to be relative prevalence of reflux with intractable CRS. There is still a lack of controlled studies with a significant number of patients to confirm this hypothesis. Few studies specifically assess the impact of treatment of reflux on symptom improvement in patients with CRS.


Resumo Introdução: A relação entre a Doença do Refluxo Gastroesofágico (DRGE) e a Rinossinusite Crônica (RSC) ainda é tema de controvérsia em literatura. Objetivo: Revisão sistemática sobre a associação entre essas duas doenças em pacientes adultos. Método: Revisão sistemática no Pubmed e Cochrane Database com os artigos publicados entre 1951 e 2015. Foram incluídos todos os artigos que estudassem especificamente a relação entre RSC e DRGE. Resultados: Dos 436 artigos encontrados, apenas 12 satisfaziam os critérios de inclusão. Oito artigos transversais sugerem relação da RSC com a DRGE, especialmente sobre a RSC refratária a tratamento clínico ou cirúrgico prévio. No entanto, os grupos são pequenos e as metodologias são muito diferentes. Outros quatro estudos longitudinais avaliaram o efeito do tratamento com Inibidores de Bomba de Prótons (IBP) sobre a melhora a dos sintomas de RSC, porém os resultados foram discordantes. Conclusões: Parece haver relação de prevalência de refluxo e RSC de difícil controle. Ainda faltam estudos controlados com um número expressivo de pacientes para que se confirme essa hipótese. São escassos os estudos que avaliem especificamente o impacto do tratamento de refluxo na melhora dos sintomas em pacientes com RSC.


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Sinusite/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Rinite/complicações , Sinusite/fisiopatologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica
7.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 83(3): 356-363, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27470496

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is still a controversial issue in literature. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of the association between these two diseases in adult patients. METHODS: Systematic review in PubMed and Cochrane Database with articles published between 1951 and 2015. We included all articles that specifically studied the relationship between CRS and GERD. RESULTS: Of the 436 articles found, only 12 met the inclusion criteria. Eight cross-sectional articles suggest a relation between CRS and GERD, especially on CRS that is refractory to clinical or surgical treatment. However, the groups are small and methodologies are different. Four other longitudinal studies have assessed the effect of treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the improvement of symptoms of CRS, but the results were conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be relative prevalence of reflux with intractable CRS. There is still a lack of controlled studies with a significant number of patients to confirm this hypothesis. Few studies specifically assess the impact of treatment of reflux on symptom improvement in patients with CRS.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Rinite/complicações , Sinusite/complicações , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Rinite/fisiopatologia , Sinusite/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA