Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ; 15(1-2): 28-39, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31826689

RESUMO

The fast changing field of social media (SM) research presents unique challenges for research ethics committees (RECs). This article examines notions of experience and expertise in the context of REC members reviewing proposals for SM research and considers the role of the RECs in this area of review. We analyze 19 interviews with REC members to highlight that a lack of personal and professional experience of SM, compounded by a lack of institutional and professional guidelines, mean many REC members feel they do not possess sufficient expertise to review SM research. This view was supported by 14 interviews with SM researchers. REC members drew on strategies to overcome their lack of experience, although most SM researchers still found this problematic, to varying degrees. We recommend several steps to ensure REC expertise in SM research keeps pace of this fast-developing field, taking a pro-active, dialogic approach.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/ética , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Competência Profissional , Projetos de Pesquisa , Mídias Sociais , Ética em Pesquisa , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Pesquisadores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA