Depth versus subdural temporal electrodes revisited: Impact on surgical outcome after resective surgery for epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To study retrospectively the impact of electrode modality (subdural or depth electrodes) during presurgical assessment on surgical outcome after temporal lobectomy. METHODS: The study included 17 patients assessed with depth electrodes and 57 with bitemporal subdural strips. RESULTS: MRI showed a larger proportion of bilateral pathology in patients undergoing depth recordings (29.41% versus 3.5%, p=0.00069). Among the operated patients, those undergoing depth electrode recordings showed better outcome at one year after surgery (11/12 versus 22/33; p=0.046). This difference disappears at longest follow up (10/12 versus 22/33; p=0.138). Moreover, the probability of undergoing surgery and having good outcome after assessment with intracranial recordings is higher for the depth electrode group at one-year follow up (11/17 versus 22/57; p=0.029) but statistical differences decrease to a trend for the longest follow up (10/17 versus 22/57; p=0.069). No other statistical differences were noted between subdural and depth electrodes. Depth electrodes showed lower complication rates than subdural electrodes. CONCLUSION: Both depth and subdural electrodes are effective for presurgical assessment of temporal lobe epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: Assessment with depth electrodes is associated with slightly increased likelihood of surgery and marginally better surgical outcome at one year follow up which disappears for longer follow up periods. Initial assessment with depth electrodes would have avoided a second implantation in 15% of patients.

Single pulse electrical stimulation of the hippocampus is sufficient to impair human episodic memory.

We have used the single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) technique to investigate whether more localized stimulation of the hippocampus can affect human episodic memory. A recognition memory test including words, object drawings, abstract drawings and unfamiliar faces was performed without stimulation (baseline) or synchronized with single 1 ms electrical pulses applied to the left, right or both hippocampi in 12 epileptic patients investigated with bilateral depth electrodes. No differences were found in memory performance between baseline and unilateral stimulation, either in the total score or in material-specific scores. In contrast, bilateral stimulation was associated with a pronounced decrease in the median of total memory scores (57%), and of material-specific sub-scores for words (38%), geometrical drawings (81%) and faces (100%). Additional study of stimulation at presentation of stimuli (encoding) versus the recognition memory (retrieval) test phase, showed reduction in memory only at encoding. The results provide causal evidence that the hippocampi are necessary for supporting episodic memory. The induction of memory deficits by bilateral stimulation with parameters that do not induce effects when applied unilaterally suggests that recognition memory can be processed independently by the hippocampus on either hemisphere.

Is it worth pursuing surgery for epilepsy in patients with normal neuroimaging?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether it is worth pursuing surgery for the treatment of epilepsy in patients with normal neuroimaging. METHODS: Two patient populations were studied: (1) 136 consecutive patients who were surgically treated; (2) 105 consecutive patients assessed with chronically implanted intracranial electrodes within the same period. Sixty patients belonged to both groups, and included all 21 patients who had normal neuroimaging. RESULTS: There were no differences in the proportion of patients with favourable outcome between those with normal and those with abnormal neuroimaging, irrespective of whether intracranial recordings were required. Among the 19 operated patients with normal neuroimaging, 74% had a favourable outcome (Engel's seizure outcome grades I and II), and among the 93 patients with abnormal neuroimaging, 73% had favourable outcome (p = 0.96). In patients with temporal resections, 92% of the 13 patients with normal neuroimaging had a favourable outcome, whereas among the 70 patients with abnormal neuroimaging, 80% had a favourable outcome (p = 0.44). In patients with extratemporal resections, two of the six patients with normal neuroimaging had a favourable outcome, while 12 of the 23 patients with abnormal neuroimaging had a favourable outcome (p = 0.65). Among the 105 patients studied with intracranial electrodes, five suffered transitory deficits as a result of implantation, and two suffered permanent deficits (one hemiplegia caused by haematoma and one mild dysphasia resulting from haemorrhage). CONCLUSIONS: It is worth pursuing surgery in patients with normal neuroimaging because it results in good seizure control and the incidence of permanent deficits associated with intracranial studies is low.

Single-pulse electrical stimulation identifies epileptogenic frontal cortex in the human brain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) to identify frontal epileptogenic cortex during presurgical assessment. METHODS: SPES (1-millisecond pulses, 4 to 8 mA, 0.1 Hz) has been used during chronic recordings in 30 patients with intracranial electrodes in the frontal lobes. As a result of presurgical assessment, 17 patients were considered to have frontal epilepsy and 13 extrafrontal epilepsy. RESULTS: Two types of responses to SPES were seen: 1) early responses: starting immediately after the stimulus and considered as normal responses; 2) late responses: two types of responses seen in some areas after the initial early response: a) delayed responses: spikes or sharp waves occurring between 100 milliseconds and 1 second after stimulation. Frontal delayed responses were seen in 11 frontal patients and 1 extrafrontal patient, whereas extrafrontal delayed responses were seen in 1 frontal and 10 extrafrontal patients. b) Repetitive responses: two or more consecutive sharp-and-slow-wave complexes, each resembling the initial early response. Repetitive responses were seen only when stimulating the frontal lobes of 10 frontal patients. Among the 17 frontal patients, 13 had late responses exclusively in the epileptogenic frontal lobe, whereas only 3 showed them in both frontal lobes. Frontal late responses were associated with neuropathologic abnormalities, and complete resection of abnormal SPES areas was associated with good postsurgical seizure outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) could be an important additional investigation during presurgical assessment to identify frontal epileptogenicity. SPES can be useful in patients who have widespread or multiple epileptogenic areas, normal neuroimaging, or few seizures during telemetry.