RESUMO
Myocardial microvasculature and haemodynamics are indicative of potential microvascular diseases for patients with symptoms of coronary heart disease in the absence of obstructive coronary arteries. However, imaging microvascular structure and flow within the myocardium is challenging owing to the small size of the vessels and the constant movement of the patient's heart. Here we show the feasibility of transthoracic ultrasound localization microscopy for imaging myocardial microvasculature and haemodynamics in explanted pig hearts and in patients in vivo. Through a customized data-acquisition and processing pipeline with a cardiac phased-array probe, we leveraged motion correction and tracking to reconstruct the dynamics of microcirculation. For four patients, two of whom had impaired myocardial function, we obtained super-resolution images of myocardial vascular structure and flow using data acquired within a breath hold. Myocardial ultrasound localization microscopy may facilitate the understanding of myocardial microcirculation and the management of patients with cardiac microvascular diseases.
Assuntos
Microcirculação , Humanos , Animais , Suínos , Miocárdio/patologia , Microvasos/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Hemodinâmica , Microscopia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
We aimed to evaluate clinical and prognostic significance of myocardial work parameters of the systemic right ventricle (SRV). Thirty-eight patients with the SRV underwent echocardiographic assessment of the SRV systolic function including 3D-echocardiography derived ejection fraction, 2D longitudinal strain and myocardial work analysis. The study endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. Global constructive work (GCW) and global work index (GWI) demonstrated moderate correlation with the 3DE-derived SRV ejection fraction (EF) (Rho 0.64, p < 0.0001 and Rho 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively). GCW showed the strongest correlation with the BNP level (Rho - 0.77, p < 0.0001), closely followed by GWI, 4-chamber longitudinal strain and 3DE EF (all Rho - 0.73, p < 0.0001). GCW and GWI were significantly lower in patients with moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation compared with less than moderate regurgitation (1226 ± 439 vs 1509 ± 264 mmHg%, p = 0.02, and 984 ± 348 vs 1259 ± 278 mmHg%, p = 0.01, respectively). During a follow-up of 3.5 (2.8-3.9) years, seven patients (18%) died and one received transplantation (3%). They had significantly lower GCW and GWI compared with patients who did not reach the study endpoint (908 ± 255 vs 1433 ± %, p < 0.001 and 721 ± 210 vs 1173 ± 315 mmHg%, p < 0.001, respectively). In Cox regression analysis, GCW, GWI, 3DE SRV volumes and EF were the best-fit models based on the Akaike Information Criterion, outperforming longitudinal strain parameters. GWI and GCW, novel echocardiographic parameters of myocardial work, provided reliable quantification of the SRV systolic function. GWI, GCW and 3DE-derived SRV parameters were closely associated with all-cause mortality and heart transplantation in patients with the SRV.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Tridimensional , Transplante de Coração , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Direita , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Prognóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/mortalidade , Idoso , Contração Miocárdica , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Volume Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodosAssuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Isquemia Miocárdica , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , IsquemiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a sensitive marker for identifying subclinical myocardial dysfunction in obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Little is known about the relationship between GLS and ischemia in patients with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between resting GLS and ischemia on stress echocardiography (SE) in patients with INOCA. METHODS: Left ventricular GLS was calculated offline on resting SE images at enrollment (n = 144) and 1-year follow-up (n = 120) in the CIAO-ISCHEMIA (Changes in Ischemia and Angina over One year in International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches trial screen failures with no obstructive CAD on computed tomography [CT] angiography) study, which enrolled participants with moderate or severe ischemia by local SE interpretation (≥3 segments with new or worsening wall motion abnormality and no obstructive (<50% stenosis) on coronary computed tomography angiography. RESULTS: Global longitudinal strain values were normal in 83.3% at enrollment and 94.2% at follow-up. Global longitudinal strain values were not associated with a positive SE at enrollment (GLS = -21.5% positive SE vs GLS = -19.9% negative SE, P = .443) or follow-up (GLS = -23.2% positive SE vs GLS = -23.1% negative SE, P = .859). Significant change in GLS was not associated with positive SE in follow-up (P = .401). Regional strain was not associated with colocalizing ischemia at enrollment or follow-up. Changes in GLS and number of ischemic segments from enrollment to follow-up showed a modest but not clinically meaningful correlation (ß = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.67; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of INOCA patients, resting GLS values were largely normal and did not associate with the presence, severity, or location of stress-induced ischemia. These findings may suggest the absence of subclinical myocardial dysfunction detectable by echocardiographic strain analysis at rest in INOCA.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Deformação Longitudinal Global , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Coração , Isquemia/complicações , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
Since the 2009 publication of the stress echocardiography expert consensus of the European Association of Echocardiography, and after the 2016 advice of the American Society of Echocardiography-European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging for applications beyond coronary artery disease, new information has become available regarding stress echo. Until recently, the assessment of regional wall motion abnormality was the only universally practiced step of stress echo. In the state-of-the-art ABCDE protocol, regional wall motion abnormality remains the main step A, but at the same time, regional perfusion using ultrasound-contrast agents may be assessed. Diastolic function and pulmonary B-lines are assessed in step B; left ventricular contractile and preload reserve with volumetric echocardiography in step C; Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery in step D; and ECG-based heart rate reserve in non-imaging step E. These five biomarkers converge, conceptually and methodologically, in the ABCDE protocol allowing comprehensive risk stratification of the vulnerable patient with chronic coronary syndromes. The present document summarizes current practice guidelines recommendations and training requirements and harmonizes the clinical guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology in many diverse cardiac conditions, from chronic coronary syndromes to valvular heart disease. The continuous refinement of imaging technology and the diffusion of ultrasound-contrast agents improve image quality, feasibility, and reader accuracy in assessing wall motion and perfusion, left ventricular volumes, and coronary flow velocity. Carotid imaging detects pre-obstructive atherosclerosis and improves risk prediction similarly to coronary atherosclerosis. The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence on echocardiographic image acquisition and analysis makes stress echo more operator-independent and objective. Stress echo has unique features of low cost, versatility, and universal availability. It does not need ionizing radiation exposure and has near-zero carbon dioxide emissions. Stress echo is a convenient and sustainable choice for functional testing within and beyond coronary artery disease.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Inteligência Artificial , EcocardiografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA) was unknown in the COVID-19 hospitalized patients. We set out to establish the utility of UEA and its safety profile. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of prospectively assessed hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for suspected cardiac pathology due to COVID-19. The indications and subsequent ability to answer the indications for all TTE were reviewed, as well as impact on diagnosis and management. UEA safety was considered through 48 h mortality. RESULTS: From a total of 364 patients (mean age 64.8yrs, 64% males) hospitalized with COVID-19 with TTE requested, an indication could be identified in 363, and 61 required administration of UEA. Standard TTE was able to answer the original indication in 275 (75.8%) patients. This was increased to 322 (88.7%) patients, a relative increase of 17.1%, with the use of UEA (p < 0.001). There was subsequent change in diagnosis in 22 out of 61 (36%) patients receiving UEA and change in management in 13 out of 61 (21.3%). There was no significant increase in 48 h (p = 0.14) mortality with UEA use. The patient population of TTE with UEA versus TTE without UEA differed in having a higher incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, right ventricular dilatation, and self-defined white ethnicity. CONCLUSION: The use of UEA in COVID-19 hospitalized patients, including those who were critically ill, provided incremental information when compared to TTE without UEA resulting in both changes in diagnosis and management plan and appears to be safe.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have a well-established role in clinical cardiology. Contrast echocardiography has evolved into a routine technique through the establishment of contrast protocols, an excellent safety profile, and clinical guidelines which highlight the incremental prognostic utility of contrast enhanced echocardiography. This document aims to provide practical guidance on the safe and effective use of contrast; reviews the role of individual staff groups; and training requirements to facilitate its routine use in the echocardiography laboratory.
RESUMO
Importance: In the Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction (REVIVED-BCIS2) trial, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not improve outcomes for patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Whether myocardial viability testing had prognostic utility for these patients or identified a subpopulation who may benefit from PCI remained unclear. Objective: To determine the effect of the extent of viable and nonviable myocardium on the effectiveness of PCI, prognosis, and improvement in left ventricular function. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective open-label randomized clinical trial recruiting between August 28, 2013, and March 19, 2020, with a median follow-up of 3.4 years (IQR, 2.3-5.0 years). A total of 40 secondary and tertiary care centers in the United Kingdom were included. Of 700 randomly assigned patients, 610 with left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35%, extensive coronary artery disease, and evidence of viability in at least 4 myocardial segments that were dysfunctional at rest and who underwent blinded core laboratory viability characterization were included. Data analysis was conducted from March 31, 2022, to May 1, 2023. Intervention: Percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Blinded core laboratory analysis was performed of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans and dobutamine stress echocardiograms to quantify the extent of viable and nonviable myocardium, expressed as an absolute percentage of left ventricular mass. The primary outcome of this subgroup analysis was the composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and improved left ventricular function at 6 months. Results: The mean (SD) age of the participants was 69.3 (9.0) years. In the PCI group, 258 (87%) were male, and in the optimal medical therapy group, 277 (88%) were male. The primary outcome occurred in 107 of 295 participants assigned to PCI and 114 of 315 participants assigned to optimal medical therapy alone. There was no interaction between the extent of viable or nonviable myocardium and the effect of PCI on the primary or any secondary outcome. Across the study population, the extent of viable myocardium was not associated with the primary outcome (hazard ratio per 10% increase, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04) or any secondary outcome. The extent of nonviable myocardium was associated with the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.15), all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and improvement in left ventricular function. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that viability testing does not identify patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who benefit from PCI. The extent of nonviable myocardium, but not the extent of viable myocardium, is associated with event-free survival and likelihood of improvement of left ventricular function. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01920048.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Volume Sistólico , Estudos Prospectivos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/complicaçõesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Severe aortic stenosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The existing treatment pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) traditionally relies on tertiary Heart Valve Centre workup. However, this has been associated with delays to treatment, in breach of British Cardiovascular Intervention Society targets. A novel pathway with emphasis on comprehensive patient workup at a local centre, alongside close collaboration with a Heart Valve Centre, may help reduce the time to TAVI. METHODS: The centre performing local workup implemented a novel TAVI referral pathway. Data were collected retrospectively for all outpatients referred for consideration of TAVI to a Heart Valve Centre from November 2020 to November 2021. The main outcome of time to TAVI was calculated as the time from Heart Valve Centre referral to TAVI, or alternative intervention, expressed in days. For the centre performing local workup, referral was defined as the date of multidisciplinary team discussion. For this centre, a total pathway time from echocardiographic diagnosis to TAVI was also evaluated. A secondary outcome of the proportion of referrals proceeding to TAVI at the Heart Valve Centre was analysed. RESULTS: Mean±SD time from referral to TAVI was significantly lower at the centre performing local workup, when compared with centres with traditional referral pathways (32.4±64 to 126±257 days, p<0.00001). The total pathway time from echocardiographic diagnosis to TAVI for the centre performing local workup was 89.9±67.6 days, which was also significantly shorter than referral to TAVI time from all other centres (p<0.003). Centres without local workup had a significantly lower percentage of patients accepted for TAVI (49.5% vs 97.8%, p<0.00001). DISCUSSION: A novel TAVI pathway with emphasis on local workup within a non-surgical centre significantly reduced both the time to TAVI and rejection rates from a Heart Valve Centre. If adopted across the other centres, this approach may help improve access to TAVI.
Assuntos
Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Ecocardiografia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
AIMS: To assess the additional prognostic significance of echocardiographic parameters of subpulmonary left ventricular (LV) size and function in patients with a systemic right ventricle (SRV). METHODS AND RESULTS: All adults with an SRV who underwent transthoracic echocardiography in 2010-18 at a large tertiary centre were identified. Biventricular size and function were assessed at the most recent examination. The study endpoint was all-cause mortality or heart/heart-lung transplantation. We included 180 patients, with 100 (55.6%) males, with a mean age of 42.4 ± 12.3 years, of whom 103 (57.2%) had undergone Mustard/Senning operations and 77 (42.8%) had congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries. Over 4.9 (3.8-5.7) years, 28 (15.6%) patients died and 4 (2.2%) underwent heart or heart-lung transplantation. Univariable predictors of the study endpoint included age, New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV, history of atrial arrhythmias, presence of a pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator, high B-type natriuretic peptide, and echocardiographic markers of SRV and subpulmonary LV size and function. On multivariable Cox analysis of echocardiographic variables, indexed LV end-systolic diameter [ESDi; hazard ratio (HR) 2.77 (95% confidence interval, CI) 1.35-5.68, P = 0.01], LV fractional area change [FAC; HR 0.7 (95% CI 0.57-0.85), P = 0.002), SRV basal diameter [HR 1.66 (95% CI 1.21-2.29), P = 0.005], and SRV FAC [HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87), P = 0.008] remained predictive of mortality or transplantation. On receiver-operating characteristic analysis, subpulmonary LV parameters performed better than SRV markers in predicting adverse events. CONCLUSION: SRV basal diameter, SRV FAC, LV ESDi, and LV FAC are significantly and independently associated with mortality and transplantation in adults with an SRV. Accurate echocardiographic assessment of both SRV and subpulmonary LV is, therefore, essential to inform risk stratification and management.
Assuntos
Transposição dos Grandes Vasos , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Prognóstico , Transposição dos Grandes Vasos/cirurgia , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Transposição das Grandes Artérias Corrigida Congenitamente/complicações , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Função Ventricular DireitaRESUMO
Aims: There is a paucity of randomized diagnostic studies in women with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). This study sought to assess the relative value of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) compared with exercise electrocardiography (Ex-ECG) in women with CAD. Methods and results: Accordingly, 416 women with no prior CAD and intermediate probability of CAD (mean pre-test probability 41%), were randomized to undergo either Ex-ECG or ESE. The primary endpoints were the positive predictive value (PPV) for the detection of significant CAD and downstream resource utilization. The PPV of ESE and Ex-ECG were 33% and 30% (P = 0.87), respectively for the detection of CAD. There were similar clinic visits (36 vs. 29, P = 0.44) and emergency visits with chest pain (28 vs. 25, P = 0.55) in the Ex-ECG and ESE arms, respectively. At 2.9 years, cardiac events were 6 Ex-ECG vs. 3 ESE, P = 0.31. Although initial diagnosis costs were higher for ESE, more women underwent further CAD testing in the Ex-ECG arm compared to the ESE arm (37 vs. 17, P = 0.003). Overall, there was higher downstream resource utilization (hospital attendances and investigations) in the Ex-ECG arm (P = 0.002). Using National Health Service tariffs 2020/21 (British pounds) the cumulative diagnostic costs were 7.4% lower for Ex-ECG compared with ESE, but this finding is sensitive to the cost differential between ESE and Ex-ECG. Conclusion: In intermediate-risk women who are able to exercise, Ex-ECG had similar efficacy to an ESE strategy, with higher resource utilization whilst providing cost savings.
RESUMO
Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Intraventricular four-dimensional flow (4D flow) phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess different components of left ventricular (LV) flow including direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume. This could be utilised to identify HFpEF. This study investigated if intraventricular 4D flow CMR could differentiate HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls. Suspected HFpEF patients and asymptomatic controls were recruited prospectively. HFpEF patients were confirmed using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 expert recommendations. Non-HFpEF patients were diagnosed if suspected HFpEF patients did not fulfil ESC 2021 criteria. LV direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume were obtained from 4D flow CMR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. 63 subjects (25 HFpEF patients, 22 non-HFpEF patients and 16 asymptomatic controls) were included in this study. 46% were male, mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume could differentiate HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls (p < 0.001 for both) as well as HFpEF vs non-HFpEF patients (p = 0.021 and p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 4 parameters, direct flow had the largest area under curve (AUC) of 0.781 when comparing HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls, while residual volume had the largest AUC of 0.740 when comparing HFpEF and non-HFpEF patients. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume show promise in differentiating HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stress echocardiography is widely used to detect coronary artery disease, but little evidence on downstream hospital costs in real-world practice is available. We examined how stress echocardiography accuracy and downstream hospital costs vary across NHS hospitals and identified key factors that affect costs to help inform future clinical planning and guidelines. METHODS: Data on 7636 patients recruited from 31 NHS hospitals within the UK between 2014 and 2020 as part of EVAREST/BSE-NSTEP clinical study, were used. Data included all diagnostic tests, procedures, and hospital admissions for 12 months after a stress echocardiogram and were costed using the NHS national unit costs. A decision tree was built to illustrate the clinical pathway and estimate average downstream hospital costs. Multi-level regression analysis was performed to identify variation in accuracy and costs at both patient, procedural, and hospital level. Linear regression and extrapolation were used to estimate annual hospital cost-savings associated with increasing predictive accuracy at hospital and national level. RESULTS: Stress echocardiography accuracy varied with patient, hospital and operator characteristics. Hypertension, presence of wall motion abnormalities and higher number of hospital cardiology outpatient attendances annually reduced accuracy, adjusted odds ratio of 0.78 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.93), 0.27 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.48), 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 0.99) respectively, whereas a prior myocardial infarction, angiotensin receptor blocker medication, and greater operator experience increased accuracy, adjusted odds ratio of 1.77 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.33), 1.64 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.22), and 1.06 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.09) respectively. Average downstream costs were £646 per patient (SD 1796) with significant variation across hospitals. The average downstream costs between the 31 hospitals varied from £384-1730 per patient. False positive and false negative tests were associated with average downstream costs of £1446 (SD £601) and £4192 (SD 3332) respectively, driven by increased non-elective hospital admissions, adjusted odds ratio 2.48 (95% CI 1.08 to 5.66), 21.06 (95% CI 10.41 to 42.59) respectively. We estimated that an increase in accuracy by 1 percentage point could save the NHS in the UK £3.2 million annually. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world evidence of downstream costs associated with stress echocardiography practice in the UK and estimates how improvements in accuracy could impact healthcare expenditure in the NHS. A real-world downstream costing approach could be adopted more widely in evaluation of imaging tests and interventions to reflect actual value for money and support realistic planning.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether initial invasive management in older vs younger adults with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia improves health status or clinical outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the impact of age on health status and clinical outcomes with invasive vs conservative management in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. METHODS: One-year angina-specific health status was assessed with the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) (score range 0-100; higher scores indicate better health status). Cox proportional hazards models estimated the treatment effect of invasive vs conservative management as a function of age on the composite clinical outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for resuscitated cardiac arrest, unstable angina, or heart failure. RESULTS: Among 4,617 participants, 2,239 (48.5%) were aged <65 years, 1,713 (37.1%) were aged 65 to 74 years, and 665 (14.4%) were aged ≥75 years. Baseline SAQ summary scores were lower in participants aged <65 years. Fully adjusted differences in 1-year SAQ summary scores (invasive minus conservative) were 4.90 (95% CI: 3.56-6.24) at age 55 years, 3.48 (95% CI: 2.40-4.57) at age 65 years, and 2.13 (95% CI: 0.75-3.51) at age 75 years (Pinteraction = 0.008). Improvement in SAQ Angina Frequency was less dependent on age (Pinteraction = 0.08). There were no age differences between invasive vs conservative management on the composite clinical outcome (Pinteraction = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia had consistent improvement in angina frequency but less improvement in angina-related health status with invasive management compared with younger patients. Invasive management was not associated with improved clinical outcomes in older or younger patients. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).
Assuntos
Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Qualidade de Vida , Doença da Artéria CoronarianaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether initial invasive management in older vs younger adults with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia improves health status or clinical outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the impact of age on health status and clinical outcomes with invasive vs conservative management in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. METHODS: One-year angina-specific health status was assessed with the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) (score range 0-100; higher scores indicate better health status). Cox proportional hazards models estimated the treatment effect of invasive vs conservative management as a function of age on the composite clinical outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for resuscitated cardiac arrest, unstable angina, or heart failure. RESULTS: Among 4,617 participants, 2,239 (48.5%) were aged <65 years, 1,713 (37.1%) were aged 65 to 74 years, and 665 (14.4%) were aged ≥75 years. Baseline SAQ summary scores were lower in participants aged <65 years. Fully adjusted differences in 1-year SAQ summary scores (invasive minus conservative) were 4.90 (95% CI: 3.56-6.24) at age 55 years, 3.48 (95% CI: 2.40-4.57) at age 65 years, and 2.13 (95% CI: 0.75-3.51) at age 75 years (Pinteraction = 0.008). Improvement in SAQ Angina Frequency was less dependent on age (Pinteraction = 0.08). There were no age differences between invasive vs conservative management on the composite clinical outcome (Pinteraction = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia had consistent improvement in angina frequency but less improvement in angina-related health status with invasive management compared with younger patients. Invasive management was not associated with improved clinical outcomes in older or younger patients. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).
Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angina Pectoris , Nível de Saúde , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Revascularização Miocárdica , Doença Crônica , Resultado do Tratamento , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Aims: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continues to be a diagnostic challenge. Cardiac magnetic resonance atrial measurement, feature tracking (CMR-FT), tagging has long been suggested to diagnose HFpEF and potentially complement echocardiography especially when echocardiography is indeterminate. Data supporting the use of CMR atrial measurements, CMR-FT or tagging, are absent. Our aim is to conduct a prospective case-control study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CMR atrial volume/area, CMR-FT, and tagging to diagnose HFpEF amongst patients suspected of having HFpEF. Methods and results: One hundred and twenty-one suspected HFpEF patients were prospectively recruited from four centres. Patients underwent echocardiography, CMR, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements within 24â h to diagnose HFpEF. Patients without HFpEF diagnosis underwent catheter pressure measurements or stress echocardiography to confirm HFpEF or non-HFpEF. Area under the curve (AUC) was determined by comparing HFpEF with non-HFpEF patients. Fifty-three HFpEF (median age 78 years, interquartile range 74-82 years) and thirty-eight non-HFpEF (median age 70 years, interquartile range 64-76 years) were recruited. Cardiac magnetic resonance left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (ResS), LA area index (LAAi), and LA volume index (LAVi) had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUCs 0.803, 0.815, and 0.776, respectively). Left atrial ResS, LAAi, and LAVi had significantly better diagnostic accuracy than CMR-FT left ventricle (LV)/right ventricle (RV) parameters and tagging (P < 0.01). Tagging circumferential and radial strain had poor diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.644 and 0.541, respectively). Conclusion: Cardiac magnetic resonance LA ResS, LAAi, and LAVi have the highest diagnostic accuracy to identify HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients amongst clinically suspected HFpEF patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking LV/RV parameters and tagging had low diagnostic accuracy to diagnose HFpEF.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is common clinically, particularly among women, but its prevalence among patients with at least moderate ischemia and the relationship between ischemia severity and non-obstructive atherosclerosis severity are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated predictors of INOCA in enrolled, nonrandomized participants in ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches), sex differences, and the relationship between ischemia and atherosclerosis in patients with INOCA. METHODS: Core laboratories independently reviewed screening noninvasive stress test results (nuclear imaging, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging or nonimaging exercise tolerance testing), and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), blinded to results of the screening test. INOCA was defined as all stenoses <50% on CCTA in a patient with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. INOCA patients, who were excluded from randomization, were compared with randomized participants with ≥50% stenosis in ≥1 vessel and moderate or severe ischemia. RESULTS: Among 3,612 participants with core laboratory-confirmed moderate or severe ischemia and interpretable CCTA, 476 (13%) had INOCA. Patients with INOCA were younger, were predominantly female, and had fewer atherosclerosis risk factors. For each stress testing modality, the extent of ischemia tended to be less among patients with INOCA, particularly with nuclear imaging. There was no significant relationship between severity of ischemia and extent or severity of nonobstructive atherosclerosis on CCTA. On multivariable analysis, female sex was independently associated with INOCA (odds ratio: 4.2 [95% CI: 3.4-5.2]). CONCLUSIONS: Among participants enrolled in ISCHEMIA with core laboratory-confirmed moderate or severe ischemia, the prevalence of INOCA was 13%. Severity of ischemia was not associated with severity of nonobstructive atherosclerosis. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).