The accuracies of abdominal computed tomography and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio used to predict the development of clinically severe acute cholecystitis in elderly patients visiting an emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with severe acute cholecystitis (AC) remains high, and the prognosis for elderly patients tends to be poor. A comparative analysis of clinical, laboratory, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) parameters was conducted in this study to investigate the effectiveness of each index for predicting clinically severe AC in elderly patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study that included 156 patients (≥65 years of age) with AC who were admitted in the ED between January 2012 and December 2014. Parameters including age, gender, initial clinical findings, laboratory findings, and CT findings in the ED were examined for their ability to predict severity. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were diagnosed with clinically severe AC. The white blood cell count, neutrophil count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, protein, albumin, and prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio values were significantly higher in the severe group than in the nonsevere group (P < 0.05). In addition, the CT parameters of increased pericholecystic fat stranding and pericholecystic fluid collection were significantly higher in the severe group than in the nonsevere group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). Increased pericholecystic fat stranding (odds ratio [OR], 8.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29-29.22; P = 0.001), pericholecystic fluid collection (OR, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.39-30.92; P = 0.018), and an NLR cutoff value of 9.9 (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.01-17.53; P = 0.049) were independent predictors of severe AC in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: The CT parameters of increased pericholecystic fat stranding and pericholecystic fluid collection with an NLR cutoff of 9.9 were useful for predicting the severity of AC in elderly patients in the ED.

Physician and nurse knowledge about patient radiation exposure in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Imaging methods that use ionizing radiation in emergency departments (EDs) have increased with advances in radiological diagnostic methods. Physician and nurse awareness of the radiation dose in the ED and the associated cancer risks to which the patients are exposed were surveyed with a questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 191 subjects in six EDs participated in this study. ED physicians and ED nurses were asked about the risks and the radiation doses of imaging methods ordered in the ED. The differences between the two groups were compared using Student's t-test for continuous variables. A Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 82 ED physicians and 109 ED nurses completed the questionnaire; 38 (46.3%) physicians and 8 (7.3%) nurses correctly answered the question about the chest X-ray radiation dose. A question about the number of chest X-rays that is equivalent to the dose of a pelvic X-ray was answered correctly by 5 (6.1%) physicians and 9 (8.3%) nurses (P = 0.571). Questions regarding abdominal computed tomography (CT), chest CT, brain CT, abdominal ultrasonography, and brain magnetic resonance imaging were answered correctly more frequently by the physician group than the nurse group (P < 0.05). The risk of developing cancer over a lifetime due to a brain CT was correctly answered by 21 (25.6%) physicians and 30 (27.5%) nurses (P = 0.170). A similar question regarding abdominal CT was correctly answered by 21 (25.6%) physicians and 42 (38.5%) nurses (P = 0.127). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the radiation exposure of radiology examinations was lower in nurses than physicians, but knowledge was poor in both groups. ED physicians and nurses should be educated about radiation exposure and cancer risks associated with various diagnostic radiological methods.