RESUMO
La terapia de alto flujo se ha popularizado durante los últimos años, basada en sus efectos fisiológicos, la entrega de una fracción inspirada de oxígeno segura y estable, sumada al flujo calefaccionado y humidificado, lo que hizo posible su utilización en distintos escenarios. Sin embargo, los estudios que muestran estos beneficios y efectos se han realizado, principalmente, con el empleo de una cánula nasal; mientras que las características de esta terapia en los pacientes traqueostomizados no se ha desarrollado suficientemente. Proponemos aquí una revisión narrativa con las características más salientes de la terapia de alto flujo en este subgrupo de pacientes.
High-flow therapy has become popular in recent years, based on its physiological effects, the delivery of a safe and stable inspired fraction of oxygen, combined with heated and humidified flow, which made its use possible in different scenarios. However, studies demonstrating these benefits and effects have been mainly conducted using a nasal cannula, while the characteristics of this therapy in tracheostomized patients have not been sufficiently developed. We propose a narrative review highlighting the most relevant characteristics of high-flow therapy in this subgroup of patients.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Terapia Respiratória/métodos , Traqueostomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial , Revisão , Cuidados Críticos , CânulaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. The proportion of health-care professionals capable of identifying and effectively managing different types of patient-ventilator asynchronies is limited. A few studies have developed specific training programs, but they mainly focused on improving patient-ventilator asynchrony detection without assessing the ability of health-care professionals to determine the possible causes. METHODS: We conducted a 36-h training program focused on patient-ventilator asynchrony detection and management for health-care professionals from 20 hospitals in Latin America and Spain. The training program included 6 h of a live online lesson during which 120 patient-ventilator asynchrony cases were presented. After the 6-h training lesson, health-care professionals were required to complete a 1-h training session per day for the subsequent 30 d. A 30-question assessment tool was developed and used to assess health-care professionals before training, immediately after the 6-h training lecture, and after the 30 d of training (1-month follow-up). RESULTS: One hundred sixteen health-care professionals participated in the study. The median (interquartile range) of the total number of correct answers in the pre-training, post-training, and 1-month follow-up were significantly different (12 [8.75-15], 18 [13.75-22], and 18.5 [14-23], respectively). The percentages of correct answers also differed significantly between the time assessments. Study participants significantly improved their performance between pre-training and post-training (P < .001). This performance was maintained after a 1-month follow-up (P = .95) for the questions related to the detection, determination of cause, and management of patient-ventilator asynchrony. CONCLUSIONS: A specific 36-h training program significantly improved the ability of health-care professionals to detect patient-ventilator asynchrony, determine the possible causes of patient-ventilator asynchrony, and properly manage different types of patient-ventilator asynchrony.