Percentage area reduction at week 4 as a prognostic indicator of complete healing in patients treated with standard of care: a post hoc analysis.

Early indicators of healing provide valuable information on the potential benefit of treatment. In patients with hard-to-heal (chronic) diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), timely intervention is critical. Ulcers that fail to show measurable progress within four weeks of treatment are considered recalcitrant. These ulcers increase the risk of soft tissue infection, osteomyelitis and lower extremity amputation. A prognostic indicator or surrogate marker allows for rapid evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety. An inverse correlation between a percentage area reduction (PAR) of ≤50% at week 4 and complete healing by week 12 has been previously established; however, the data were derived from a standard of care (SoC) arm of clinical trials that are over a decade old. In this post hoc analysis, data from a large multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial were reviewed to assess PAR at week 4 as a prognostic indicator in patients treated with SoC. Overall, 65.4% (17/26) of patients with PAR >50% at week 4 achieved complete closure at week 12. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for area reduction by week 4 showed strong discrimination for predicting non-healing (area under the ROC curve: 0.92; p<0.001; positive predictive value: 70.6%; negative predictive value: 87.2%). These findings are consistent with previous studies and support the use of four-week PAR as a prognostic indicator.

Concurrent Appendicitis and Meckel's Diverticulitis Presenting With Small Bowel Obstruction in an Adult: A Case Report.

We present a case of multiple abdominal pathologies occurring simultaneously, which emphasizes the importance of keeping a broad differential and evaluating each diagnosis. A 33-year-old female presented with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Her workup included computerized tomography which demonstrated acute appendicitis with concern for a closed-loop bowel obstruction. She was offered diagnostic laparoscopy with anticipation of laparoscopic appendectomy and further evaluation for the source of the bowel obstruction. At the time of surgery, a Meckel's diverticulum with acute diverticulitis was identified, in addition to an inflamed appendix. A small band near the base of the Meckel's diverticulum was found and divided. The appendix was treated with a laparoscopic appendectomy and the Meckel's diverticulum was resected. She did well in recovery and continued to do well at her follow-up appointment. This case emphasized the importance of a thorough evaluation of a patient's differential diagnosis, as it is possible for multiple pathologies to occur simultaneously.

Hexasodium fytate for the treatment of calciphylaxis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extension.

Background: In the CALCIPHYX trial, we investigated hexasodium fytate, an inhibitor of vascular calcification, for the treatment of calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis), a rare condition characterised by painful, non-healing skin lesions. Methods: In this international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with an ulcerated calciphylaxis lesion and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score ≥50/100 were randomised 1:1 to hexasodium fytate 7 mg/kg or placebo intravenously during maintenance haemodialysis. Primary efficacy outcomes were an 8-item modification of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT-CUA) and Pain VAS in the intention-to-treat population. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04195906. Findings: Overall, 34/37 patients randomised to hexasodium fytate and 26/34 patients randomised to placebo completed the 12-week randomised treatment period. At Week 12, both groups (hexasodium fytate versus placebo) showed similar improvements in BWAT-CUA (mean [standard deviation (SD)], -5.3 [5.2] versus -6.0 [6.2]; least squares mean difference, 0.3 [96% confidence interval (CI): -2.5, 3.0]; p = 0.88) and Pain VAS (mean [SD], -19.5 [26.9] versus -32.2 [38.5]; least squares mean difference, 11.5 [96% CI: -4.8, 27.8]; p = 0.15). One patient randomised to placebo briefly received hexasodium fytate in error. Serious adverse events through Week 12 included: calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation (2/38 [5%] versus 11/33 [33%]) and death (1/38 [3%] versus 5/33 [15%]). During the subsequent 12 weeks of open-label hexasodium fytate and 4 weeks of follow-up, there were no additional calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation. Over the course of the entire trial, deaths were 2/38 [5%] for the hexasodium fytate group and 7/33 [21%] for the placebo group. Interpretation: In patients with calciphylaxis, BWAT-CUA and Pain VAS improved similarly in hexasodium fytate- and placebo-treated patients; over the course of the entire trial, there were fewer deaths and calciphylaxis-related events leading to hospitalisation in the hexasodium fytate group. Funding: Funded by Sanifit, a CSL Vifor company.

Audit of Antimicrobial Prescribing Trends in 1447 Outpatient Wound Assessments: Baseline Rates and Impact of Bacterial Fluorescence Imaging.

Background/Objectives: In the field of wound care, the prescription of antibiotics and antimicrobials is haphazard and irrational, which has led to unchecked overprescribing. Recent Joint Commission guidelines mandate that hospital outpatient clinics develop and implement antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Yet few ASPs exist in wound clinics across the United States (US). Understanding baseline prescribing practices and rates in the US is a critical first step toward rational antimicrobial use and effective ASPs. Methods: This prospective study was conducted across eight outpatient wound clinics from January-December 2022. Data from consecutive patients attending single-time-point initial visits were recorded, including clinical findings, antimicrobial prescribing trends, and sampling practices. Results: A total of 1438 wounds were included; 964 were assessed by clinical examination (standard of care, SoC), and 474 by clinical examination plus fluorescence imaging. SoC patients were prescribed more concurrent medications on average than fluorescence patients (1.4 vs. 1 per patient). Prescriptions were preferentially topical in the fluorescence group (92% vs. 64%, p > 0.0001), and systemic antibiotics represented 36% of the single items prescribed under SoC (vs. 8% in fluorescence group p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Fluorescence imaging provided objective and actionable information at the bedside, which led to a decrease in the use of antibiotics. Real-time diagnostic technologies are essential in establishing a meaningful ASP.

Prospective derivation and validation of a NECROtizing Soft tissue InfectionS (NECROSIS) score: An EAST multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Although several risk indices have been developed to aid in the diagnosis of NSTIs, these instruments suffer from varying levels of reproducibility and failure to incorporate key clinical variables in model development. The objective of this study was to derive and validate a clinical risk index score - NECROSIS - for identifying NSTIs in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients being evaluated for severe skin and soft tissue infections. METHODS: We performed a prospective study across 16 sites in the US of adult EGS patients with suspected NSTIs over a 30-month period. Variables analyzed included demographics, admission vitals and labs, physical exam, radiographic, and operative findings. The main outcome measure was the presence of NSTI diagnosed clinically at the time of surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for the presence of NSTI using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the Akaike information criteria. RESULTS: Of 362 patients, 297 (82%) were diagnosed with a NSTI. Overall mortality was 12.3%. Multivariate analysis identified 3 independent predictors for NSTI: systolic blood pressure ≤ 120 mmHg, violaceous skin, and WBC ≥15 (x103/uL). Multivariate modelling demonstrated Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit (p = 0.9) with a c-statistic for the prediction curve of 0.75. Test characteristics of the NECROSIS score were similar between the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: NECROSIS is a simple and potentially useful clinical index score for identifying at-risk EGS patients with NSTIs. Future validation studies are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria, Level III.

A Diagnostic-Driven Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Combination of an Antibiofilm Agent and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Each year, millions of Americans develop truncal pressure ulcers (PUs) which can persist for months, years, or until the end of life. Despite the negative impact on quality of life and escalating costs associated with PUs, there is sparse evidence supporting validated and efficacious treatment options. As a result, treatment is based on opinion and extrapolation from other wound etiologies. The ideal reconstructive plan maximizes the patient's nutritional status, incorporates the basic tenets of wound bed preparation (debridement, offloading, proper moisture balance, reduction of bacterial burden), and employs diagnostics to guide therapeutic intervention. The use of combination therapies can potentially overcome several of the barriers to wound healing. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), a commonly used modality in the management of PUs, facilitates healing by stimulating the formation of granulation tissue and promoting wound contraction; however, NPWT alone is not always effective. Clinical studies examining microbial bioburden in PUs determined that most ulcers contain bacteria at levels that impede wound healing (>104 CFU/g). OBJECTIVE: Thus, we hypothesized that adding an anti-microbial agent to decrease both planktonic and biofilm bacteria in the wound would increase the efficacy of NPWT. METHOD: In this prospective study, twenty patients with recalcitrant PUs that previously failed NPWT were treated with a biofilm-disrupting agent (Blast-X, Next Science, Jacksonville, FL, USA) in combination with NPWT. Fluorescence imaging was used to follow bacterial burden and guide therapy. RESULTS: In total, 45% of the PUs reduced in size over the course of the four-week study, with a resolution of bacterial fluorescence in the NPWT dressing and wound bed seen in an average of three weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of an antibiofilm agent and NPWT reduced bacterial levels and improved wound healing in recalcitrant PUs.

A model for diabetic foot ulcer clinical trials on advanced therapies.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: TS is a consultant for Inotec AMD Ltd., UK. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

A double-blind trial comparing an antimicrobial combination to standard care in hard-to-heal wounds.

OBJECTIVE: Excessive numbers of bacteria in hard-to-heal wounds impede wound healing. Numerous topical antiseptics have demonstrated effectiveness in benchtop studies; however, few clinical studies have demonstrated efficacy in the target population: patients with hard-to-heal wounds. This study addressed the clinical efficacy of a novel antibiofilm cleanser and gel in reducing bacterial load and improving wound outcomes. METHOD: Hard-to-heal wounds were photographed, measured and evaluated for bacterial load using fluorescence imaging weekly for four weeks. The target ulcers were randomised to be cleaned and treated with either a synergistic antibiofilm cleanser and antibiofilm gel with standard of care (AMC-AMG + SoC) or normal saline wash and an amorphous gel with standard of care (NSS-HG + SoC). RESULTS: A Chi-squared test of independence determined that the relationship between the treatment and the patient reaching 40% percentage area reduction (PAR) in four weeks was not significant (χ2(1, n=54)=0.73; p=0.39 at a significance level of 0.05); however, there was a strong trend favouring the antibiofilm cleanser and gel. A significant reduction (p<0.05) in bacterial load was observed in the antibiofilm group. CONCLUSION: This randomised controlled double-blind proof-of-concept study suggests that the performance of antibiofilm agents in vivo is comparable to that in vitro studies.

Skin Pigmentation Impacts the Clinical Diagnosis of Wound Infection: Imaging of Bacterial Burden to Overcome Diagnostic Limitations.

Underrepresentation of diverse skin tones in medical education and providers' implicit racial bias drives inequities in wound care, such as disproportionally poor outcomes for Black patients. Diagnostic indicators (e.g., erythema) can present differently depending on skin pigmentation. This post hoc analysis of 350 chronic wounds from a prospective 14-site clinical trial aimed to determine how the perception of clinical signs and symptoms of infection (CSS) differs by patient skin tone and if fluorescence-imaging can offer a more objective diagnostic solution. Participants were grouped by skin tone (low, medium, high) as measured by the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) scale. CSS and total bacterial load (TBL) were compared across FSPC groups, along with sensitivity to detect TBL >104 CFU/g using CSS alone and combined with fluorescence-imaging. Erythema was reported less often with increasing FSPC score (p = 0.05), from 13.4% (low), to 7.2% (medium), to 2.3% (high), despite comparable bacterial loads (median = 1.8 × 106 CFU/g). CSS sensitivity in the high group (2.9%) was 4.8-fold to 8.4-fold lower than the low (p = 0.003) and medium groups (p = 0.04). Fluorescence-imaging significantly improved the detection of high bacterial load in each group, peaking in the high group at 12-fold over CSS alone. These findings underscore the threat of pervasive racialized health inequities in wound care, where missed diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria and infection could delay treatment, increasing the risk of complications and poor outcomes. Fluorescence-imaging is poised to fill this gap, at least in part, serving as a more objective and equitable indicator of wound bacteria. Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03540004 registered 16-05-2018.

Consenso de expertos sobre la eficacia clínica y directrices sobre la terapia de oxígeno transdérmico continuo para la cicatrización de las heridas complejas o difíciles de cicatrizar.

INTRODUCTION: Oxygen is pivotal for wound healing. Its lack or hypoxia can delay this process, especially in individuals with comorbidities, potentially resulting in complex or hard-to-heal wounds. The Colombian Association of Diabetes (ACD) and the Colombian Association of Internal Medicine (ACMI) collaborated with a diverse group of experts to provide recommendations on the efficacy and best practices of continuous transdermal oxygen therapy (TOTc) in the care of such wounds. METHOD: A modified Delphi technique was employed to obtain controlled feedback and responses. Experts from various disciplines engaged in reviewing and discussing numerous relevant scientific studies, focusing on the role of TOTc in treating chronic ulcers. RESULTS: Continuous transdermal oxygen therapy has proven to be an effective and safe treatment for chronic and/or hard-to-heal ulcers. This therapy directly addresses the wound's oxygen deficiency, providing an environment conducive to healing. Significant benefits were observed, including the acceleration of the healing process, wound size reduction, and an enhancement in patient quality of life. Its efficacy was found across various ulcer etiologies, underscoring its therapeutic versatility. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous transdermal oxygen therapy is effective and safe for treating chronic and hard-to-heal ulcers. It's crucial to address each case individually and through a multidisciplinary approach to maximize this therapy's benefits. Both evidence and clinical experience back its utility across a variety of ulcer etiologies.

RESUMEN: Introducción: El oxígeno es esencial en la cicatrización de heridas. Su ausencia o hipoxia puede retrasar este proceso, especialmente en individuos con comorbilidades, lo que podría resultar en heridas complejas o de difícil cicatrización. La Asociación Colombiana de Diabetes (ACD) y la Asociación Colombiana de Medicina Interna (ACMI) se unieron con un grupo diverso de expertos para brindar recomendaciones sobre la eficacia y práctica de la terapia de oxígeno transdérmico continuo (TOTc) en el cuidado de estas heridas. Método: Se utilizó la técnica Delphi modificada para obtener respuestas y retroalimentación controlada. Expertos de diversas disciplinas participaron en la revisión y discusión de numerosos estudios científicos relevantes, centrados en el papel de la TOTc en el tratamiento de úlceras crónicas. Resultados: El oxígeno transdérmico continuo ha demostrado ser una terapia eficaz y segura en el tratamiento de úlceras crónicas y/o de difícil cicatrización. Esta terapia aborda directamente la deficiencia de oxígeno en la herida, proporcionando un entorno propicio para la curación. Se observaron beneficios significativos, incluyendo aceleración del proceso de cicatrización, reducción del tamaño de la herida y mejora en la calidad de vida del paciente. Se encontró eficacia en diversas etiologías de úlceras, subrayando su versatilidad terapéutica. Conclusiones: La terapia de oxígeno transdérmico continuo es eficaz y segura para tratar úlceras crónicas y de difícil cicatrización. Es vital abordar cada caso de manera individualizada y mediante un enfoque multidisciplinario para maximizar los beneficios de esta terapia. La evidencia y experiencia clínica respaldan su utilidad en diversas etiologías de úlceras. Palabras clave: Terapia de oxígeno transdérmico continuo, Oxígeno, Pie diabético, Cicatrización de heridas, Cuidado de heridas, Úlceras vasculares, Lesiones por presión, Hipoxia, Infección.

The First In-Human Application of Continuous Low-Irradiance Phototherapy for Chronic Wounds: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Polymicrobial colonization and resultant biofilm formation significantly impair the process of wound healing. Stagnant tissue repair processes predispose patients to serious complications including systemic infection and limb amputation. Continuous Low-Irradiance Phototherapy (CLIP) is a novel therapeutic approach that delivers blue light at low irradiance for extended periods of time. Bench and preclinical work in the literature indicates that 405 nm light avoids thermal injury of healthy tissue, promotes a cytokine milieu favoring re-epithelialization and angiogenesis, and prevents bacterial and biofilm growth.  Objective: This is the first in-human evaluation of a technology that delivers continuous low-irradiance 405 nm light to chronic wounds. The objective of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and ergonomics of this device for the treatment of chronic wounds in adult human subjects. This was not a randomized study to determine device efficacy, although data on outcome were collected. METHODS: In this prospective observational pilot study, participants received the intervention 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, for 4 weeks. Cohort I was conducted from December 2018 to March 2019, with Cohorts II and III ongoing. 25 study participants were recruited by referral (Cohort I: 5 participants, Cohort II: 10 participants, Cohort III: 10 participants). Our primary endpoint was to monitor for safety, assess usability by nurses and physicians, and evaluate patient comfort. The secondary endpoint, although not randomized nor directly compared with standard intervention, was the percentage area reduction (PAR) of the wound.  Results: No adverse events or subject discomfort occurred with the CLIP intervention. The staff treating the study participants reported no ergonomic or compliance issues with the use of the device. The device received high scores in categories assessing practicality and ease of use. There was an average PAR of 29% (SD = 0.42).  Conclusion: This study serves as the first in-human evaluation of extended low-irradiance 405 nm light for chronic wound therapy. The device appears safe and easy to use and had no compliance issues in the outpatient setting. Study participants who received CLIP without interruption saw either partial or complete reduction in wound area.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11):1111-1117     doi:10.36849/JDD.7206.

A Clinical Trial Design for Evaluating Topical Antimicrobials in Chronic Wounds: The BLEU Trial.

Chronic wound management is a global challenge. Millions of patients suffer from nonhealing ulcers and health systems are overwhelmed by the growing demand for treatment. Despite the prevalence of chronic wounds, the emergence of wound centers and specialized physicians is a recent phenomenon. Likewise, clinical research in wound healing is in its infancy. To date, many of the products in wound care have little or no clinical evidence. The field needs standardized clinical trial design, endpoints recognized by clinicians and payers, and improved overall clinical evidence. Wound healing is impeded by the presence of bacterial biofilms, which exist in most chronic wounds. It is not surprising that biofilm disruption is the focus of wound management and essential to the healing process. Multiple laboratory and preclinical studies demonstrate promising efficacy of several antimicrobials in treating biofilms; however, the field lacks in vivo clinical studies. In addition, a standardized trial design to evaluate efficacy of antimicrobials in chronic wounds does not exist. The advent of new diagnostic technologies, such as fluorescence imaging, has led to clinical trial designs that are reliable, easier to conduct, and cost efficient. The protocol presented here describes a randomized controlled double-blind trial designed to evaluate antiseptics in chronic wounds.

Proceedings of the Leaders in Wound Healing conference.

SerenaGroup Research Foundation, New Orleans, 17-19 April 2023.

Clinical prediction models and risk tools for early detection of patients at risk of surgical site infection and surgical wound dehiscence: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in surgical techniques, intraoperative practice and a plethora of advanced wound therapies, surgical wound complications (SWCs), such as surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical wound dehiscence (SWD), continue to pose a considerable burden to the patient and healthcare setting. Predicting those patients at risk of a SWC may give patients and healthcare providers the opportunity to implement a tailored prevention plan or potentially ameliorate known risk factors to improve patient postoperative outcomes. METHOD: A scoping review of the literature for studies which reported predictive power and internal/external validity of risk tools for clinical use in predicting patients at risk of SWCs after surgery was conducted. An electronic search of three databases and two registries was carried out with date restrictions. The search terms included 'prediction surgical site infection' and 'prediction surgical wound dehiscence'. RESULTS: A total of 73 records were identified from the database search, of which six studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, the majority of validated risk tools were predominantly within the cardiothoracic domain, and targeted morbidity and mortality outcomes. There were four risk tools specifically targeting SWCs following surgery. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review have highlighted an absence of well-developed risk tools specifically for SSI and/or SWD in most surgical populations. This review suggests that further research is required for the development and clinical implementation of rigorously validated and fit-for-purpose risk tools for predicting patients at risk of SWCs following surgery. The ability to predict such patients enables the implementation of preventive strategies, such as the use of prophylactic antibiotics, delayed timing of surgery, or advanced wound therapies following a procedure.

Breast Implant Illness: A Cohort Study.

Background Breast implant illness (BII) is a clinical disease defined by a constellation of symptoms that patients experience as a result of their breast implants. This retrospective, cohort study evaluated the benefit of breast implant explantation with total capsulectomy on patients' symptoms. Methodology This is a single-center, single-arm, cohort study utilizing retrospectively collected data. All participants included in this study voluntarily presented to the department of plastic and reconstructive surgery and requested breast implant removal. A total of 229 patients were enrolled in the study over a three-year period from 2018 to 2021. The primary endpoints of the study were to objectively grade the improvement of symptomatology following surgical intervention. The secondary endpoints were to identify co-factors such as age, comorbidities, implant characteristics, the timing of symptoms, and other data that were potentially influenced by or influencers of the breast implant illness. Results The study achieved a total of 549-point decrease in symptom frequencies following surgery. Furthermore, with an average preoperative symptom score of 3.5 (scored 1-5) and a postoperative average of 1.9, the study demonstrated a score reduction of 1.6 across all symptoms. Furthermore, the study was able to eliminate on average 2.8 symptoms of breast implant illness from every patient following explantation. Conclusion Breast implant illness is a true clinical entity that affects an extensive population of patients who have undergone breast augmentation. This study has not only highlighted the extensive morbidity of breast implant illness but has also demonstrated that there is an opportunity to standardize treatment for this disease. These outcomes have proven that a significant reduction in disease severity can be achieved with breast implant explantation and total capsulectomy.

Point-of-care fluorescence imaging reveals extent of bacterial load in diabetic foot ulcers.

Elevated levels of bacteria, including biofilm, increase the risk of chronic wound infection and inhibit healing. Addressing asymptomatic high bacterial loads is challenged by a lack of clinical terminology and diagnostic tools. This post-hoc multicenter clinical trial analysis of 138 diabetic foot ulcers investigates fluorescence (FL)-imaging role in detecting biofilm-encased and planktonic bacteria in wounds at high loads. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical assessment and FL-imaging were compared across bacterial loads of concern (104 -109 CFU/g). Quantitative tissue culture confirmed the total loads. Bacterial presence was confirmed in 131/138 ulcers. Of these, 93.9% had loads >104 CFU/g. In those wounds, symptoms of infection were largely absent and did not correlate with, or increase proportionately with, bacterial loads at any threshold. FL-imaging increased sensitivity for the detection of bacteria across loads 104 -109 (P < .0001), peaking at 92.6% for >108 CFU/g. Imaging further showed that 84.2% of ulcers contained high loads in the periwound region. New terminology, chronic inhibitory bacterial load (CIBL), describes frequently asymptomatic, high bacterial loads in diabetic ulcers and periwound tissues, which require clinical intervention to prevent sequelae of infection. We anticipate this will spark a paradigm shift in assessment and management, enabling earlier intervention along the bacterial-infection continuum and supporting improved wound outcomes.