Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is really a good option?

INTRODUCTION: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (LUKA) account for only < 1% of all knee arthroplasties and for only 5-10% of all unicompartmental knee replacements. This means that there is less published literature on these procedures and that the surgeon's experience with them is smaller than with medial UKA. The aim of this study was to analyze the survival and the clinical-functional outcomes of LUKA according to the type of bearing surface (all-polyethylene versus metal-backed) used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 42 LUKAs operated between 2009 and 2021. Two fixed polyethylene-bearing models were used: the all-polyethylene ACCURIS knee (38%) and the metal-backed Triathlon PKR system (62%). Demographic parameters, knee range of motion (ROM), tibiofemoral alignment, implant survival (as estimated with the Kaplan-Meier curve), and clinical-functional outcomes (as measured with the Knee Society Score) were analyzed. RESULTS: Average patient age was 65.5 (range, 36-87) years and mean follow-up was 8.2 (range, 2.1-12.8) years. Thirty LUKAs (71.4%) were implanted in women. The main reason for performing a LUKA was osteoarthritis (88.1%). No patient developed post-surgical complications or had to be re-operated. Overall LUKA survival was 100% at 1-year and 5-year's follow-up. Knee Society Score, knee ROM and tibiofemoral alignment all improved significantly post-surgery (p < 0.001). The clinical Knee Society Score increased from 46.5 ± 14.5 pre-surgery to 93.5 ± 10.3 post-surgery, the functional Knee Society Score increased from 48.1 ± 13.5 pre-surgery to 94.6 ± 9.3 post-surgery, maximum flexion increased from 108.5 ± 8.7 degrees pre-surgery to 121 ± 8.9 degrees post-surgery and tibiofemoral alignment was corrected from 13.1 ± 1.74 degrees pre-surgery to 5.7 ± 0.8 degrees post-surgery. There were no statistically significant clinical-functional improvement or knee ROM differences between groups (p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: LUKA is a valid and definitive option for patients with lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, with a survival rate of > 95% at 5-years follow-up. Clinical-functional outcomes are the same, irrespective of the tibial component used.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: does the type of tibial component selected influence implant survival?

INTRODUCTION: Few information has been published on the survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and fixed-bearing tibial components. The aim of this study is to analyze if UKA survival varies according to UKA model used and to analyze the possible risk factors for UKA revision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study analyzing 301 UKAs (ACCURIS, all-polyethylene tibial component, 152; Triathlon PKR, metal-backed tibial component, 149) was performed. Demographic parameters as well as implant survival and cause of prosthetic revision were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log-rank test and the Cox multiple regression were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 8.1 ± 3.08-years. Average age was 68.1 ± 8.6-years; 70.4% of subjects were women. The ACCURIS UKA group had a UKA revision rate higher compared to the Triathlon PKR group (16/152, 10.6% vs 5/149, 3.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). The main cause of prosthetic revision was aseptic loosening (5/21, 23.8%). All aseptic loosening cases and tibial component collapse were reported with the ACCURIS UKA group. Overall UKA survival was 98.01% (95% CI 95.62-99.1) at 1-year, 94.27% (95% CI 90.95-96.4) at 5-years and 92.38% (95% CI 88.48-94.99) at 10-years' follow-up. There were no differences in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves regarding operated side or affected tibiofemoral compartment (log-rank test = 0.614 and 0.763, respectively). However, Kaplan-Meier survival curve according to UKA model used was different (log-rank test = 0.033). The metal-backed component appeared to be a protector factor for UKA revision when adjusted for age, sex, operated side, and affected tibiofemoral compartment (Hazard Ratio 0.32, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Fixed-bearing UKAs showed excellent mid- and long-term survival rates. Aseptic loosening is the main cause of implant failure. PKR group (metal-backed component) seem to be a protector factor to UKA revision when it was compared with ACCURIS UKA group (all-polyethylene tibial component).

Megaprosthesis use in Paprosky III/IV femoral defects in non-oncological patients: analysis of survival, clinical, and functional outcomes after an average follow-up of five years.

PURPOSE: To determine the survival and patient-reported outcomes in non-oncological patients treated with proximal femoral resection (PFR) using MEG for femoral reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 16 patients. Demographic variables and complications developed were analyzed. Clinical-functional outcomes were measured using the modified Harris score (mHSS), numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. MEG survival was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 5 years (range, 1-9). The 75% of patients were overweight and women with an average age of 74.2 ± 5.9-years (BMI of 28.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2). The main cause of MEG was periprosthetic infection (43.7%). The 50% of patients had post-surgical complications regarding with MEG, being the most frequent seromas and MEG dislocation. Implant survival was 93.4% and 80.9% at 3 and 7 years of follow-up, respectively. The functional results at the end of the follow-up with respect to the pre-surgical state improved from 9.5 ± 2.6 to 3 ± 0.9 mean NPRS and 26.5 ± 6.8 to 69.5 ± 13.5 mean mHHS, p < 0.001, respectively. The mean MSTS score was 68.1% that these results were considered excellent. CONCLUSIONS: The MEG for reconstruct III-IV femoral defects is a good therapeutic option that offers an acceptable clinical-functional result. Short-term and medium-term survival was greater than 80%. The most frequent complications are seromas and MEG dislocation. The use of constrained liner and abductor system reconstruction is essential to prevent the dislocation.

Short neck-preserving femoral stem for total hip arthroplasty: medium-term results of a 68-case series.

INTRODUCTION: Short stems seem to be a good alternative for young patients as they offer promising results, rapid recovery and preservation of metaphyseal bone stock. This is one of the few studies in the literature to report medium-term clinical-radiological results for short hip stems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study evaluated 68 short femoral stems in 63 patients treated with total hip replacement. Clinical, functional and quality-of-life outcomes were measured at 6 and 12 months, and annually thereafter until the end of follow-up. The radiological analysis included measurements of potential leg length discrepancies, stem alignment and signs compatible with stress shielding. RESULTS: Fifty-four males (59 hips) and nine females (9 hips) of an average age of 44.3 years (range, 25-68) were studied. The most common diagnosis was osteoarthritis (51.5%). Mean overall follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 5.8-9.8). The overall survival rate was 97.1% (95% CI 88.7-99.7%). Surgery resulted in an increase of 42.3 ± 1.1 points in the modified Harris Hip Score and 21.9 ± 0.6 points in the Oxford Hip Score (p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, the pain score as measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS) improved from 95.8 to 36.3. As regards function, an improvement was observed from 3.2 ± 0.8 points to 6.8 ± 1.14 points on the University of California at Los Angeles activity score (p < 0.001, respectively). The radiological analysis showed an absence of radiolucencies or stress-shielding throughout the series. The complications rate at the end of follow-up was 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultra-short cylindrical stems with complete anchorage in the femoral neck was shown to offer promising medium-term results. Such stems appear to be a good option for young patients, who are likely to require several revisions over their lifetime.

Effects of electrical stimulation in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of an internal electrostimulator could improve the results obtained with core decompression alone in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 41 patients (55 hips) treated for osteonecrosis of the femoral head between 2005 and 2014. Mean follow-up time was 56 (12-108) months. We recorded 3 parameters: time to recurrence of pain, time to conversion to arthroplasty and time to radiographic failure. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The equality of the survival distributions was determined by the Log rank test. RESULTS: Implanted electrostimulator was a factor that increased the survival of hips in a pre-op Steinberg stage of II or below, while it remained unchanged if the stage was III or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an internal electrostimulator provides increased survival compared to core decompression alone at stages below III.

Total Knee Arthroplasty After Failed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Results, Radiologic Findings, and Technical Tips.

BACKGROUND: The loss of anatomic references and bone stock turns unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision surgery difficult, and according to some authors, it is technically as challenging as a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of 559 Oxford medial UKA was performed between 2007 and 2013. Nineteen knees were revised to TKA for reasons other than infection, most commonly for osteoarthritis progression. RESULTS: The most frequent cause of failure in our series was osteoarthritis progression (10 cases, 52.63%). In 15 patients (78.95%), tibial stems were needed, and in 10 (55.5%), metallic blocks for augmentation of tibial plateau were used. Postoperative radiographic studies showed a correct implant alignment, preserving adequate joint line (24.8 mm), and patellar (1.1 mm) height (according to Insall-Salvati). After a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 6-51) mean values of 78.8 (standard deviation [SD] = 16.8) and 62.3 (SD = 19.6) were obtained for the physical and mental scores of the Knee Society Score test. In the SF-36 tests mean values of 45.2 (SD = 7.6) and 53 (SD = 5.2) were obtained for the physical and mental scores respectively. In one case, a varus/valgus instability occurred intraoperatively and it required revision with a prosthesis with higher constriction. No thromboembolic or infectious events were observed during postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: Following a standardized technique, UKA revision surgery can be achieved with TKA in almost every case despite bone stock loss and lack of anatomic landmarks.

Percutaneous iliosacral fixation in external rotational pelvic fractures. A biomechanical analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Although the gold standard in open book pelvic fractures remains the pubic symphysis (PS) plate fixation, the clinical outcomes are not satisfactory, despite the excellent anatomical reduction assessed radiologically. Some authors suggest that residual instability of the posterior pelvic elements may be responsible for the chronic pain and the early osteoarthritic changes in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the isolated posterior fixation with one or two iliosacral screws (ISSs) is sufficient to provide adequate stability for the treatment of Burgess Young APC-II (YB APC-II) type of pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: Biomechanical experimental study using 7 fresh human pelvises, where an YB APC-II pelvic injury was previously implemented. The isolated posterior fixation of the pelvic ring with 1 or 2 ISSs directed in the S1 vertebra body was analysed in each specimen following an axial load of 300N. The different displacement of the SIJ and of the PS were analysed in all three spatial axes, using the validated optical measurement system 3D PONTOS 5M. A multivariate version of Friedman test (non-parametric ANOVA for repeated measures) was performed. RESULTS: The isolated fixation of the SIJ with 1 ISS did not show any differences with respect to the intact pelvis (p=0.851). Regarding the PS, both type of fixations (with 1 or 2 ISSs) confirmed an acceptable correction and adequate control of the PS even though with some differences compared to the intact pelvis (p=0.01). The presence of the second ISS found not to offer any significant additional benefit. The three-dimensional analysis of the behaviour of the pelvic elements, in these two different types of fixation, did not show any statistical significant differences (p=0.645). CONCLUSION: The posterior fixation with ISS can represent an alternative option for treatment of pelvic injuries associated with rotational instability. Further prospective clinical studies are necessary to determine, the influence of the residual pubic symphysis mobility in the every day life, when the above-mentioned technique is applied.