Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Psychopharmacol ; 32(12): 1308-1318, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30255720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Binding studies have demonstrated that levels of the cannabinoid receptor type-1 are highest in the basal ganglia and cerebellum, two areas critical for motor control. However, no studies have systematically examined the dose-related effects of intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the primary cannabinoid receptor type-1 partial agonist in cannabis, on broad domains of psychomotor function in humans. AIMS: Therefore, three domains of psychomotor function were assessed in former cannabis users (cannabis abstinent for a minimum of three months; n=23) in a three test-day, within-subject, double-blind, randomized, cross-over, and counterbalanced study during which they received intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (placebo, 0.015 mg/kg, and 0.03 mg/kg). METHODS: Gross motor function was assessed via the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Motor Screening Task, fine motor control via the Lafayette Instrument Grooved Pegboard task, and motor timing via a Paced Finger-Tapping Task. In addition, the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery Rapid Visual Processing Task was utilized to determine whether delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced motor deficits were confounded by disruptions in sustained attention. RESULTS/OUTCOMES: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol resulted in robust dose-dependent deficits in fine motor control (Grooved Pegboard Task) and motor timing (Paced Finger-Tapping Task), while gross motor performance (Motor Screening Task) and sustained attention (Rapid Visual Processing Task) were unimpaired. Interestingly, despite the observed dose-dependent increases in motor impairment and blood levels of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, subjects reported similar levels of intoxication in the two drug conditions. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These data suggest that while several domains of motor function are disrupted by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, subjective feelings of intoxication are dissociable from cannabinoid-induced psychomotor effects. Results are discussed in terms of the potential neural mechanisms of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in motor structures.


Assuntos
Atenção/efeitos dos fármacos , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides/administração & dosagem , Dronabinol/administração & dosagem , Desempenho Psicomotor/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides/efeitos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides/farmacologia , Estudos Cross-Over , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Dronabinol/efeitos adversos , Dronabinol/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Neuropharmacology ; 135: 412-423, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29604295

RESUMO

Cannabis use has been associated with altered sensory gating and neural oscillations. However, it is unclear which constituent in cannabis is responsible for these effects, or whether these are cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) mediated. Therefore, the present study in humans and rats examined whether cannabinoid administration would disrupt sensory gating and evoked oscillations utilizing electroencephalography (EEG) and local field potentials (LFPs), respectively. Human subjects (n = 15) completed four test days during which they received intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), Δ9-THC + CBD, or placebo. Subjects engaged in a dual-click paradigm, and outcome measures included P50 gating ratio (S2/S1) and evoked power to S1 and S2. In order to examine CB1R specificity, rats (n = 6) were administered the CB1R agonist CP-55940, CP-55940+AM-251 (a CB1R antagonist), or vehicle using the same paradigm. LFPs were recorded from CA3 and entorhinal cortex. Both Δ9-THC (p < 0.007) and Δ9-THC + CBD (p < 0.004) disrupted P50 gating ratio compared to placebo, while CBD alone had no effect. Δ9-THC (p < 0.048) and Δ9-THC + CBD (p < 0.035) decreased S1 evoked theta power, and in the Δ9-THC condition, S1 theta negatively correlated with gating ratios (r = -0.629, p < 0.012 (p < 0.048 adjusted)). In rats, CP-55940 disrupted gating in both brain regions (p < 0.0001), and this was reversed by AM-251. Further, CP-55940 decreased evoked theta (p < 0.0077) and gamma (p < 0.011) power to S1, which was partially blocked by AM-251. These convergent human/animal data suggest that CB1R agonists disrupt sensory gating by altering neural oscillations in the theta-band. Moreover, this suggests that the endocannabinoid system mediates theta oscillations relevant to perception and cognition.


Assuntos
Ondas Encefálicas/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Moduladores de Receptores de Canabinoides/farmacologia , Receptor CB1 de Canabinoide/agonistas , Filtro Sensorial/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Animais , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Ondas Encefálicas/fisiologia , Cicloexanóis/farmacologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Dronabinol/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Piperidinas/farmacologia , Pirazóis/farmacologia , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Receptor CB1 de Canabinoide/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor CB1 de Canabinoide/metabolismo , Filtro Sensorial/fisiologia , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA