Risks, costs, and the expected complication of re-injury.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of young victims of violence and the risk of rehospitalization due to intentional injury (recidivism) and to estimate the potential cost of these injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trauma admissions from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1993, at San Francisco General Hospital of youths < 25 years old who were victims of gunshot wounds (GSWs), assault, and stab wounds were screened. Five hundred and fifty-two charts were reviewed after sampling every other chart. The cost of hospitalization was estimated from the Medicare charge-to-cost ratio. RESULTS: There were 87 (16%) persons who had a prior injury, of whom 82 (94%) had suffered their injury within the previous 5 years. The predominate mechanism of injury was GSW (242, 44%). There were 38 deaths; 35 (92%) were by firearms. The estimated cost of hospitalization for 552 youths for 3 years was $3,843,545.58. CONCLUSIONS: Intentional injury is a major risk factor and potential predictor for re-injury. Firearms are a major mechanism of intentional injury among youths and a major determinate of death. With the estimated cost of $2,562,363.72 per year for all youths at our hospital, intentional injury is a major health care issue for youths and hospitals.

Trauma centers in a managed care environment.

Health care reform will affect the relationship of trauma centers to health maintenance organizations and other managed care plans. We studied Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (Kaiser) members admitted to the Trauma Center at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) to determine: (1) variables predicting transfer from SFGH to a Kaiser Hospital (repatriation), (2) the length of hospital stay (LOS), and (3) the cost of their care. The SFGH trauma registry provided data on 7,794 patients admitted before 1994. To investigate LOS, 89 Kaiser patients over 1 year were matched with non-Kaiser patients on age, maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale score (MAIS) by body region, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head injury severity, and blunt or penetrating injury and disposition. Kaiser patients were significantly younger, more likely to have blunt injury, and had a lower death rate. Significant predictors of repatriation were an MAIS score > or = 3, abdominal or extremity injury, and an ISS score of 26 to 40. The mean LOS for all Kaiser patients was 7.6 days, compared with 4.8 for controls (p = 0.20). However, mean LOS was significantly longer in repatriated Kaiser patients compared with controls (16 vs. 7.8 days, p < 0.0005). Kaiser reimbursement rates were comparable with commercial payors, but higher than others. A relatively small number of severely injured patients account for a large percentage of costly trauma care. Analyses of patient subsets are necessary for trauma centers to negotiate suitable relationships with managed care plans. A prospective study is needed to examine the cost efficiency of early transfer of managed care patients.

Development of a surgical/trauma intermediate care unit.

During these times of escalating health care costs and increased demand for critical care beds, hospitals are often unable to provide the intensive level of nursing care that is required. One large urban trauma center found that 36% of the surgical intensive care unit patients required a level of nursing care intermediate between the intensive care unit and the general ward. A multidisciplinary team met to plan and develop a surgical/trauma intermediate care unit to provide this level of care. Goals, objectives, specific admission, discharge criteria, and administrative responsibility were determined. An educational program was developed based on a needs assessment of the staff. During the implementation phase and throughout the unit's operation, advanced practice nurses performed an integral role as resource personnel. The purpose of this paper is to describe the multidisciplinary process used in the development of a new unit and to highlight the advanced practice role in this activity.

Can adult trauma surgeons care for injured children?

Large urban trauma centers care for injured children as well as adults in many areas of the country, but the quality of care in these hospitals has not been evaluated versus that available at pediatric trauma centers. The recent validation of TRISS methodology in pediatric populations allowed us to evaluate the quality of pediatric trauma care being provided in a level I trauma center treating injured patients of all ages. We reviewed the records of 353 injured children (aged 0-17 years) who were admitted to our trauma center over a 30-month period for the following data: demographics, mechanism of injury, initial physiologic status (RTS), surgical procedures required, need for intensive care, nature and severity of the injuries (ISS), and outcome. TRISS analysis allowed us to compare our population with the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Only two of the 21 total deaths (overall mortality, 6%) were unexpected, and there were seven unexpected survivors. One hundred twenty-one patients underwent emergency surgical procedures and 63 required admission to the intensive care unit. The Z scores ranged from +0.32 for the children aged less than 2 years to +3.98 for the older age group (14-17 years). We conclude that the quality of care for pediatric trauma patients admitted to trauma centers that care for patients of all ages compares favorably with national standards. In most areas of the country, improvements in pediatric trauma care will likely come from addressing the special needs of injured children in general trauma centers rather than from developing separate pediatric facilities.

Safety of pre-hospital therapy with morphine sulfate.

The safety of prehospital pharmacologic therapy has not been well studied. The authors evaluated field use of morphine sulfate (MS) in San Francisco County over a 6-month period. Paramedics assessed patients for ischemic chest pain (ICP) and/or pulmonary edema (PE), made base hospital contact, and administered 2- to 4-mg doses of intravenous morphine according to treatment protocols. Clinical assessments and patient responses to therapy were recorded by both field paramedics and emergency department (ED) physicians. Safety was evaluated by determining the (1) accuracy of paramedic field assessment, (2) appropriateness of field administration of MS, and (3) therapeutic complications. During the study period, paramedics administered MS to 84 patients. In 69 cases paramedic assessment of either ICP and/or PE corresponded to ED physician diagnosis. In five cases paramedics correctly recognized ICP but missed physical findings of PE. In this group the paramedics' assessment was considered inaccurate but the judgement to give MS was considered appropriate. In the remaining 10 cases paramedics identified ICP or PE but the ED physician diagnosed a different condition. These assessments were considered inaccurate and the management inappropriate. Therefore, overall paramedic accuracy was 77% (true rate 73% to 82%, 95% confidence interval); appropriateness of therapy was 88% (true rate 85% to 92%, 95% confidence interval); and the overall complication rate was 6% (true rate 2% to 12%, 95% confidence interval). Complications of respiratory depression or hypotension occurred in only one of the cases in which MS was inappropriately administered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)