RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19, and factors that may be associated with increased acceptance, among US caregivers of various racial and ethnic identities who presented with their child to the Emergency Department (ED) after emergency use authorization of vaccines for children ages 5-11. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey of caregivers presenting to 11 pediatric EDs in the United States in November-December 2021. Caregivers were asked about their identified race and ethnicity and if they planned to vaccinate their child. We collected demographic data and inquired about caregiver concerns related to COVID-19. We compared responses by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression models served to determine factors that were independently associated with increased vaccine acceptance overall and among racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: Among 1916 caregivers responding, 54.67% planned to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Large differences in acceptance were noted by race/ethnicity, with highest acceptance among Asian caregivers (61.1%) and those who did not specify a listed racial identity (61.1%); caregivers identifying as Black (44.7%) or Multi-racial (44.4%) had lower acceptance rates. Factors associated with intent to vaccinate differed by racial/ethnic group, and included caregiver COVID-19 vaccine receipt (all groups), caregiver concerns about COVID-19 (White caregivers), and having a trusted primary provider (Black caregivers). CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver intent to vaccinate children against COVID-19 varied by race/ethnicity, but race/ethnicity did not independently account for these differences. Caregiver COVID-19 vaccination status, concerns about COVID-19, and presence of a trusted primary provider are important in vaccination decisions.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Etnicidade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Cuidadores , Estudos Transversais , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Caregiver attitudes toward mandating COVID-19 vaccines for their children are poorly understood. We aimed to determine caregiver acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools/daycares and assess if opposition to mandates would result in removal of children from the educational system. STUDY DESIGN: Perform a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of adult caregivers with children ≤ 18 years presenting to 21 pediatric emergency departments in the United States, Canada, Israel, and Switzerland, November 1st through December 31st, 2021. The primary outcome was caregiver acceptance rates for school vaccine mandates, and the secondary outcomes included factors associated with mandate acceptance and caregiver intention to remove the child from school. RESULTS: Of 4,393 completed surveys, 37% of caregivers were opposed to any school vaccine mandate. Caregiver acceptance was lowest for daycare settings (33%) and increased as the child's level of education increased, college (55%). 26% of caregivers report a high likelihood (score of 8-10 on 0-10 scale) to remove their child from school if the vaccine became mandatory. Child safety was caregivers' greatest concern over vaccine mandates. A multivariable model demonstrated intent to vaccinate their child for COVID-19 (OR = 8.9, 95% CI 7.3 to 10.8; P < 0.001) and prior COVID-19 vaccination for the caregiver (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.9; P < 0.001) had the greatest odds of increasing mandate acceptance for any school level. CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers are resistant to COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools, and acceptance varies with school level. One-fourth of caregivers plan to remove their child from the educational system if vaccines become mandated.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Cuidadores , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estados Unidos , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Every heatlhcare encounter is an opportunity to provide both acute care and health maintenance to children. A Clinical Decision Support (CDS) intervention was instituted in a tertiary pediatric health system to improve influenza vaccination rates during the 2019-2020 season among eligible children receiving care in an acute care inpatient healthcare setting. This study explores reasons for low vaccine uptake following implementation of a CDS aimed at improving vaccine administration as well as identifying possible solutions to improve flu vaccine coverage.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Criança , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Pacientes Internados , Estações do Ano , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Importance: Hospitalized children are at increased risk of influenza-related complications, yet influenza vaccine coverage remains low among this group. Evidence-based strategies about vaccination of vulnerable children during all health care visits are especially important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To design and evaluate a clinical decision support (CDS) strategy to increase the proportion of eligible hospitalized children who receive a seasonal influenza vaccine prior to inpatient discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted among children eligible for the seasonal influenza vaccine who were hospitalized in a tertiary pediatric health system providing care to more than half a million patients annually in 3 hospitals. The study used a sequential crossover design from control to intervention and compared hospitalizations in the intervention group (2019-2020 season with the use of an intervention order set) with concurrent controls (2019-2020 season without use of an intervention order set) and historical controls (2018-2019 season with use of an order set that underwent intervention during the 2019-2020 season). Interventions: A CDS intervention was developed through a user-centered design process, including (1) placing a default influenza vaccine order into admission order sets for eligible patients, (2) a script to offer the vaccine using a presumptive strategy, and (3) just-in-time education for clinicians addressing vaccine eligibility in the influenza order group with links to further reference material. The intervention was rolled out in a stepwise fashion during the 2019-2020 influenza season. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of eligible hospitalizations in which 1 or more influenza vaccines were administered prior to discharge. Results: Among 17â¯740 hospitalizations (9295 boys [52%]), the mean (SD) age was 8.0 (6.0) years, and the patients were predominantly Black (n = 8943 [50%]) or White (n = 7559 [43%]) and mostly had public insurance (n = 11â¯274 [64%]). There were 10â¯997 hospitalizations eligible for the influenza vaccine in the 2019-2020 season. Of these, 5449 (50%) were in the intervention group, and 5548 (50%) were concurrent controls. There were 6743 eligible hospitalizations in 2018-2019 that served as historical controls. Vaccine administration rates were 31% (n = 1676) in the intervention group, 19% (n = 1051) in concurrent controls, and 14% (n = 912) in historical controls (P < .001). In adjusted analyses, the odds of receiving the influenza vaccine were 3.25 (95% CI, 2.94-3.59) times higher in the intervention group and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.15-1.42) times higher in concurrent controls than in historical controls. Conclusions and Relevance: This quality improvement study suggests that user-centered CDS may be associated with significantly improved influenza vaccination rates among hospitalized children. Stepwise implementation of CDS interventions was a practical method that was used to increase quality improvement rigor through comparison with historical and concurrent controls.
Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Alta do Paciente , Cobertura Vacinal , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Cross-Over , Humanos , Pandemias , Seleção de Pacientes , Pediatria , SARS-CoV-2 , Estações do Ano , VacinaçãoRESUMO
Acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI) is a cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis presenting with purpura, ecchymosis, fever, and edema. Pediatricians must effectively differentiate AHEI from other diseases that have similar presentations but are more severe in order to treat appropriately without overutilizing expensive, unnecessary diagnostic tests. In this article, we describe a case of a 6-month-old previously well male who presented to our institution with a worsening rash and fever. In this case, the patient's age and benign clinical manifestations without systemic involvement favored the diagnosis of AHEI over more serious conditions. This case is a valuable example of the clinical findings of AHEI and the effectiveness of conservative therapy once a diagnosis is made for pediatricians, especially emergency and urgent care physicians.