RESUMO
Background Dental age estimation plays an enormous role in the determination of an individual's identity and age in forensic and anthropological fields. The estimation of the chronological age of the individual is also important in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment outcomes in the dental field. The third molar has some inimitable characteristics in terms of its size, shape, formation, and long path of eruption and usually erupts after puberty, which seems to be a reliable method of age estimation in adulthood. To establish the individual's identity, inference of age has gained considerable attention in forensics, and the aspect of dentistry has broadened nowadays. Thus the present study was conducted. Methodology The digital orthopantomograms of 720 patients who were exposed to X-rays for routine examination were assessed, and calcification of the tooth was observed. In order to ensure the blinding of the examiners, radiographs were numerically coded. Clinical stages of the tooth were categorised into erupted, pre-erupted, and missing. Statistical analysis was performed by IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with a level of significance set below 5%. Results The age of the patients whose OPGs were assessed ranged from 6 to 22 years, with a mean age of 18.93±3.129 years. Among the 720 participants, 370 (51.4%) were male and 350 (48.6%) were female. When the clinical status of the third molar among all the participants was assessed, in 148 (20.6%) subjects, third molars had erupted; in 188 (26.1%) subjects, the third molars were in the pre-erupted stage; and in 384 (53.30%), third molars were missing. When comparing the clinical status of the third molar in both arches and between genders, it was found that missing molars were common in females and the mandible arch, with statistically significant p-values. A comparison of Demirjian's stages between genders showed that the mean age to attain stage H was 21.37±0.774 years among males and 21.69±0.616 years among females. This means that the calcification of third-molar attainment occurs earlier in males compared with females. In a similar comparison between the upper and lower arches, it was found that calcification of the third molar was attained earlier in the maxillary arch compared to the mandibular arch. Conclusion It was concluded that the third molar is a versatile tooth and its path of mineralization can be used in orthodontics, pedodontics, and forensics to estimate chronological age, and chronological age significantly follows Demirjian's stages of third molar calcification. Third molar calcification occurred earlier in the maxillary arch and males, whereas several impacted molars were higher in females.
RESUMO
Background The use of lasers has increased in the field of dentistry in recent years. However, in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, the use of lasers has been largely restricted to soft tissue, and less focus is placed on the use of lasers for hard tissues. Aim The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of a erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser for cutting the bone while removing the impacted mandibular third molar with the use of a surgical bur. Methods The study assessed 80 subjects undergoing removal of impacted mandibular third molars. The subjects were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Luxmi Bai Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India. They were randomly divided into two groups, each consisting of 40 subjects. Group I used an Er:YAG laser to remove the bone, while Group II used a surgical bur. Assessments and comparisons were made for complications, wound healing, trismus, edema, bleeding, and pain. Results The study examined the efficacy of the Er:YAG laser for cutting the bone and extracting the impacted mandibular third molars using a surgical bur in two groups of 80 patients each. When the laser was used in place of a surgical bur, Group I patients experienced less edema, bleeding, and discomfort; nevertheless, the difference was not statistically significant. Time taken by laser for bone cutting was significantly higher compared to the surgical bur. In Group I (laser), trismus existed for a longer time. For mouth opening, the preoperative mouth opening was comparable in the two groups with p = 0.87. Conclusion Pain, hemorrhage, and edema were lesser, and the time required for bone cutting was substantially longer in the laser group. Apart from these, laser-assisted intra-oral bone cutting should be preferred because of its less invasive nature, simpler procedure, and simpler osteotomy when compared to traditional surgical burs and also in anxiety-prone patients.