Dynamical effects of memristive electromagnetic induction on a 2D Wilson neuron model.

Electromagnetic induction plays a crucial impact on the firing activity of biological neurons, since it exists along with the mutual effect between membrane potential and ions transport. Flux-controlled memristor is an available candidate in characterizing the electromagnetic induction effect. Different from the previously reported literature, a non-ideal flux-controlled memristor with cosine mem-conductance function is employed to determine the periodic magnetization and leakage flux processes in neurons. Thereafter, a three-dimensional (3D) memristive Wilson (m-Wilson) neuron model is constructed under the consideration of this kind of electromagnetic induction. Numerical simulations are performed by multiple numerical tools, which demonstrate that the 3D m-Wilson neuron model can generate abundant firing activities. Interestingly, coexisting firing activities, antimonotonicity, and firing frequency regulation are discovered under special parameter settings. Furthermore, a PCB-based analog circuit is designed and hardware measurements are executed to verify the numerical simulations. These explorations in numerical and hardware surveys might provide insights to regulate the firing activities by appropriate electromagnetic induction.

Fission yeast CK1 promotes DNA double-strand break repair through both homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining.

The CK1 family are conserved serine/threonine kinases with numerous substrates and cellular functions. The fission yeast CK1 orthologues Hhp1 and Hhp2 were first characterized as regulators of DNA repair, but the mechanism(s) by which CK1 activity promotes DNA repair had not been investigated. Here, we found that deleting Hhp1 and Hhp2 or inhibiting CK1 catalytic activities in yeast or in human cells activated the DNA damage checkpoint due to persistent double-strand breaks (DSBs). The primary pathways to repair DSBs, homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, were both less efficient in cells lacking Hhp1 and Hhp2 activity. In order to understand how Hhp1 and Hhp2 promote DSB repair, we identified new substrates using quantitative phosphoproteomics. We confirmed that Arp8, a component of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex, is a bona fide substrate of Hhp1 and Hhp2 that is important for DSB repair. Our data suggest that Hhp1 and Hhp2 facilitate DSB repair by phosphorylating multiple substrates, including Arp8.