Hemodynamics: Strangers to Lung-kidney Crosstalk in ARDS?

How to cite this article: Magoon R, Sharma AG, Yadav N, Choupoo NS. Hemodynamics: Strangers to Lung-kidney Crosstalk in ARDS? Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(2):177-178.

Comparison of Ultrasound Examination and Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy for Confirmation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare ultrasound (US) examination and fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) for confirmation of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) placement. 2) To evaluate the necessity for reinsertion of LMA based on FOL. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 100 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II, undergoing elective surgery under General Anesthesia requiring Proseal LMA™ placement as an airway device. LMA placement was first confirmed by clinical tests. Clinically acceptable patients were further assessed by US and categorized as acceptable (US-A) or unacceptable (US-U) and again by FOL as (FOL-A and FOL-U). Categorical variables presented in number, percentage (%), and continuous variables presented as mean ± SD and median. Inter-rater kappa agreement was used to find out the strength of agreement of acceptability between FOL and US. RESULTS: The LMA placement was clinically acceptable in 82% of patients on first attempt. FOL had 63% (FOL-A) acceptable LMA placement as compared with US examination which had 56% (US-A). In 85% of patients, US and FOL findings were in good agreement with each other for LMA placement (κ = 0.690 and P < .05). In all patients of FOL of unacceptable (FOL-U) category (37%), LMA was replaced with endotracheal tube. CONCLUSION: US provides a safe, non-invasive, and real-time dynamic assessment with 85% diagnostic accuracy for confirmation of LMA placement as compared with FOL.

Comparison of Awareness of Patient Parameters between Two Groups of Caregivers in Intensive Care Unit.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The overlap in the scope of duties performed by two core groups of Intensive Care Unit caregivers, the doctors and nurses may lead to gaps in awareness of patient-related parameters among them. Our study tested the hypothesis that there is no difference in the awareness of patient-related parameters between the two study groups (doctors and nurses). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire-based study, incorporating various aspects of a patient's medical care was designed. Pro forma for 100 patients was filled by doctors and nurses divided into two groups of 100 each (50 junior residents [JRs] and 50 senior residents [SRs] in the doctors' group). Statistical analysis of categorical data was done by Chi-squared test and interval data by t-test. A subgroup analysis was done for comparison between nurses SRs and JRs as independent groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (doctors and nurses) in terms of percentage of correct responses in the questionnaire (P = 0.655). A highly significant difference between the knowledge of SRs and nurses was found with a P = 0.0001. P < 0.0001 was calculated for the SRs versus JRs which was highly significant. CONCLUSIONS: As a group, doctors (SRs and JRs) did not reflect any difference in awareness of patient-related parameters when compared to nurses. However, SRs were more knowledgeable about the patient-related parameters when compared independently with the JRs and the nurses.

Leg amputation: A rare complication of intra-aortic balloon pump.

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a bridge to definitive management in a patient with compromised systolic function. It is a life-saving mechanical support to the failing myocardium. It is a procedure that should be employed judiciously with utmost caution. In this correspondence, we aim to highlight a rather serious complication associated with IABP use. A patient with triple vessel disease was posted for coronary artery bypass grafting with poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction 30%) and previous myocardial infarction 4 months back. An IABP was inserted in the left femoral artery following which he developed irreversible ischemia of the left lower limb leading to amputation of the limb. This catastrophic complication is one of the most dreaded impediments in the use of IABP. The clinician needs to weigh the pros and cons carefully and employ this vital procedure only when its use is explicitly justified.

An account of the anesthetist's vigilance and prevention of adversity during donor nephrectomy.

Here, we present the case of a 42 year old female patient, ASA1 and donor for renal transplant surgery of her husband. The pre-anesthesia visit did not reveal any co-morbidity on history and the physical examination was also within normal limits. The patient was taken to the operating room and routine monitoring in the form of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), SpO2 probe and five lead electrocardiogram were applied. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 1mg intravenous (i/v), fentanyl 100 µg i.v, propofol 100mg i/v and vecuronium bromide 5 mg. i/v. At the end of surgery, anesthesia was reversed and breathing attempts were observed. Suddenly the monitor displayed a drop in the ETCO2 to 5-6 mmHg. Immediately the ventilator circuit was checked which was found to be in place and on chest auscultation, bilateral equal air entry was heard. Sudden bradycardia with heart beat dropping to 32 beats per minute and a blood pressure reading of 90/50 mmHg was displayed on the monitor. Surgeons were informed about the possibility of an intra-abdominal bleed. On surgical exploration, the renal artery pedicle ligature was found to have slipped away resulting in torrential amount of bleeding. The bleeder having been identified was secured and a complete inspection of other possible bleeding sites was done. Post operatively, the patient was shifted to the intensive care unit with inotropic support. It was decided to keep the patient mechanically ventilated on volume control mode of ventilation. The patient remained stable on post-operative day 5, the patient was shifted to the ward.

Inadvertent high spinal anesthesia as sequelae to epidural injection of normal saline.

Here we present a case of high spinal blockade in a patient belonging to ASA Grade I which lead to need for endotracheal intubation. A 35 year old healthy male, weighing 59 kg, of height 165 cms presented with a post traumatic raw area over the left lower limb. A reverse sural graft along with skin grafting (from the thigh) was planned. In OR, the patient was placed in sitting position and the extradural space was identified by 'loss of resistance to air' technique at the L2-L3 intervertebral space. The catheter could not be threaded into the extradural space, hence 5ml of 0.9% saline was injected. However, still the catheter could not be negotiated. Further attempts to identify the extradural space at the L1-L2 and L3-L4 interspace levels were made. During these attempts a total of 18 ml of 0.9% saline was injected into the extradural space. Within 2 minutes blood pressure fell to 90/60 mmHg. Injection mephenteramine (3 mg) was given intravenously and a slight head up tilt was applied. After 2 more minutes the patient started complaining of tingling in his hands and difficulty in breathing. Oxygen 100% was administered via a face mask attached to the anesthesia circle system. In view of onset of respiratory failure, general anesthesia was induced. Thiopentone (200 mg) and Suxamethonium (75 mg) were given intravenously, the patient's trachea was intubated and his lungs ventilated with 40% oxygen, 60% nitrous oxide and 0.2-0.4% Isoflurane, without additional neuromuscular blockade. The arterial saturation promptly returned to 97% and, immediately after intubation, the heart rate was found to be 103 beats/min and the arterial BP 162/102 mmHg. At the end of surgery, spontaneous ventilation returned and the patient was allowed to breathe 100% oxygen via the tracheal tube until he awoke, when his trachea was extubated.