Uptake of self-management strategies in a heart failure management programme.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary heart failure programs including patient education and self-management strategies such as daily recording of body weight and use of a patient diary decrease hospital readmissions and improve quality of life. However, the degree of uptake of individual components of these programs and their contribution to patient benefit are uncertain. METHODS: Patients with heart failure admitted to Auckland Hospital were randomised into the management or usual care groups of the Auckland heart failure management study (AHFMS). Patients in the management group were given a heart failure diary for the recording of daily weights, attended a heart failure clinic and were encouraged to attend three education sessions. Patients in the usual care group received routine clinical care, mainly from general practitioners. Patients were followed to 12 months. This study investigated the uptake of self-management by assessing diary use and self-weighing behaviour in the group receiving the heart failure intervention, and compared the level of knowledge of heart failure self-management of the management group to the control group after 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 197 patients in the AHFMS, 100 patients were included in the management group and received a diary and education about heart failure self-management including monitoring weight daily. Of these patients, 76 patients used the diary. These patients were on more medication; were more likely to attend the education sessions, heart failure clinic, and primary care, and had a lower mortality rate over the course of the study. Variables independently associated with use of the diary included less severe symptoms (OR 15, 95% confidence intervals 1.7, 144), frequent attendance at the heart failure clinic (OR 15, 95% CI 3, 78) and attendance at an education session (OR 8, 95% CI 1.5, 42). Of the 76 patients who used the diary, 51 weighed themselves regularly. More of these patients owned scales at home; they were also more likely to attend the education sessions, and experienced fewer hospital admissions than those patients who did not weigh themselves regularly. Variables independently associated with regular self-weighing included the presence of scales at home (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.7, 14.1), left ventricular ejection fraction >30% (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.1, 17.5), and attendance at the education session(s) (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.7, 14.1). Patients in the management group exhibited higher levels of knowledge at 12 months of follow-up and were more likely to monitor their condition using daily weighing, compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: At 12 months of follow-up, implementation of self-management strategies including daily weight monitoring and level of education on self-management was significantly higher in the management group than the control group. For the patients in the management group, not using the diary or inability to perform daily weighing were associated with less frequent attendance at the heart failure clinic and education sessions and poorer health outcomes. In this study, attendance at the education sessions was associated with the adoption of self-management, underlining the importance of education in multidisciplinary heart failure programmes. Self-weighing could be increased by provision of scales to all patients. The subset of patients who did not adopt self-management strategies in this study were at high risk of death or readmission.

Factors influencing the length of hospital stay of patients with heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is characterised by frequent hospital admissions and prolonged length of hospital stay. Admissions for HF have increased over the last decade while length of stay has decreased; the reasons for this change in length of stay are uncertain. This study investigates the effect of patient-related variables, in-hospital progress and complications on length of stay. METHODS: Patients admitted to Auckland Hospital general medical service and randomised into the Auckland Heart Failure Management Programme were included in this study. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients were included in this study. Mean age 73 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 32%; 52% had one or more previous HF admissions and 75% were New York Heart Association class IV at admission. Median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR 4, 9) which is comparable to the national average from New Zealand admission databases. Longer than average length of stay, defined as >6 days, was associated with the presence of peripheral congestion, duration of treatment with intravenous diuretic, the development of renal impairment, other acute medical problems at admission, iatrogenic complications during hospital stay, and social problems requiring intervention. Factors independently associated with length of stay in the top quartile (>10 days) on logistic regression included the presence of oedema at admission (OR 10.5), change in weight during stay (OR 1.3), duration of treatment with iv diuretic (OR 7.5), the development of renal impairment (OR 9.8), concurrent respiratory problems requiring specific treatment (OR 3.8), and social problems requiring intervention (OR 6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral congestion, concomitant acute medical problems requiring specific treatment, the development of renal impairment and the presence of social problems were related to a longer than average length of hospital stay. Multivariate models only partly explained variance in hospital stay, suggesting the importance of pre-admission and post-discharge factors, including the healthcare environment, the availability of primary and secondary care resources, and the threshold for hospital admission.

Randomized, controlled trial of integrated heart failure management: The Auckland Heart Failure Management Study.

AIMS: To determine the effect of an integrated heart failure management programme, involving patient and family, primary and secondary care, on quality of life and death or hospital readmissions in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This trial was a cluster randomized, controlled trial of integrated primary/secondary care compared with usual care for patients with heart failure. The intervention involved clinical review at a hospital-based heart failure clinic early after discharge, individual and group education sessions, a personal diary to record medication and body weight, information booklets and regular clinical follow-up alternating between the general practitioner and heart failure clinic. Follow-up was for 12 months. One hundred and ninety-seven patients admitted to Auckland Hospital with an episode of heart failure were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups for the combined end-point of death or hospital readmission. The physical dimension of quality of life showed a greater improvement in the intervention group from baseline to 12 months compared with the control group (-11.1 vs -5.8 respectively, 2 P=0.015). The main effect of the intervention was attributable to the prevention of multiple admissions (56 intervention group vs 95 control group, 2 P=0.015) and associated reduction in bed days. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated management programme for patients with chronic heart failure improved quality of life and reduced total hospital admissions and total bed days.

Matching the standards of clinical trial evidence with application in practice.

A high standard of proof of efficacy and safety is required in clinical trials. This standard requires careful translation into practice, combining an evidence-based approach with clinical experience and judgment to maximise patient benefits and minimise harms. The tendency to extend application of new treatments to patient groups other than those for whom reliable data exist should be avoided. Equally, extrapolation of the data to agents of the same class untested for particular indications should not occur. If the considerable potential benefits of modern cardiovascular therapeutics are to be maximised and harms avoided, clinicians should observe these principles carefully as new treatments become accessible and are applied.

Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: the case in medical genetics.

There is a consensus among medical geneticists that it is desirable to recontact patients as new information becomes available. Furthermore, some have suggested that there are legal arguments to support an obligation, creating a duty to recontact. Thus far much of the discussion among medical geneticists has focused on the practical concerns of implementing such a policy. However, we think that any such policy raises a number of important ethical concerns that must first be considered. Furthermore, there has not been a careful evaluation of the legal precedents that may reflect on a hypothetical duty to recontact. In this paper we first present an analysis of the scope of approaches and issues to be addressed in the development of ethical policy on this question. Secondly, we examine whether there is a legal obligation to recontact former patients about advances in genetics, as well as the legal implications if such a policy were to be adopted. Finally, we consider some of the functional and resource implications of adopting a policy of recontact. Our goal is to provide a framework for further discussion of this question and to stimulate further debate and research.

Effects of improved glycaemic control on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes have abnormal endothelial function but it is not certain whether improvements in glycaemic control will improve endothelial function. AIMS: To examine the effects of short-term improved glycaemic control on endothelial function in patients with inadequately regulated type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Forty-three patients with type 2 diabetes and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 8.9% were randomized to either improved glycaemic control (IC) n = 21 or usual glycaemic control (UC) n = 22 for 20 weeks. Using high-resolution B-mode ultrasound, brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and glyceryl trinitrate-mediated dilatation (GTN-D) were measured at baseline and 20 weeks later. RESULTS: After 20 weeks, HbA1c was significantly lower in IC versus UC (IC 8.02 +/- 0.25% versus UC 10.23 +/- 0.23%, P < 0.0001) but changes in FMD and GTN-D were not different between the groups (FMD at baseline and week 20 IC 5.1 +/- 0.56% versus 4.9 +/- 0.56% and UC 4.2 +/- 0.51% versus 3.1 +/- 0.51%; P = 0.23: GTN-D IC 12.8 +/- 1.34% versus 10.4 +/- 1.32% and UC 13.7 +/- 1.2% versus 12.7 +/- 1.23%; P = 0.39). In the IC group weight increased by 3.2 +/- 0.8 kg after 20 weeks compared to 0.02 +/- 0.70 kg in UC (P = 0.003). Blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations did not change in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term reduction of HbA1c levels did not appear to affect endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and previously poorly regulated glycaemic control.

Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

BACKGROUND: The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)). METHODS AND RESULTS: An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

Factors determining non-attendance at a cardiac rehabilitation programme following myocardial infarction.

AIM: To identify factors contributing to patient nonattendance at an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme following hospital admission for a first myocardial infarction. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted over a two year period to the Auckland or Green Lane Hospital Coronary Care Units for a first myocardial infarction were identified. All patients had been invited to attend the cardiac rehabilitation programme during their admission. A questionnaire was mailed to all identified patients. RESULTS: Overall 324 patients were identified with a mean age of 61 years, of whom 212 (65%) subsequently attended the cardiac rehabilitation programme. 220 of the 324 patients (68%) responded to the questionnaire. Univariate analysis revealed that non-attenders were less well educated (p <0.05), more often from a lower socioeconomic status (p<0.05) and lived alone (p<0.05). Non-attendance and withdrawal from the programme were most frequently related to transport and inconvenient scheduling. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with less education, lower socioeconomic status and patients living alone were less likely to attend a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Provision of a transport service and more flexible scheduling of the programme may improve attendance.

Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and adrenomedullin: prognostic utility and prediction of benefit from carvedilol in chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Australia-New Zealand Heart Failure Group.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess plasma concentrations of the amino (N)-terminal portion of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) and adrenomedullin for prediction of adverse outcomes and responses to treatment in 297 patients with ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who were randomly assigned to receive carvedilol or placebo. BACKGROUND: Although neurohormonal status has known prognostic significance in heart failure, the predictive power of either N-BNP or adrenomedullin in chronic ischemic LV dysfunction has not been previously reported. METHODS: Plasma N-BNP and adrenomedullin were measured in 297 patients with chronic ischemic (LV) dysfunction before randomization to carvedilol or placebo, added to established treatment with a converting enzyme inhibitor and loop diuretic (with or without digoxin). The patients' clinical outcomes, induding mortality and heart failure events, were recorded for 18 months. RESULTS: Above-median N-BNP and adrenomedullin levels conferred increased risks (all p < 0.001) of mortality (risk ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 4.67 [2-10.9] and 3.92 [1.76-8.7], respectively) and hospital admission with heart failure (4.7 [2.2-10.3] and 2.4 [1.3-4.5], respectively). Both of these predicted death or heart failure independent of age, New York Heart Association functional class, LV ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction or previous admission with heart failure. Carvedilol reduced the risk of death or heart failure in patients with above-median levels of N-BNP or adrenomedullin, or both, to rates not significantly different from those observed in patients with levels below the median value. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with established ischemic LV dysfunction, plasma N-BNP and adrenomedullin are independent predictors of mortality and heart failure. Carvedilol reduced mortality and heart failure in patients with higher pre-treatment plasma N-BNP and adrenomedullin.

Does intention-to-treat analysis answer all questions in long-term mortality trials? Considerations on the basis of the ANZ trial.

AIMS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses are the gold standard in endpoint analyses of randomized clinical trials. Valuable information, however, may be lost in this approach as the actual time on trial medication is not accounted for in patients who withdraw early. Since compliance per se can be a prognostic factor and the actual treatment time is a variable likely to influence clinical outcome, this information should be added to an ITT analysis concept. Thus, the aim is to elucidate the influence of actual treatment time on the results of ITT analysis using available data from a well-conducted, large-scale clinical trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ANZ trial, a carvedilol study in heart failure, is characterized by a considerable number of early withdrawals in the carvedilol group. Using the ANZ trial database, the percentage of withdrawals was calculated as well as the number of days on treatment. Fourteen out of 21 deaths (67%) in the carvedilol group occurred after discontinuation of carvedilol. At the time of death, 14 out of 29 (48%) patients in the placebo group had withdrawn from treatment. Mean time of patients on medication who withdrew and died later were 301 days for placebo, but only 204 days for carvedilol. We performed a conventional ITT analysis, and an ITT-based Cox-proportional hazards model (modified ITT) in which the actual time on trial medication was entered into the model as an explanatory variable. The risk ratio in conventional ITT analysis was 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 1.24, p = 0.228) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.28-0.90, p < 0.001 ) in modified ITT analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of the actual treatment time substantially influences the result of this exemplary ITT analysis. The resulting risk ratio is clearly in accordance with clinical implications and in close agreement with those of other beta-blocker trials in heart failure. Entering the actual treatment time into a Cox-proportional hazards model as an explanatory variable is reasonable if not necessary from a clinical point of view and thus may strengthen the validity of ITT analysis.

Effect of pravastatin on frequency of fracture in the LIPID study: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease.

BACKGROUND: Statins inhibit the same biochemical pathway as aminobisphosphonates, therefore these cholesterol-lowering agents may have a beneficial effect on osteoporosis. This possibility has been supported by the finding that some statins also stimulate bone formation, and by observational studies suggesting that patients using statins have higher bone densities and lower fracture rates than controls. To assess whether statins have clinically significant effects on bone, we studied the frequency of fractures in a large randomised controlled trial of these agents. METHODS: 9014 patients (17% women, median age 62 years) with ischaemic heart disease were randomly assigned pravastatin 40 mg daily or placebo and followed up for a mean of 6.0 years. Fractures were ascertained from adverse-event reports. FINDINGS: 101 patients in the placebo group were admitted to hospital for fracture compared with 107 in the pravastatin group (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.80-1.37]). When patients with fractures not necessitating hospital admission were added, the total number of patients having a fracture was 183 in the placebo group and 175 in the pravastatin group (0.94 [0.77-1.16]). Separate analyses for women alone and for individuals aged 65 years and over gave similar results. INTERPRETATION: These findings offer no support for the hypothesis that statins have a significant effect on fracture risk. However, this study was not of an osteoporotic population, and fracture rate, although clinically important, is an insensitive index of effects on bone. Statins should not be used to prevent osteoporosis until there is evidence for their efficacy based on randomised controlled trials.

Comparison of ultrasound assessment of flow-mediated dilatation in the radial and brachial artery with upper and forearm cuff positions.

In the published literature relating to flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), there are substantial differences between centres in terms of normal FMD amongst healthy subjects. This present study attempts to identify the effect of differing methodologies on FMD. High frequency ultrasound was used to measure blood flow and percentage brachial and radial artery dilatation after reactive hyperaemia induced by forearm or upper arm cuff occlusion in 24 healthy subjects, less than 40 years, without known cardiovascular risk factors. FMD of the brachial artery was significantly higher after upper arm occlusion, compared with forearm occlusion, 6.4 (3.3) and 3.9 (2.6)% (P<0.05), respectively. FMD of the radial artery was significantly higher after forearm occlusion, compared with upper arm occlusion, 10.0 (4.6) and 7.9 (3.5)% (P<0.05), respectively. The percentage blood flow increase in the brachial and radial arteries after forearm and upper arm occlusion were similar. After forearm and upper arm occlusion, the radial artery percentage dilatation was greater than the brachial artery. In conclusion dilatation of the brachial artery, after reactive hyperaemia induced by upper arm occlusion, was significantly more pronounced compared with dilatation of the brachial artery after forearm occlusion, despite a similar percentage blood flow increase. The local ischaemia of the brachial artery with a proximal occlusion may explain why the brachial artery dilated more after upper arm occlusion compared with after forearm occlusion. The study has also shown that FMD of the radial artery could be assessed by B-mode ultrasound technique. FMD was greater using the radial artery compared with the brachial artery, suggesting that the radial artery may be a useful way to assess FMD in future clinical studies.

The effects of intensive glycaemic control on body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To examine the effects of improved glycaemic control over 20 weeks on the type and distribution of weight change in patients with type 2 diabetes who at baseline have poor glycaemic control. METHODS: Forty-three patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c > 8.9% were randomised to either intensive glycaemic control (IC) n = 21 or usual glycaemic control (UC) n = 22 for 20 weeks. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess the type and distribution of weight change during the study. RESULTS: After 20 weeks HbA1c was significantly lower in patients randomised to IC than UC (HbA1c IC 8.02 +/- 0.25% vs. UC 10.23 +/- 0.23%, p < 0.0001). In the IC group weight increased by 3.2 +/- 0.8 kg after 20 weeks (fat-free mass increased by 1.8 +/- 0.3 kg) compared to 0.02 +/- 0.70 kg in UC (p = 0.003). The gain in total body fat mass comprised trunk fat mass (IC 0.94 +/- 0.5 kg vs. UC 0.04 +/- 0.4 kg, p = 0.18) and peripheral fat mass (total body fat - trunk fat) (IC 0.71 +/- 0.32 kg vs. UC -0.21 +/- 0.28 kg, p = 0.04). Blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations did not change over time in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive glycaemic control was associated with weight gain which was distributed in similar proportions between the central and peripheral regions and consisted of similar proportions of fat and fat-free mass. Blood pressure and serum lipid concentrations were not adversely affected.

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, in patients with coronary or other occlusive arterial disease. PART-2 Collaborative Research Group. Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, ramipril, on carotid atherosclerosis in patients with coronary, cerebrovascular or peripheral vascular disease. BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of coronary events in various patient groups and to prevent the development of atherosclerosis in animal models. It has been hypothesized that the clinical benefits of ACE inhibitors may, therefore, be mediated by effects on atherosclerosis. METHODS: Six hundred seventeen patients were randomized in equal proportions to ramipril (5-10 mg daily) or placebo. At baseline, two years and four years, carotid atherosclerosis was assessed by B-mode ultrasound, and left ventricular mass was assessed by M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Blood pressure (BP) was reduced by a mean of 6 mm Hg systolic and 4 mm Hg diastolic in the ramipril group compared with the placebo group (p<0.001). There was no difference between groups in the changes in common carotid artery wall thickness (p = 0.58) or in carotid plaque (p = 0.93). Left ventricular mass index decreased by 3.8 g/m2 (4%) in the ramipril group compared with the placebo group (2p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The results provide no support for the hypothesis that reduced atherosclerosis is responsible for the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors on major coronary events. It is more likely that the benefits are due to lower BP, reduced left ventricular mass or other factors such as reversal of endothelial dysfunction.

The effect of acute hyperglycaemia on brachial artery flow mediated dilatation in normal volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial function is known to be abnormal in patients with diabetes and acute hyperglycaemia may play an aetiological role. AIMS: The aim of this randomised controlled study was to determine if acute systemic hyperglycaemia impairs endothelial function in normal subjects. METHODS: Endothelial function was assessed by the change in brachial artery diameter in response to forearm ischaemia using B-mode ultrasound in ten healthy subjects (eight male) aged 19-35 years. Brachial artery blood flow velocity and diameter were measured before and after five minutes of forearm ischaemia. Measurements were performed in the supine position after an overnight fast, before and after 60 minute infusions of 0.9% saline or 10% dextrose. Measurements were made on two separate occasions at least 24 hours apart, and subjects were randomised to saline first or dextrose first. The largest diameter measured after ischaemia was divided by the resting arterial diameter to calculate percent dilatation of the artery from baseline, and is reported as flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). RESULTS: Dextrose infusion resulted in a significant rise in mean (SD) serum glucose 5.2 (0.1) to 9.2 (0.3) mmol/L and insulin concentration 6.3 (1.4) to 20.6 (3.7) mU/L p<0.002. Brachial artery blood flow velocity and diameter increased significantly from baseline after ischaemia (p<0.002). Mean FMD (SEM) before and after infusion were not, however, significantly different (p=0.4) (pre-saline 7.3 [1.0]%, post saline 5.2 [1.5]% and predextrose 8.1 [2.0]%, post dextrose 5.9 [1.7]%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that acute hyperglycaemia does not impair FMD in normal subjects.